Korea / Special Sits, Pairs, Index Rebalancing, Clepsydra Capital

Sanghyun Park

Korea / Special Sits, Pairs, Index Rebalancing

Clepsydra Capital

Investigate special situations, pairs, and index rebalancing trades in Korea.

Equity Capital Markets

AllocationAll the allocation results for the Kakao Bank IPO are now available at DART. Institutional investors took 55% of the total offering, and retail took 25.5%, receiving the forfeited shares from the ESOP subscriptions.
Almost all institutional allocations have gone to local publicly raised funds and pensions known for their long-term holding tendencies. Yes, as expected, those presumably long-term foreign funds also took a substantial portion, which Kakao Bank needs to boost the foreign ownership percentage, often interpreted as a symbolic indicator of popularity.









Allocation by type
Allocated, % of the offering
Final, % of the offering
Final, % of post-IPO SO


Institutional
55.00%
55.00%
7.58%


1. Local publicly raised funds
-
16.00%
2.21%


2. Local Br/IA
-
1.02%
0.14%


3. Local pension, etc.
-
9.83%
1.36%


4. Local others
-
0.61%
0.08%


5. Foreign
-
27.53%
3.80%


6. Foreign, other
-
0.00%
0.00%


Retail
25.00%
25.50%
3.51%


ESOP
20.00%
19.50%
2.68%


Total
100.00%
100.00%
13.78%

Source: DART



Below is the classification of institutional investors as defined in KRX statistics.






By investor type

1. Local publicly raised funds

Long-term


2. Local brokerages/investment advisories

Short-term


3. Local pensions, funds managing proprietary assets, banks, and insurance companies
Long-term


4. Local others: discretionary investment companies, savings banks, real estate trust companies, capital companies, and leasing companies
Mainly, short-term


5. Foreign institutional investors with a transaction record: foreign IPO/hedge funds

Depends


6. Foreign institutional investors without transaction record: local hot money

Mostly, short-term

Source: DART




Lockups
Institutional allocations without lockup account for only 40%. Most of the shares allocated to local publicly raised funds and pensions are locked up for 3-6 months. Foreign funds also locked up about 25% of their allocated shares, which is much higher than usual.
The initial expectation was to take the lockup weight to a minimum considering the immediate float, but it turns out that Kakao Bank has aggressively locked up than originally expected.















Lockups by institution type
1. Local PO
2. Local Br/IA
3. Local pension, etc.
4. Local others
5. Foreign
6. Foreign, other
Total


6 months
13.02%
0.25%
14.84%
0.29%
8.42%
0.00%
36.81%


3 months
9.63%
0.62%
1.86%
0.29%
1.67%
0.00%
14.07%


1 month
4.13%
0.23%
0.59%
0.17%
3.61%
0.00%
8.72%


15 days
0.17%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.22%


No lockup
2.15%
0.71%
0.58%
0.37%
36.36%
0.00%
40.18%


Total
29.10%
1.85%
17.88%
1.12%
50.06%
0.00%
100.00%

Source: DART


The amount released to the market immediately after the listing is 22.55% of the total number of outstanding shares. This includes pre-IPO minority shareholders (mostly VC and corporate), which account for 15.99%.












Post-IPO lockup releases, as a % of SO
IPO shareholders
Major shareholder
ESOP
VC/corporate stakeholders
Other pre-IPO minority shareholders (mostly VC/corporate)
Total


1 year
0.00%
0.00%
2.68%
0.00%
0.00%
2.68%


6 months
2.79%
27.26%
0.00%
39.76%
0.00%
69.81%


3 months
1.07%
0.00%
0.00%
3.20%
0.00%
4.27%


1 month
0.66%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.66%


15 days
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%


Lock-up
4.54%
27.26%
2.68%
42.96%
0.00%
77.44%


No lock-up
6.56%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
15.99%
22.55%

Source: DART





Kakao Bank: Full Allocation Results, Index Floats, & Fast Entry Possibilities

As expected, Krafton's IPO price has been confirmed at ₩498,000, the upper end of the indicative price band. So, Krafton gets to raise a total of ₩4.3T through this public offering, and its market cap reaches ₩24.4T.







