Materials Analyst/Strategist, Janus Analysis

Gaius King

Materials Analyst/Strategist

Accelerating Tomorrow’s Independent Research

Boost Research

Boost Research Ltd is an appointed representative of Messels Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the FCA of the UK. 

This document is issued by Boost Research Limited solely for its clients. It may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed to any other person in whole or in part for any purpose without written consent of Boost Research. The material in this document is not intended for distribution or use outside the United Kingdom. This material is not directed at you if Boost Research is prohibited or restricted by any legislation or regulation in any jurisdiction from making it available to you.

This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer, solicitation, invitation, inducement or recommendation relating to the subscription, purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument.  This document does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, investment advice.  It is accordingly recommended that you should seek independent advice from a suitably qualified professional advisor before taking any decisions in relation to the investments detailed herein. All expressions of opinions and estimates constitute a judgement and, unless otherwise stated, are those of the author and the research department of Boost Research only, and are subject to change without notice. Boost Research is under no obligation to update the information contained herein. Whilst Boost Research has taken all reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this document is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, Boost Research cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness, and you should not act on it without first independently verifying its contents. This document is not guaranteed to be a complete statement or summary of any securities, markets, reports or developments referred to herein. No representation or warranty either expressed or implied is made, nor responsibility of any kind is accepted, by Boost Research or any of its respective directors, officers, employees or analysts either as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this document nor should it be relied on as such. No liability whatsoever is accepted by Boost Research or any of its respective directors, officers, employees or analysts for any loss, whether direct or consequential, arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of the recipient acting on the content of this document, including, without limitation, lost profits arising from the use of this document or any of its contents.

This document is provided with the understanding that Boost Research is not acting in a fiduciary capacity and it is not a personal recommendation to you. Investing in securities entails risks. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The value of and the income produced by products may fluctuate, so that an investor may get back less than he invested. Investments in the entities and/or the securities or other financial instruments referred to are not suitable for all investors and this document should not be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment in relation to any such investment. The stated price of any securities mentioned herein will generally be the closing price at the end of any of the three business days immediately prior to the publication date on this document. This stated price is not a representation that any transaction can be effected at this price.

Boost Research and its respective analysts are remunerated for providing investment research to professional investors, corporations, other research institutions and consultancy houses. Boost Research, or its respective directors, officers, employees and clients may have or take positions in the securities or entities mentioned in this document.  Any of these circumstances could create, or be perceived as creating, conflicts of interest. Boost Research’ analysts are not censored in any way and are free to express their personal opinions. As a result, Boost Research may have issued other documents that are inconsistent with and reach different conclusions from, the information contained in this document. Those documents reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of their authors. No director, officer or employee of Boost Research is on the board of directors of any company referenced herein and no one at any such referenced company is on the board of directors of Boost Research.

Messels is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority for the provision of investment advice. Residents of the United Kingdom should seek specific professional financial and investment advice from a stockbroker, banker, solicitor, accountant or other independent professional adviser authorised pursuant to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. This report is intended only for investors who are 'professional clients' as defined by the FCA, and may not, therefore, be redistributed to other classes of investors.

The content of this report is covered by our Policy of Independence which may be viewed at www.messels.com.

 

Analysts’ Certification

The analysts involved in the production of this document hereby certify that the views expressed in this document accurately reflect their personal views about the securities mentioned herein. The analysts point out that they may buy, sell or already have taken positions in the securities, and related financial instruments, mentioned in this document

Equity Bottom-Up

<ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/23731" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:23731:1">Vale SA (VALE US)</a> have had two major fatal dam-failures in three years</li>
<li>Possible (probable?) design flaw</li>
<li>Expect all Vale's iron ore operations to be technically audited</li>
<li>Substantial Management &amp; Board changes inevitable</li>
<li>Probability that a portion of Vale's existing operations will fail engineering inspection.</li>
<li>Forecast resultant capacity constraints</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/13" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13:1">Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU)</a>,  <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/147" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:147:1">Bhp Billiton (BHP AU)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/41" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:41:1">Fortescue Metals (FMG AU)</a> to benefit from lost production</li>
</ul>



Vale SA (VALE US) have had two major fatal dam-failures in three years
Possible (probable?) design flaw
Expect all Vale's iron ore operations to be technically audited
Substantial Management &amp; Board changes inevitable
Probability that a portion of Vale's existing operations will fail engineering inspection.
Forecast resultant capacity constraints

Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU),  Bhp Billiton (BHP AU), Fortescue Metals (FMG AU) to benefit from lost production


