Asian Insight Provider - Actionable ideas, CrossASEAN Research

Henry Soediarko

Asian Insight Provider - Actionable ideas

CrossASEAN Research

At CrossASEAN Research we strive to produce unbiased and differentiated on the ground insights on companies across South East Asia. Our Research is produced for the most part after face to face meetings and conversations with company management to dig deep into the long term vision and strategy of the companies we cover. We seek to deliver investable and actionable themes on sectors and markets across SE Asia, often in collaboration with other Insight Providers across the region, pooling the vast experience of the analysts within the Smartkarma Ecosystem. We also offer bespoke work and tailor made trips for our clients. 

Insights across South East Asia

Equity Bottom-Up

The bloodbath in Hong Kong and H-shares in the first week of July 2021 was mainly caused by the perceived worsening corporate governance to invest in Chinese companies as the Chinese regulator has gone more draconian on the new listing of the Chinese companies, especially for tech companies.  This will inevitably put downward pressure on the share prices of the tech companies but it will increase trading volume in the HK exchange, on the short term basis at least. In the long term, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hong-kong-exchanges-clearing" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:490:1" rel="noopener">HKEX (388 HK)</a> may be the only Exchange approved by the Chinese government for Chinese companies to raise money from foreign investors. Maintain Buy.

The bloodbath in Hong Kong and H-shares in the first week of July 2021 was mainly caused by the perceived worsening corporate governance to invest in Chinese companies as the Chinese regulator has gone more draconian on the new listing of the Chinese companies, especially for tech companies.  This will inevitably put downward pressure on the share prices of the tech companies but it will increase trading volume in the HK exchange, on the short term basis at least. In the long term, HKEX (388 HK) may be the only Exchange approved by the Chinese government for Chinese companies to raise money from foreign investors. Maintain Buy. 

HK Exchange (388): Beneficiary of HK Tech Crack Down

Alpha-Centric ESG Research

Kyle Rudden

Well, that sure escalated quickly.Early last week, in the Insight <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/pre-ipo-esg-analysis-didi-s-exemplary-esg-achievements-eclipsed-by-regulatory-risks-and-uncertainty" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:53687" rel="noopener">Pre-IPO ESG Analysis: DiDi's Exemplary ESG Achievements Eclipsed By Regulatory Risks and Uncertainty</a>, I juxtaposed <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/didi-chuxing-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27467:1" rel="noopener">DiDi's (DIDI US)</a> relatively strong ESG results in areas under its control with serious concerns about regulatory risk outside of its direct control.Late last week, days after DiDi's successful US$4.4 billion initial public offering, Chinese regulators ordered the removal of DiDi's business-critical ride-hailing apps from online app markets, until the company rectifies "serious violations" pertaining to collection and use of customer data.DiDi is down 5.3% so far (delayed open today).Regulatory risk was central to my thesis in the first Insight. I hardly anticipated this, but I referred to regulatory risk as real, near-term, tangible investment risk; not just some fuzzy ESG risk. Given that, I felt obliged to follow up. At the same time, however, this news is covered ad nauseam.No sense in beating a dead horse with a broken record.So, I decided to do something different. That statement about regulatory risk being a real tangible investment risk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence – i.e., when regulators flex their muscle, stocks go down, not up. But "anecdotal" isn't good enough.Which is why I took this opportunity to quantify the impacts of adverse regulatory events in China. Specifically, with event studies measuring abnormal returns around major regulatory events across four broad categories. That's what most of this Insight is about. But back to DiDi for a moment.Regulatory risk and uncertainty for DiDi is much worse today than it was last week. Typically, the opposite would be true; a negative event out in the open is better than a possible event lurking in the shadows. But not this time. Barring an immediate change of heart by the PRC, this is bad.Therefore, downgrading to bearish.

Well, that sure escalated quickly.Early last week, in the Insight Pre-IPO ESG Analysis: DiDi's Exemplary ESG Achievements Eclipsed By Regulatory Risks and Uncertainty, I juxtaposed DiDi's (DIDI US) relatively strong ESG results in areas under its control with serious concerns about regulatory risk outside of its direct control.Late last week, days after DiDi's successful US$4.4 billion initial public offering, Chinese regulators ordered the removal of DiDi's business-critical ride-hailing apps from online app markets, until the company rectifies "serious violations" pertaining to collection and use of customer data.DiDi is down 5.3% so far (delayed open today).Regulatory risk was central to my thesis in the first Insight. I hardly anticipated this, but I referred to regulatory risk as real, near-term, tangible investment risk; not just some fuzzy ESG risk. Given that, I felt obliged to follow up. At the same time, however, this news is covered ad nauseam.No sense in beating a dead horse with a broken record.So, I decided to do something different. That statement about regulatory risk being a real tangible investment risk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence – i.e., when regulators flex their muscle, stocks go down, not up. But "anecdotal" isn't good enough.Which is why I took this opportunity to quantify the impacts of adverse regulatory events in China. Specifically, with event studies measuring abnormal returns around major regulatory events across four broad categories. That's what most of this Insight is about. But back to DiDi for a moment.Regulatory risk and uncertainty for DiDi is much worse today than it was last week. Typically, the opposite would be true; a negative event out in the open is better than a possible event lurking in the shadows. But not this time. Barring an immediate change of heart by the PRC, this is bad.Therefore, downgrading to bearish.

