Telco/Internet specialist

Kirk Boodry

Redex Research

Equity Bottom-Up

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/z-holdings-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:19603:1" rel="noopener">Z Holdings (4689 JP)</a>  has posted a second solid quarter with LINE fully consolidated and the company’s first ¥100bn EBITDA quarter is a tantalizing sign of things to come although markets may have to wait for big gains in profitability as full-year guidance remains unchanged. The bad news is H2 comparables will get harder and management is committed to investing for growth over near-term profit expansion but LINE-fueled core performance and long-term potential remain enticing. We are raising our target price from ¥680 to ¥750 and remain at Buy.

Z Holdings (4689 JP)  has posted a second solid quarter with LINE fully consolidated and the company’s first ¥100bn EBITDA quarter is a tantalizing sign of things to come although markets may have to wait for big gains in profitability as full-year guidance remains unchanged. The bad news is H2 comparables will get harder and management is committed to investing for growth over near-term profit expansion but LINE-fueled core performance and long-term potential remain enticing. We are raising our target price from ¥680 to ¥750 and remain at Buy.

Z Holdings (Buy) Q2 21 Results Reaction: Mostly Positive but Guidance Unchanged

Equity Capital Markets

The Oyo listing should be a win for Softbank Group, which owns 47% (pre-listing) for a mere $1.1bn but initial pricing talk of $10-12bn seems wildly optimistic when matched against comparable valuations for premium online travel companies like Airbnb (implied Oyo value $4bn) or India tech ($7bn). Last year we thought this was worthless, so the turnaround is a pleasant surprise but we would not be buyers over INR 80/share ($7bn).

The Oyo listing should be a win for Softbank Group, which owns 47% (pre-listing) for a mere $1.1bn but initial pricing talk of $10-12bn seems wildly optimistic when matched against comparable valuations for premium online travel companies like Airbnb (implied Oyo value $4bn) or India tech ($7bn). Last year we thought this was worthless, so the turnaround is a pleasant surprise but we would not be buyers over INR 80/share ($7bn).

Oyo and Softbank Group - This Would Be Generously Valued at $4-7bn but that Keeps CEO Under Water

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

Ebook Initiative Japan Co Ltd / Event-Driven

Back in April I discussed how those looking at <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/softbank-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27445:1" rel="noopener">Softbank Corp (9434 JP)</a> on an EV/EBITDA basis would be measuring the company incorrectly. The insight was <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/softbank-corp-accounting-for-the-accounting-is-complicated" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:50684" rel="noopener">Softbank Corp - Accounting for The Accounting Is Complicated</a>.Yeah... it was an accounting thing. When you look at Softbank Corp and its consolidated revenues and EBITDA, you were looking at the parent co business of telecoms, then because Softbank Corp owned 50% of a company which owned 65% of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/z-holdings-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:19603:1" rel="noopener">Z Holdings (4689 JP)</a> which itself consolidated <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ebook-initiative-japan-co-lt" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:10613:1" rel="noopener">Ebook Initiative Japan Co Lt (3658 JP)</a> because of the 43% it held, it meant that Softbank Corp consolidated 100% of the top line but only 14% of the bottom line. That is about to get weirder as LINE Digital Frontier has just announced a Tender Offer to take out "minorities" in Ebook Initiative Japan at ¥4750/share. That takeout price is a lifetime high, a 4-bagger since covid-crash lows, 10x book, 550+x EBITDA and one could add more comments that suggest it is a superlative exit for investors. <section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/232/841/original/Screenshot+2021-09-30+at+3.58.23+PM.png?1632988893" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="232841"></figure></section>Those things are nice, but....But it is likely to tick off some people. I discuss why in more detail below but a summary can be...This kind of transaction is yet another situation where the METI Fair M&amp;A Guidelines introduced in summer 2019 have been roundly ignored. There is a lack of good procedure and governance, the valuation is inadequate, the advise provided insufficient, the price manifestly too low, synergies explicitly unaccounted for, no fairness opinion, and the takeover premium is as low as I have seen. And other than that Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?This situation begs for some cowbell (and, obviously, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-needs-more-cowbell" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41191" rel="noopener">Japan Needs More Cowbell</a>) <section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/232/870/original/more+cowbell.gif?1632996696" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="232870"></figure></section>Much more below the fold.

Back in April I discussed how those looking at Softbank Corp (9434 JP) on an EV/EBITDA basis would be measuring the company incorrectly. The insight was Softbank Corp - Accounting for The Accounting Is Complicated.Yeah... it was an accounting thing. When you look at Softbank Corp and its consolidated revenues and EBITDA, you were looking at the parent co business of telecoms, then because Softbank Corp owned 50% of a company which owned 65% of Z Holdings (4689 JP) which itself consolidated Ebook Initiative Japan Co Lt (3658 JP) because of the 43% it held, it meant that Softbank Corp consolidated 100% of the top line but only 14% of the bottom line. That is about to get weirder as LINE Digital Frontier has just announced a Tender Offer to take out "minorities" in Ebook Initiative Japan at ¥4750/share. That takeout price is a lifetime high, a 4-bagger since covid-crash lows, 10x book, 550+x EBITDA and one could add more comments that suggest it is a superlative exit for investors. Those things are nice, but....But it is likely to tick off some people. I discuss why in more detail below but a summary can be...This kind of transaction is yet another situation where the METI Fair M&amp;A Guidelines introduced in summer 2019 have been roundly ignored. There is a lack of good procedure and governance, the valuation is inadequate, the advise provided insufficient, the price manifestly too low, synergies explicitly unaccounted for, no fairness opinion, and the takeover premium is as low as I have seen. And other than that Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?This situation begs for some cowbell (and, obviously, Japan Needs More Cowbell) Much more below the fold. 