Vale in Trouble - Expect Rio, BHP, FMG to Benefit (Flash Note)

Over 25-yrs in Global Materials & Soft Commodities

Charles Spencer

Investment Conclusion: We recommend closing our long-<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/13" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13:1">Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU)</a>/short-<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/147" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:147:1">Bhp Billiton (BHP AU)</a> following recent trading updates from both companies which helped to narrow the previous valuation gap we identified in our Aug-18 note: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/us-20bn-in-lost-market-cap-looks-hard-to-justify-recommend-long-rio-short-bhp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:23456">US$20bn in Lost Market Cap Looks Hard to Justify: Recommend Long Rio; Short BHP</a>

Investment Conclusion:  We recommend closing our long-Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU)/short-Bhp Billiton (BHP AU) following recent trading updates from both companies which helped to narrow the previous valuation gap we identified in our Aug-18 note: US$20bn in Lost Market Cap Looks Hard to Justify: Recommend Long Rio; Short BHP

RIO & BHP:  Valuation Gap Gone; Closing Long-Rio/Short-BHP

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<ul>
<li>Quantifying nuclear statistics with substantial discrepancies</li>
<li>LT contracts &amp; speculative hoarding driving recent 40% spot price increase</li>
<li>Primary/secondary Uranium supplies currently 112% of 2017 demand</li>
<li>Uranium supply deficits extremely unlikely before 2022</li>
<li>Global Uranium demand to fall 25-40% by 2050</li>
<li> Primary Uranium sector LT SELL</li>
</ul>
We have independently audited global nuclear construction statistics in order to determine future Uranium demand.  Although near-term statistics match those in the public domain, long-term demand determined via construction pipeline illustrates substantial discrepancies.  Compiling planned plant construction, operational extensions, nameplate upgrades, versus decommissioning announcements/events, and in many cases, public policy inertia; has led us to believe that despite historical primary supply shortages, global nuclear demand peaked in 2006.
Since plateauing and despite strong Chinese growth, nuclear power generation has fallen &lt;2% over the past two decades, a decline that is predicted to accelerate as a number of developed and developing nations pursue other energy options.
The macro-trend not replacing existing nuclear infrastructure means (dependent on assumptions), according to our calculations, global uranium demand will decrease between 20 to 40% by 2050.
As opposed to signifying a fundamental change in underlying demand, we believe that recent Uranium price increases are the result of producers closing primary operations, and substituting production with purchases on the spot market to meet long-term contract obligations.  In addition, hedge funds are buying physical uranium in order to realise profits on potential future commodity price increases.  Critically, we determine that primary and secondary supplies are more than sufficient to meet forecast demand over the next four to five years; before taking into account substantial existing global uranium stocks, some of which are able to re-enter the spot market at short notice.


Quantifying nuclear statistics with substantial discrepancies
LT contracts &amp; speculative hoarding driving recent 40% spot price increase
Primary/secondary Uranium supplies currently 112% of 2017 demand
Uranium supply deficits extremely unlikely before 2022
Global Uranium demand to fall 25-40% by 2050
 Primary Uranium sector LT SELL

We have independently audited global nuclear construction statistics in order to determine future Uranium demand.  Although near-term statistics match those in the public domain, long-term demand determined via construction pipeline illustrates substantial discrepancies.  Compiling planned plant construction, operational extensions, nameplate upgrades, versus decommissioning announcements/events, and in many cases, public policy inertia; has led us to believe that despite historical primary supply shortages, global nuclear demand peaked in 2006.
Since plateauing and despite strong Chinese growth, nuclear power generation has fallen &lt;2% over the past two decades, a decline that is predicted to accelerate as a number of developed and developing nations pursue other energy options.
The macro-trend not replacing existing nuclear infrastructure means (dependent on assumptions), according to our calculations, global uranium demand will decrease between 20 to 40% by 2050.
As opposed to signifying a fundamental change in underlying demand, we believe that recent Uranium price increases are the result of producers closing primary operations, and substituting production with purchases on the spot market to meet long-term contract obligations.  In addition, hedge funds are buying physical uranium in order to realise profits on potential future commodity price increases.  Critically, we determine that primary and secondary supplies are more than sufficient to meet forecast demand over the next four to five years; before taking into account substantial existing global uranium stocks, some of which are able to re-enter the spot market at short notice.

Uranium - About to Enter Its Own Nuclear Winter

Chart based progressive global trading strategies, Chart Partners

Thomas Schroeder

Chart based progressive global trading strategies

Chart Partners

Chart Partners objective is to discover medium-term cycle turns and profit opportunities before they unfold, within structural trends while preserving capital with clear degrees of risk. We have real return ideas. 

