Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

David Blennerhassett

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

<div>
<p>Back on the 21 June, IR solutions provider <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/51-job-inc-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:532:1" rel="noopener">51 Job Inc (JOBS US)</a> <a href="https://sec.report/Document/0001193125-21-195283/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> it had entered into a definitive privatisation agreement at US$79.05/share. </p>
<p>Just last week in <em><a href="https://skr.ma/d8W2a" target="_blank" rel="noopener">51job (JOB US): Searching For Answers</a></em>, when the gross spread to terms was 30.8% -  the widest since the take-private transaction was first floated on the <a href="https://sec.report/Document/0001104659-20-105912/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">17 September 202</a>0 - I thought this was the right price to get involved. </p>
<p>Despite China's ongoing scrutiny of the internet industry, I had not seen any specific issue pushing back on this deal. Additionally,  wasn't helping people find jobs more easily in-line with common prosperity?</p>
<p>51job has now <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001295484/000110465921132333/tm2131363d1_sc13da.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">updated</a> its Schedule 13D - an SEC form to be filed when a person or group acquires more than 5% of a company. The amendment discusses facility agreements entered into with China Merchants Bank, the lead arranger, and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co (joint lead arranger). The facilities provide funding of US$2.275bn, just shy of the US$2.6bn required to complete the transaction.</p>
<p>Shares gained 9.8% on this development, the only newsflow since the firm agreement was entered into. </p>
<p>Timing still remains unknown. However, this is a buy here.</p>
</div>
<p>More below the fold</p>


Back on the 21 June, IR solutions provider 51 Job Inc (JOBS US) announced it had entered into a definitive privatisation agreement at US$79.05/share. 
Just last week in 51job (JOB US): Searching For Answers, when the gross spread to terms was 30.8% -  the widest since the take-private transaction was first floated on the 17 September 2020 - I thought this was the right price to get involved. 
Despite China's ongoing scrutiny of the internet industry, I had not seen any specific issue pushing back on this deal. Additionally,  wasn't helping people find jobs more easily in-line with common prosperity?
51job has now updated its Schedule 13D - an SEC form to be filed when a person or group acquires more than 5% of a company. The amendment discusses facility agreements entered into with China Merchants Bank, the lead arranger, and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co (joint lead arranger). The facilities provide funding of US$2.275bn, just shy of the US$2.6bn required to complete the transaction.
Shares gained 9.8% on this development, the only newsflow since the firm agreement was entered into. 
Timing still remains unknown. However, this is a buy here.

More below the fold

51job (JOB US): Shares Pop As Financing Progresses

<div>
<p>On the 21 June, nine months after IR solutions provider <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/51-job-inc-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:532:1" rel="noopener">51 Job Inc Adr (JOBS US)</a> first announced it had received a preliminary non-binding <a href="https://sec.report/Document/0001104659-20-105912/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Proposal</a> from DCP Capital Partners to acquire all of its shares for US$79.05/common share, 51job <a href="https://sec.report/Document/0001193125-21-195283/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> it had entered into a definitive privatisation agreement, also at US$79.05/share. </p>
<p>What appeared to be the clincher for the deal was <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/recruit-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15070:1" rel="noopener">Recruit Holdings (6098 JP)</a> - 51job's largest shareholder with 34.8% - joining the consortium, which also comprised DCP plus Ocean Link and CEO Rick Yan, both of whom joined following the non-binding proposal <a href="https://ir.51job.com/ir/php/2021/PreRelease20210504.php?0504" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> on the 4 May. All in, the continuing shareholders and their affiliates hold 56.1% in 51job. </p>
<p>Despite a low-balled Offer - and the prospects of dissension apparent - the deal appeared done. It was just a question of timing.</p>
<p>Then China's internet sector campaign kicked into gear, with 51job ostensibly finding itself lumped (rightly or otherwise) with other internet-related stocks being scrutinised. Or at least, 51job was perceived to be in the cross-hairs. </p>
<p>It doesn't help there has been a complete lack of newsflow on the transaction since the definitive agreement. No mention whatsoever in the 2Q21 results. The current gross spread of 30.8% - well below the undisturbed price - is the widest since the transaction was first floated. </p>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/237/750/original/image_859790017111635317164110.png?1635317164" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="237750"></figure>
</div>
<div>This looks like the right price to get involved. </div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>More below the fold</p>
</div>


