Financials Credit Analyst

Hank Calenti, CFA

CreditContinuum

Credit

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/indusind-bank-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1558:1" rel="noopener">IndusInd Bank's (IIB IN)</a> bondholders would greatly welcome advances by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kotak-mahindra-bank-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:126:1" rel="noopener">Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB IN)</a>. Trading at a discount to <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bank-of-baroda" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:545:1" rel="noopener">Bank of Baroda's (BOB IN)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/canara-bank" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:543:1" rel="noopener">Canara Bank's (CBK IN)</a> 2022 maturity notes, IndusInd’s similar maturity bond is set to compress onto these bonds. We see at least 180 basis points of upside should Kotak Mahindra acquire IndusInd Bank.Bloomberg News reported that the Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., backed by Asia’s richest banker, is exploring a takeover of IndusInd Bank Ltd., citing people with knowledge of the matter. Kotak's  pro-forma CET1 ratio would decline to approximately 11.4%, post-acquisition, based on end-June 2020 capital levels and risk-weighted asset requirements. Although materially lower than its 21.8% current level, this would still leave Kotak Mahindra Bank as one of the better capitalized banks in India’s banking system. All of this is positive for IndusInd bondholders, should this transaction move forward.These are early days in the discussions, according to news reports; however, we expect the market to price-in a potential purchase quickly. We move to Overweight on IndusInd’s 3 7/8% coupon April 2022 maturity US$-bond on this news event.

IndusInd Bank's (IIB IN) bondholders would greatly welcome advances by Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB IN). Trading at a discount to Bank of Baroda's (BOB IN) and Canara Bank's (CBK IN) 2022 maturity notes, IndusInd’s similar maturity bond is set to compress onto these bonds. We see at least 180 basis points of upside should Kotak Mahindra acquire IndusInd Bank.Bloomberg News reported that the Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., backed by Asia’s richest banker, is exploring a takeover of IndusInd Bank Ltd., citing people with knowledge of the matter. Kotak's  pro-forma CET1 ratio would decline to approximately 11.4%, post-acquisition, based on end-June 2020 capital levels and risk-weighted asset requirements. Although materially lower than its 21.8% current level, this would still leave Kotak Mahindra Bank as one of the better capitalized banks in India’s banking system. All of this is positive for IndusInd bondholders, should this transaction move forward.These are early days in the discussions, according to news reports; however, we expect the market to price-in a potential purchase quickly. We move to Overweight on IndusInd’s 3 7/8% coupon April 2022 maturity US$-bond on this news event.

Kotak + IndusInd = Happy IndusInd Bondholders; Move to Overweight

Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Independent Insight Provider

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

*Strong Results, But Managed: HDFC Bank (HDFCB.IN) [HDFCB] reported FY 2Q21 results of INR 770.3 bn, which increased INR 77.6 bn (11.2%) linked quarter. On a core operating basis, results improved INR 84.6 bn (14.5%) to INR 668.6 bn over the period. Other income drove the results outperformance;*Credit Still Breaking Down Ex-Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation directed that accounts which were not declared NPL through August 31, 2020 shall not be declared as such until further notice. On an apples-to-apples basis, we find that HDFCB’s gross NPLs increased 4.3% linked quarter. Inclusive of NCOs of INR 184 bn, we calculate that net new NPLs actually increased INR 765 bn or 22.4% on an annualized basis; and*Reserve Cover Needs Improvement: While provisions cover NCOs by 2.4x, we would be more comfortable if HDFCB was a bit more aggressive with its provisions – especially during periods when volatile sources of fee revenues gives HDFCB a gift to build reserves. By our calculation, reserves are currently short by nearly INR 680 bn or an entire quarter of core operating results.

*Strong Results, But Managed: HDFC Bank (HDFCB.IN) [HDFCB] reported FY 2Q21 results of INR 770.3 bn, which increased INR 77.6 bn (11.2%) linked quarter. On a core operating basis, results improved INR 84.6 bn (14.5%) to INR 668.6 bn over the period. Other income drove the results outperformance;*Credit Still Breaking Down Ex-Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation directed that accounts which were not declared NPL through August 31, 2020 shall not be declared as such until further notice. On an apples-to-apples basis, we find that HDFCB’s gross NPLs increased 4.3% linked quarter. Inclusive of NCOs of INR 184 bn, we calculate that net new NPLs actually increased INR 765 bn or 22.4% on an annualized basis; and*Reserve Cover Needs Improvement: While provisions cover NCOs by 2.4x, we would be more comfortable if HDFCB was a bit more aggressive with its provisions – especially during periods when volatile sources of fee revenues gives HDFCB a gift to build reserves. By our calculation, reserves are currently short by nearly INR 680 bn or an entire quarter of core operating results.   