PRC Shows DiDi Who's Boss: An Analysis of Adverse Regulatory Events on Stock Prices

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

David Blennerhassett

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

<div>
Back on the 27 July, Chinese search-engine <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sogou-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:25996:1" rel="noopener">Sogou Inc (SOGO US)</a>, majority-owned by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sohu-com-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22853:1" rel="noopener">Sohu.com Inc (SOHU US)</a>  and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tencent-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26:1" rel="noopener">Tencent Holdings (700 HK)</a>, <a href="http://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=101533&amp;ref=115257193&amp;type=PDF&amp;symbol=SOGO&amp;companyName=Sogou+Inc.+American+Depositary+Shares+each+representing+one+Class+A&amp;formType=6-K&amp;dateFiled=2020-09-29&amp;CK=1713947" target="_blank" rel="noopener">entered</a> into a definitive agreement for a "Going-Private Transaction" at US$9/share.
Additionally, Sohu entered into a SPA with Tencent concerning its stake in Sogou, which would result in Tencent holding not less than 90% of the voting power in Sogou. Therefore the Merger would be a short-form merger - there is no vote. Dissenting rights will, however, now be afforded following the Grand Court of  Cayman Islands ruling handed down on the 28 January this year and discussed in <a href="https://skr.ma/H7E1t" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Changyou (CYOU US): Short-Form Merger Dissent Now Permitted</a>. Sohu's privatisation of Changyou competed on the 17 April.
</div><div>
The deal appeared to be a lock, until Sogou's 1 December <a href="http://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=101533&amp;ref=115473750&amp;type=PDF&amp;symbol=SOGO&amp;companyName=Sogou+Inc.+American+Depositary+Shares+each+representing+one+Class+A&amp;formType=SC+13E3%2FA&amp;dateFiled=2020-12-01&amp;CK=1713947" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SEC filing</a>, wherein the termination date for the SPA was pushed out to 31 July, from 29 March previously, to allow clearance from the PRC regulatory authorities, specifically State Administration for Market Regulation or SAMR.
What seemed an ample extension at the time now appears less assured as SAMR bears down on the tech sector. 
This muddies when (and potentially if) the merger goes through. Plus the knock-on effect to Sohu which would pocket ~US$1.2bn under the merger compared to its current maker cap of ~US$0.7bn.
But Tencent is unlikely to walk - not at this Offer price. 
</div><div>More below the fold.</div>


Back on the 27 July, Chinese search-engine Sogou Inc (SOGO US), majority-owned by Sohu.com Inc (SOHU US)  and Tencent Holdings (700 HK), entered into a definitive agreement for a "Going-Private Transaction" at US$9/share.
Additionally, Sohu entered into a SPA with Tencent concerning its stake in Sogou, which would result in Tencent holding not less than 90% of the voting power in Sogou. Therefore the Merger would be a short-form merger - there is no vote. Dissenting rights will, however, now be afforded following the Grand Court of  Cayman Islands ruling handed down on the 28 January this year and discussed in Changyou (CYOU US): Short-Form Merger Dissent Now Permitted. Sohu's privatisation of Changyou competed on the 17 April.

The deal appeared to be a lock, until Sogou's 1 December SEC filing, wherein the termination date for the SPA was pushed out to 31 July, from 29 March previously, to allow clearance from the PRC regulatory authorities, specifically State Administration for Market Regulation or SAMR.
What seemed an ample extension at the time now appears less assured as SAMR bears down on the tech sector. 
This muddies when (and potentially if) the merger goes through. Plus the knock-on effect to Sohu which would pocket ~US$1.2bn under the merger compared to its current maker cap of ~US$0.7bn.
But Tencent is unlikely to walk - not at this Offer price. 
More below the fold.

Sohu/Sogou: Persuasive Situation Amid Ongoing Antitrust Investigations

Better late than never, as they say.Typically, I publish pre-IPO ESG assessments well before book building). This pre-IPO ESG report on <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/full-truck-alliance" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:33429:1" rel="noopener">Full Truck Alliance (YMM US)</a>, aka Manbang, aka the "Uber for trucks," is admittedly a tad late in the IPO process – given that shares are expected to be trading in one day from now.Nevertheless, there are some important ESG issues to contemplate. Nothing that will alter the IPO, of course. And there really aren't all that many highly-material ESG issues for FTA. However, there are one or two big ones – the sort that could crush a technology stock just out of the IPO gate.For this Insight, I changed my modus operandi. Instead of addressing every conceivable ESG issue, I focus on the two most material issues for each ESG pillar. The ultra-condensed version is as follows (in decreasing order of materiality hence the Social, Governance, Environmental sequence):<ul>
<li>
Social: Nothing else matters in terms of acute investment risk. To be clear, FTA seems on top of things vis-à-vis cyber-risk management. There are no specific concerns. But one data breach, or one ransomware attack. That's all it takes to decimate any newly-listed technology company.</li>
<li>
Governance: They pale in comparison to Social-pillar cyber-risks, but two material Governance issues are: 1) disproportionate ownership and voting control (nothing new for tech, but an ESG hot-button), and 2) regulatory risk and uncertainty, mainly regarding China's antitrust stance.</li>
<li>
Environmental: Environmental issues just don't matter that much from a financial-materiality viewpoint. As a technology firm, FTA's direct climate footprint is negligible. Longer-term it must address its indirect footprint (emissions from third-party activities enabled by its platform).</li>
</ul>

