Overseas Chinese Equities, Aequitas Research

Ming Lu

Overseas Chinese Equities

IPOs and Placements coverage across Asia Pacific

Aequitas Research

We cover all listing across the Asia Pacific along with follow-up placements. As of Dec 2020, our team had covered 539 IPOs with a hit rate of 73.5% and 685 placements with a hit rate of 66.8%.

We combine fundamental bottom-up views with our proprietary quantitative framework to provide a holistic coverage across new listings and placements. Our coverage includes pre-IPO notes before the deal is launched, follow-up analysis once the deal is live and post-listing trading analysis as well.

Equity Bottom-Up

Alibaba Group Holding  / Equity Bottom-Up

<ul>
<li>State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) fined Alibaba RMB18 billion.</li>
<li>Alibaba had forced retailers to leave competitors via an “either-or” choice since 2015.</li>
<li>The penalty amount is not significant to Alibaba.</li>
<li>We believe that the penalty is just part of SAMR’s action after the new law, but not especially against Alibaba.</li>
<li>We do not believe the penalty will impact Alibaba’s long-term value.</li>
<li>We set an upside of 37% and a price target of USD$306 according to the 3-year P/E average.</li>
</ul>
Our previous coverage on Alibaba:
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/alibaba-baba-many-positive-signals-in-december-quarter-27-upside" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:47726" rel="noopener">Alibaba (BABA): Many Positive Signals in December Quarter, 27% Upside</a>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/alibaba-baba-this-online-antitrust-wave-a-risk-but-not-a-massacre" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:46377" rel="noopener">Alibaba (BABA): This Online Antitrust Wave, A Risk, But Not A Massacre</a>


State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) fined Alibaba RMB18 billion.
Alibaba had forced retailers to leave competitors via an “either-or” choice since 2015.
The penalty amount is not significant to Alibaba.
We believe that the penalty is just part of SAMR’s action after the new law, but not especially against Alibaba.
We do not believe the penalty will impact Alibaba’s long-term value.
We set an upside of 37% and a price target of USD$306 according to the 3-year P/E average.

Our previous coverage on Alibaba:
Alibaba (BABA): Many Positive Signals in December Quarter, 27% Upside
Alibaba (BABA): This Online Antitrust Wave, A Risk, But Not A Massacre 

Alibaba (BABA): Fined $2.78 Billion for “Either Or”, But Impact Is Neither Big Nor Long Term

Global TMT analyst with Asia ex-Japan focus.

Mitchell Kim

Chinese regulators announced a record fine for <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> amounting to USD2.75 billion for violations related to antitrust regulations.  While the final amount for the fine was previously unknown, the fine itself is not a surprise.  We believe this is a positive outcome for Alibaba: <ol>
<li>
We did not see any hint of additional rectifications related to AML (Anti-monopoly law) other than the penalty amount. (Alibaba has already pledged to modify its "exclusivity" practice to allow for merchants to have greater freedom to list their products on multiple platforms. Share overhang related to this issue should dissipate. 
</li>
<li>
Alibaba could have been penalized more severely (as much as 10% of its revenues for antitrust violations).  The penalty amount represents only about 3.5% of Alibaba's FY20 revenues (4% of CY2019 revenues).</li>
<li>The lower-than-expected fine amount appears to signal that the regulators are not trying to excessively debilitate the industry.  </li>
</ol>We have highlighted the AML and the consumer lending regulation risks to be key share overhang on the BABA shares in our February report, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/alibaba-baba-us-ant-group-woes-overly-priced-in" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:48648" rel="noopener">Alibaba (BABA US): Ant Group Woes Overly Priced-In</a>.   We believe BABA shares are undervalued due to the overhang.  The latest regulatory announcement signals the lifting of share overhang related to AML, in our view.

Chinese regulators announced a record fine for Alibaba Group (BABA US) amounting to USD2.75 billion for violations related to antitrust regulations.  While the final amount for the fine was previously unknown, the fine itself is not a surprise.  We believe this is a positive outcome for Alibaba: 

We did not see any hint of additional rectifications related to AML (Anti-monopoly law) other than the penalty amount. (Alibaba has already pledged to modify its "exclusivity" practice to allow for merchants to have greater freedom to list their products on multiple platforms. Share overhang related to this issue should dissipate. 


Alibaba could have been penalized more severely (as much as 10% of its revenues for antitrust violations).  The penalty amount represents only about 3.5% of Alibaba's FY20 revenues (4% of CY2019 revenues).
The lower-than-expected fine amount appears to signal that the regulators are not trying to excessively debilitate the industry.  
We have highlighted the AML and the consumer lending regulation risks to be key share overhang on the BABA shares in our February report, Alibaba (BABA US): Ant Group Woes Overly Priced-In.   We believe BABA shares are undervalued due to the overhang.  The latest regulatory announcement signals the lifting of share overhang related to AML, in our view.  

