Head of Research, IPOs & Placements, Aequitas Research

Sumeet Singh

Head of Research, IPOs & Placements

IPOs and Placements coverage across Asia Pacific

Aequitas Research

We cover all listing across the Asia Pacific along with follow-up placements. As of Dec 2020, our team had covered 539 IPOs with a hit rate of 73.5% and 685 placements with a hit rate of 66.8%.

We combine fundamental bottom-up views with our proprietary quantitative framework to provide a holistic coverage across new listings and placements. Our coverage includes pre-IPO notes before the deal is launched, follow-up analysis once the deal is live and post-listing trading analysis as well.

Equity Capital Markets

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/up-fintech-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27957:1" rel="noopener">Up Fintech (TIGR US)</a> aims to raise around US$165m via a follow-on offering. This will be the first raising by the company since it was listed in 2019. It comes close on the heels of the US$1.7bn raising by its competitor <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/futu-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27858:1" rel="noopener">Futu Holdings Ltd (FUTU US)</a> in Apr 2021.We covered the IPO across a series of note, links to which are below:<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/futu-holdings-ipo-quick-note-comparison-with-tiger-brokers-same-market-different-economics" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Futu Holdings IPO Quick Note - Comparison with Tiger Brokers - Same Market, Different Economics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/up-fintech-tiger-brokers-pre-ipo-quick-note-much-too-reliant-on-ibkr" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Pre-IPO Quick Note - Much Too Reliant on IBKR</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/up-fintech-tiger-brokers-ipo-quick-take-it-s-not-like-futu-won-t-perform-like-it-either" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take - It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/up-fintech-tiger-brokers-ipo-trading-update-first-day-volume-was-higher-than-futu-close-to-qtt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Trading Update - First Day Volume Was Higher than Futu, Close to QTT</a></li>
</ul>In this note, we will run the deal through our ECM framework and talk about the deal dynamics.

Up Fintech (TIGR US) aims to raise around US$165m via a follow-on offering. This will be the first raising by the company since it was listed in 2019. It comes close on the heels of the US$1.7bn raising by its competitor Futu Holdings Ltd (FUTU US) in Apr 2021.We covered the IPO across a series of note, links to which are below:
Futu Holdings IPO Quick Note - Comparison with Tiger Brokers - Same Market, Different Economics
Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Pre-IPO Quick Note - Much Too Reliant on IBKR
Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take - It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either
Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Trading Update - First Day Volume Was Higher than Futu, Close to QTT
In this note, we will run the deal through our ECM framework and talk about the deal dynamics.

Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Placement - Needs a Large Correction, Just like Futu

China Specialist, Auto and Industrial Specialist

Victoria Li

Equity Bottom-Up

With its share price hit YTD low of US$22.73 at mid-May, short term negative, mainly the uncertainty of its coming P5 model, has been fully digested by the market, in our view. Looking forward, positive momentums are expected. Xpeng's car delivery would be boosted by 1) increasing delivery of  LFP version and wing version of P7; 2) rising market interest triggered by valet parking assist function coming with latest OTA; 3) G3 facelift in Q3; 4) new P5 model, whose MSRP and technical specifications might be available in July-August;5) easing of chip shortage.

With its share price hit YTD low of US$22.73 at mid-May, short term negative, mainly the uncertainty of its coming P5 model, has been fully digested by the market, in our view. Looking forward, positive momentums are expected. Xpeng's car delivery would be boosted by 1) increasing delivery of  LFP version and wing version of P7; 2) rising market interest triggered by valet parking assist function coming with latest OTA; 3) G3 facelift in Q3; 4) new P5 model, whose MSRP and technical specifications might be available in July-August;5) easing of chip shortage. 

Xpeng: Short Term Negative Priced In, Positive Momentum Is Back

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

Compared to corresponding period in 2019, China's PV retail sales in May increased by 5%, slightly better than that of April, while wholesale sales increased by 4%, from 6.4% in April. Chip shortage issue might be bottoming.Except Xpeng, the deliver of the main EV brands decreased MoM, indicating EV segment sales might decreased slightly MoM due to seasonality. According to posts on social media (not official source), Tesla China's order in May was halved. However, its delivery in China is estimated to increase by 88% MoM. Negative impact from recent PR Crisis related to 'brake failure' or 'sudden acceleration' appears to have been quite limited.Xpeng (XPEV.US) and Geely (175.HK) remain our favourites among emerging EV brands and traditional OEMs  respectively.

