Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

Four weeks ago, I gave the warning that H/A spreads had moved tighter - too far too fast. The next week, spreads widened, they bounced back with a vengeance, then slightly wider in the short week at the start of Chinese New Year, and bouncing back in the post-CNY week.In the two weeks from before to after Chinese New Year, the average sector spread moved about 70bp tighter, but the average spread moved only 42bp tighter.<table class="table table-striped"><tbody>
<tr>
<td>Sector</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">Last Week</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">Previous Week</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3wks Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4wks Ago</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Consumer</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  1.20%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 2.55%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 2.32%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  2.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Energy</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 1.43%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  1.64%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 1.98%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  0.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Financials &amp; Real Estate</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.10%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.29%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.62%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  1.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Health Care &amp; Info Tech</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 1.45%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  1.52%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 2.29%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  0.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Industrials</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.26%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  0.62%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 2.48%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  1.30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Materials</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 3.08%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  0.57%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 2.66%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  0.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Utilities</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.99%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.25%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 1.06%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  2.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sector Average</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 0.87%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  0.18%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+ 1.92%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-  1.41%</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>This week, the data is a bit cut short as the China Securities Depository and Clearing has not reported Southbound position data since the 10th as far as I can tell. <div class="content-highlight">There were 75 recommendations last week.  The 32 short recommendations lost an average of 48bp, slightly underperforming the market as a whole. The 43 long recommendations averaged gains of 50bp over the two weeks, outperforming the market as a whole. The combined total package was up 0.084% over the two weeks. </div><div><div><h3>The H/A Spread Market</h3></div></div><div>
The past two weeks straddling Chinese New Year saw mixed movement in H/A spreads, with 63 of 98 liquid spreads (64%) narrowing an average of 42bp. They are on average 92bp tighter over four weeks. 
<section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/189/832/original/Screenshot+2021-02-20+at+5.17.17+PM.png?1613812651" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="189832"></figure></section><hr>
</div><div><div><h3>Consumer Sector</h3></div></div><div>
The first sector discussed is Consumer, where liquid H/A spreads narrowed on average 1.35% over the two weeks, but with some bumpiness. 
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/byd-co-ltd-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:20962:1" rel="noopener">BYD (1211 HK)</a> saw its spread move 3.1% wider over the two weeks and is now 7.1% wider over four weeks and it is no longer the narrowest liquid H/A spread in the sector, with <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/fuyao-glass-industry-group-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:330:1" rel="noopener">Fuyao Glass Industry Group (3606 HK)</a> taking its place moving 2.4% in the two weeks and 10.7% in four.
</div><div class="content-highlight">
Two weeks ago, I recommended staying long the <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/great-wall-motor-co-ltd-cb302af9-398c-4d2d-ba39-023e43287eef" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:128:1" rel="noopener">Great Wall Motor (2333 HK)</a>, and short <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/byd-co-ltd-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:20962:1" rel="noopener">BYD (1211 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hisense-home-appliances-group-co-ltd-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:20107:1" rel="noopener">Hisense Home Appliances Group Co., Ltd. H (921 HK)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/fuyao-glass-industry-group-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:330:1" rel="noopener">Fuyao Glass Industry Group (3606 HK)</a> H vs A. 
Those four trades gained an average of 1.67% in spread terms on the week.
</div><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/189/833/original/Screenshot+2021-02-20+at+5.28.45+PM.png?1613813350" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="189833"></figure></section>For this week's recommendations on Consumer, and discussion of the Energy, Financials &amp; Real Estate, Health Care, Tech, Industrials, Materials, and Utilities sectors, and all trade recommendations, please read on.

Four weeks ago, I gave the warning that H/A spreads had moved tighter - too far too fast. The next week, spreads widened, they bounced back with a vengeance, then slightly wider in the short week at the start of Chinese New Year, and bouncing back in the post-CNY week.In the two weeks from before to after Chinese New Year, the average sector spread moved about 70bp tighter, but the average spread moved only 42bp tighter.