Pricing
Low
High (final)


Price
₩400,000
₩498,000


Base deal size
₩3,461.7B
₩4,309.8B


- Institutional allotment
₩1,903.9B
₩2,370.4B


Implied market cap
₩19,559.2B
₩24,351.2B


- Discount
30.93%
14.01%

Source: DART

The competitive rate for institutional subscriptions came out to be 243.2 to 1, similar to what has already been leaked from the market. Compared to the recent mega IPOs that easily exceeded 1,000 to 1, it can be seen that this IPO's institutional participation rate was low. However, considering that this IPO has a substantially larger offering size and a very aggressive price, it can be concluded that the interest of institutions was higher than expected.









By investor type
Institution
%
Demand
%


Local publicly raised funds
231
37.20%
445,792,000
38.52%


Local brokerages/investment advisories
18
2.90%
28,393,000
2.45%


Local pensions, funds managing proprietary assets, banks, and insurance companies
94
15.14%
242,965,000
20.99%


Local others (mostly discretionary investment companies - local hedge funds)
104
16.75%
234,982,000
20.30%


Foreign (foreign IPO funds &amp; hedge funds)
146
23.51%
62,498,497
5.40%


Foreign others (mostly local hot money)
28
4.51%
142,697,000
12.33%


Total
621
100.00%
1,157,327,497
100.00%


Subscription rate
243.15 to 1

Source: DART

Looking at the application results for each type of institution below, we can find a very interesting fact.
First, a large number of foreign institutions with business relationships (i.e., major foreign investment institutions) participated in this subscription. The share of 23.5% by the number of participating institutions is significantly higher than the typical level for local IPOs. Of course, most of them applied based on actual demand, so their proportion of total subscription volume is only 5.4%. However, considering that all these quantities are actual demand, we can safely say that their participation level is quite high. This is a result consistent with what Mirase Asset (the bookrunner) has continuously leaked to the market about the active participation of many major overseas institutions.

Another point to note is that the number of participating local institutions is remarkably low, consistent with the initial forecast that most small and medium-sized institutions skipped this IPO due to scheduling conflicts with LG Energy Solutions.
Finally, institutions belonging to the category 'Foreign others' were quite aggressive in taking orders despite a small number of participating institutions. These are mainly local hot money managers, who are the most active in early profit realization trading. In other words, their aggressive move to secure Krafton IPO shares means that they are heavily betting on a short-term price increase due to the entry of local retailers immediately after Krafton's listing.

The category 'Foreign' indicates foreign institutional investors with transaction records. They are foreign institutional investors who have a business relationship with the underwriter or of whom the underwriter acquirer is aware of the identity. So, these foreign institutions can be considered well-established overseas institutions actually based overseas.
In contrast, the category 'Foreign others' indicates foreign institutional investors without transaction records. Most of them are local hot money only whose legal office is registered overseas.
The "Unspecified" category usually indicates that they want the shares above the high end. With that in mind, 37.4% have gone for the upper end or above. The other 57.5% selected 75-100% of the upper end. So, most of the orders (95%) are priced at 75-100% of the upper end or higher. Unlike the initial concerns, we can say the institutional pricing is quite aggressive.