Compared to corresponding period in 2019, China's PV retail sales in May increased by 5%, slightly better than that of April, while wholesale sales increased by 4%, from 6.4% in April. Chip shortage issue might be bottoming.Except Xpeng, the deliver of the main EV brands decreased MoM, indicating EV segment sales might decreased slightly MoM due to seasonality. According to posts on social media (not official source), Tesla China's order in May was halved. However, its delivery in China is estimated to increase by 88% MoM. Negative impact from recent PR Crisis related to 'brake failure' or 'sudden acceleration' appears to have been quite limited.Xpeng (XPEV.US) and Geely (175.HK) remain our favourites among emerging EV brands and traditional OEMs  respectively.

China Auto: End Demand Keeps Getting Better; Chip Shortage Bottoms

Investment Advisors, JL Warren Capital

Junheng Li

Investment Advisors

JL Warren Capital

JL Warren Capital LLC is a leading independent equity research firm focused on Chinese companies and listed multinationals in China. We employ a bottom-up research approach that takes great care to avoid the acquisition of material non-public information. Through investigative due diligence including channel surveys and interviews, our research helps clients to pinpoint the dislocations in the market.

In 5M, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tesla-motors-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:20279:1" rel="noopener">Tesla Motors (TSLA US)</a>  China received ~72K orders for MIC M3, plus 22K backlog orders exiting 2020.  GF3 made 103K M3 in 5M, among which 69K were delivered in China and 29K were exported.  The estimated order backlog exiting May was ~25K, slightly down from 26K backlog exiting April.  Excess production at the GF3 has been exported to markets around the world.  If TSLA China does not implement effective promotional programs and or policies to stimulate demand, we estimate that MIC 3 orders will stagnate around 9K per month, vs. monthly production of ~21K.  In other words, MIC 3 exports are likely to increase MoM due to the lower cost structure including BoM of MIC cars.

In 5M, Tesla Motors (TSLA US)  China received ~72K orders for MIC M3, plus 22K backlog orders exiting 2020.  GF3 made 103K M3 in 5M, among which 69K were delivered in China and 29K were exported.  The estimated order backlog exiting May was ~25K, slightly down from 26K backlog exiting April.  Excess production at the GF3 has been exported to markets around the world.  If TSLA China does not implement effective promotional programs and or policies to stimulate demand, we estimate that MIC 3 orders will stagnate around 9K per month, vs. monthly production of ~21K.  In other words, MIC 3 exports are likely to increase MoM due to the lower cost structure including BoM of MIC cars.

Consumer Discretionary / Industrials

Henry Kwon

NIO closed at $34.06 on Friday, failing to close above its 10-Day EMA of $34.42, although the stock climbed as high as $34.78 intra-day. DCF analysis using consensus FCF forecast suggests that currently NIO's shares may be implying a 18.1% perpetuity growth outlook which would be bearish if the yield curve continues to steepen. While fundamental valuation implications do not necessarily become reflected in stock prices over a short period, Friday's technical chart alignment could signal further bearish short term price action.<ul>
<li>
Bearish Technical Alignment on Friday: Dark Cloud Cover was formed on the daily candlestick chart on Friday. While the pattern needs to be confirmed on Monday, it may be a new bearish signal to what looks like an impending death cross that I mentioned in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/nio-is-it-re-entry-point-yet" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:51824" rel="noopener">NIO: Is It Re-Entry Point Yet?</a> on May 20.</li>
<li>
DCF Analysis Reality Check: At current share price, 3-year consensus FCF forecast and 1Q21 balance sheet details suggest that the market may be implying a 18.1% perpetuity growth rate and 139x terminal EBITDA multiple assumption. Long term fundamental valuations therefore would suggest there is further downside risk, but having said this, I would point out that other catalysts can often impact short term price action more strongly.</li>
<li>
Systemic Risk could be a greater concern than company risk at this point: NIO remains a high beta EV play. While the 10-year Treasury yield looked more stable on Friday, any sudden spike in the Treasury yield can have a sharp negative effect on EV stock valuations.</li>
<li>
A Short term Bullish Scenario: If the stock manages to reject the Dark Cloud Cover formation on Monday and close above its 10 day EMA, the move may accelerate price recovery with the first resistance level coming in at the 21 day EMA currently fixed at $35.68. Clearing these two hurdles may accelerate the upward momentum to the $38.19 - $38.67 zone, which represent the stock's current 200 DMA and the 61.8% Fibonacci Retracement, respectively.</li>
<li>
A Short term Bearish Scenario: If Dark Cloud Cover is confirmed first support should come in at the stock's 78.6% Fibonacci Retracement at $30.98 which basically held recently. If the stock breaks below this level, however, the decline may accelerate towards the $20-22 zone last seen in October, 2020, over the next few trading sessions.</li>
</ul>Operating environment for NIO remains constructive. 3 month moving average sales volume comparison with XPEV and TSLA suggests NIO's volume sales have been more stable than its peers. Continuing sales growth in the context of overall improvement in 2021 auto demand and continuing tailwinds from the new car effect (EC 6) looks constructive for earnings implications over the next 1-2 quarters at current pace. At this point, therefore, we see more price risk stemming more from systemic risk than company risk.