Sector
Last Week
Previous Week
3wks Ago
4wks Ago


Consumer
-  1.20%
+ 2.55%
+ 2.32%
-  2.62%


Energy
+ 1.43%
-  1.64%
+ 1.98%
-  0.59%


Financials &amp; Real Estate
+ 0.10%
+ 0.29%
+ 0.62%
-  1.73%


Health Care &amp; Info Tech
+ 1.45%
-  1.52%
+ 2.29%
-  0.27%


Industrials
+ 0.26%
-  0.62%
+ 2.48%
-  1.30%


Materials
+ 3.08%
-  0.57%
+ 2.66%
-  0.95%


Utilities
+ 0.99%
+ 0.25%
+ 1.06%
-  2.45%


Sector Average
+ 0.87%
-  0.18%
+ 1.92%
-  1.41%

This week, the data is a bit cut short as the China Securities Depository and Clearing has not reported Southbound position data since the 10th as far as I can tell. There were 75 recommendations last week.  The 32 short recommendations lost an average of 48bp, slightly underperforming the market as a whole. The 43 long recommendations averaged gains of 50bp over the two weeks, outperforming the market as a whole. The combined total package was up 0.084% over the two weeks. The H/A Spread Market
The past two weeks straddling Chinese New Year saw mixed movement in H/A spreads, with 63 of 98 liquid spreads (64%) narrowing an average of 42bp. They are on average 92bp tighter over four weeks. 

Consumer Sector
The first sector discussed is Consumer, where liquid H/A spreads narrowed on average 1.35% over the two weeks, but with some bumpiness. 
BYD (1211 HK) saw its spread move 3.1% wider over the two weeks and is now 7.1% wider over four weeks and it is no longer the narrowest liquid H/A spread in the sector, with Fuyao Glass Industry Group (3606 HK) taking its place moving 2.4% in the two weeks and 10.7% in four.

Two weeks ago, I recommended staying long the Great Wall Motor (2333 HK), and short BYD (1211 HK), Hisense Home Appliances Group Co., Ltd. H (921 HK), and Fuyao Glass Industry Group (3606 HK) H vs A. 
Those four trades gained an average of 1.67% in spread terms on the week.
For this week's recommendations on Consumer, and discussion of the Energy, Financials &amp; Real Estate, Health Care, Tech, Industrials, Materials, and Utilities sectors, and all trade recommendations, please read on.

Quiddity Weekly H/A: High Volatility in Materials and Industrials and Spreads Over Lunar New Year

Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Independent Insight Provider

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

*Costs Now An Issue: Ping An Bank (000001.CH) [PAB], the Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) [Ping An] banking subsidiary, reported CNY 6.5 bn – declining CNY 2.2 bn (25.1%) on a linked quarter basis. In this environment, credit troubles no doubt are a foregone conclusion. However, this was not necessarily PAB’s biggest issue in its most results announcement, where the bulk of the earnings decline was attributed to a CNY 1.9 bn (17.1%) linked quarter increase in costs;*Credit Is WEAKER Still:  We find that credit weakness is actually deteriorating at an even more accelerated pace than in 3Q20, as net new NPLs have increased CNY 20.5 bn or a massive 241% (223% in 3Q20) on an annualized basis. We also find that PAB’s reserves still remain quite light by CNY 152 bn if we assume a 2x NPL ratio. This shortfall represents 60% of stated equity; and*Fundamentally Challenged Still: Despite the Investor Day cheerleading session, Ping An P&amp;C operating profits declined CNY 2.6 bn (29.2%) HOH in 1H20, as the overall combined ratio eroded 1.5% to 98.1% due primarily to continued weakness within the credit insurance unit where the combined ratio came in at 125.6% (up 32.4%). The credit insurance segment reported a CNY 3.5 bn underwriting loss, due to defaults on underlying loans.

*Costs Now An Issue: Ping An Bank (000001.CH) [PAB], the Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) [Ping An] banking subsidiary, reported CNY 6.5 bn – declining CNY 2.2 bn (25.1%) on a linked quarter basis. In this environment, credit troubles no doubt are a foregone conclusion. However, this was not necessarily PAB’s biggest issue in its most results announcement, where the bulk of the earnings decline was attributed to a CNY 1.9 bn (17.1%) linked quarter increase in costs;*Credit Is WEAKER Still:  We find that credit weakness is actually deteriorating at an even more accelerated pace than in 3Q20, as net new NPLs have increased CNY 20.5 bn or a massive 241% (223% in 3Q20) on an annualized basis. We also find that PAB’s reserves still remain quite light by CNY 152 bn if we assume a 2x NPL ratio. This shortfall represents 60% of stated equity; and*Fundamentally Challenged Still: Despite the Investor Day cheerleading session, Ping An P&amp;C operating profits declined CNY 2.6 bn (29.2%) HOH in 1H20, as the overall combined ratio eroded 1.5% to 98.1% due primarily to continued weakness within the credit insurance unit where the combined ratio came in at 125.6% (up 32.4%). The credit insurance segment reported a CNY 3.5 bn underwriting loss, due to defaults on underlying loans. 