E-Book Initiative (3658 JP) Tender Offer Takeout - This One Needs Cowbell Too

Expert on Japan Retail and Consumer Markets, JapanConsuming

Michael Causton

Expert on Japan Retail and Consumer Markets

Real Insight on Japanese Consumer Markets

JapanConsuming

JapanConsuming is a specialist research firm producing intelligence on Japanese retail and consumer markets. Founded in 2000, JapanConsuming has become the leading provider of insights on Japanese retailers and consumer trends to retailers, brands, government agencies and investors. As well as a highly regarded monthly report on the market, JapanConsuming produces in-depth reports on retail sectors, seminars on key trends and telephone consulting to investors on trends and retailers.

JapanConsuming was founded by Michael Causton and Roy Larke. 

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

There were some fears that e-commerce growth would stall following massive consumer adoption after March 2020 but for <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/rakuten-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:31:1" rel="noopener">Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)</a> at least, repeat customers have helped sustain momentum. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/z-holdings-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:19603:1" rel="noopener">Z Holdings (4689 JP)</a> had a trickier start to the year, however. Last year, excluding the big convenience stores, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/amazon-com-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:409:1" rel="noopener">Amazon.com Inc (AMZN US)</a> overtook Fast Retailing to become Japan’s third largest retailer and one of just four with sales over ¥2 trillion and  accounted for 3.2% of all retail sales in Nikkei’s survey of 488 companies.Despite early, pessimistic forecasts for e-commerce in 2020, METI’s latest annual survey released in July shows that BtoC e-commerce surged 21.7% to ¥12.23 trillion.

There were some fears that e-commerce growth would stall following massive consumer adoption after March 2020 but for Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) at least, repeat customers have helped sustain momentum. Z Holdings (4689 JP) had a trickier start to the year, however. Last year, excluding the big convenience stores, Amazon.com Inc (AMZN US) overtook Fast Retailing to become Japan’s third largest retailer and one of just four with sales over ¥2 trillion and  accounted for 3.2% of all retail sales in Nikkei’s survey of 488 companies.Despite early, pessimistic forecasts for e-commerce in 2020, METI’s latest annual survey released in July shows that BtoC e-commerce surged 21.7% to ¥12.23 trillion.

Askul posted a mixed quarter as revenue growth slowed but margin improvements continued apace. FY22 is largely a rebuilding year as the company more tightly integrates B2C and logistics into the Z Holdings ecosystem and Q1 performance gives them a solid start in meeting full-year guidance. We do not cover Askul but we follow it as part of our Z Holdings coverage.

Askul posted a mixed quarter as revenue growth slowed but margin improvements continued apace. FY22 is largely a rebuilding year as the company more tightly integrates B2C and logistics into the Z Holdings ecosystem and Q1 performance gives them a solid start in meeting full-year guidance. We do not cover Askul but we follow it as part of our Z Holdings coverage.   

Askul Corp Q1 22 Results Reaction: Slowing Revenue Growth but Profit Beat

Japan

LY Corporation operates as an internet search engine "Yahoo! JAPAN". The Company provides electronic commerce and settlement finance services for small medium enterprises and individuals. LY also operates media business including search linked advertising and display advertising services.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

LY (4689 JP)

Z Holdings (Buy) Q2 21 Results Reaction: Mostly Positive but Guidance Unchanged

ZHD has posted a second solid quarter with a fully consolidated LINE and a first ¥100bn EBITDA quarter is exciting although full-year guidance...

Kirk Boodry

Oyo and Softbank Group - This Would Be Generously Valued at $4-7bn but that Keeps CEO Under Water

An Oyo listing is a likely win for Softbank, which owns 47% for a mere $1.1bn but pricing talk of $10-12bn is optimistic compared to the $4-7bn...

Kirk Boodry

E-Book Initiative (3658 JP) Tender Offer Takeout - This One Needs Cowbell Too

This takeout of Ebook Initiatives "minorities" is a related party transaction which should have more procedural approval but governance here is a...

Travis Lundy

Japanese E-Commerce Growth Continues

Japan is well-known for lagging some markets in e-commerce penetration but sales surged last year to more than 20%. Only Rakuten and Amazon seem to...

Michael Causton

Askul Corp Q1 22 Results Reaction: Slowing Revenue Growth but Profit Beat

Askul posted a mixed quarter as revenue growth slowed but margin improvements continued apace. Covid-19 dislocation makes it hard to find real...

Kirk Boodry

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)