Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

<p>On 6 July 2020, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sina-corp-china" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22691:1" rel="noopener">Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US)</a> made an <a href="http://ir.sina.com/index.php/static-files/69e95aee-2729-457f-be56-73628090b8ea" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announcement</a> they had received a preliminary non-binding “going private” proposal from New Wave MMXV - a company controlled by its chairman and CEO Charles Chao. The bid was US$41/share. The GlobalTimes had an <a href="https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1202472.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> where sources opined Sina would "go home" to list in HK or on the STAR Market. This was followed by an <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/de1ddd0f-354f-42de-9b33-b1bc414ab1b4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Agreement and Plan of Merger</a> pursuant to which New Wave would acquire all of outstanding ordinary shares not owned at US$43.30/share. Shareholders approved the merger on <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/ea4a5614-30e8-472c-895c-31e120de3261" target="_blank" rel="noopener">23 December</a> 2020.</p><p>The importance of Sina Corp was that it owned a very large stake in China's premier micro-blogging (twitter-equivalent) service, operated by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a>. </p><p>Prior to that EGM, according to <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/profiles/david-blennerhassett" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="accounts:840" rel="noopener">David Blennerhassett</a>'s excellent write-ups of the deal in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/sina-corp-management-buyout-offer" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41035" rel="noopener">Sina Corp: Management Buyout Offer</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/what-s-going-on-with-sina-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:48344" rel="noopener">What's Going On With Sina Corp?</a> (along with a fabulous initial cut at dissenters' appraisal rights for Chinese companies coming home in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/sina-corp-appraisal-rights-and-fair-value" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41068" rel="noopener">Homecoming For Chinese Companies: Appraisal Rights &amp; Fair Value</a>), Sina had intended to issue written notices of authorization to objecting shareholders (prior to the EGM, <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/722deb54-0426-4b43-a58a-1c8be8b59b61" target="_blank" rel="noopener">21.5mn shares or 35.9%</a> of the outstanding shares of Sina issued notices of objections to the company). </p><p>The dissenting total was quite high, and <em>could have</em> been a reason for Charles Chao to walk away from the deal, but despite the "requirement" to issue authorization notices by early Feb, there was no public acknowledgment of the situation by SINA until 22 March when the company issued a <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sina-announces-completion-of-merger-301253197.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press release</a> saying the merger had been completed.</p><p>So that was done.</p><p>Back in February, the Hong Kong capital markets world was atwitter (woefully bad pun intended) with the news (<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-18/china-s-twitter-like-weibo-said-to-plan-hong-kong-second-listing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bloomberg</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-weibo-hires-banks-hong-kong-secondary-listing-sources-say-2021-02-23/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reuters</a>, that <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a>, China's largest micro-blogging service (China twitter) intended to launch a secondary offering in Hong Kong, like many other US ADR-listed Chinese companies, and had hired banks (GS, CLSA, CS) to do so. </p><p>But since then, there has been no follow-up news. </p><h2>But There is Now NEW "News"... Which is Not Yet News</h2><p>Late in the Asia evening on 6 July 2021, Reuters had an <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-weibo-chairman-state-firm-plan-take-chinas-twitter-private-sources-2021-07-06/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EXCLUSIVE</a> which said Weibo chairman Charles Chao - with 45% of shares out but 71% of voting rights - would team up with an as-yet unnamed Shanghai-based state firm to take the company private. </p><p>One goal would be to get <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> out of their 30% stake. Two sources told Reuters the consortium plans to offer $90-100/share.</p><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/217/007/original/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+8.35.37+PM.png?1625574980" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="217007"></figure></section><p>As I wrote that sentence, the shares were indicated +30% at just over US$71/share. </p><p>My first thought was that the shares would trade "wide" to these early-reported terms as there are political considerations (will the State Council appreciate that a regional SASAC puts up money to buy out an internet firm?), questions about where BABA would agree to sell, timeline, and questions about what Charles Chao and the unnamed Shanghai entity would do if materially all the minorities dissented.</p><p>As I finish that paragraph, Bloomberg appears to have reached a <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a> spokesperson who says that this rumour is not true. </p><p>And a while later, we have a Weibo release which offers a pretty strong denial. </p><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/217/010/original/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+9.39.13+PM.png?1625578767" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="217010"></figure><p></p></section><p>Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't true. It just means that it isn't true for public consumption yet.</p><p>But it is a big interesting situation so we take a closer look at the parameters! And the shares opened up 10%.</p>