China Merchants Bank H / Equity Bottom-Up

*Weak 4Q20 Bottom-Line: China Merchants Bank (3968.HK) [CMB] announced a poor set of preliminary 4Q20 results, with net profit declining CNY 6.1 bn (22.7%) on a linked quarter basis – this, despite having its tax rate decline 790 bp to 15.6% over the period; and*Best Retail Franchise Hitting Credit Wall: While CMB has the best retail franchise in mainland China, credit risk has substantially increased in 4Q20. We note a potential net new NPL increase of CNY 11.4 bn linked quarter for a whopping annualized increase in NPLs of 80.4%. Trouble is brewing in paradise.

*Weak 4Q20 Bottom-Line: China Merchants Bank (3968.HK) [CMB] announced a poor set of preliminary 4Q20 results, with net profit declining CNY 6.1 bn (22.7%) on a linked quarter basis – this, despite having its tax rate decline 790 bp to 15.6% over the period; and*Best Retail Franchise Hitting Credit Wall: While CMB has the best retail franchise in mainland China, credit risk has substantially increased in 4Q20. We note a potential net new NPL increase of CNY 11.4 bn linked quarter for a whopping annualized increase in NPLs of 80.4%. Trouble is brewing in paradise.  

China Merchants Bank – Massive 4Q20 Charge-Offs

Financials Credit Analyst

Hank Calenti, CFA

CreditContinuum

Credit

Goldilocks may morph into a market wolf if the US Senate changes leadership while 100 mask wearing days haunts of Jimmy Carter-like sentiment. This is not priced in and these changes may limit the annual January bounce.Also, there is a risk that the market has gotten ahead of itself as bank management’s loss expectations are yet to be tested. US bank earnings announcements at mid-month will be watched for signs of management concern as well as dividend expectations. January’s top 10 performers could have distinctively lower risk profiles.Idiosyncratic plus vaccine impact expectations drove December performance. As such, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bank-of-east-asia-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:341:1" rel="noopener">Bank of East Asia (23 HK)</a> and Thai Bank Additional Tier 1 (AT1) securities outperformed in Asia, albeit for differing reasons.While Thai bank bonds rode the wave of enthusiasm following announcements of Coronavirus vaccines, Bank of East Asia’s notes gained on credit technical reasons. Similarly, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/vietnam-prosperity-jsc-bank" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26914:1" rel="noopener">Vietnam Prosperity's (VPB VN)</a> bond rose on vaccine developments while Ardshindbank and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-minsheng-banking-a" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:655:1" rel="noopener">China Minsheng  (600016 CH)</a> gained as their respective credit situations improved.Bank of East Asia’s decision to retire its December callable Additional Tier 1 bonds woke the market to our insight several months earlier that this debt is inefficient capital. Please see <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/bank-of-east-asia-buy-the-inefficient-capital-securities" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:42753" rel="noopener">Buy the Inefficient Capital Securities</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/bank-of-east-asia-move-to-overweight-the-capital-inefficient-securities-from-buy" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:45652" rel="noopener">Move to Overweight the Capital Inefficient Securities from Buy</a> for more details.<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yes-bank-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:767:1" rel="noopener">YES Bank (YES IN)</a> led spread widening. Having hit par at one point during December, investors followed our recommendation to lighten exposure. Please see: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/yes-bank-par-is-plenty-move-to-underweight" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:46120" rel="noopener">Par Is Plenty- Move to Underweight</a> for more details.In a positive sign from a vaccine momentum perspective, the positive spread movement amongst Thailand’s AT1 bonds continued throughout December. Nonetheless, we see this as a cognitive dissonance trade which ignores vaccine distribution and time extension risks. Rolling lockdowns do not improve consumer confidence and lower Q1 economic output in Europe and the US may ensue. This could impact Asia asset values and our preference would be to fade the rally in Thai bank AT1.