NIO closed at $34.06 on Friday, failing to close above its 10-Day EMA of $34.42, although the stock climbed as high as $34.78 intra-day. DCF analysis using consensus FCF forecast suggests that currently NIO's shares may be implying a 18.1% perpetuity growth outlook which would be bearish if the yield curve continues to steepen. While fundamental valuation implications do not necessarily become reflected in stock prices over a short period, Friday's technical chart alignment could signal further bearish short term price action.

Bearish Technical Alignment on Friday: Dark Cloud Cover was formed on the daily candlestick chart on Friday. While the pattern needs to be confirmed on Monday, it may be a new bearish signal to what looks like an impending death cross that I mentioned in NIO: Is It Re-Entry Point Yet? on May 20.

DCF Analysis Reality Check: At current share price, 3-year consensus FCF forecast and 1Q21 balance sheet details suggest that the market may be implying a 18.1% perpetuity growth rate and 139x terminal EBITDA multiple assumption. Long term fundamental valuations therefore would suggest there is further downside risk, but having said this, I would point out that other catalysts can often impact short term price action more strongly.

Systemic Risk could be a greater concern than company risk at this point: NIO remains a high beta EV play. While the 10-year Treasury yield looked more stable on Friday, any sudden spike in the Treasury yield can have a sharp negative effect on EV stock valuations.

A Short term Bullish Scenario: If the stock manages to reject the Dark Cloud Cover formation on Monday and close above its 10 day EMA, the move may accelerate price recovery with the first resistance level coming in at the 21 day EMA currently fixed at $35.68. Clearing these two hurdles may accelerate the upward momentum to the $38.19 - $38.67 zone, which represent the stock's current 200 DMA and the 61.8% Fibonacci Retracement, respectively.

A Short term Bearish Scenario: If Dark Cloud Cover is confirmed first support should come in at the stock's 78.6% Fibonacci Retracement at $30.98 which basically held recently. If the stock breaks below this level, however, the decline may accelerate towards the $20-22 zone last seen in October, 2020, over the next few trading sessions.
Operating environment for NIO remains constructive. 3 month moving average sales volume comparison with XPEV and TSLA suggests NIO's volume sales have been more stable than its peers. Continuing sales growth in the context of overall improvement in 2021 auto demand and continuing tailwinds from the new car effect (EC 6) looks constructive for earnings implications over the next 1-2 quarters at current pace. At this point, therefore, we see more price risk stemming more from systemic risk than company risk.

NIO: Dark Cloud Cover with Close Below the 10-Day EMA on Friday May Add A Short Term Bearish Signal

China

XPeng Inc. designs, produces, and distributes electric vehicles. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets smart smart electric vehicles, as well as finance, parts, and maintenance services. XPeng serves customers in China.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

XPeng (XPEV US)

Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Placement - Needs a Large Correction, Just like Futu

Up Fintech (TIGR US) aims to raise around US$165m via a follow-on offering. This will be the first raising by the company since it was listed in 2019.

Sumeet Singh

Xpeng: Short Term Negative Priced In, Positive Momentum Is Back

With its share price hit YTD low of US$22.73 at mid-May, short term negative, mainly the uncertainty of its coming P5 model, has been fully...

Victoria Li

China Auto: End Demand Keeps Getting Better; Chip Shortage Bottoms

Compared to corresponding period in 2019, China's PV retail sales in May increased by 5%, slightly better than that of April, while wholesale sales...

Victoria Li

TSLA China Losing to Chinese NEV OEMs

TSLA will begin to experience excess production of the Y in the next couple of months, as the China order backlog wanes from 43KQ1 to 17K Q2. Y...

JL Warren Capital

NIO: Dark Cloud Cover with Close Below the 10-Day EMA on Friday May Add A Short Term Bearish Signal

Dark Cloud Cover bearish reversal pattern was formed on Friday's daily candlestick chart, while a DCF analysis based on current 3-year consensus...

Henry Kwon

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)