Markets are dynamic and trading systems must reflect this. It is crucial to determine underlying correlations and lead-lag relationships within global markets and the impact on linked instruments. Our weekly Chartonics product gives you short-term trading strategies that can be applied within the medium and longer term macro trends that are mapped out in our strategy updates. 

Our methodology fuses global market variables and isolates drivers in trends. We specialize in FX, index trade in NY and Asia with a focus on Asian stocks. 

Technical Analysis

We are playing any surprise bounce via Shanghai A 50 futures and the HSCE.RIO tactical bounce trade presented.Duration defensive long set ups outlined with stops and rally targets in China Mobile and SK Telecom.KLSE bear triangle second trade in the making for a press toward 1,620/15.In Europe, Italy is lagging the break down and a prime short candidate for a break below triple lows/out of flat congestion.S&amp;P tactical break points outlined with a bounce set up in the DJI. Base case view is to short a bounce.Higher conviction pivot levels for a USD/JPY short are laid out with action turn levels and risk points.

We are playing any surprise bounce via Shanghai A 50 futures and the HSCE.RIO tactical bounce trade presented.Duration defensive long set ups outlined with stops and rally targets in China Mobile and SK Telecom.KLSE bear triangle second trade in the making for a press toward 1,620/15.In Europe, Italy is lagging the break down and a prime short candidate for a break below triple lows/out of flat congestion.S&amp;P tactical break points outlined with a bounce set up in the DJI. Base case view is to short a bounce.Higher conviction pivot levels for a USD/JPY short are laid out with action turn levels and risk points.

China Mobile and SK Telecom Defensive Plays and Top Trade Set Ups

Macro and Australian equity strategist, Macro Strategy Advisors

Shane Lee

Macro and Australian equity strategist

Macro Strategy Advisors

Cross Asset Strategy

<ul>
<li>
A Correction and Not and End-Cycle Sell-off. In our note dated 20 October – “It’s Not Over Yet, But Lift the Bar on Defence” - we argued that the global equity market sell-off was likely a correction and not the beginning of an end-cycle sell-off.  We retain this view, but think better news on trade tariffs is needed if the market is to bounce back.  The US equity market PE derating is more a fundamental adjustment to slower earnings growth rather and better news on costs would be well-received.  The Fed will probably remain unfazed by the October risk-off period, so tightening financial conditions remain a headwind for equities unless the Fed pauses. </li>
<li>
Risk-off Underpinned by Fundamentals: US reporting season has shown that underlying late-cycle cost pressure has been managed relatively well.  However, the large lift in tariffs by the Trump Administration has added to these pressures and the prospect of more tariffs is weighing on the outlook.  The BXB quarterly result showed how these forces are coming together.  Global equity markets fell by 7.3% in the month, with Japan, the US and Asian markets particularly hard hit.  The Australian market began its decline in September (-1.4%), but saw a smaller decline in October than most other developed markets (-6.1%).  Emerging markets in Latin America, apart from Brazil, were also hit hard. </li>
<li>
Cost Pressures Seem to be Modest. During AGM season management has generally guided earnings estimates for FY19 a little lower on the back of higher costs.  Industrial stocks with US operations are under cost pressure (eg. BXB), but higher oil prices are reaching into areas such as airline ticket pricing (FLT).  The Miners are in a sweet spot – production has generally been solid against the backdrop of high bulk commodity prices and a weaker Australian dollar.  The Banks are reimbursing customers for overcharging in an attempt to front-run the recommendations of the Royal Commission.</li>
<li>
The Earnings outlook Still Looks Solid. The Upgrades: downgrades ratio for the market is above average and FY19 earnings growth is tracking similar to FY18 and around 8%.  In our latest model portfolio update, we increased the number of stocks in the portfolio and bought in a defensive earnings tilt.  The Tech sector (-11.5%) was swept up in the global sell-off in the sector and our exposure to WTC has been a drag on the portfolio, but the outlook for the stock seems positive, with management upgrading FY19 guidance.</li>
<li>
The Sell-off Ramped up Short Positioning. Short positioning generally increased during the sell-off.  The most shorted stocks in the ASX 200 are JBH, ORE and GXY.  ING, CSR and IFL saw the largest increase in short positioning, while CYB, AHY and VOC saw the largest falls in short positioning.</li>
<li>
Solid Economic Data Shows the Economy is on a Solid Path. Strong employment data indicates the domestic economy is still growing above trend.  Weak building Approvals and housing finance data highlighted the softness in housing, while weak inflation data for Q3 reinforced the RBA’s rates-on-hold policy agenda.  The Miners and weak currency helped deliver a strong trade surplus in September leaving Australia’s call on global savings relatively small.</li>
</ul>