Goldilocks may morph into a market wolf if the US Senate changes leadership while 100 mask wearing days haunts of Jimmy Carter-like sentiment. This is not priced in and these changes may limit the annual January bounce.Also, there is a risk that the market has gotten ahead of itself as bank management’s loss expectations are yet to be tested. US bank earnings announcements at mid-month will be watched for signs of management concern as well as dividend expectations. January’s top 10 performers could have distinctively lower risk profiles.Idiosyncratic plus vaccine impact expectations drove December performance. As such, Bank of East Asia (23 HK) and Thai Bank Additional Tier 1 (AT1) securities outperformed in Asia, albeit for differing reasons.While Thai bank bonds rode the wave of enthusiasm following announcements of Coronavirus vaccines, Bank of East Asia’s notes gained on credit technical reasons. Similarly, Vietnam Prosperity's (VPB VN) bond rose on vaccine developments while Ardshindbank and China Minsheng  (600016 CH) gained as their respective credit situations improved.Bank of East Asia’s decision to retire its December callable Additional Tier 1 bonds woke the market to our insight several months earlier that this debt is inefficient capital. Please see Buy the Inefficient Capital Securities and Move to Overweight the Capital Inefficient Securities from Buy for more details.YES Bank (YES IN) led spread widening. Having hit par at one point during December, investors followed our recommendation to lighten exposure. Please see: Par Is Plenty- Move to Underweight for more details.In a positive sign from a vaccine momentum perspective, the positive spread movement amongst Thailand’s AT1 bonds continued throughout December. Nonetheless, we see this as a cognitive dissonance trade which ignores vaccine distribution and time extension risks. Rolling lockdowns do not improve consumer confidence and lower Q1 economic output in Europe and the US may ensue. This could impact Asia asset values and our preference would be to fade the rally in Thai bank AT1.

Bank Credit Compass: Regime Change May Limit the Annual January Bounce

There is a healthy concern that the Fed is spiking this holiday season’s punch bowl while the ECB is sweetening the brew with additional TLTROs and less collateral. US federal stimulus may add the moonshine. These actions will impact Asia’s risk assets. Thin markets could see outsized moves as year-end event deadlines approach. Risk remains to the downside as positive outcomes are already priced in. Nonetheless, the Fed continues to underwrite this market although the longevity is open to debate despite recent announcements. Credit investors cannot fight the Fed, but you can fight the urge to overindulge.Two days after the Fed announcement to extend the longevity, but not alter the duration, of its bond purchases, FOMC members openly began to qualify this decision. The announcement is tantamount to spiking the punch bowl. Price discovery is already distorted in the credit markets and excessive risk taking is already encouraged. With economic recovery priced-into risk assets but mispriced in risk-free assets due to central bank policies, the ability to hedge market downturns may be impaired. This could exacerbate a market correction. This risk remains some time off, but it may approach at some point in 2021 and begin to get priced in much earlier.The failure of the Fed to alter the duration of its bond purchases should embolden the market to break the psychological 1% barrier on the 10-year Treasury bond, especially if we see a US federal stimulus package over the weekend. This would be beneficial to bank securities over the short term, especially if it occurs in tandem with continued bear steepening from the short end of the curve. Concurrently, higher rates would raise the real effective rate and could be dollar negative. Asia and EM securities could follow, then retrace positive moves.Work through the weekend to agree additional US federal stimulus may bear fruit as a compromise on ending the Fed’s emergency lending programs is reached. A limited agreement is priced-in, but downside may also be limited as the early January Senate run-off race in Georgia will become the focus irrespective of the current stimulus bill. The run-off race outcome could deliver even more stimulus shorter thereafter.In Europe, fishing rights are damming the works towards a Brexit deal. This disagreement could be bridged. Meanwhile, Christmas is effectively cancelled in London due to the virus while other US and European jurisdictions continue to see increased economic impacts. Rolling lockdowns do not improve consumer confidence and Q1 2021 economic contractions may ensue. This could impact Asia asset values.In Asia itself, China-centric risk assets continue to perform, although these still have a long way to catchup with the recent US rally. Positive sentiment that China’s economy will continue to outperform are tempered with caution regarding the potential for increased defaults. Vaccine expectations continue to power other markets in Asia in a cognitive dissonance trade which ignores vaccine distribution and time extension risks.Market Outlook: Positive stimulus or Brexit news could lead to a strong start in Asia as the week begins. However, a buy the rumor, sell the fact tactical trade could then ensue. Thin markets may exacerbate price moves over the next two to three weeks. This may confuse noise for signals. We think it better to fade a further market rally. At the same time, we would avoid extending into any year-end decline.

