Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Independent Insight Provider

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

*Many Moving Parts: Ping An Bank (000001.CH) [PAB], the Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) [Ping An] banking subsidiary, remains challenged. For 1Q21, PAB reported results of CNY 10.1 bn – increasing CNY 3.6 bn (55.2%) on a linked quarter basis. Revenues, however, did increase CNY 4.8 bn (13.0%), much of which, in our view, can likely be attributed to gains while operating expenses contracted CNY 802 mn or 6.2% over the period; and*Credit Seeing Improvement: By our analysis, we find that credit weakness continues to occur as net new NPLs have increased CNY 4.2 bn or 53.6% on an annualized basis. In fairness, however, this is far better than the CNY 20.5 bn or a massive 241% (223% in 3Q20) increase on an annualized basis. Assuming the credit break in the PAB portfolio continues to remain at the current improved level, we find that PAB’s reserves still remain quite light by CNY 19 bn if we assume a 2x NPL ratio. This shortfall represents 6% of stated equity.

*Many Moving Parts: Ping An Bank (000001.CH) [PAB], the Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) [Ping An] banking subsidiary, remains challenged. For 1Q21, PAB reported results of CNY 10.1 bn – increasing CNY 3.6 bn (55.2%) on a linked quarter basis. Revenues, however, did increase CNY 4.8 bn (13.0%), much of which, in our view, can likely be attributed to gains while operating expenses contracted CNY 802 mn or 6.2% over the period; and*Credit Seeing Improvement: By our analysis, we find that credit weakness continues to occur as net new NPLs have increased CNY 4.2 bn or 53.6% on an annualized basis. In fairness, however, this is far better than the CNY 20.5 bn or a massive 241% (223% in 3Q20) increase on an annualized basis. Assuming the credit break in the PAB portfolio continues to remain at the current improved level, we find that PAB’s reserves still remain quite light by CNY 19 bn if we assume a 2x NPL ratio. This shortfall represents 6% of stated equity.  

*Stake Purchase In Mainland Bank: DBS Group Holdings (DBS.SP) [DBS] for the second time in five months announced a transaction. The latest being its intention to acquire a 13% stake in the privately-held Shenzhen Rural Commercial Bank (SRCB) for CNY 5.29 bn (USD 814.3 mn), in a move that will accelerate its Greater Bay Area expansion strategy;*Very Expensive Transaction: DBS did disclose that this stake will be priced at a stated P/BV of 1.01x. By our calculation, the post-money P/BV amounts to 0.92x – which is still 41.5% (USD 338 mn) higher than the average valuation (0.65x P/BV) for a mainland Chinese bank; and*Deal Distractions Mount: On November 17, 2020, the RBI also announced a draft scheme to merge LVB with DBS Bank India Limited, the 100%-owned subsidiary of DBS Bank Holdings (DBS.SP), which will infuse INR 25 bn into its subsidiary to absorb and recapitalize LVB. While SRCB dos not appear to be riddled with problems the way LVB is, no doubt there will be issues to contend with.  DBS apparently isn’t done with its shopping spree, being in the running for parts of Citigroup's (C.US) consumer business in Asia. Frankly, DBS needs to focus on improving its own legacy issues before it starts both taking on that of other financial institutions.

*Stake Purchase In Mainland Bank: DBS Group Holdings (DBS.SP) [DBS] for the second time in five months announced a transaction. The latest being its intention to acquire a 13% stake in the privately-held Shenzhen Rural Commercial Bank (SRCB) for CNY 5.29 bn (USD 814.3 mn), in a move that will accelerate its Greater Bay Area expansion strategy;*Very Expensive Transaction: DBS did disclose that this stake will be priced at a stated P/BV of 1.01x. By our calculation, the post-money P/BV amounts to 0.92x – which is still 41.5% (USD 338 mn) higher than the average valuation (0.65x P/BV) for a mainland Chinese bank; and*Deal Distractions Mount: On November 17, 2020, the RBI also announced a draft scheme to merge LVB with DBS Bank India Limited, the 100%-owned subsidiary of DBS Bank Holdings (DBS.SP), which will infuse INR 25 bn into its subsidiary to absorb and recapitalize LVB. While SRCB dos not appear to be riddled with problems the way LVB is, no doubt there will be issues to contend with.  DBS apparently isn’t done with its shopping spree, being in the running for parts of Citigroup's (C.US) consumer business in Asia. Frankly, DBS needs to focus on improving its own legacy issues before it starts both taking on that of other financial institutions.

