Semiconductors, Memory and SSDs Specialist, Objective Analysis

Jim Handy

Semiconductors, Memory and SSDs Specialist

Objective Analysis

Objective Analysis offers third-party independent market research and data for the semiconductor industry and investors in the semiconductor industry.

Semiconductors, Memory and SSDs

Equity Bottom-Up

<p>In today's Samsung earnings call the company reported lower semiconductor profits than those of its first quarter, and gave relatively weak excuses for the company's performance.  This comes one day after SK hynix revealed higher-than-expected revenues and earnings for the same quarter, and one month after a very positive call from Micron.</p>

In today's Samsung earnings call the company reported lower semiconductor profits than those of its first quarter, and gave relatively weak excuses for the company's performance.  This comes one day after SK hynix revealed higher-than-expected revenues and earnings for the same quarter, and one month after a very positive call from Micron.

Samsung Earnings Disappoint After Strong SK Hynix Call

<p>SK hynix' earnings call today showed good results, and management's outlook is for an even more positive second quarter and second half.  As a result, the company is accelerating its capital spending.</p>

SK hynix' earnings call today showed good results, and management's outlook is for an even more positive second quarter and second half.  As a result, the company is accelerating its capital spending.

SK Hynix Posts Good Results, Expects Even Better

Korea / Special Sits, Pairs, Index Rebalancing, Clepsydra Capital

Sanghyun Park

Korea / Special Sits, Pairs, Index Rebalancing

Clepsydra Capital

Investigate special situations, pairs, and index rebalancing trades in Korea.

Equity Capital Markets

Kioxia Holdings  / Equity Capital Markets

<p>In today's conference call, SK Hynix said an interesting thing about Kioxia.</p><ul>
<li><strong>Hynix confirmed that Kioxia would give another shot to an IPO in the second half of this year instead of taking the Micron/WD offer.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Hynix said that was what it was told by the Bain Capital Consortium and the Kioxia management lately.</strong></li>
</ul>

In today's conference call, SK Hynix said an interesting thing about Kioxia.
Hynix confirmed that Kioxia would give another shot to an IPO in the second half of this year instead of taking the Micron/WD offer.
Hynix said that was what it was told by the Bain Capital Consortium and the Kioxia management lately.


SK Hynix Conference Call Today: Kioxia IPO in 2H & Plan to Sell 31% After IPO

Korea/Asia, Events, IPOs, Douglas Research Advisory

Douglas Kim

Korea/Asia, Events, IPOs

Event-Driven

<div class="content-highlight"><p>In this insight, we highlight the closing of the pricing gaps between the major Korean holdcos and opcos, especially with the upcoming end of the ban on the short selling of shares in Korea in May. In this insight, we highlight 26 pair trades that involve Korean holdcos and opcos.</p></div><p>Just a reminder that the ban on short selling of KOSPI 200 and KOSDAQ 150 included stocks will remain in place until May 2nd and investors will be able to resume their shorting on these 350 stocks starting on May 3rd. Once this ban on short selling of stocks ends, there could be more investors that may look to add to the holdco shares and short the opco shares (especially among the pairs where the holdco shares have underperformed the opco shares in the past year). However, some of these moves have already started to take place in the past few weeks, which could reduce the overall profits on the pair trades. </p><p>Traditionally, the pair trades involving Korean holdcos and opcos have been a trading strategy that many hedge funds have employed for many years. However, the ban on short selling of stocks in Korea have prevented many of these funds from employing these pair trade strategies. Once the ban ends, you will likely see these funds becoming more active in these trading methods once again. </p><div class="content-highlight">
<p>In the section below, we separated the pair trades into two different sections. The first table involves major opcos outperforming holdcos (regular and quasi) in the past year. Of the 26 pair trade strategies mentioned in this insight, this section I involves 19 of them (73% of total). The section II (which involve holdcos outperforming the opcos in the past year) involves 7 pair trade strategies (27% of total).</p>
<p>In other words, the opcos in general have vastly outperformed the holdcos in the past year, especially due to the ban on the short selling of stocks in Korea. Because the opcos tend to be the bigger company than the holdcos in terms of market cap, many fund managers (both active and passive) have tended to just invest in the opcos and pay less attention to the holdcos.  </p>
</div><p>Also, we described the holdcos as either regular or quasi. SK Telecom and Samsung C&amp;T would be examples of "quasi" holdcos whereas Orion Holdings and Hanjin Kal would be examples of regular holdcos. </p>

In this insight, we highlight the closing of the pricing gaps between the major Korean holdcos and opcos, especially with the upcoming end of the ban on the short selling of shares in Korea in May. In this insight, we highlight 26 pair trades that involve Korean holdcos and opcos.Just a reminder that the ban on short selling of KOSPI 200 and KOSDAQ 150 included stocks will remain in place until May 2nd and investors will be able to resume their shorting on these 350 stocks starting on May 3rd. Once this ban on short selling of stocks ends, there could be more investors that may look to add to the holdco shares and short the opco shares (especially among the pairs where the holdco shares have underperformed the opco shares in the past year). However, some of these moves have already started to take place in the past few weeks, which could reduce the overall profits on the pair trades. Traditionally, the pair trades involving Korean holdcos and opcos have been a trading strategy that many hedge funds have employed for many years. However, the ban on short selling of stocks in Korea have prevented many of these funds from employing these pair trade strategies. Once the ban ends, you will likely see these funds becoming more active in these trading methods once again. 
In the section below, we separated the pair trades into two different sections. The first table involves major opcos outperforming holdcos (regular and quasi) in the past year. Of the 26 pair trade strategies mentioned in this insight, this section I involves 19 of them (73% of total). The section II (which involve holdcos outperforming the opcos in the past year) involves 7 pair trade strategies (27% of total).
In other words, the opcos in general have vastly outperformed the holdcos in the past year, especially due to the ban on the short selling of stocks in Korea. Because the opcos tend to be the bigger company than the holdcos in terms of market cap, many fund managers (both active and passive) have tended to just invest in the opcos and pay less attention to the holdcos.  
Also, we described the holdcos as either regular or quasi. SK Telecom and Samsung C&amp;T would be examples of "quasi" holdcos whereas Orion Holdings and Hanjin Kal would be examples of regular holdcos. 