There is a healthy concern that the Fed is spiking this holiday season’s punch bowl while the ECB is sweetening the brew with additional TLTROs and less collateral. US federal stimulus may add the moonshine. These actions will impact Asia’s risk assets. Thin markets could see outsized moves as year-end event deadlines approach. Risk remains to the downside as positive outcomes are already priced in. Nonetheless, the Fed continues to underwrite this market although the longevity is open to debate despite recent announcements. Credit investors cannot fight the Fed, but you can fight the urge to overindulge.Two days after the Fed announcement to extend the longevity, but not alter the duration, of its bond purchases, FOMC members openly began to qualify this decision. The announcement is tantamount to spiking the punch bowl. Price discovery is already distorted in the credit markets and excessive risk taking is already encouraged. With economic recovery priced-into risk assets but mispriced in risk-free assets due to central bank policies, the ability to hedge market downturns may be impaired. This could exacerbate a market correction. This risk remains some time off, but it may approach at some point in 2021 and begin to get priced in much earlier.The failure of the Fed to alter the duration of its bond purchases should embolden the market to break the psychological 1% barrier on the 10-year Treasury bond, especially if we see a US federal stimulus package over the weekend. This would be beneficial to bank securities over the short term, especially if it occurs in tandem with continued bear steepening from the short end of the curve. Concurrently, higher rates would raise the real effective rate and could be dollar negative. Asia and EM securities could follow, then retrace positive moves.Work through the weekend to agree additional US federal stimulus may bear fruit as a compromise on ending the Fed’s emergency lending programs is reached. A limited agreement is priced-in, but downside may also be limited as the early January Senate run-off race in Georgia will become the focus irrespective of the current stimulus bill. The run-off race outcome could deliver even more stimulus shorter thereafter.In Europe, fishing rights are damming the works towards a Brexit deal. This disagreement could be bridged. Meanwhile, Christmas is effectively cancelled in London due to the virus while other US and European jurisdictions continue to see increased economic impacts. Rolling lockdowns do not improve consumer confidence and Q1 2021 economic contractions may ensue. This could impact Asia asset values.In Asia itself, China-centric risk assets continue to perform, although these still have a long way to catchup with the recent US rally. Positive sentiment that China’s economy will continue to outperform are tempered with caution regarding the potential for increased defaults. Vaccine expectations continue to power other markets in Asia in a cognitive dissonance trade which ignores vaccine distribution and time extension risks.Market Outlook: Positive stimulus or Brexit news could lead to a strong start in Asia as the week begins. However, a buy the rumor, sell the fact tactical trade could then ensue. Thin markets may exacerbate price moves over the next two to three weeks. This may confuse noise for signals. We think it better to fade a further market rally. At the same time, we would avoid extending into any year-end decline.

Bank Credit Weekly: Fed Spikes While the ECB Sweetens the Punch Bowl

China

China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. operates in commercial banking businesses. The Bank provides deposit, loan, settlement, discount, financial bond issuance, government bond underwriting and trading, letter of credit, bank guarantee, and other related financial services.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

China Minsheng Banking A (600016 CH)

Quiddity Weekly H/A: High Volatility in Materials and Industrials and Spreads Over Lunar New Year

H/A spreads have been reasonably volatile over the CNY period, but again they net narrowed over two weeks. There are still several sectors where...

Travis Lundy

Ping An Insurance - Awful Bank Result

PING AN INSURANCE: PAB reported a 25.1% lower linked quarter result. The bulk of the earnings decline was attributed to a 17.1% increase in costs;...

Thomas J. Monaco

China Merchants Bank – Massive 4Q20 Charge-Offs

CHINA MERCHANTS BANK: CMB announced a poor set of preliminary 4Q20 results, as profit declined 22.7% QOQ. Credit risk has substantially increased...

Thomas J. Monaco

Bank Credit Compass: Regime Change May Limit the Annual January Bounce

Goldilocks may morph into a market wolf if the US Senate changes hands while 100 mask wearing days haunts of Carter-like sentiment. This is not...

Hank Calenti, CFA

Bank Credit Weekly: Fed Spikes While the ECB Sweetens the Punch Bowl

The Fed spikes while the ECB sweetens the seasonal punch bowl. US stimulus may add the moonshine. This could be a festive week for bank securities....

Hank Calenti, CFA

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)