Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

David Blennerhassett

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

After submitting a confidential, non-binding, indicative all-scrip merger proposal to <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/oil-search-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:773:1" rel="noopener">Oil Search Ltd (OSH AU)</a>'s board on the 25 June, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/santos-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:711:1" rel="noopener">Santos Ltd (STO AU)</a> <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02402372-2A1313090?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">bumped</a> the scrip consideration on the 2 August by 6.5% to 0.6275 new Santos shares for every OSH share.  This would give OSH's shareholders 38.5% of the merger group. The implied transaction price of A$4.52/share  - if using Santos price on the 24 June - is a 19.7% premium to the undisturbed price.  The OSH board recommended the Offer in the absence of superior proposal, and due diligence was afforded.
This morning, Santos and OSH <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02420086-2A1322734?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">entered into</a> a definitive agreement to merge the two companies in an all-scrip transaction. The scrip ratio remains unchanged. 
The OSH board has unanimously recommended shareholders vote in favour of the merger in the absence of a superior proposal.
The merger would create a major regional player with a pro-forma market cap of ~A$21bn. Santos expects the merger to unlock pre-tax synergies of US$90-115mn per annum.
The merger is subject to OSH shareholder approval, regulatory approvals, and Papua New Guinea (PNG) court approval.
It's that last approval that could prove to be a sticking point.  
Santos has a 13.5% interest in PNG LNG, behind <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/exxon-mobil-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:811:1" rel="noopener">Exxon Mobil (XOM US)</a>'s 33.2% and OSH's 29%. OSH also holds a 22.8% interest in Papua LNG, a brownfield LNG growth opportunity.
In a recently completed <a href="https://www.coiubsl.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">royal commission</a> involving complex UBS loans, the bank maintained the fees it charged the PNG government to borrow $1.2bn in 2014 to purchase a 10.1% stake in OSH were appropriate. The PNG government was compelled to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/papua-oil-search-idUSL4N1M23EF" target="_blank" rel="noopener">sell</a> that stake in 2017 when OSH's shares fell and it did not have the necessary funds to put up extra capital for the loan. Contrary to PNG's former PM comments that it made A$39mn on the deal, the commission heard PNG lost US$432mn. 
In <a href="https://skr.ma/epYxh" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Santos/Oil Search: Getting Facts Straight</a>, I wondered if this less-than-satisfactory situation might resurface in any government approval process for a Santos/OSH merger.
In various media articles, Deputy Prime Minister Samuel Basil said this week:
<blockquote>
If the merger will result in the weakening of any Papua New Guinean shareholders or shareholder interests, reduction in market liquidity, potential for job losses, potential delisting from PNGX, and loss of local ownership of the company assets to a foreign interest, it is not in PNG’s national interest.
</blockquote>
Such a statement raises the stakes after PNG's PM James Marapoe's earlier <a href="https://www.pmnec.gov.pg/index.php/secretariats/pm-media-statements/336-pm-marape-says-government-is-closely-monitoring-a-proposed-acquisition-of-oil-search-limited" target="_blank" rel="noopener">comments</a> back in August that:
<blockquote>
Oil Search Limited is a prominent PNG company whose activities comprise a significant percentage of PNG’s GDP and provides the livelihood to thousands of Papua New Guineans both directly and indirectly. Any proposed merger must satisfy the national interest test.
</blockquote>
OSH (incorporated in PNG) is listed in both Australia and PNG, however, Santos is only listed in Australia. OSH has around 5,000 PNG shareholders according to Basil.
Should the merger complete, and OSH is delisted - taking with it almost one-third of PNG's market cap - domestic shareholders will have no option but to acquire and trade their shares in Australia, an activity compounded by foreign exchange restrictions. Unless Santos plans to list the merged entity in PNG. 
Basil continues:
<blockquote>
The Board of Oil Search and Santos must explicitly inform Papua New Guinea their plans for PNG capital market development in the context of this merger. Our concern derives from the possibility that PNG will incur significant detriment in the oil and gas sector to a foreign company. It is equal to losing our sovereignty in the oil and gas industry where PNG will have no control over it.
</blockquote>
Put another way: should PNG investment funds re-domicile in Australia, PNG local investors will be cut off from investing (via Santos and OSH) in PNG's large PNG projects.
More below the fold.