In this, the second of several short insights in our Yes Bank Deposit Run Anniversary Series, we adjust Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) assumptions regarding likely deposit flight to the reality of what occurred at <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yes-bank-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:767:1" rel="noopener">Yes Bank (YES IN)</a> to derive “Yes-Stressed” resultant LCRs for each institution. We then assess this “Yes-Stressed” LCR relative to US$-denominated securities to see if this real liquidity is priced-in, from a credit perspective. We also consider the implications of it not being priced and conclude with whether it was Yes Bank’s missing LCR deposits that broke the bank.Approximately one-year ago, India-headquartered Yes Bank began to experience a silent run on its deposits. To mark this inauspicious anniversary, we undertake a series of short insights to determine if the funding and liquidity lessons from Yes Bank are being applied at India-headquartered banks. Spoiler alert: they are not.As we noted in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/india-bank-deposit-flight-risk-lessons-from-yes-bank" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:37617" rel="noopener">India Bank Deposit Flight Risk: Lessons from Yes Bank</a>, India-headquartered bank funding franchises are more sensitive to potential deposit flight than displayed in their quarterly financial presentations. With an undue focus on the levels of current, savings and time deposits, the discussion neglects crucial factors which lead to a stable deposit franchise. At the same, undue reliance on Liquidity Coverage Ratios is not warranted.In our first insight on this matter, we derived the amount of stable deposits and compared this to deposit costs at each major India-headquartered bank. We then assessed these items relative to US$-denominated securities to see if they are priced-in, from a credit perspective. Please see <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/india-headquartered-banks-stable-deposits-and-costs-1-year-after-the-yes-bank-silent-run" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:43981" rel="noopener">India-Headquartered Banks: Stable Deposits and Costs 1-Year After the Yes Bank Silent Run</a> for more details. In follow-up insights, we intent to incorporate deposits that are not captured in LCR reports and then further stress the reported LCRs for possible Covid-19 related payment delinquencies.

In this, the second of several short insights in our Yes Bank Deposit Run Anniversary Series, we adjust Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) assumptions regarding likely deposit flight to the reality of what occurred at Yes Bank (YES IN) to derive “Yes-Stressed” resultant LCRs for each institution. We then assess this “Yes-Stressed” LCR relative to US$-denominated securities to see if this real liquidity is priced-in, from a credit perspective. We also consider the implications of it not being priced and conclude with whether it was Yes Bank’s missing LCR deposits that broke the bank.Approximately one-year ago, India-headquartered Yes Bank began to experience a silent run on its deposits. To mark this inauspicious anniversary, we undertake a series of short insights to determine if the funding and liquidity lessons from Yes Bank are being applied at India-headquartered banks. Spoiler alert: they are not.As we noted in India Bank Deposit Flight Risk: Lessons from Yes Bank, India-headquartered bank funding franchises are more sensitive to potential deposit flight than displayed in their quarterly financial presentations. With an undue focus on the levels of current, savings and time deposits, the discussion neglects crucial factors which lead to a stable deposit franchise. At the same, undue reliance on Liquidity Coverage Ratios is not warranted.In our first insight on this matter, we derived the amount of stable deposits and compared this to deposit costs at each major India-headquartered bank. We then assessed these items relative to US$-denominated securities to see if they are priced-in, from a credit perspective. Please see India-Headquartered Banks: Stable Deposits and Costs 1-Year After the Yes Bank Silent Run for more details. In follow-up insights, we intent to incorporate deposits that are not captured in LCR reports and then further stress the reported LCRs for possible Covid-19 related payment delinquencies. 

India-Headquartered Banks: Yes-Stressed Deposit Flight Simulation

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

*Capital Forbearance and Liquidity Moves: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced several measures designed to further improve banking system liquidity and capital at its latest monetary policy meeting; and *Additional Measures: The RBI was kind enough to extend other programs as well: a) Real Time Gross Settlement System (RTGS), used for large value transactions, is to be made available 24 hours per day; extension of the 2018 co-origination scheme; and the granting of a certificate of authorization to all PSOs (both new and existing) on a perpetual basis.