On the 21 June, nine months after IR solutions provider 51 Job Inc Adr (JOBS US) first announced it had received a preliminary non-binding Proposal from DCP Capital Partners to acquire all of its shares for US$79.05/common share, 51job announced it had entered into a definitive privatisation agreement, also at US$79.05/share. 
What appeared to be the clincher for the deal was Recruit Holdings (6098 JP) - 51job's largest shareholder with 34.8% - joining the consortium, which also comprised DCP plus Ocean Link and CEO Rick Yan, both of whom joined following the non-binding proposal announced on the 4 May. All in, the continuing shareholders and their affiliates hold 56.1% in 51job. 
Despite a low-balled Offer - and the prospects of dissension apparent - the deal appeared done. It was just a question of timing.
Then China's internet sector campaign kicked into gear, with 51job ostensibly finding itself lumped (rightly or otherwise) with other internet-related stocks being scrutinised. Or at least, 51job was perceived to be in the cross-hairs. 
It doesn't help there has been a complete lack of newsflow on the transaction since the definitive agreement. No mention whatsoever in the 2Q21 results. The current gross spread of 30.8% - well below the undisturbed price - is the widest since the transaction was first floated. 


This looks like the right price to get involved. 


More below the fold


China and US Equity Analyst

Roger Xie

Equity Bottom-Up

<ul>
<li>Regulatory risk is the major headwind for <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (WB US)</a>, a twitter-like social media platform for sharing news and user opinions.  As Beijing tightening its grip on social media platform, we have observed Weibo's value declining 65% from its high in 3-year period. In the latest move, China reiterates the ban on private enterprise in news organizations. In the past 10 months, the magnitude of policy change on tech giant is unprecedent. The latest rounds of measurements on social media include: 1) crackdown of internet influencer/celebrity culture; 2) adjustment on algorithm-powered feeds; 3) macro impact on SME ad campaign spending. </li>
<li>We believe <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (WB US)</a> has strong presence in celebrity and key opinion leaders on social media, which differentiates it from other major platform such as <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tencent-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26:1" rel="noopener">Tencent (700 HK)'s  </a>WeChat/QQ, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bytedance-technology" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27936:1" rel="noopener">ByteDance (1439927D CH)</a>'s Toutiao.  With its 521 million monthly active users and 225 million daily active users, Weibo is one of the largest social platform.  As more key opinion leaders join Weibo, more users use Weibo to read view the key opinion leaders’ content and engage with them through replying, sharing, and clicking the “Like” button. These key opinion leaders can also get tipping from or sell merchandise to their fans. We believe Weibo's business model and scale is hard to replicate. </li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (WB US)</a> has strategic partnership with <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sina-corp-china" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22691:1" rel="noopener">Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US).</a> The parent company Sina owns 45% Weibo outstanding shares and has 71% voting right. Alibaba owns 30% Weibo outstanding shares and has 16% voting right. Given the recent scrutiny of Alibaba and forcing exit from media industry, we think the upcoming recapitalization of Weibo could be a positive catalyst. Weibo has already explored the potential Hong Kong secondary listing.  And it could use the IPO proceed to partially buyout Alibaba stake. Another option is that new strategic investors could be introduced to take Alibaba's stake as well. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (WB US)</a> is traded at forward 15x consensus P/E, and could deliver 15% revenue CAGR in the next 3 year. We think valuation is attractive for Weibo's scale and monetization potential. </li>
</ul>


Regulatory risk is the major headwind for Weibo Corp (WB US), a twitter-like social media platform for sharing news and user opinions.  As Beijing tightening its grip on social media platform, we have observed Weibo's value declining 65% from its high in 3-year period. In the latest move, China reiterates the ban on private enterprise in news organizations. In the past 10 months, the magnitude of policy change on tech giant is unprecedent. The latest rounds of measurements on social media include: 1) crackdown of internet influencer/celebrity culture; 2) adjustment on algorithm-powered feeds; 3) macro impact on SME ad campaign spending. 
We believe Weibo Corp (WB US) has strong presence in celebrity and key opinion leaders on social media, which differentiates it from other major platform such as Tencent (700 HK)'s  WeChat/QQ, and ByteDance (1439927D CH)'s Toutiao.  With its 521 million monthly active users and 225 million daily active users, Weibo is one of the largest social platform.  As more key opinion leaders join Weibo, more users use Weibo to read view the key opinion leaders’ content and engage with them through replying, sharing, and clicking the “Like” button. These key opinion leaders can also get tipping from or sell merchandise to their fans. We believe Weibo's business model and scale is hard to replicate. 

