The last couple of weeks have seen stories carried in the media about the impact of the BOJ in its equity index ETF buying program. Some of these stories point out how the BOJ is now the top shareholder, on a look-through basis, of more Japanese companies than ever before. The Nikkei reported in late June that the BOJ would be considered a top-10 shareholder in 40% of Japan's listed companies and suggested in another title last week "BOJ's huge share purchases cause investor unease."
Another article the week before last noted that Japanese stocks would suffer a "dividend hit" because when March-end dividends are paid out in early July (pay date for the biggest ones is early this week). Theoretically, it is the ex-date which matters not the pay-date. The delta risk comes off on the day before ex-date, which was around the time that article was written. It was a non-event.
The selldown was well-known, as is the buy-in at the end of March when the ETFs have to buy futures into the ex-date for the stock dividends to maintain their NAVs. It has also been arbed for years. Because 80+% of the ETFs which track the big three indices (Nikkei 225, TOPIX, JPX Nikkei 400) are owned by the BOJ, the dividends are received in the trust which owns the ETFs on behalf of the BOJ, and when I asked the BOJ a few years ago "What happens to those dividends?" the answer was, "It goes into the BOJ's income statement" [and is not added to the provisions]. So it does not get reinvested.
The BOJ certainly does own some ETFs. As of the end of June, by my calculations, the BOJ roughly 80.7% of the outstanding ETFs of those three major indices, and a mark-to-market portfolio value of some ¥25.5 trillion.
For kicks I measured the Top 10, Top 5, and #1 shareholder for each of the 2000+ names in TOPIX, and by my calculation, the BOJ's combined look-through holdings would have been a Top 10 shareholder for 1365 TOPIX names according to the Bloomberg public filing data (and therefore 36.3% of the companies listed in Japan). It would have been Top 5 shareholder for 350 names and the number one shareholder for 51 stocks.
That is less of a problem than it looks. The BOJ owns a whopping 4% of listed Japan. That is neither here nor there. It could be higher, it could be zero. If all of listed Japan were float, and all of the indices float-weighted, that would be fine.
But there's the rub. They're not.
The BOJ on a look-through basis owns more than 10% of 39 companies by my calculation. In terms of economic ownership, its top stake is 23%. It owns 15-20% of market cap of some well-known large companies such as Taiyo Yuden Co Ltd (6976 JP), TDK Corp (6762 JP), Trend Micro Inc (4704 JP), Konami Holdings Corp (9766 JP), Tokyo Electron Ltd (8035 JP), Nitto Denko Corp (6988 JP), and Fast Retailing Co Ltd (9983 JP). It generally owns 20-35% of the "float" of those companies.
But that is in the past. It is already bought. The bigger problem is what is to come.
At its current pace and methodology, in the next 12 months, the BOJ's ETF buying will purchase more than 5% of the remaining float of 13 stocks. With two of them at rates of higher than 15%.
One name is truly special because of a corporate action. THAT name will see - if nothing is done about it - between 25-55% of its remaining float purchased by the BOJ's ETF buying in the next 12 months.
The history is that in 2010 the Bank of Japan started buying ETFs in order to implement quantitative easing.
To repeat what I wrote in February - in addition to the history...
What is done is done. What might be more interesting is what to come. The issues then are the issues now, except they are worse.
We know from various media reports from 6-18 months ago that there are murmurings inside the BOJ about the possible market impact of its ETF buying. In the past, when BOJ Governor Kuroda has been asked about this topic in a general way, he has stated that the BOJ could alter its methods if it became a problem.
Looking back, it is pretty close to having been a problem in the case of several stocks. Going forward it will be more of one.
I continue to think that one of two things is likely before long.
The first would solve some issues, but not all of them.
The second would solve most of the past and future issues, and would be really, really interesting.
To do it right would mean (at current levels) a gross rebalance trade of US$70 billion, with 15 different stocks seeing a US$1 billion flow, and one name seeing (as of now) an $8bn flow. But it would solve the BOJ's "problems" regarding ETF impact on the market and single names for years to come.
The Last Five Insights in the BOJ vs ETF Series | |
24 April 2018 | JAPAN PASSIVE: Update on the BOJ and Its ETF Buying |
12 Feb 2018 | Trading the BOJ-Nikkei 225 Baskets |
4 Feb 2018 | The BOJ's Ongoing ETF Impact - Is a Nikkei 225 Reshuffle in the Cards? |
12 Jan 2018 | Fast Retailing: Still Squeezable |
19 Jul 2017 | JAPAN PASSIVE: The BOJ and Japan ETFs |
This is a long insight with some technical detail. You can jump down to the table at the bottom with the "To Buy" and "To Sell" headers. If you own any in the right hand side, beware. If you are short any on the left hand side, beware. It is worth a think of how a change in the Nikkei 225 might affect you.
Join 55,000+ investors, including top global asset managers overseeing $13+ trillion.
Upgrade later to our paid plans for full-access.