*Capital Forbearance and Liquidity Moves: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced several measures designed to further improve banking system liquidity and capital at its latest monetary policy meeting; and *Additional Measures: The RBI was kind enough to extend other programs as well: a) Real Time Gross Settlement System (RTGS), used for large value transactions, is to be made available 24 hours per day; extension of the 2018 co-origination scheme; and the granting of a certificate of authorization to all PSOs (both new and existing) on a perpetual basis. 

Reserve Bank of India – Greasing The Skid

Approximately one-year ago, India-headquartered <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yes-bank-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:767:1" rel="noopener">Yes Bank (YES IN)</a> began to experience a silent run on its deposits. Several months later, this deposit run took the institution past the point of non-viability. To mark this inauspicious anniversary, we undertake a series of short insights to determine if the funding and liquidity lessons from Yes Bank are being applied at India-headquartered banks. Spoiler alert: they are not.As we noted in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/india-bank-deposit-flight-risk-lessons-from-yes-bank" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:37617" rel="noopener">Deposit Flight Risk: Lessons from Yes Bank</a>, India-headquartered bank funding franchises are more sensitive to potential deposit flight than displayed in their quarterly financial presentations. With an undue focus on the levels of current, savings and time deposits, the discussion neglects crucial factors which lead to a stable deposit franchise. At the same, undue reliance on Liquidity Coverage Ratios (LCRs) is not warranted.We inaugurate this Yes Bank Deposit Run Anniversary Series by assessing the level of stable deposits and deposit costs. We then compare these items at each US$-issuing bank to see if they are priced-in, from a credit perspective. In follow-up insights, we adjust the assumptions regarding likely deposit flight by type of deposit, incorporate deposits that are not captured in LCR reports and stress the reported LCRs for possible Covid-19 related payment delinquencies while assessing the credit-worthiness of India-headquartered banks.

Approximately one-year ago, India-headquartered Yes Bank (YES IN) began to experience a silent run on its deposits. Several months later, this deposit run took the institution past the point of non-viability. To mark this inauspicious anniversary, we undertake a series of short insights to determine if the funding and liquidity lessons from Yes Bank are being applied at India-headquartered banks. Spoiler alert: they are not.As we noted in Deposit Flight Risk: Lessons from Yes Bank, India-headquartered bank funding franchises are more sensitive to potential deposit flight than displayed in their quarterly financial presentations. With an undue focus on the levels of current, savings and time deposits, the discussion neglects crucial factors which lead to a stable deposit franchise. At the same, undue reliance on Liquidity Coverage Ratios (LCRs) is not warranted.We inaugurate this Yes Bank Deposit Run Anniversary Series by assessing the level of stable deposits and deposit costs. We then compare these items at each US$-issuing bank to see if they are priced-in, from a credit perspective. In follow-up insights, we adjust the assumptions regarding likely deposit flight by type of deposit, incorporate deposits that are not captured in LCR reports and stress the reported LCRs for possible Covid-19 related payment delinquencies while assessing the credit-worthiness of India-headquartered banks.

India-Headquartered Banks: Stable Deposits and Costs 1-Year After the Yes Bank Silent Run

India

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited is a full service commercial bank. The Bank offers a wide range of products and services such as personal, commercial, and corporate banking services, including deposit accounts, loans, and investments. Kotak Mahindra Bank serves customers in India.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB IN)

Kotak + IndusInd = Happy IndusInd Bondholders; Move to Overweight

IndusInd bondholders would greatly welcome advances by Kotak Mahindra Bank. Trading at a discount to Bank of Baroda's and Canara Bank’s securities,...

Hank Calenti, CFA

HDFC Bank – Not A Great Quarter

HDFC Bank: Improved Bottom-line Clouded By Supreme Court Ruling On Credit Quality Calculations. Reserve Cover Lower Than On/Off Balance Sheet Risk...

Thomas J. Monaco

India-Headquartered Banks: Yes-Stressed Deposit Flight Simulation

In this 2'nd insight in our Yes Bank Deposit Run Anniversary Series, we apply Yes Bank deposit flight rates to derive “Yes-Stressed” LCRs at India...

Hank Calenti, CFA

Reserve Bank of India – Greasing The Skid

*Capital Forbearance and Liquidity Moves: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced several measures designed to further improve banking system...

Thomas J. Monaco

India-Headquartered Banks: Stable Deposits and Costs 1-Year After the Yes Bank Silent Run

Approximately one-year ago, India-headquartered Yes Bank began to experience a silent run on its deposits. To mark this inauspicious anniversary,...

Hank Calenti, CFA

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)