Weibo Corp (WB US) has strategic partnership with Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US) and Alibaba Group (BABA US). The parent company Sina owns 45% Weibo outstanding shares and has 71% voting right. Alibaba owns 30% Weibo outstanding shares and has 16% voting right. Given the recent scrutiny of Alibaba and forcing exit from media industry, we think the upcoming recapitalization of Weibo could be a positive catalyst. Weibo has already explored the potential Hong Kong secondary listing.  And it could use the IPO proceed to partially buyout Alibaba stake. Another option is that new strategic investors could be introduced to take Alibaba's stake as well. Weibo Corp (WB US) is traded at forward 15x consensus P/E, and could deliver 15% revenue CAGR in the next 3 year. We think valuation is attractive for Weibo's scale and monetization potential. 


Weibo (WB US): Regulatory Risks Overshadow Cheap Valuation And Recapitalization Optionality

Travis Lundy

<p>On 6 July 2020, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sina-corp-china" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22691:1" rel="noopener">Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US)</a> made an <a href="http://ir.sina.com/index.php/static-files/69e95aee-2729-457f-be56-73628090b8ea" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announcement</a> they had received a preliminary non-binding “going private” proposal from New Wave MMXV - a company controlled by its chairman and CEO Charles Chao. The bid was US$41/share. The GlobalTimes had an <a href="https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1202472.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> where sources opined Sina would "go home" to list in HK or on the STAR Market. This was followed by an <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/de1ddd0f-354f-42de-9b33-b1bc414ab1b4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Agreement and Plan of Merger</a> pursuant to which New Wave would acquire all of outstanding ordinary shares not owned at US$43.30/share. Shareholders approved the merger on <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/ea4a5614-30e8-472c-895c-31e120de3261" target="_blank" rel="noopener">23 December</a> 2020.</p><p>The importance of Sina Corp was that it owned a very large stake in China's premier micro-blogging (twitter-equivalent) service, operated by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a>. </p><p>Prior to that EGM, according to <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/profiles/david-blennerhassett" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="accounts:840" rel="noopener">David Blennerhassett</a>'s excellent write-ups of the deal in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/sina-corp-management-buyout-offer" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41035" rel="noopener">Sina Corp: Management Buyout Offer</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/what-s-going-on-with-sina-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:48344" rel="noopener">What's Going On With Sina Corp?</a> (along with a fabulous initial cut at dissenters' appraisal rights for Chinese companies coming home in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/sina-corp-appraisal-rights-and-fair-value" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41068" rel="noopener">Homecoming For Chinese Companies: Appraisal Rights &amp; Fair Value</a>), Sina had intended to issue written notices of authorization to objecting shareholders (prior to the EGM, <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/722deb54-0426-4b43-a58a-1c8be8b59b61" target="_blank" rel="noopener">21.5mn shares or 35.9%</a> of the outstanding shares of Sina issued notices of objections to the company). </p><p>The dissenting total was quite high, and <em>could have</em> been a reason for Charles Chao to walk away from the deal, but despite the "requirement" to issue authorization notices by early Feb, there was no public acknowledgment of the situation by SINA until 22 March when the company issued a <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sina-announces-completion-of-merger-301253197.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press release</a> saying the merger had been completed.</p><p>So that was done.</p><p>Back in February, the Hong Kong capital markets world was atwitter (woefully bad pun intended) with the news (<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-18/china-s-twitter-like-weibo-said-to-plan-hong-kong-second-listing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bloomberg</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-weibo-hires-banks-hong-kong-secondary-listing-sources-say-2021-02-23/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reuters</a>, that <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a>, China's largest micro-blogging service (China twitter) intended to launch a secondary offering in Hong Kong, like many other US ADR-listed Chinese companies, and had hired banks (GS, CLSA, CS) to do so. </p><p>But since then, there has been no follow-up news. </p><h2>But There is Now NEW "News"... Which is Not Yet News</h2><p>Late in the Asia evening on 6 July 2021, Reuters had an <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-weibo-chairman-state-firm-plan-take-chinas-twitter-private-sources-2021-07-06/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EXCLUSIVE</a> which said Weibo chairman Charles Chao - with 45% of shares out but 71% of voting rights - would team up with an as-yet unnamed Shanghai-based state firm to take the company private. </p><p>One goal would be to get <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> out of their 30% stake. Two sources told Reuters the consortium plans to offer $90-100/share.</p><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/217/007/original/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+8.35.37+PM.png?1625574980" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="217007"></figure></section><p>As I wrote that sentence, the shares were indicated +30% at just over US$71/share. </p><p>My first thought was that the shares would trade "wide" to these early-reported terms as there are political considerations (will the State Council appreciate that a regional SASAC puts up money to buy out an internet firm?), questions about where BABA would agree to sell, timeline, and questions about what Charles Chao and the unnamed Shanghai entity would do if materially all the minorities dissented.</p><p>As I finish that paragraph, Bloomberg appears to have reached a <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a> spokesperson who says that this rumour is not true. </p><p>And a while later, we have a Weibo release which offers a pretty strong denial. </p><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/217/010/original/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+9.39.13+PM.png?1625578767" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="217010"></figure><p></p></section><p>Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't true. It just means that it isn't true for public consumption yet.</p><p>But it is a big interesting situation so we take a closer look at the parameters! And the shares opened up 10%.</p>