Closing the Gap: Korean Holdcos Vs. Opcos

Quantitative Analysis

<div><p>On April 9, the Korea NPS finalized the changes in the asset allocation tolerable bands. It raised the SAA (strategic asset allocation) from ±2.0%p to ±3.0%p but cut the TAA (tactical asset allocation) to ±2.0%p to keep the overall tolerable band at ±5.0%p.</p></div><div>
<table class="table table-striped">
<colgroup>
<col width="100">
<col width="100">
<col width="100">
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"SAA &amp; TAA allowable range"}'>SAA &amp; TAA tolerable bands</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"SAA"}'>SAA (strategic asset allocation)</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"TAA"}'>TAA (tactical asset allocation)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Domestic bonds"}'>Domestic bonds</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±3.5"}'>±3.5%p</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±5.0"}'>±5.0%p</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Overseas bonds"}'>Overseas bonds</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±0.5"}'>±0.5%p</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±1.0"}'>±1.0%p</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Domestic stocks"}'>Domestic stocks</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±2.0"}'>±3.0%p</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±3.0"}'>±2.0%p</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Overseas stocks"}'>Overseas stocks</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±1.0"}'>±1.0%p</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±1.0"}'>±1.0%p</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Alternative"}'>Alternative</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±1.2"}'>±1.2%p</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"±1.2"}'>±1.2%p</td>
</tr>
<tr><td colspan="3" rowspan="1" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Source: Korea NPS"}'>Source: Korea NPS</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<p><strong>Here is what it would imply on the overall trading pattern:</strong></p>
<div data-message-id="364865"><div><div><div><div><div><ul>
<li>SAA (Strategic Asset Allocation): The fund management committee determines the allocation weight for the portfolio target asset, usually for the next 5 years.</li>
<li>TAA (tactical asset allocation): Each portfolio manager flexibly determines which stock/asset gets an additional weight.</li>
</ul></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<div data-message-id="364867">
<p><strong>Why would this change, while reducing the TAA, stop the selling spree?</strong></p>
<p>The NPS portfolio managers have been pressured to sell in the current market phase because they can only care about maximizing return. On the other hand, the SAA should have been exposed to external political influence. By upping the SAA but reducing the TAA, keeping more local equity while not worrying too much about maximizing absolute return can be more easily justified inside the NPS.</p>
</div>
</div>

On April 9, the Korea NPS finalized the changes in the asset allocation tolerable bands. It raised the SAA (strategic asset allocation) from ±2.0%p to ±3.0%p but cut the TAA (tactical asset allocation) to ±2.0%p to keep the overall tolerable band at ±5.0%p.








SAA &amp; TAA tolerable bands
SAA (strategic asset allocation)
TAA (tactical asset allocation)


Domestic bonds
±3.5%p
±5.0%p


Overseas bonds
±0.5%p
±1.0%p


Domestic stocks
±3.0%p
±2.0%p


Overseas stocks
±1.0%p
±1.0%p


Alternative
±1.2%p
±1.2%p

Source: Korea NPS



Here is what it would imply on the overall trading pattern:

SAA (Strategic Asset Allocation): The fund management committee determines the allocation weight for the portfolio target asset, usually for the next 5 years.
TAA (tactical asset allocation): Each portfolio manager flexibly determines which stock/asset gets an additional weight.


Why would this change, while reducing the TAA, stop the selling spree?
The NPS portfolio managers have been pressured to sell in the current market phase because they can only care about maximizing return. On the other hand, the SAA should have been exposed to external political influence. By upping the SAA but reducing the TAA, keeping more local equity while not worrying too much about maximizing absolute return can be more easily justified inside the NPS.



Korea NPS Local Equity Trading Goes Extreme: TAA ±2.0%p Must Be Near Zero Now

South Korea

SK Hynix Inc. provides products and services for the electronic components industry. The Company manufactures semiconductors, such as dynamic random access memory (DRAM), NAND flash memory, and static random access memory (SRAM) chips.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

SK Hynix (000660 KS)

Samsung Earnings Disappoint After Strong SK Hynix Call

Samsung's April 29 earnings call was lackluster compared to its competitors' recent announcements. Is the company losing its technology lead? Are...

Jim Handy

SK Hynix Posts Good Results, Expects Even Better

SK hynix' April 28 earnings call disclosed not only a good first quarter, but also a great outlook for the rest of 2021, not just for SK hynix, but...

Jim Handy

SK Hynix Conference Call Today: Kioxia IPO in 2H & Plan to Sell 31% After IPO

This post briefly summarizes the Hynix conference call today about Kioxia IPO and its plan to sell the Kioxia stake after IPO.

Sanghyun Park

Closing the Gap: Korean Holdcos Vs. Opcos

In this insight, we highlight the closing of the pricing gaps between the major Korean holdcos and opcos, especially with the upcoming end of the...

Douglas Kim

Korea NPS Local Equity Trading Goes Extreme: TAA ±2.0%p Must Be Near Zero Now

This post examines the Korea NPS' recent trading on local equity after the April 9 asset allocation weight changes. The NPS doesn't seem to be...

Sanghyun Park

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)