Alibaba (BABA US): Record Fine - Grin and Bear It as Better Days Are Ahead

Financials & FinTech research, Galliano’s Financials Research

Victor Galliano

Financials & FinTech research

Financials & FinTech, EM & Developed Markets

Galliano’s Financials Research

Galliano's Financials Research provides fundamental research in Emerging Markets financials, including FinTech, as well as financials in select Developed Markets.

The investment style applied is generally value oriented, although Growth At Reasonable Price (GARP) strategies can also be used where appropriate. 

Our investment research approach aim is often contrarian, looking to capitalise on overly sceptical or optimistic consensus views. In terms of valuation techniques, the focus is on PBV ratio to ROE, PE multiples and dividend yield, as well as the application of PEG ratios and, where appropriate, Sum of the Parts (SOTP) valuations.

<ul>
<li>SAMR’s RMB18.2bn fine for abuse of market dominance could potentially be seen as a watershed marking that the worst of regulatory risk is past</li>
<li>In terms of Alibaba’s relative share performance, since the start of November 2020, it has clearly underperformed Tencent as well as Meituan and Pinduoduo</li>
<li>Relative to these peers, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> trades at a discount on the core valuation metrics; versus its closest competitor <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tencent-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26:1" rel="noopener">Tencent Holdings (700 HK)</a> , Alibaba trades at a 28% discount to 2022E PE multiple and at a 21% discount to 2022E EV/EBITDA ratio</li>
<li>Nonetheless, in terms of long term growth potential, Alibaba’s PEG ratio discount of 5% to Tencent is low</li>
<li>In our view, Alibaba’s outlook, especially relating to regulatory risks, remain unclear, especially with regard to the future of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ant-group-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:24240:1" rel="noopener">Ant Financial Services Group (6688 HK)</a>, its value and its potential IPO</li>
<li>Risks to our bearish view on Alibaba include a better than expected performance versus its core competitors and a fast resolution to regulatory risks with SAMR</li>
</ul>


SAMR’s RMB18.2bn fine for abuse of market dominance could potentially be seen as a watershed marking that the worst of regulatory risk is past
In terms of Alibaba’s relative share performance, since the start of November 2020, it has clearly underperformed Tencent as well as Meituan and Pinduoduo
Relative to these peers, Alibaba Group (BABA US) trades at a discount on the core valuation metrics; versus its closest competitor Tencent Holdings (700 HK) , Alibaba trades at a 28% discount to 2022E PE multiple and at a 21% discount to 2022E EV/EBITDA ratio
Nonetheless, in terms of long term growth potential, Alibaba’s PEG ratio discount of 5% to Tencent is low
In our view, Alibaba’s outlook, especially relating to regulatory risks, remain unclear, especially with regard to the future of Ant Financial Services Group (6688 HK), its value and its potential IPO
Risks to our bearish view on Alibaba include a better than expected performance versus its core competitors and a fast resolution to regulatory risks with SAMR


Alibaba (BABA) Fine – Close, but No Cigar

Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Independent Insight Provider

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

*Focus On Positives: Given the scrutiny that Tencent Holdings (700.HK) [Tencent] has come under, it comes as no surprise that Tencent wanted to highlight its positive developments such as international expansion and tailwinds in gaming, potential ad load expansion in Video Accounts, and Mini Programs enrichment; and*Elephant In The Room: Over time, it is our belief that Tencent likely will be required to create a financial holding company for all of its banking, insurance, and payment services businesses – and be regulated along the lines of the banking sector. For Tencent, WeChat Pay and the broader lending/deposit taking business are likely to be reined-in. No matter what spin that Tencent wants to place on its other businesses, an FHC represents significant downside risks.

*Focus On Positives: Given the scrutiny that Tencent Holdings (700.HK) [Tencent] has come under, it comes as no surprise that Tencent wanted to highlight its positive developments such as international expansion and tailwinds in gaming, potential ad load expansion in Video Accounts, and Mini Programs enrichment; and*Elephant In The Room: Over time, it is our belief that Tencent likely will be required to create a financial holding company for all of its banking, insurance, and payment services businesses – and be regulated along the lines of the banking sector. For Tencent, WeChat Pay and the broader lending/deposit taking business are likely to be reined-in. No matter what spin that Tencent wants to place on its other businesses, an FHC represents significant downside risks.