By price
Institution
%
Demand
%


Above high end
59
9.50%
279,666,000
24.16%


75-100% of high end
246
39.61%
665,029,823
57.46%


50-75% of high end
1
0.16%
1,000
0.00%


25-50% of high end
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


0-25% of high end
7
1.13%
11,370,000
0.98%


Median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


75-100% of median
1
0.16%
1,000
0.00%


50-75% of median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


25-50% of median
3
0.48%
77,000
0.01%


0-25% of median
105
16.91%
48,077,000
4.15%


Low end or below
27
4.35%
37,000
0.00%


Unspecified
172
27.70%
153,068,674
13.23%


Total
621
100.00%
1,157,327,497
100.00%

Source: DART



Krafton Bookbuilding: Subscription/Lockup Data & Resulting Implications

<p>The last day of Krafton's bookbuilding? Well, it was really a crazy day.</p><div class="content-highlight">
<h2><strong>A suspicious rumor circulated at noon yesterday</strong></h2>
<p><strong>First of all, at noon yesterday, a rumor circulated among local institutions through the messenger mainly used by institutions.</strong></p>
<p><em>Previously, Yahoo Messenger was the main medium for circulating all sorts of rumors and stories between local institutional investors. But after the Yahoo Messenger service was terminated, NateOn is mainly used now.</em></p>
<p><strong>The content of this rumor was somewhat provocative. The rumor said that the bankers are currently holding an emergency meeting due to the low competition rate for institutional subscriptions in the Krafton bookbuilding.</strong></p>
<p><strong>When Mirae Asset Securities learned that this rumor was circulating through NateOn, it immediately denied it, which led to an unusual situation where a banker updated the bookbuilding progress even before bookbuilding was closed.</strong></p>
<p>In fact, Mirae Asset explained to local institutions yesterday afternoon that this Krafton bookbuilding was significantly more positive than initially expected and that the rumor of holding an emergency meeting due to the disastrous results simply was not true.</p>
<p>However, it is said that this rumor has caused confusion among some local institutions and has had some effect on the institutional subscription rate on the last day.</p>
</div>

The last day of Krafton's bookbuilding? Well, it was really a crazy day.
A suspicious rumor circulated at noon yesterday
First of all, at noon yesterday, a rumor circulated among local institutions through the messenger mainly used by institutions.
Previously, Yahoo Messenger was the main medium for circulating all sorts of rumors and stories between local institutional investors. But after the Yahoo Messenger service was terminated, NateOn is mainly used now.
The content of this rumor was somewhat provocative. The rumor said that the bankers are currently holding an emergency meeting due to the low competition rate for institutional subscriptions in the Krafton bookbuilding.
When Mirae Asset Securities learned that this rumor was circulating through NateOn, it immediately denied it, which led to an unusual situation where a banker updated the bookbuilding progress even before bookbuilding was closed.
In fact, Mirae Asset explained to local institutions yesterday afternoon that this Krafton bookbuilding was significantly more positive than initially expected and that the rumor of holding an emergency meeting due to the disastrous results simply was not true.
However, it is said that this rumor has caused confusion among some local institutions and has had some effect on the institutional subscription rate on the last day.


Krafton Bookbuilding: A Quick Recap of Last Day Craziness

Kakao Bank's bookbuilding results are out. As already leaked to the market earlier today, the offering price got finalized at ₩39,000, the upper end of the indicative price band, implying a market cap of ₩18.6T. There is no change in the offering volume.







Indicative price band
Low
High (Final)


Price
₩33,000
₩39,000


Base deal size
₩2,159.9B
₩2,552.6B


- Institutional allotment
₩1,187.9B
₩1,403.9B


Implied market cap
₩15,766.5B
₩18,633.1B


- Discount
31.33%
18.85%


Equity, including capital inflow from IPO
₩5,009.4B
₩5,402.1B


Capital inflow from IPO
₩2,159.9B
₩2,552.6B

Source: DART

The institutional subscription competition rate is 1,733 to 1, only slightly below the record holder SKIET's 1,883 to 1.









Name
Ticker
IPO date
Offering size
Institutional subscription competition rate


Kakao Bank
323410
2021. 08. 05
₩2,552.6B
1,732.83 to 1


SD Biosensor
361610
2021. 07. 16
₩776.4B
1,143.76 to 1


SK IE Technology
361610
2021. 05. 11
₩2,246.0B
1,882.88 to 1


SK Bioscience Co Ltd
302440
2021. 03. 18
₩1,491.8B
1,274.50 to 1


HYBE Co Ltd
352820
2020. 10. 15
₩962.6B
1,117.00 to 1


Kakao Games Corp
293490
2020. 09. 10
₩384.0B
1,478.50 to 1


SK Biopharmaceuticals Co Ltd
326030
2020. 07. 02
₩959.3B
835.00 to 1

Source: DART


₩2.433 quadrillion (thousand trillion) worth of subscription orders were poured into the bookbuilding. How large is this? Well, Kakao Bank's total value of subscription orders surpassed SKIET's ₩2.417 quad, which was the largest amount in history for an IPO in Korea.
Compared to SD Biosensor, which was an IPO just before this listing, the participation of local institutional investors (local investment advisories and hedge funds) who are active in short-term trading was higher in this listing. It can be inferred that many investors believe that the short-term share price of Kakao Bank is more likely to rise immediately after listing.