After submitting a confidential, non-binding, indicative all-scrip merger proposal to Oil Search Ltd (OSH AU)'s board on the 25 June, Santos Ltd (STO AU) bumped the scrip consideration on the 2 August by 6.5% to 0.6275 new Santos shares for every OSH share.  This would give OSH's shareholders 38.5% of the merger group. The implied transaction price of A$4.52/share  - if using Santos price on the 24 June - is a 19.7% premium to the undisturbed price.  The OSH board recommended the Offer in the absence of superior proposal, and due diligence was afforded.
This morning, Santos and OSH entered into a definitive agreement to merge the two companies in an all-scrip transaction. The scrip ratio remains unchanged. 
The OSH board has unanimously recommended shareholders vote in favour of the merger in the absence of a superior proposal.
The merger would create a major regional player with a pro-forma market cap of ~A$21bn. Santos expects the merger to unlock pre-tax synergies of US$90-115mn per annum.
The merger is subject to OSH shareholder approval, regulatory approvals, and Papua New Guinea (PNG) court approval.
It's that last approval that could prove to be a sticking point.  
Santos has a 13.5% interest in PNG LNG, behind Exxon Mobil (XOM US)'s 33.2% and OSH's 29%. OSH also holds a 22.8% interest in Papua LNG, a brownfield LNG growth opportunity.
In a recently completed royal commission involving complex UBS loans, the bank maintained the fees it charged the PNG government to borrow $1.2bn in 2014 to purchase a 10.1% stake in OSH were appropriate. The PNG government was compelled to sell that stake in 2017 when OSH's shares fell and it did not have the necessary funds to put up extra capital for the loan. Contrary to PNG's former PM comments that it made A$39mn on the deal, the commission heard PNG lost US$432mn. 
In Santos/Oil Search: Getting Facts Straight, I wondered if this less-than-satisfactory situation might resurface in any government approval process for a Santos/OSH merger.
In various media articles, Deputy Prime Minister Samuel Basil said this week:

If the merger will result in the weakening of any Papua New Guinean shareholders or shareholder interests, reduction in market liquidity, potential for job losses, potential delisting from PNGX, and loss of local ownership of the company assets to a foreign interest, it is not in PNG’s national interest.

Such a statement raises the stakes after PNG's PM James Marapoe's earlier comments back in August that:

Oil Search Limited is a prominent PNG company whose activities comprise a significant percentage of PNG’s GDP and provides the livelihood to thousands of Papua New Guineans both directly and indirectly. Any proposed merger must satisfy the national interest test.

OSH (incorporated in PNG) is listed in both Australia and PNG, however, Santos is only listed in Australia. OSH has around 5,000 PNG shareholders according to Basil.
Should the merger complete, and OSH is delisted - taking with it almost one-third of PNG's market cap - domestic shareholders will have no option but to acquire and trade their shares in Australia, an activity compounded by foreign exchange restrictions. Unless Santos plans to list the merged entity in PNG. 
Basil continues:

The Board of Oil Search and Santos must explicitly inform Papua New Guinea their plans for PNG capital market development in the context of this merger. Our concern derives from the possibility that PNG will incur significant detriment in the oil and gas sector to a foreign company. It is equal to losing our sovereignty in the oil and gas industry where PNG will have no control over it.

Put another way: should PNG investment funds re-domicile in Australia, PNG local investors will be cut off from investing (via Santos and OSH) in PNG's large PNG projects.
More below the fold.

Oil Search/Santos: PNG a Potential Party Pooper

China Logistics Property Holdings / Event-Driven

<div>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-logistics-property-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22799:1" rel="noopener">China Logistics Property Holdings (1589 HK)</a> (CLPH) has <a href="https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2021/0903/2021090300814.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> its chairman, Li Shifa, has entered into an S&amp;P Agreement with <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/jd-com-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:29043:1" rel="noopener">JD.com Inc. (9618 HK)</a>, to sell his 26.38% stake in CLPH at a price of $4.35/share.
Provided conditions to the S&amp;P are fulfilled, and with JD.com currently holding 10.64%, it would be obligated to make a Mandatory General Offer (MGO) - also at HK$4.35/share.
The key S&amp;P condition is approval from China's AML (Anti-Monopoly Law) Authority.
The key condition to the MGO becoming unconditional is JD.com holding 50% of the voting rights in CLPH. RRJ Capital, Joy Orient, and Dajia Baoxian have given irrevocables to tender in their 21.94%, 3.3%, and 4.14% respective stakes.
This all looks pretty clean.
The pushback is that when CLPH <a href="https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2020/1229/2020122901322.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> on the 29 December 2020 Li and RRJ Capital were "conducting a preliminary strategic review of their stakes", indicating a possible change of control for the company, the pre-announcement share price was HK$3.90. Therefore the Offer Price is an 11.5% premium to the undisturbed price. Many investors thought a $4.50+ handle was more in keeping with this space which has been garnering significant attention.
The Offer price will not be increased. 
Still, as one reader put it, they're just happy to get this slow-burning deal off their books.
More below the fold.
</div>