China and US Equity Analyst

Roger Xie

<ul>
<li>HKEx is rising as a global trading venue as secondary-listing Chinese companies are moving to swap their US ADRs to Hong Kong shares. Since <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> pioneered the secondary listing scheme in Hong Kong in 2018, the share fungibility has opened the door for swapping its US ADR to Hong Kong. We estimated that 20% of outstanding shares of Alibaba have been moved to Hong Kong.</li>
<li>Some top institutional investors, such as Temasek, Baillie Gifford, and Matthews Asia, are among the major shareholders that have swapped stakes in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> US ADRs. This has reflected some strategic consideration to  avoid US sanction and delisting of Chinese tech companies. We expect this trend will likely accelerate in the future. For current 13 dual-listing Chinese ADRs, we expect 30% of total trading volume will be shifted to Hong Kong from US in next 2 years. This is a significant jump from around 18% of trading volume at Hong Kong now. Dual-listing Chinese ADRs at Hong Kong will likely accelerate as well. </li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hong-kong-exchanges-clearing" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:490:1" rel="noopener">HKEX (388 HK)</a>  serves as the only offshore gateway to China capital market. HKEx has consistently enjoyed the superior margin and profitability, given that it can charge higher trading fee rates than other bourses. We forecast Securities ADT of HK$240bn in FY 21 (Hong Kong and Stock Connect Northbound). Given the acceleration of US ADRs conversion, there is risk to the upside of the Securities ADT forecast. We continue to favor <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hong-kong-exchanges-clearing" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:490:1" rel="noopener">HKEX (388 HK)</a> and reiterate HKEx TP HKD 550. </li>
</ul>


HKEx is rising as a global trading venue as secondary-listing Chinese companies are moving to swap their US ADRs to Hong Kong shares. Since Alibaba Group (BABA US) pioneered the secondary listing scheme in Hong Kong in 2018, the share fungibility has opened the door for swapping its US ADR to Hong Kong. We estimated that 20% of outstanding shares of Alibaba have been moved to Hong Kong.
Some top institutional investors, such as Temasek, Baillie Gifford, and Matthews Asia, are among the major shareholders that have swapped stakes in Alibaba Group (BABA US) US ADRs. This has reflected some strategic consideration to  avoid US sanction and delisting of Chinese tech companies. We expect this trend will likely accelerate in the future. For current 13 dual-listing Chinese ADRs, we expect 30% of total trading volume will be shifted to Hong Kong from US in next 2 years. This is a significant jump from around 18% of trading volume at Hong Kong now. Dual-listing Chinese ADRs at Hong Kong will likely accelerate as well. 

HKEX (388 HK)  serves as the only offshore gateway to China capital market. HKEx has consistently enjoyed the superior margin and profitability, given that it can charge higher trading fee rates than other bourses. We forecast Securities ADT of HK$240bn in FY 21 (Hong Kong and Stock Connect Northbound). Given the acceleration of US ADRs conversion, there is risk to the upside of the Securities ADT forecast. We continue to favor HKEX (388 HK) and reiterate HKEx TP HKD 550. 


Hong Kong Market: Conversion of US ADRs Will Boost HKEx as Global Trading Venue

China

PDD Holdings Inc. is a multinational commerce group that owns and operates a portfolio of businesses. The Company focuses on digital economy so that local communities and small businesses can benefit from the increased productivity and new opportunities. PDD Holdings has built a network of sourcing, logistics, and fulfillment capabilities for its underlying businesses.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

PDD Holdings (PDD US)

Alibaba (BABA): Fined $2.78 Billion for “Either Or”, But Impact Is Neither Big Nor Long Term

The penalty amount is not significant to Alibaba. We believe the penalty is just part of authorities’ action after the new law, but not especially...

Ming Lu

Alibaba (BABA US): Record Fine - Grin and Bear It as Better Days Are Ahead

A record-setting fine related to the antitrust violations was imposed on Alibaba on Friday. Find out why we think this is a positive outcome for...

Mitchell Kim

Alibaba (BABA) Fine – Close, but No Cigar

SAMR's fine on Alibaba is a positive step in the process of resolving regulatory risk, but we are not there yet, in our view; unresolved issues...

Victor Galliano

Tencent Holdings – What Wasn’t Said

TENCENT HOLDINGS: Tencent receives a premium valuation which will be eroded over time, as it likely will be required to create an FHC. No matter...

Thomas J. Monaco

Hong Kong Market: Conversion of US ADRs Will Boost HKEx as Global Trading Venue

We expect 30% of total dual-list China ADR trading volume will be shifted to Hong Kong from US in next 2 years, a significant jump from current...

Roger Xie

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)