By investor type
Institution
%
Demand
%


Local publicly raised funds
581
34.85%
25,201,600,000
40.40%


Local brokerages/investment advisories
258
15.48%
11,597,306,000
18.59%


Local pensions, funds managing proprietary assets, banks, and insurance companies
243
14.58%
9,949,064,000
15.95%


Local others (mostly discretionary investment companies - local hedge funds)
205
12.30%
8,444,119,000
13.54%


Foreign (foreign IPO funds &amp; hedge funds)
194
11.64%
1,364,938,000
2.19%


Foreign others (mostly local hot money)
186
11.16%
5,820,409,000
9.33%


Total
1,667
100.00%
62,377,436,000
100.00%


Subscription rate
1,732.83

Source: DART


The "Unspecified" category usually indicates that they want the shares above the high end. With that in mind, more than half must have priced Kakao Bank at the upper end or above. The remaining 46.01% went for a 75-100% of the upper end, so it isn't that far either.










By price
Institution
%
Demand
%


Above high end
640
38.39%
26,259,108,000
42.10%


75-100% of high end
767
46.01%
32,312,440,000
51.80%


50-75% of high end
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


25-50% of high end
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


0-25% of high end
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


Median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


75-100% of median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


50-75% of median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


25-50% of median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


0-25% of median
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


Low end or below
0
0.00%
0
0.00%


Unspecified
260
15.60%
3,805,888,000
6.10%


Total
1,667
100.00%
62,377,436,000
100.00%

Source: DART




Kakao Bank Bookbuilding Results: Disclosing Subscription/Lockup Orders in Detail

<p><strong>Kakao Bank's official bookbuilding results will be released after the market closes this afternoon. However, most of the important information has already been leaked to the market.</strong></p><p>First, more than ₩2,500T of subscription orders were poured into the bookbuilding. In addition, it was confirmed that the competition ratio of institutional investors for subscriptions was over 1,700 to 1. The competition ratio of 1,000 to 1 was already recorded on the first day, and a significant number of subscriptions were made on the second day as well.</p><p>The total value of subscription orders surpassed SKIET's ₩2,417T, which was the largest amount in history for an IPO in Korea.</p><div class="content-highlight"><p><strong>As a result, the offering price was also almost decided at ₩39,000, which is the upper end of the indicative price band.</strong></p></div><p> The market capitalization based on ₩39,000 is ₩18.6T. This is close to that of KB Financial Group (₩21.6T) and Shinhan Financial Group (₩19.9T). So, it is likely that Kakao Bank will become the largest market cap bank in Korea after its listing.</p><table class="table table-striped">
<colgroup>
<col width="100">
<col width="100">
<col width="100">
<col width="100">
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Market cap"}'>Market cap</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"KB Financial Group Inc"}' data-sheets-formula='=googlefinance(R[1]C[0], "name")'>KB Financial Group</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd."}' data-sheets-formula='=googlefinance(R[1]C[0], "name")'>Shinhan Financial Group</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Kakao Bank"}'>Kakao Bank</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Ticker"}'>Ticker</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"105560"}' data-sheets-formula='="105560"'>105560</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"055550"}' data-sheets-formula='="055550"'>055550</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"323410"}' data-sheets-formula='="323410"'>323410</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Market cap"}'><strong>Market cap</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":21580.431048}' data-sheets-numberformat='{"1":2,"2":"₩#,##0.0B"}' data-sheets-formula='=googlefinance(R[-1]C[0], "shares")*googlefinance(R[-1]C[0], "price")/1000000000'><strong>₩21,580.4B</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":19940.7427844}' data-sheets-numberformat='{"1":2,"2":"₩#,##0.0B"}' data-sheets-formula='=googlefinance(R[-1]C[0], "shares")*googlefinance(R[-1]C[0], "price")/1000000000'><strong>₩19,940.7B</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"₩18,633.1B"}'><strong>₩18,633.1B</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr><td colspan="4" rowspan="1" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Source: KRX &amp; DART"}'>Source: KRX &amp; DART</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table><p>The general view of institutions on the public offering price of Kakao Bank, which has been proven in this bookbuilding, is that it is NOT ridiculously high.