On 6 July 2020, Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US) made an announcement they had received a preliminary non-binding “going private” proposal from New Wave MMXV - a company controlled by its chairman and CEO Charles Chao. The bid was US$41/share. The GlobalTimes had an article where sources opined Sina would "go home" to list in HK or on the STAR Market. This was followed by an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which New Wave would acquire all of outstanding ordinary shares not owned at US$43.30/share. Shareholders approved the merger on 23 December 2020.The importance of Sina Corp was that it owned a very large stake in China's premier micro-blogging (twitter-equivalent) service, operated by Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US). Prior to that EGM, according to David Blennerhassett's excellent write-ups of the deal in Sina Corp: Management Buyout Offer, and What's Going On With Sina Corp? (along with a fabulous initial cut at dissenters' appraisal rights for Chinese companies coming home in Homecoming For Chinese Companies: Appraisal Rights &amp; Fair Value), Sina had intended to issue written notices of authorization to objecting shareholders (prior to the EGM, 21.5mn shares or 35.9% of the outstanding shares of Sina issued notices of objections to the company). The dissenting total was quite high, and could have been a reason for Charles Chao to walk away from the deal, but despite the "requirement" to issue authorization notices by early Feb, there was no public acknowledgment of the situation by SINA until 22 March when the company issued a press release saying the merger had been completed.So that was done.Back in February, the Hong Kong capital markets world was atwitter (woefully bad pun intended) with the news (Bloomberg, Reuters, that Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US), China's largest micro-blogging service (China twitter) intended to launch a secondary offering in Hong Kong, like many other US ADR-listed Chinese companies, and had hired banks (GS, CLSA, CS) to do so. But since then, there has been no follow-up news. But There is Now NEW "News"... Which is Not Yet NewsLate in the Asia evening on 6 July 2021, Reuters had an EXCLUSIVE which said Weibo chairman Charles Chao - with 45% of shares out but 71% of voting rights - would team up with an as-yet unnamed Shanghai-based state firm to take the company private. One goal would be to get Alibaba Group (BABA US) out of their 30% stake. Two sources told Reuters the consortium plans to offer $90-100/share.As I wrote that sentence, the shares were indicated +30% at just over US$71/share. My first thought was that the shares would trade "wide" to these early-reported terms as there are political considerations (will the State Council appreciate that a regional SASAC puts up money to buy out an internet firm?), questions about where BABA would agree to sell, timeline, and questions about what Charles Chao and the unnamed Shanghai entity would do if materially all the minorities dissented.As I finish that paragraph, Bloomberg appears to have reached a Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US) spokesperson who says that this rumour is not true. And a while later, we have a Weibo release which offers a pretty strong denial. Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't true. It just means that it isn't true for public consumption yet.But it is a big interesting situation so we take a closer look at the parameters! And the shares opened up 10%.

Head of Research, IPOs & Placements, Aequitas Research

Sumeet Singh

Head of Research, IPOs & Placements

IPOs and Placements coverage across Asia Pacific

Aequitas Research

We cover all listing across the Asia Pacific along with follow-up placements. As of Dec 2020, our team had covered 539 IPOs with a hit rate of 73.5% and 685 placements with a hit rate of 66.8%.

We combine fundamental bottom-up views with our proprietary quantitative framework to provide a holistic coverage across new listings and placements. Our coverage includes pre-IPO notes before the deal is launched, follow-up analysis once the deal is live and post-listing trading analysis as well.

Equity Capital Markets

<div>
<p><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/xpeng-motors" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:29217:1" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (XPEV US)</a> raised around US$2bn via a listing in Hong Kong. In this note, we will talk about the trading dynamics and the updates since our last note, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-hk-listing-will-probably-be-hot-given-strong-momentum-but-past-deal-didn-t-do-well" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors HK Listing - Will Probably Be Hot Given Strong Momentum but past Deal Didn’t Do Well.</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>We have covered the IPO in:</p>
</div>
<div>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-pre-ipo-lots-to-like-with-solid-backing-from-investors" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42126" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Pre-IPO - Lots to like with Solid Backing from Investors</a> </li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-visited-a-store-fairly-priced-but-with-recharging-problem" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42283" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车): Visited a Store, Fairly Priced, But with Recharging Problem</a> </li>
<li><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-pre-ipo-car-comparison-and-p7-performance-test" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42386" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Pre-IPO - Car Comparison and P7 Performance Test</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-pre-ipo-peer-comparison-and-valuation" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42389" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Pre-IPO - Peer Comparison and Valuation</a> </li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-ipo-riding-the-momentum" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42503" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) IPO - Riding the Momentum</a> </li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-trading-nio-leading-the-charge" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42616" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Trading - NIO Leading the Charge</a> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<p>And the previous placement in:</p>
</div>
<div>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
<li><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/xpeng-motors-placement-level-the-playing-field" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Placement - Level the Playing Field</a></li>
</ul>
</div>