Better late than never, as they say.Typically, I publish pre-IPO ESG assessments well before book building). This pre-IPO ESG report on Full Truck Alliance (YMM US), aka Manbang, aka the "Uber for trucks," is admittedly a tad late in the IPO process – given that shares are expected to be trading in one day from now.Nevertheless, there are some important ESG issues to contemplate. Nothing that will alter the IPO, of course. And there really aren't all that many highly-material ESG issues for FTA. However, there are one or two big ones – the sort that could crush a technology stock just out of the IPO gate.For this Insight, I changed my modus operandi. Instead of addressing every conceivable ESG issue, I focus on the two most material issues for each ESG pillar. The ultra-condensed version is as follows (in decreasing order of materiality hence the Social, Governance, Environmental sequence):

Social: Nothing else matters in terms of acute investment risk. To be clear, FTA seems on top of things vis-à-vis cyber-risk management. There are no specific concerns. But one data breach, or one ransomware attack. That's all it takes to decimate any newly-listed technology company.

Governance: They pale in comparison to Social-pillar cyber-risks, but two material Governance issues are: 1) disproportionate ownership and voting control (nothing new for tech, but an ESG hot-button), and 2) regulatory risk and uncertainty, mainly regarding China's antitrust stance.

Environmental: Environmental issues just don't matter that much from a financial-materiality viewpoint. As a technology firm, FTA's direct climate footprint is negligible. Longer-term it must address its indirect footprint (emissions from third-party activities enabled by its platform).


Pre-IPO ESG Analysis of Full Truck Alliance: Strong ESG Profile... But With One Potential Landmine

Global Emerging Market Equities, Propitious Research

Wium Malan, CFA

Global Emerging Market Equities

Independent, Fundamental Quantitative Research

Propitious Research

Fully independent, fundamental and quantitative equity research, focused on companies in the Telecommunication, Media, Technology, Internet and Healthcare sectors in the Global Emerging Markets. Idea generation focused on Quality stocks, trading below their intrinsic Value, with sound Corporate Governance.

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

This insight provides a summary of the key news developments impacting the largest countries and constituents of the Global Emerging Markets equity indices. 
Companies mentioned this week:
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/prosus-nv" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:28104:1" rel="noopener">Prosus (PRX NA)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:28434:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (9988 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/baidu-inc-a55ca720-5968-48f0-8194-ac94390d065c" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:32212:1" rel="noopener">Baidu (9888 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bytedance-technology" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27936:1" rel="noopener">ByteDance (1460967D CH)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/naver-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:16029:1" rel="noopener">Naver Corp (035420 KS)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/e-mart-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6993:1" rel="noopener">E Mart Inc (139480 KS)</a>

This insight provides a summary of the key news developments impacting the largest countries and constituents of the Global Emerging Markets equity indices. 
Companies mentioned this week:
Prosus (PRX NA), Alibaba Group (9988 HK), Baidu (9888 HK), ByteDance (1460967D CH), Naver Corp (035420 KS), E Mart Inc (139480 KS) 

Global Emerging Markets Weekly: 18 June 2021

China

Baidu, Inc. operates an Internet search engine. The Company offers algorithmic search, enterprise search, news, MP3, and image searches, voice assistance, online storage, and navigation services. Baidu serves clients globally.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Baidu (9888 HK)

HK Exchange (388): Beneficiary of HK Tech Crack Down

HKEX (388 HK) may be the only Exchange approved by the Chinese government for Chinese companies to raise money from foreign investors. Maintain Buy

Henry Soediarko

PRC Shows DiDi Who's Boss: An Analysis of Adverse Regulatory Events on Stock Prices

Last week, I wrote about DiDi's regulatory risk. This week, it's worse. Hence the downgrade. But this is mostly an analysis of how regulatory...

Kyle Rudden

Sohu/Sogou: Persuasive Situation Amid Ongoing Antitrust Investigations

Trading at a gross spread of 7.5%. Even assuming another six months out from here to complete the deal, that looks compelling. I still like Sohu...

David Blennerhassett

Pre-IPO ESG Analysis of Full Truck Alliance: Strong ESG Profile... But With One Potential Landmine

There aren't many highly material ESG issues for FTA. But quantity is irrelevant when there is one big ESG issue with the potential to crush any...

Kyle Rudden

Global Emerging Markets Weekly: 18 June 2021

This insight provides a summary of the key news developments impacting the largest countries and constituents of the Global Emerging Markets equity...

Wium Malan, CFA

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)