</p><div class="content-highlight"><p><strong>They seem to have paid attention to the growth potential of Kakao Bank as a platform business and the rapid growth that supports it.</strong></p></div><p>In fact, the price accepted as the ceiling by local street is PBR 4x, but since the upper end of the indicative price band stays at 3.5x, it is said that they generally did not feel any objection to the price.</p><table class="table table-striped">
<colgroup>
<col width="200">
<col width="150">
<col width="150">
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Indicative price band"}'>Indicative price band</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Low"}'>Lower end</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"High"}'>Upper end</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Price"}'>Price</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":33000}' data-sheets-numberformat='[null,2,"[$₩-412]#,##0",1]'>₩33,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":39000}' data-sheets-numberformat='[null,2,"[$₩-412]#,##0",1]'>₩39,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Implied market cap"}'>Implied market cap</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":15766.510221}' data-sheets-numberformat='[null,2,"₩#,##0.0B",1]' data-sheets-formula="=R[-3]C[0]*R14C2/1000000000">₩15,766.5B</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":18633.148443}' data-sheets-numberformat='[null,2,"₩#,##0.0B",1]' data-sheets-formula="=R[-3]C[0]*R14C2/1000000000">₩18,633.1B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Equity, including capital inflow from IPO"}'>Equity, including capital inflow from IPO</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":5009.4}' data-sheets-numberformat='[null,2,"₩#,##0.0B",1]' data-sheets-formula="=R[-13]C[0]+R[-12]C[0]">₩5,009.4B</td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":5402.05}' data-sheets-numberformat='[null,2,"₩#,##0.0B",1]' data-sheets-formula="=R[-13]C[-1]+(Terms!R[-15]C[-1]*R[-5]C[0])/1000000000">₩5,402.1B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"PBR"}'><strong>PBR</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":3.1473849604743087}' data-sheets-numberformat='{"1":2,"2":"0.00x"}' data-sheets-formula="=R[-3]C[0]/R[-1]C[0]"><strong>3.15x</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;" data-sheets-value='{"1":3,"3":3.449273598541294}' data-sheets-numberformat='{"1":2,"2":"0.00x"}' data-sheets-formula="=R[-3]C[0]/R[-1]C[0]"><strong>3.45x</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr><td colspan="3" data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Source: DART"}'>Source: DART</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table><div class="content-highlight">
<p>To clarify Kakao Bank's PBR calculations:</p>
<ol>
<li>Implied market cap by the indicative price band / Equity as of 1Q21 gives a 5.53~6.54x.</li>
<li>(Implied market cap by the indicative price band - Capital inflow from IPO) / Equity as of 1Q21 gives a 4.78~5.64x.</li>
<li><strong>Implied market cap by the indicative price band / (Equity as of 1Q21 + Capital inflow from IPO) gives you a 3.15~3.45x.</strong></li>
</ol>
<p><strong>The bankers used No. 2 to derive the indicative price band in the IPO prospectus. And many in the local street seem to be using No. 3 to get a sense of Kakao Bank's actual PBR post IPO.</strong></p>
</div><p>In particular, local institutional investors paid attention to the fact that Kakao Bank opened 6.2 million new accounts within one year. This is 40 times the total number of non-face-to-face accounts opened by 16 commercial banks in Korea over the past four years. Kakao Bank also achieved a market share of 7% in the personal credit loan market within four years of its establishment. </p><p>In other words, although Kakao Bank still provides simple banking services, the market acknowledges the actual capabilities of Kakao Bank's online platform in that it has achieved a huge customer base expansion in a short period of time.</p>