Xpeng Motors (XPEV US) raised around US$2bn via a listing in Hong Kong. In this note, we will talk about the trading dynamics and the updates since our last note, Xpeng Motors HK Listing - Will Probably Be Hot Given Strong Momentum but past Deal Didn’t Do Well.


We have covered the IPO in:




Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Pre-IPO - Lots to like with Solid Backing from Investors 

Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车): Visited a Store, Fairly Priced, But with Recharging Problem 
Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Pre-IPO - Car Comparison and P7 Performance Test

Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Pre-IPO - Peer Comparison and Valuation 

Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) IPO - Riding the Momentum 

Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Trading - NIO Leading the Charge 



And the previous placement in:



Xpeng Motors (小鹏汽车) Placement - Level the Playing Field



Xpeng Motors HK Trading - More Hot with Instis that Retail

Global TMT analyst with Asia ex-Japan focus.

Mitchell Kim

Equity Bottom-Up

<p>The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) ordered app stores in China to remove Didi's app for the illegal collection and use of personal data.  This comes after the CAC announcing a cybersecurity review of Didi.   </p><p>The regulatory investigations are not just limited to Didi.  The CAC also opened a cybersecurity probe into the recent US-listed Chinese online recruiter Boss Zhipin and subsidiaries of Full Truck Alliance (both backed by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tencent-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26:1" rel="noopener">Tencent (700 HK)</a> ). </p><p>The removal of the Didi app from app stores is concerning as this could have a direct impact on new user and driver acquisitions, and thus impacting its revenue, which is a key driver for the company's valuation.  Didi's China Mobility business had 337 million annual active users (AAU) and 156 monthly active users (MAU) generating 25 million average daily transactions at the March quarter. </p><p>I am cautious on Didi because of its rich valuation, risks related to its bike-sharing business, and regulatory and business risks.  Please see my last insight, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/didi-chuxing-didi-us-avoid-buyers-remorse-do-an-apples-to-apples-comparison" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:53823" rel="noopener">Didi Chuxing (DIDI US): Avoid Buyers' Remorse - Do an Apples to Apples Comparison,</a> for discussions on valuations. </p>

The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) ordered app stores in China to remove Didi's app for the illegal collection and use of personal data.  This comes after the CAC announcing a cybersecurity review of Didi.   The regulatory investigations are not just limited to Didi.  The CAC also opened a cybersecurity probe into the recent US-listed Chinese online recruiter Boss Zhipin and subsidiaries of Full Truck Alliance (both backed by Tencent (700 HK) ). The removal of the Didi app from app stores is concerning as this could have a direct impact on new user and driver acquisitions, and thus impacting its revenue, which is a key driver for the company's valuation.  Didi's China Mobility business had 337 million annual active users (AAU) and 156 monthly active users (MAU) generating 25 million average daily transactions at the March quarter. I am cautious on Didi because of its rich valuation, risks related to its bike-sharing business, and regulatory and business risks.  Please see my last insight, Didi Chuxing (DIDI US): Avoid Buyers' Remorse - Do an Apples to Apples Comparison, for discussions on valuations. 