A Correction and Not and End-Cycle Sell-off. In our note dated 20 October – “It’s Not Over Yet, But Lift the Bar on Defence” - we argued that the global equity market sell-off was likely a correction and not the beginning of an end-cycle sell-off.  We retain this view, but think better news on trade tariffs is needed if the market is to bounce back.  The US equity market PE derating is more a fundamental adjustment to slower earnings growth rather and better news on costs would be well-received.  The Fed will probably remain unfazed by the October risk-off period, so tightening financial conditions remain a headwind for equities unless the Fed pauses. 

Risk-off Underpinned by Fundamentals: US reporting season has shown that underlying late-cycle cost pressure has been managed relatively well.  However, the large lift in tariffs by the Trump Administration has added to these pressures and the prospect of more tariffs is weighing on the outlook.  The BXB quarterly result showed how these forces are coming together.  Global equity markets fell by 7.3% in the month, with Japan, the US and Asian markets particularly hard hit.  The Australian market began its decline in September (-1.4%), but saw a smaller decline in October than most other developed markets (-6.1%).  Emerging markets in Latin America, apart from Brazil, were also hit hard. 

Cost Pressures Seem to be Modest. During AGM season management has generally guided earnings estimates for FY19 a little lower on the back of higher costs.  Industrial stocks with US operations are under cost pressure (eg. BXB), but higher oil prices are reaching into areas such as airline ticket pricing (FLT).  The Miners are in a sweet spot – production has generally been solid against the backdrop of high bulk commodity prices and a weaker Australian dollar.  The Banks are reimbursing customers for overcharging in an attempt to front-run the recommendations of the Royal Commission.

The Earnings outlook Still Looks Solid. The Upgrades: downgrades ratio for the market is above average and FY19 earnings growth is tracking similar to FY18 and around 8%.  In our latest model portfolio update, we increased the number of stocks in the portfolio and bought in a defensive earnings tilt.  The Tech sector (-11.5%) was swept up in the global sell-off in the sector and our exposure to WTC has been a drag on the portfolio, but the outlook for the stock seems positive, with management upgrading FY19 guidance.

The Sell-off Ramped up Short Positioning. Short positioning generally increased during the sell-off.  The most shorted stocks in the ASX 200 are JBH, ORE and GXY.  ING, CSR and IFL saw the largest increase in short positioning, while CYB, AHY and VOC saw the largest falls in short positioning.

Solid Economic Data Shows the Economy is on a Solid Path. Strong employment data indicates the domestic economy is still growing above trend.  Weak building Approvals and housing finance data highlighted the softness in housing, while weak inflation data for Q3 reinforced the RBA’s rates-on-hold policy agenda.  The Miners and weak currency helped deliver a strong trade surplus in September leaving Australia’s call on global savings relatively small.


Aussie Equities Month in Review (Oct 2018)

Australia

Rio Tinto Limited is an international mining company.  The Company has interests in mining for aluminum, borax, coal, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, silver, tin, uranium, zinc, titanium dioxide feedstock, diamonds, talc and zircon. Dually-listed company with RIO LN.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU)

Vale in Trouble - Expect Rio, BHP, FMG to Benefit (Flash Note)

Vale SA (VALE US) have had two major fatal dam-failures in three years Possible (probable?) design flaw Expect all Vale's iron ore operations to...

Boost Research

RIO & BHP: Valuation Gap Gone; Closing Long-Rio/Short-BHP

Investment Conclusion: We recommend closing our long-Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU)/short-Bhp Billiton (BHP AU) following recent trading updates from both...

Charles Spencer

Uranium - About to Enter Its Own Nuclear Winter

Quantifying nuclear statistics with substantial discrepancies LT contracts & speculative hoarding driving recent 40% spot...

Boost Research

China Mobile and SK Telecom Defensive Plays and Top Trade Set Ups

We are playing any surprise bounce via Shanghai A 50 futures and the HSCE.RIO tactical bounce trade presented.Duration defensive long set ups...

Thomas Schroeder

Aussie Equities Month in Review (Oct 2018)

A Correction and Not and End-Cycle Sell-off. In our note dated 20 October – “It’s Not Over Yet, But Lift the Bar on Defence” - we argued that the...

Shane Lee

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)