China Logistics Property Holdings (1589 HK) (CLPH) has announced its chairman, Li Shifa, has entered into an S&amp;P Agreement with JD.com Inc. (9618 HK), to sell his 26.38% stake in CLPH at a price of $4.35/share.
Provided conditions to the S&amp;P are fulfilled, and with JD.com currently holding 10.64%, it would be obligated to make a Mandatory General Offer (MGO) - also at HK$4.35/share.
The key S&amp;P condition is approval from China's AML (Anti-Monopoly Law) Authority.
The key condition to the MGO becoming unconditional is JD.com holding 50% of the voting rights in CLPH. RRJ Capital, Joy Orient, and Dajia Baoxian have given irrevocables to tender in their 21.94%, 3.3%, and 4.14% respective stakes.
This all looks pretty clean.
The pushback is that when CLPH announced on the 29 December 2020 Li and RRJ Capital were "conducting a preliminary strategic review of their stakes", indicating a possible change of control for the company, the pre-announcement share price was HK$3.90. Therefore the Offer Price is an 11.5% premium to the undisturbed price. Many investors thought a $4.50+ handle was more in keeping with this space which has been garnering significant attention.
The Offer price will not be increased. 
Still, as one reader put it, they're just happy to get this slow-burning deal off their books.
More below the fold.


China Logistics (1589 HK): JD.com's Offer Comes Up Short

Dental surgery chain <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/1300-smiles-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:11112:1" rel="noopener">1300 Smiles Ltd (ONT AU)</a> has <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02410735-2A1317455?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> it has entered into a Scheme Implementation Agreement with BGH/OTPPB-backed Abano Healthcare.
Abano is offering $8/share to non-founder shareholders, less any special dividends.
Non-founder shareholders (meaning Daryl Holmes), who hold ~59.8% of shares out will receive $6.33/share. These shareholders also have the right to roll over 26.2% of their shares - or ~15.7% - and they have indicated their intention. Therefore the Scheme is for ~84% of shares out.
Elleston Capital, holding 7.1% of shares out, intends to vote in favour of the Scheme.
The Scheme is also subject to FIRB approval.
No definitive timetable was provided, by presumably this transaction could be wrapped up late November, early December,
More below the fold.

Dental surgery chain 1300 Smiles Ltd (ONT AU) has announced it has entered into a Scheme Implementation Agreement with BGH/OTPPB-backed Abano Healthcare.
Abano is offering $8/share to non-founder shareholders, less any special dividends.
Non-founder shareholders (meaning Daryl Holmes), who hold ~59.8% of shares out will receive $6.33/share. These shareholders also have the right to roll over 26.2% of their shares - or ~15.7% - and they have indicated their intention. Therefore the Scheme is for ~84% of shares out.
Elleston Capital, holding 7.1% of shares out, intends to vote in favour of the Scheme.
The Scheme is also subject to FIRB approval.
No definitive timetable was provided, by presumably this transaction could be wrapped up late November, early December,
More below the fold. 