On 6 July 2020, Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US) made an announcement they had received a preliminary non-binding “going private” proposal from New Wave MMXV - a company controlled by its chairman and CEO Charles Chao. The bid was US$41/share. The GlobalTimes had an article where sources opined Sina would "go home" to list in HK or on the STAR Market. This was followed by an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which New Wave would acquire all of outstanding ordinary shares not owned at US$43.30/share. Shareholders approved the merger on 23 December 2020.The importance of Sina Corp was that it owned a very large stake in China's premier micro-blogging (twitter-equivalent) service, operated by Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US). Prior to that EGM, according to David Blennerhassett's excellent write-ups of the deal in Sina Corp: Management Buyout Offer, and What's Going On With Sina Corp? (along with a fabulous initial cut at dissenters' appraisal rights for Chinese companies coming home in Homecoming For Chinese Companies: Appraisal Rights &amp; Fair Value), Sina had intended to issue written notices of authorization to objecting shareholders (prior to the EGM, 21.5mn shares or 35.9% of the outstanding shares of Sina issued notices of objections to the company). The dissenting total was quite high, and could have been a reason for Charles Chao to walk away from the deal, but despite the "requirement" to issue authorization notices by early Feb, there was no public acknowledgment of the situation by SINA until 22 March when the company issued a press release saying the merger had been completed.So that was done.Back in February, the Hong Kong capital markets world was atwitter (woefully bad pun intended) with the news (Bloomberg, Reuters, that Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US), China's largest micro-blogging service (China twitter) intended to launch a secondary offering in Hong Kong, like many other US ADR-listed Chinese companies, and had hired banks (GS, CLSA, CS) to do so. But since then, there has been no follow-up news. But There is Now NEW "News"... Which is Not Yet NewsLate in the Asia evening on 6 July 2021, Reuters had an EXCLUSIVE which said Weibo chairman Charles Chao - with 45% of shares out but 71% of voting rights - would team up with an as-yet unnamed Shanghai-based state firm to take the company private. One goal would be to get Alibaba Group (BABA US) out of their 30% stake. Two sources told Reuters the consortium plans to offer $90-100/share.As I wrote that sentence, the shares were indicated +30% at just over US$71/share. My first thought was that the shares would trade "wide" to these early-reported terms as there are political considerations (will the State Council appreciate that a regional SASAC puts up money to buy out an internet firm?), questions about where BABA would agree to sell, timeline, and questions about what Charles Chao and the unnamed Shanghai entity would do if materially all the minorities dissented.As I finish that paragraph, Bloomberg appears to have reached a Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US) spokesperson who says that this rumour is not true. And a while later, we have a Weibo release which offers a pretty strong denial. Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't true. It just means that it isn't true for public consumption yet.But it is a big interesting situation so we take a closer look at the parameters! And the shares opened up 10%.