Alpha-Centric ESG Research

Kyle Rudden

<p>Well, that sure escalated quickly.</p><p>Early last week, in the Insight <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/pre-ipo-esg-analysis-didi-s-exemplary-esg-achievements-eclipsed-by-regulatory-risks-and-uncertainty" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:53687" rel="noopener">Pre-IPO ESG Analysis: DiDi's Exemplary ESG Achievements Eclipsed By Regulatory Risks and Uncertainty</a>, I juxtaposed <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/didi-chuxing-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27467:1" rel="noopener">DiDi's (DIDI US)</a> relatively strong ESG results in areas under its control with serious concerns about regulatory risk outside of its direct control.</p><p>Late last week, days after DiDi's successful US$4.4 billion initial public offering, Chinese regulators ordered the removal of DiDi's business-critical ride-hailing apps from online app markets, until the company rectifies "serious violations" pertaining to collection and use of customer data.</p><p>DiDi is down 5.3% so far (delayed open today).</p><p>Regulatory risk was central to my thesis in the first Insight. I hardly anticipated this, but I referred to regulatory risk as real, near-term, tangible investment risk; not just some fuzzy ESG risk. Given that, I felt obliged to follow up. At the same time, however, this news is covered <em>ad nauseam.</em></p><p>No sense in beating a dead horse with a broken record.</p><p>So, I decided to do something different. That statement about regulatory risk being a real tangible investment risk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence – i.e., when regulators flex their muscle, stocks go down, not up. But "anecdotal" isn't good enough.</p><p>Which is why I took this opportunity to quantify the impacts of adverse regulatory events in China. Specifically, with event studies measuring abnormal returns around major regulatory events across four broad categories. That's what most of this Insight is about. But back to DiDi for a moment.</p><p>Regulatory risk and uncertainty for DiDi is much worse today than it was last week. Typically, the opposite would be true; a negative event out in the open is better than a possible event lurking in the shadows. But not this time. Barring an immediate change of heart by the PRC, this is bad.</p><p>Therefore, downgrading to bearish.</p>

Well, that sure escalated quickly.Early last week, in the Insight Pre-IPO ESG Analysis: DiDi's Exemplary ESG Achievements Eclipsed By Regulatory Risks and Uncertainty, I juxtaposed DiDi's (DIDI US) relatively strong ESG results in areas under its control with serious concerns about regulatory risk outside of its direct control.Late last week, days after DiDi's successful US$4.4 billion initial public offering, Chinese regulators ordered the removal of DiDi's business-critical ride-hailing apps from online app markets, until the company rectifies "serious violations" pertaining to collection and use of customer data.DiDi is down 5.3% so far (delayed open today).Regulatory risk was central to my thesis in the first Insight. I hardly anticipated this, but I referred to regulatory risk as real, near-term, tangible investment risk; not just some fuzzy ESG risk. Given that, I felt obliged to follow up. At the same time, however, this news is covered ad nauseam.No sense in beating a dead horse with a broken record.So, I decided to do something different. That statement about regulatory risk being a real tangible investment risk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence – i.e., when regulators flex their muscle, stocks go down, not up. But "anecdotal" isn't good enough.Which is why I took this opportunity to quantify the impacts of adverse regulatory events in China. Specifically, with event studies measuring abnormal returns around major regulatory events across four broad categories. That's what most of this Insight is about. But back to DiDi for a moment.Regulatory risk and uncertainty for DiDi is much worse today than it was last week. Typically, the opposite would be true; a negative event out in the open is better than a possible event lurking in the shadows. But not this time. Barring an immediate change of heart by the PRC, this is bad.Therefore, downgrading to bearish.

PRC Shows DiDi Who's Boss: An Analysis of Adverse Regulatory Events on Stock Prices