1300Smiles (ONT AU): BGH Sinks Its Teeth In

<div>
Back on the 26 February this year, Huon <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02347852-3A562617?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> a loss of A$95.3mn for the 1H21, including a non-impairment charge of A$113.9mn. In a <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02336871-3A560489?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">market update</a> earlier that month, Huon said salmon prices had declined ~40% relative to the first six months of 2020. Concurrent with its 1H21 results, Huon said the board has initiated a strategic review to assess the potential for corporate-level transactions for the benefit of shareholders. In a follow-up announcement on the <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02387935-3A569418?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">25 June</a>, Huon said that strategic review remained ongoing. 
</div>
<div>
The most likely outcome of the review was a take-private transaction, however, an auction process dragged on, with a number of bidders pulling out on account of pricing. 
On the 6 August, Huon <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02404691-3A572314?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> a firm Offer, by way of a Scheme, with  Brazil's <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/jbs-sa" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:24455:1" rel="noopener">JBS SA (JBSS3 BZ)</a>. Huon shareholders would receive A$3.85/share in cash. A fully-franked dividend of $0.0125/share - if paid - will be netted.
The cash price was a 61% premium to the last close, before the strategic review was announced on the 26 February. The Bender family with 53% of shares out intend to vote all of their shares in support of the Scheme, in the absence of a superior offer. The Offer also required approval from FIRB.
Apart from FIRB signing off - no small ask given JBS had fallen foul of US regulators recently - this looked like a done deal, with possible completion in November. 
</div>
<div>
But Andrew Forrest's family fund Tattarang had other plans and promptly upped its stake to <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02405676-3A572494?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">18.51%</a> on the 10 August from 7.33% at the time of the SID announcement. That current stake all but blocks a Scheme. 
Not to be outdone,  JBS announced a parallel takeover bid on the <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02406953-3A572757?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">13 August</a>. This second Offer is conditional on 50.1% acceptances from shareholders.  With the Bender's stake, that Offer is effectively done - barring FIRB rejection. The Bender family also entered in a pre-bid acceptance agreement for 19.9% of shares out. 
It was unclear at the time whether Forrest was trying to block JBS in Huon or just looking for a better price.
In various media advertisements last Friday, Forrest <a href="https://www.harvestroad.com/its-time-to-commit-a-public-challenge-to-jbs-from-dr-andrew-forrest-ao/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">called on</a> JBS to commit to the same principles as Tattarang’s agri-food business, Harvest Road, and its beef processing company, Harvey Beef.
<div>
<blockquote>
For a small expense and through good management at Harvey Beef, we have established a clear No Pain No Fear framework in the critical stages of cattle processing as part of our ambition to exceed animal welfare standards and create a path for others to follow.
This means our customers don’t have to compromise their values when they choose to buy our products.
Animals provide humans with a valuable source of protein, the least we can do is respect this by ensuring they are treated with the utmost care.
As the world’s biggest protein producer, JBS can rise to this same standard.
</blockquote>
Not altogether surprisingly, JBS took umbrage with this challenge, saying it already adheres to high standards in its animal handling. As did Huon. 
Huon <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02409974-3A573426?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">said</a> this morning...   that it has been...
<blockquote>
uncompromising in its commitment to the highest standards of animal husbandry, biosecurity, environmental management, and sustainable farming practices. Huon remains the only seafood producer in Australia to achieve RSPCA Approved Farming certification and firmly believes its sustainable salmon farming practices can be benchmarked against the best standards in the world.
</blockquote>
</div>
Huon also added Tattarang had earlier expressed interest in Huon and submitted a non-binding and conditional indicative offer. Tattarang was invited to participate further in the strategic review process but declined to do so. Tattarang’s non-binding and conditional indicative offer was at a material discount to JBS’s $3.85 offer.
Oddly, Huon is trading almost at terms. Given the non-negligible risk FIRB blocks the deal, I would avoid shares here.
More below the fold. 

</div>


Back on the 26 February this year, Huon announced a loss of A$95.3mn for the 1H21, including a non-impairment charge of A$113.9mn. In a market update earlier that month, Huon said salmon prices had declined ~40% relative to the first six months of 2020. Concurrent with its 1H21 results, Huon said the board has initiated a strategic review to assess the potential for corporate-level transactions for the benefit of shareholders. In a follow-up announcement on the 25 June, Huon said that strategic review remained ongoing. 


The most likely outcome of the review was a take-private transaction, however, an auction process dragged on, with a number of bidders pulling out on account of pricing. 
On the 6 August, Huon announced a firm Offer, by way of a Scheme, with  Brazil's JBS SA (JBSS3 BZ). Huon shareholders would receive A$3.85/share in cash. A fully-franked dividend of $0.0125/share - if paid - will be netted.
The cash price was a 61% premium to the last close, before the strategic review was announced on the 26 February. The Bender family with 53% of shares out intend to vote all of their shares in support of the Scheme, in the absence of a superior offer. The Offer also required approval from FIRB.
Apart from FIRB signing off - no small ask given JBS had fallen foul of US regulators recently - this looked like a done deal, with possible completion in November. 


But Andrew Forrest's family fund Tattarang had other plans and promptly upped its stake to 18.51% on the 10 August from 7.33% at the time of the SID announcement. That current stake all but blocks a Scheme. 
Not to be outdone,  JBS announced a parallel takeover bid on the 13 August. This second Offer is conditional on 50.1% acceptances from shareholders.  With the Bender's stake, that Offer is effectively done - barring FIRB rejection. The Bender family also entered in a pre-bid acceptance agreement for 19.9% of shares out. 
It was unclear at the time whether Forrest was trying to block JBS in Huon or just looking for a better price.
In various media advertisements last Friday, Forrest called on JBS to commit to the same principles as Tattarang’s agri-food business, Harvest Road, and its beef processing company, Harvey Beef.


For a small expense and through good management at Harvey Beef, we have established a clear No Pain No Fear framework in the critical stages of cattle processing as part of our ambition to exceed animal welfare standards and create a path for others to follow.
This means our customers don’t have to compromise their values when they choose to buy our products.
Animals provide humans with a valuable source of protein, the least we can do is respect this by ensuring they are treated with the utmost care.
As the world’s biggest protein producer, JBS can rise to this same standard.