<div>
<p>Nine months after IR solutions provider <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/51-job-inc-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:532:1" rel="noopener">51 Job Inc Adr (JOBS US)</a> first announced it had received a preliminary non-binding <a href="https://sec.report/Document/0001104659-20-105912/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Proposal</a> from DCP Capital Partners to acquire all of its shares for US$79.05/common share, 51job <a href="https://sec.report/Document/0001193125-21-195283/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> yesterday it has entered into a definitive privatisation agreement. </p>
<p>The price remains unchanged, which is also in keeping with the non-binding proposal <a href="https://ir.51job.com/ir/php/2021/PreRelease20210504.php?0504" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> on the 4 May, wherein Ocean Link and CEO Rick Yan joined DCP in the consortium to take the company private.</p>
<p>The big news is that <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/recruit-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15070:1" rel="noopener">Recruit Holdings (6098 JP)</a>, 51job's largest shareholder with 34.8%, has now joined the consortium. </p>
<p>The merger requires the approval of two-thirds of all shareholders at an EGM, and the consortium has 54.9% in the bag. </p>
<p>This deal is by no means a sure thing. But even if the EGM resolution passes, minorities are afforded dissension rights. And as recently seen in the recent privatisations of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sina-corp-china" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22691:1" rel="noopener">Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-biologic-products-hold" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22633:1" rel="noopener">China Biologic Products (CBPO US)</a>, shareholders have taken up that cause. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p>More below the fold.</p>
</div>


Nine months after IR solutions provider 51 Job Inc Adr (JOBS US) first announced it had received a preliminary non-binding Proposal from DCP Capital Partners to acquire all of its shares for US$79.05/common share, 51job announced yesterday it has entered into a definitive privatisation agreement. 
The price remains unchanged, which is also in keeping with the non-binding proposal announced on the 4 May, wherein Ocean Link and CEO Rick Yan joined DCP in the consortium to take the company private.
The big news is that Recruit Holdings (6098 JP), 51job's largest shareholder with 34.8%, has now joined the consortium. 
The merger requires the approval of two-thirds of all shareholders at an EGM, and the consortium has 54.9% in the bag. 
This deal is by no means a sure thing. But even if the EGM resolution passes, minorities are afforded dissension rights. And as recently seen in the recent privatisations of Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US) and China Biologic Products (CBPO US), shareholders have taken up that cause. 


More below the fold.


51job’s Privatisation: Firm Offer Is Still The Wrong Price

China

SINA Corporation is a global Internet media company operating Chinese-language destination sites. The Company offers a network of branded content and services targeting people of Chinese descent worldwide. SINA.com offers online news, entertainment, community, and commerce through web sites that are produced and updated by local teams in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and North America.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US)

51job (JOB US): Shares Pop As Financing Progresses

Trading at a gross/annualised spread of 19.8%/56.3%, assuming completion at the end of 1Q22. That still looks attractive,

David Blennerhassett

51job (JOB US): Searching For Answers

Trading at a gross/annualised spread of 30.8%/88.3%, assuming completion 1Q22-end. Despite China's ongoing scrutiny of the internet industry, I've...

David Blennerhassett

Weibo (WB US): Regulatory Risks Overshadow Cheap Valuation And Recapitalization Optionality

Although Weibo (WB.US) is facing regulatory risk and growth is slow, we think valuation is attractive for its scale and monetization potential....

Roger Xie

What's Going On With Weibo?

Weibo was in the news as a story suggested the chairman would join with a state entity to take the company private. This was denied shortly after....

Travis Lundy

51job’s Privatisation: Firm Offer Is Still The Wrong Price

I'd buy here. Given recent Cayman petitions, I would expect this pushback on pricing to continue here, which may avail smaller investors the...

David Blennerhassett

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)