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Better, But Likely Unsustainable: Bank of America (BAC.US) [BAC] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 2.4 bn (45.2%) linked quarter. Results were driven by two factors: a) a negative USD 1.9 bn, in contravention to overall credit performance; and b) a USD 2.1 bn (147.3%) increase trading activities, the sustainability of which we call into question; and*BAC Still Needs To Focus On Credit Quality: Given the USD 774 mn in NCOs (33 bp annualized of total loans), we note that net new NPLs reversed course – increasing a a high 74.8% on an annualized basis. JPM and Citigroup each reported declines. Relative to NPLs, however, reserves – while still significant – declined 67.4% to 3.00x while declining 24 bp to 1.79% against total loans.

*Results Better, But Likely Unsustainable: Bank of America (BAC.US) [BAC] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 2.4 bn (45.2%) linked quarter. Results were driven by two factors: a) a negative USD 1.9 bn, in contravention to overall credit performance; and b) a USD 2.1 bn (147.3%) increase trading activities, the sustainability of which we call into question; and*BAC Still Needs To Focus On Credit Quality: Given the USD 774 mn in NCOs (33 bp annualized of total loans), we note that net new NPLs reversed course – increasing a a high 74.8% on an annualized basis. JPM and Citigroup each reported declines. Relative to NPLs, however, reserves – while still significant – declined 67.4% to 3.00x while declining 24 bp to 1.79% against total loans.

Bank of America – Not Exactly A Shining Result

*Update Confirms Weak Outlook: Negative rental reversion rates persist in Hong Kong, as do negative tenant sales. We continue to await another round of negative revaluation of property due to lower rents and/or higher cap rates; and  *No Serious Capital Management Strategy Exists: Management of Link appears hellbent on destroying shareholder value.As gearing was 19.2% at September 2020, management continues to believe that it has abundant headroom to add debt for acquisition. Instead of weighing a buyback’s return versus new investment ROI, management views share buybacks as a mechanism to defend its shares against short-selling. Maybe a re-re-review of its acquisition strategy will occur by earnings when Link’s new mainland China acquisition strategy truly flops.

*Update Confirms Weak Outlook: Negative rental reversion rates persist in Hong Kong, as do negative tenant sales. We continue to await another round of negative revaluation of property due to lower rents and/or higher cap rates; and  *No Serious Capital Management Strategy Exists: Management of Link appears hellbent on destroying shareholder value.As gearing was 19.2% at September 2020, management continues to believe that it has abundant headroom to add debt for acquisition. Instead of weighing a buyback’s return versus new investment ROI, management views share buybacks as a mechanism to defend its shares against short-selling. Maybe a re-re-review of its acquisition strategy will occur by earnings when Link’s new mainland China acquisition strategy truly flops.

Hong Kong

CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF is an exchange-traded fund incorporated in Hong Kong. The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE China A50 Index. The Fund invests most of its total assets in the equities of member companies of the FTSE China A50 Index. This is a RQFII fund.

CSOP FTSE China A50 (HKD) (2822 HK)

Ping An Insurance – Sea Change At Bank

PING AN INSURANCE: PAB reported a 55.2% QOQ improvement in results. Net new NPLs have increased 53.6% on an annualized basis - far better than the...

Thomas J. Monaco

DBS Group Holdings – Pricey China Deal

DBS GROUP HOLDINGS: DBS is acquiring a 13% stake in the privately-held SRCB for USD 814.3 mn. P/BV amounts to 0.92x – which is still 41.5% higher...

Thomas J. Monaco

Citigroup – Shifting Winds

CITIGROUP: Citi reported a QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line result increase of 89.0% due to provision reversals and principal transactions. Net new NPLs...

Thomas J. Monaco

Bank of America – Not Exactly A Shining Result

BANK OF AMERICA: BAC's QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line increased 45.2% driven by reserve releases and trading (not sustainable). Net new NPLs reversed course...

Thomas J. Monaco

Link REIT – Cash Burning Holes

LINK REIT: Negative rental reversion rates and tenant sales persist in Hong Kong, negative revaluation of property continues. Link is hellbent on...

Thomas J. Monaco