<p>In a spate of three days, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) has announced a cyber security review on three China tech companies, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/didi-chuxing-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27467:1" rel="noopener">DiDi Chuxing (DIDI US)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kanzhun-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:33368:1" rel="noopener">Kanzhun (BZ US)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/full-truck-alliance" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:33429:1" rel="noopener">Full Truck Alliance (YMM US)</a>. It might just be a coincidence that all three were recently listed in the US. </p>
<div>
<p>We have looked at the ADRs in the past, in our previous notes:</p>
</div>
<div>
<ul style="list-style-type: disc;">
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/china-adrs-secondary-listing-deep-dive-yin-and-yang" target="_blank" rel="noopener">China ADRs Secondary Listing Deep-Dive: Yin and Yang,</a> published in Feb 2020,  we looked at the background and rules around undertaking a secondary listing in Hong Kong and then came up with a short-list of companies that might undertake a secondary listing. </li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/china-adrs-secondary-listing-covid-19-has-increased-the-tension-but-narrowed-the-short-list" target="_blank" rel="noopener">In China ADRs Secondary Listing: COVID-19 Has Increased the Tension but Narrowed the Short List</a> published in May 2020, we looked at the recent developments and provided an revised short-list</li>
<li>In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/china-adrs-secondary-listing-holding-foreign-companies-accountable-act-i-m-coming-home" target="_blank" rel="noopener">China ADRs Secondary Listing - Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act - I’m Coming Home</a>, published in May 2020, we spoke about the implication of the act which had made its way through the senate.</li>
<li>In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/china-adrs-secondary-listing-pipeline-looks-rich-have-three-years-to-move" target="_blank" rel="noopener">China ADRs Secondary Listing - Pipeline Looks Rich, Have Three Years to Move</a>, published in Feb 2021 we looked at the ADR pipeline and spoke about the updates from the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act becoming law and the updates at Hong Kong end as well. </li>
<li>In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/china-adrs-sec-notice-instead-of-three-probably-have-four-years-till-2025-correction-overdone" target="_blank" rel="noopener">China ADRs - SEC Notice - Instead of Three, Probably Have Four Years till 2025 - Correction Overdone, </a> we spoke about the new SEC notice and its implications. </li>
<li>In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/china-adrs-a-new-act-aims-to-put-an-end-to-china-adr-ipos" target="_blank" rel="noopener">China ADRs - A New Act Aims to Put an End to China ADR IPOs</a>, we spoke about the No IPOs for Unaccountable Actors Act, which aims to prohibit IPO on U.S. exchanges for Chinese companies. </li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<p>In this note, we'll talk about the implications of the recent China regulatory announcements.</p>
</div>

In a spate of three days, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) has announced a cyber security review on three China tech companies, DiDi Chuxing (DIDI US), Kanzhun (BZ US) and Full Truck Alliance (YMM US). It might just be a coincidence that all three were recently listed in the US. 

We have looked at the ADRs in the past, in our previous notes:




China ADRs Secondary Listing Deep-Dive: Yin and Yang, published in Feb 2020,  we looked at the background and rules around undertaking a secondary listing in Hong Kong and then came up with a short-list of companies that might undertake a secondary listing. 

In China ADRs Secondary Listing: COVID-19 Has Increased the Tension but Narrowed the Short List published in May 2020, we looked at the recent developments and provided an revised short-list
In China ADRs Secondary Listing - Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act - I’m Coming Home, published in May 2020, we spoke about the implication of the act which had made its way through the senate.
In China ADRs Secondary Listing - Pipeline Looks Rich, Have Three Years to Move, published in Feb 2021 we looked at the ADR pipeline and spoke about the updates from the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act becoming law and the updates at Hong Kong end as well. 
In China ADRs - SEC Notice - Instead of Three, Probably Have Four Years till 2025 - Correction Overdone,  we spoke about the new SEC notice and its implications. 
In China ADRs - A New Act Aims to Put an End to China ADR IPOs, we spoke about the No IPOs for Unaccountable Actors Act, which aims to prohibit IPO on U.S. exchanges for Chinese companies. 



In this note, we'll talk about the implications of the recent China regulatory announcements.


China ADRs - Kanzhun, Full Truck and Didi - Regulators Sending a Message

China

Tencent Holdings Limited operates as an investment holding company. The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides Internet and mobile value-added services (VAS), online advertising, and e-commerce transactions. Tencent Holdings offers services to users worldwide.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Tencent (700 HK)

What's Going On With Weibo?

Weibo was in the news as a story suggested the chairman would join with a state entity to take the company private. This was denied shortly after....

Travis Lundy

Xpeng Motors HK Trading - More Hot with Instis that Retail

Xpeng Motors (XPEV US) raised around US$2bn via a listing in Hong Kong. In this note, we will talk about the trading dynamics and the updates since...

Sumeet Singh

DIDI US: Regulatory Risk on the Rise

The CAC ordered app stores in China to remove Didi's app for the illegal collection and use of personal data. With rich valuations and regulatory...

Mitchell Kim

PRC Shows DiDi Who's Boss: An Analysis of Adverse Regulatory Events on Stock Prices

Last week, I wrote about DiDi's regulatory risk. This week, it's worse. Hence the downgrade. But this is mostly an analysis of how regulatory...

Kyle Rudden

China ADRs - Kanzhun, Full Truck and Didi - Regulators Sending a Message

In a spate of three days, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) has announced a cyber security review on three China tech companies. By...

Sumeet Singh

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)