HK/China Equity Long-Short

Osbert Tang, CFA

Equity Bottom-Up

China Power International / Equity Bottom-Up

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-power-international" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15548:1" rel="noopener">China Power International (2380 HK)</a> (CPI) thinks that power storage in China will stay on in the near term, as supply-side structural issues are further exacerbated by cyclical demand issues. That said, the reform in power tariff will be a major policy direction in the future and will lead to a more market driven power sector in China. In our view, new/renewable energy sub-segment is likely to better place in the industry and we still prefer <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-longyuan-power-group-corp-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14215:1" rel="noopener">China Longyuan Power Group Corp (916 HK)</a>.However, we think CPI is more interesting than many power conglomerates. It has the highest proportion of clean/renewable installed capacity (47.1%) when compared with <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-resources-power-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:5385:1" rel="noopener">China Resources Power (836 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/datang-international-power-generation-company-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3664:1" rel="noopener">Datang International (991 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/huaneng-power-intl-inc-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:28:1" rel="noopener">Huaneng Power Intl (902 HK)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/huadian-power-intl-corp-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:2506:1" rel="noopener">Huadian Power Intl (1071 HK)</a>, and this has also protected its 1H21 profit. Its plan to speed up disposal of coal-fired power plants also adds justification to its valuations. Relative to new energy plays' average of 18x PER and 2.1x P/B FY21F, CPI's 11.9x and 0.9x are clearly not expensive.

China Power International (2380 HK) (CPI) thinks that power storage in China will stay on in the near term, as supply-side structural issues are further exacerbated by cyclical demand issues. That said, the reform in power tariff will be a major policy direction in the future and will lead to a more market driven power sector in China. In our view, new/renewable energy sub-segment is likely to better place in the industry and we still prefer China Longyuan Power Group Corp (916 HK).However, we think CPI is more interesting than many power conglomerates. It has the highest proportion of clean/renewable installed capacity (47.1%) when compared with China Resources Power (836 HK), Datang International (991 HK), Huaneng Power Intl (902 HK) and Huadian Power Intl (1071 HK), and this has also protected its 1H21 profit. Its plan to speed up disposal of coal-fired power plants also adds justification to its valuations. Relative to new energy plays' average of 18x PER and 2.1x P/B FY21F, CPI's 11.9x and 0.9x are clearly not expensive. 

China Power International (2380 HK): Industry and Company Updates, Looks Relatively Inexpensive

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-longyuan-power-group-corp-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14215:1" rel="noopener">China Longyuan Power Group Corp (916 HK)</a> achieved an impressive 39.4% YoY growth in wind power generation in 2M21 on a low base a year ago. However, even as we compared 2M21 generation with 2M19, the CAGR still reach a resilient 18.4%. This suggested that the low base effect is not a key reason for the surge in generation, but instead, the underlying demand is resilient. Longyuan has taken a beating on the back of the concerns on future tariff, on-grid capacity and profitability if the proposal in the consultation paper released by the National Energy Association is fully implemented. However, with its valuation now back to the end-2020 level (10x PER), we see a lot of uncertainties have been discounted. With a 34% plunge in share price in just 5 trading days and 49% from its peak, the market has already turned from overly bullish to overly bearish, in our view.

China Longyuan Power Group Corp (916 HK) achieved an impressive 39.4% YoY growth in wind power generation in 2M21 on a low base a year ago. However, even as we compared 2M21 generation with 2M19, the CAGR still reach a resilient 18.4%. This suggested that the low base effect is not a key reason for the surge in generation, but instead, the underlying demand is resilient. Longyuan has taken a beating on the back of the concerns on future tariff, on-grid capacity and profitability if the proposal in the consultation paper released by the National Energy Association is fully implemented. However, with its valuation now back to the end-2020 level (10x PER), we see a lot of uncertainties have been discounted. With a 34% plunge in share price in just 5 trading days and 49% from its peak, the market has already turned from overly bullish to overly bearish, in our view. 

China Longyuan (916 HK): Things Aren't that Bad

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-longyuan-power-group-corp-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14215:1" rel="noopener">China Longyuan Power Group Corp (916 HK)</a> has a very strong turnout in Jan as its overall power generation was up by 47.5% YoY, with wind generation (+50.8%) being the most important driver. We do not think that a low base and distortion from timing of the Chinese New Year are the reasons for the impressive growth, and we see underlying momentum very solid. While Jan is a record-breaking month for generation, we believe the peak generation in this year is yet to come.Longyuan has an attractive long term story, supported by factors including: 1.) beneficiary of government support, 2.) access to the A-share market, 3.) acquisition of Pingzhuang renewable assets, and 4.) increased potential from parent injection. Share price has rallied 59.5% YTD but valuations are still not too stretched. We believe any pull-back is opportunity for taking position in this encouraging long-term story of renewable energy development.

China Longyuan Power Group Corp (916 HK) has a very strong turnout in Jan as its overall power generation was up by 47.5% YoY, with wind generation (+50.8%) being the most important driver. We do not think that a low base and distortion from timing of the Chinese New Year are the reasons for the impressive growth, and we see underlying momentum very solid. While Jan is a record-breaking month for generation, we believe the peak generation in this year is yet to come.Longyuan has an attractive long term story, supported by factors including: 1.) beneficiary of government support, 2.) access to the A-share market, 3.) acquisition of Pingzhuang renewable assets, and 4.) increased potential from parent injection. Share price has rallied 59.5% YTD but valuations are still not too stretched. We believe any pull-back is opportunity for taking position in this encouraging long-term story of renewable energy development. 