Kakao Bank's official bookbuilding results will be released after the market closes this afternoon. However, most of the important information has already been leaked to the market.First, more than ₩2,500T of subscription orders were poured into the bookbuilding. In addition, it was confirmed that the competition ratio of institutional investors for subscriptions was over 1,700 to 1. The competition ratio of 1,000 to 1 was already recorded on the first day, and a significant number of subscriptions were made on the second day as well.The total value of subscription orders surpassed SKIET's ₩2,417T, which was the largest amount in history for an IPO in Korea.As a result, the offering price was also almost decided at ₩39,000, which is the upper end of the indicative price band. The market capitalization based on ₩39,000 is ₩18.6T. This is close to that of KB Financial Group (₩21.6T) and Shinhan Financial Group (₩19.9T). So, it is likely that Kakao Bank will become the largest market cap bank in Korea after its listing.








Market cap
KB Financial Group
Shinhan Financial Group
Kakao Bank


Ticker
105560
055550
323410


Market cap
₩21,580.4B
₩19,940.7B
₩18,633.1B

Source: KRX &amp; DART

The general view of institutions on the public offering price of Kakao Bank, which has been proven in this bookbuilding, is that it is NOT ridiculously high.They seem to have paid attention to the growth potential of Kakao Bank as a platform business and the rapid growth that supports it.In fact, the price accepted as the ceiling by local street is PBR 4x, but since the upper end of the indicative price band stays at 3.5x, it is said that they generally did not feel any objection to the price.







Indicative price band
Lower end
Upper end


Price
₩33,000
₩39,000


Implied market cap
₩15,766.5B
₩18,633.1B


Equity, including capital inflow from IPO
₩5,009.4B
₩5,402.1B


PBR
3.15x
3.45x

Source: DART


To clarify Kakao Bank's PBR calculations:

Implied market cap by the indicative price band / Equity as of 1Q21 gives a 5.53~6.54x.
(Implied market cap by the indicative price band - Capital inflow from IPO) / Equity as of 1Q21 gives a 4.78~5.64x.
Implied market cap by the indicative price band / (Equity as of 1Q21 + Capital inflow from IPO) gives you a 3.15~3.45x.

The bankers used No. 2 to derive the indicative price band in the IPO prospectus. And many in the local street seem to be using No. 3 to get a sense of Kakao Bank's actual PBR post IPO.
In particular, local institutional investors paid attention to the fact that Kakao Bank opened 6.2 million new accounts within one year. This is 40 times the total number of non-face-to-face accounts opened by 16 commercial banks in Korea over the past four years. Kakao Bank also achieved a market share of 7% in the personal credit loan market within four years of its establishment. In other words, although Kakao Bank still provides simple banking services, the market acknowledges the actual capabilities of Kakao Bank's online platform in that it has achieved a huge customer base expansion in a short period of time.

Kakao Bank Bookbuilding: What's Really Happened Among Local Institutions?

South Korea

Kakao Pay Corp. operates financial businesses. The Company provides online payment, currency encryption, and other services. Kakao Pay conducts businesses in South Korea.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Kakaopay (377300 KS)

Kakao Bank: Full Allocation Results, Index Floats, & Fast Entry Possibilities

This post details Kakao Bank IPO's full allocation results, index floats, and & Fast Entry possibilities for the major indexes.

Sanghyun Park

Krafton Bookbuilding: Subscription/Lockup Data & Resulting Implications

As expected, Krafton's IPO price has been confirmed at ₩498,000, the upper end of the band. This post details subscription/lockup orders by each...

Sanghyun Park

Krafton Bookbuilding: A Quick Recap of Last Day Craziness

This post is a quick recap of what's happened yesterday in the Krafton IPO bookbuilding. It examines the market rumor that surfaced yesterday and...

Sanghyun Park

Kakao Bank Bookbuilding Results: Disclosing Subscription/Lockup Orders in Detail

This post details Kakao Bank's bookbuilding results with full disclosures of subscription and lockup orders by each type of institutional investor.

Sanghyun Park

Kakao Bank Bookbuilding: What's Really Happened Among Local Institutions?

Most of the important information about Kakao Bank's bookbuilding results has already been leaked. This post explains circumstantial factors...

Sanghyun Park

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)