Not altogether surprisingly, JBS took umbrage with this challenge, saying it already adheres to high standards in its animal handling. As did Huon. 
Huon said this morning...   that it has been...

uncompromising in its commitment to the highest standards of animal husbandry, biosecurity, environmental management, and sustainable farming practices. Huon remains the only seafood producer in Australia to achieve RSPCA Approved Farming certification and firmly believes its sustainable salmon farming practices can be benchmarked against the best standards in the world.


Huon also added Tattarang had earlier expressed interest in Huon and submitted a non-binding and conditional indicative offer. Tattarang was invited to participate further in the strategic review process but declined to do so. Tattarang’s non-binding and conditional indicative offer was at a material discount to JBS’s $3.85 offer.
Oddly, Huon is trading almost at terms. Given the non-negligible risk FIRB blocks the deal, I would avoid shares here.
More below the fold. 



<div>
Just under two weeks after <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02395702-2A1310049?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">rejecting</a> two take-private proposals from KKR and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (OTPPB), Aussie poles and wires company <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/spark-infrastructure-group" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:595:1" rel="noopener">Spark Infrastructure (SKI AU)</a> announced <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02399952-2A1312120?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">support</a> for the Consortium's improved proposal of $2.95/share. The Offer was up from the initial Offer of $2.70/share. Due diligence was subsequently afforded.
On the 10 August, Spark <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02405270-2A1314740?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">received</a> a request from the Consortium to engage with Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP), Canada's largest pension investment managers.  OTTPB and KKR said their interest in Spark is not contingent on PSP receiving all internal and external approvals to participate in the Consortium's revised Offer.
A firm Offer has now been <a href="https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02409984-2A1317108?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tabled</a> and a SID entered into with KKR, OTTPB, and PSP. The terms remain the same. Spark's board unanimously recommends the Offer. The Scheme Meeting is expected to be held by the end of 2021.
</div>
<div>
As discussed in <a href="https://skr.ma/LdjsX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Spark Infrastructure (SKI AU): KKR &amp; OTPPB Pay Up</a>, $2.95/share appeared a full price. This looks done to me.
</div>
<div>
More below the fold.
</div>


Just under two weeks after rejecting two take-private proposals from KKR and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (OTPPB), Aussie poles and wires company Spark Infrastructure (SKI AU) announced support for the Consortium's improved proposal of $2.95/share. The Offer was up from the initial Offer of $2.70/share. Due diligence was subsequently afforded.
On the 10 August, Spark received a request from the Consortium to engage with Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP), Canada's largest pension investment managers.  OTTPB and KKR said their interest in Spark is not contingent on PSP receiving all internal and external approvals to participate in the Consortium's revised Offer.
A firm Offer has now been tabled and a SID entered into with KKR, OTTPB, and PSP. The terms remain the same. Spark's board unanimously recommends the Offer. The Scheme Meeting is expected to be held by the end of 2021.


As discussed in Spark Infrastructure (SKI AU): KKR &amp; OTPPB Pay Up, $2.95/share appeared a full price. This looks done to me.


More below the fold.


Spark Infrastructure (SKI AU): KKR/OTPPB/PSP's Firm Offer

Australia

Sydney Airport operates the Sydney, Australia airport. The Company develops and maintains the airport infrastructure and leases terminal space to airlines and retailers.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Sydney Airport (SYD AU)

Oil Search/Santos: PNG a Potential Party Pooper

Trading relatively tight at 2.5%/10%, assuming mid-Dec completion. Provided Santos/OSH can mollify the PNG government - just how challenging is it...

David Blennerhassett

China Logistics (1589 HK): JD.com's Offer Comes Up Short

The price is widely viewed as a disappointment. But this should trade relatively tight to terms - perhaps around HK$4.25, or 2.4%/16.0% gross...

David Blennerhassett

1300Smiles (ONT AU): BGH Sinks Its Teeth In

This looks done. You have major shareholder support. You also have another substantial shareholder backing the deal. This is a highly complementary...

David Blennerhassett

Huon Ag (Huo AU): Twiggy Went To Market

Trading at a gross/annualised return of 0.2%/1.2%. I doubt there is a bump here. I'd be inclined to avoid this transaction. I think FIRB approval...

David Blennerhassett

Spark Infrastructure (SKI AU): KKR/OTPPB/PSP's Firm Offer

Trading tight at a 2.0%/6.6% gross/annualised spread. Franking credits may add up to an additional A$0.05/share to those shareholders who can take...

David Blennerhassett

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)