China Longyuan (916 HK): Record-Breaking Jan, and Strategically Positioned for the Long Term

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

David Blennerhassett

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

China Renewable Energy Investment / Event-Driven

<div>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-renewable-energy-inves" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14033:1" rel="noopener">China Renewable Energy Investment (987 HK)</a> is a micro-cap clean energy play in China.
Last April, 55.66% of issued shares moved within CCASS, from HSBC into BEA. This is <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hkc-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14707:1" rel="noopener">Hkc Holdings (190 HK)</a>'s stake.
The movement may simply have been an administrative matter. But given the flurry of M&amp;A activity in the PRC renewable energy space, it was worth speculating on the matter.
Both <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-renewable-energy-inves" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14033:1" rel="noopener">China Renewable Energy Investment (987 HK)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hkc-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14707:1" rel="noopener">Hkc Holdings (190 HK)</a> are now <a href="https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2021/0113/2021011300128.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suspended</a> pursuant to the Hong Kong Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
Should an Offer be tabled, this would be the fifth Hong Kong-listed, clean-energy company subject to a privatisation or change of control in the last two years - and seventh in which interested parties have been circling.
As always, more below the fold.
</div>
<div>

</div>


China Renewable Energy Investment (987 HK) is a micro-cap clean energy play in China.
Last April, 55.66% of issued shares moved within CCASS, from HSBC into BEA. This is Hkc Holdings (190 HK)'s stake.
The movement may simply have been an administrative matter. But given the flurry of M&amp;A activity in the PRC renewable energy space, it was worth speculating on the matter.
Both China Renewable Energy Investment (987 HK) and Hkc Holdings (190 HK) are now suspended pursuant to the Hong Kong Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
Should an Offer be tabled, this would be the fifth Hong Kong-listed, clean-energy company subject to a privatisation or change of control in the last two years - and seventh in which interested parties have been circling.
As always, more below the fold.





China Renewable Energy (987 HK): Possible Privatisation Offer

Travis Lundy

On the 12th of November, newly lame duck US president Donald Trump signed an <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-addressing-threat-securities-investments-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order</a>(Executive Order on Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments that Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies) banning investment and capital provision by "US persons" to companies in lists established by the US Department of Defense pursuant to Public Law 105-261, Section 1237 (Fiscal Year 1999 National Defense Authorization Act).The various global index providers immediately commenced consultations with their myriad investors and with OFAC (the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the US Treasury Department) and decided in early December for the most part to delete certain securities from their indices. New guidance from OFAC in the form of FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions related to Executive Order (E.O.) 13959, "Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments that Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies":  <a href="https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/857" target="_blank" rel="noopener">857</a>, <a href="https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/858" target="_blank" rel="noopener">858</a>, <a href="https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/859" target="_blank" rel="noopener">859</a>, <a href="https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/860" target="_blank" rel="noopener">860</a>, <a href="https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/861" target="_blank" rel="noopener">861</a>). This insight looks at the indirect holdings and subsidiaries.It is a BIG list (I have a list of 133 names, most of which appear to be 50+% controlled, which could be affected in portfolios).Investors would do well to understand how much of the float is for sale.

On the 12th of November, newly lame duck US president Donald Trump signed an Executive Order(Executive Order on Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments that Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies) banning investment and capital provision by "US persons" to companies in lists established by the US Department of Defense pursuant to Public Law 105-261, Section 1237 (Fiscal Year 1999 National Defense Authorization Act).The various global index providers immediately commenced consultations with their myriad investors and with OFAC (the Office of Foreign Asset Control of the US Treasury Department) and decided in early December for the most part to delete certain securities from their indices. New guidance from OFAC in the form of FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions related to Executive Order (E.O.) 13959, "Addressing the Threat from Securities Investments that Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies":  857, 858, 859, 860, 861). This insight looks at the indirect holdings and subsidiaries.It is a BIG list (I have a list of 133 names, most of which appear to be 50+% controlled, which could be affected in portfolios).Investors would do well to understand how much of the float is for sale.

OFAC Makes a Longer List of Trump Names of China Military Cos

Hong Kong

CGN New Energy Holdings Co Ltd is a diversified independent power producer in Asia. The Company has a portfolio of gas-fired, coal-fired, oil-fired, hydro, cogen and fuel cell power generation projects in the People's Republic of China and Korea.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

CGN New Energy Holdings (1811 HK)

China Power International (2380 HK): Industry and Company Updates, Looks Relatively Inexpensive

China Power Intl is interesting as a new/renewable energy play among the traditional large power conglomerates in China. It has a high 47.1%...

Osbert Tang, CFA

China Longyuan (916 HK): Things Aren't that Bad

Longyuan has achieved good generation in 2M21, suggesting excellent underlying demand. The recent weakness in share price has largely discounted...

Osbert Tang, CFA

China Longyuan (916 HK): Record-Breaking Jan, and Strategically Positioned for the Long Term

China Longyuan has a strong Jan generation with 50.8% YoY growth in wind generation. We expect it to benefit from China's clean energy initiatives...

Osbert Tang, CFA

China Renewable Energy (987 HK): Possible Privatisation Offer

Shares are suspended. I think an Offer needs to be pitched closer to $0.30/share, around a four-year high, and a premium to last close in line with...

David Blennerhassett

OFAC Makes a Longer List of Trump Names of China Military Cos

There are a LOT of names which could be affected by the Trump Executive Order on China Military Companies. It behooves investors to have a list....

Travis Lundy

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)