Semiconductor & Technology Specialist, Ingenuity

William Keating

Dr. William Keating is a highly experienced senior executive with over 25 years experience in the IT/Semiconductor Industry. The majority of Dr. Keating's career was spent at Intel Corporation where he held senior leadership positions in Europe, the US and Asia from 1992 through 2014. He served as Intel's IT Director for APAC, China & Japan from 2005 through 2014 when he was based in Hong Kong and was responsible for the IT systems (Infrastructure, Networks, Data Centres, ERP, Sales & Marketing systems, Business Intelligence etc. ) for all of Intel's offices & factories through the region. From 1998 through 2005, he was the founder & director of an internal IT Consulting Organisation (IT Flex Services), a 500-person team which remains a core part of the Intel IT Organisation to this day. Dr. Keating's first 6 years at Intel were spent in charge of the Factory Automation Systems (Robotics, Databases, Networks, Servers, Clients etc.) supporting Intel's then state-of-the-art 200mm factory network. Since leaving Intel in 2014, Dr Keating established his own Technology Research & Consulting Company (www.ingenuity.hk) where he focuses on the products, roadmaps & technologies of companies such as Intel, AMD, Samsung, Apple, Micron- as well as the key equipment suppliers to those companies e.g. ASML, AMAT, Canon, Nikon etc. Dr. Keating specializes in niche topics of high significance within the semiconductor industry. These include the future of Moore's Law and in particular the significance of Lithography in maintaining Moore's Law (EUV, SDA, NanoImprint), the role & growth of the GPU in specialised applications such as Deep Learning (Neural Networks) for Voice, Image & Pattern recognition at companies such as Facebook, Google & Baidu. He also holds regular discussions on the future of memory, in particular the rise of 3D NAND and the emergence of new memory technologies such as 3D Xpoint.

Semiconductor & Technology Specialist

Tesla (TSLA): 1Q Deliveries - Aging Products or the Impact of Tax Credit Phase Out?

Tesla "Autonomy Day" Takes Investors For Another Ride

Tesla (TSLA): Impressions from 1Q Earnings Call - One Offs Behind the Earnings Miss

Tesla's Autopilot 3.0 Hardware - The Delusion May Be Dawning

Ingenuity

Our focus is exclusively on in-depth research & consulting in the broader semiconductor industry. We focus on the key players, namely Intel, Micron, Qualcomm, Apple, Samsung, NVIDIA, AMD, TSMC & Global Foundries - as well as some of the lesser known, but nonetheless critical, companies such as ASML (for EUV), Mellanox, Cavium, Xilinx etc. We specialise in their products, roadmaps, process technologies, competitive advantages & threats etc. We also help our clients understand the implications of new and emerging technologies, e.g. 3D X-Point, 3D NAND, Carbon Nanotubes, Autonomous Driving, Graphene, Silicon Photonics, Wafer-Level Optics, Artificial Intelligence, FPGA, GPU, ASIC etc. 

Semiconductor Analysis & Research

Equity Bottom-Up

In its final report into a fatal accident involving a <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/20279" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:20279:1">Tesla</a> Model S being driven in Autopilot Mode by one Joshua Brown, the NHTSA included the controversial finding that having Autopilot engaged reduced accident rates by 40%. Now, after battling both the NHTSA and Tesla for almost two years to get access to the underlying dataset, independent US-based consulting firm QCS has published a detailed report casting serious doubt on the methodology, statistics and science behind this 40% safer claim. Meanwhile on March 2'nd 2019, in a carbon copy of the circumstances which claimed the life of Joshua Brown almost three years ago, another Tesla driver lost his life when his Model 3 crashed into a semi-trailer as it legitimately crossed his line of travel to make a right-hand turn at an uncontrolled intersection. At the time of the accident, it was unknown whether Autopilot was engaged or not. If it transpires that it was engaged, it will represent a serious blow to Tesla's credibility not least in part due to the company's claims that its self-driving technology is continuously learning and improving based on the experiences and data collected on a daily basis from its ever-growing fleet of vehicles on the road.Until now, on the one-month anniversary on this latest fatality, Tesla's silence on the matter remains deafening.

In its final report into a fatal accident involving a Tesla Model S being driven in Autopilot Mode by one Joshua Brown, the NHTSA included the controversial finding that having Autopilot engaged reduced accident rates by 40%. Now, after battling both the NHTSA and Tesla for almost two years to get access to the underlying dataset, independent US-based consulting firm QCS has published a detailed report casting serious doubt on the methodology, statistics and science behind this 40% safer claim. Meanwhile on March 2'nd 2019, in a carbon copy of the circumstances which claimed the life of Joshua Brown almost three years ago, another Tesla driver lost his life when his Model 3 crashed into a semi-trailer as it legitimately crossed his line of travel to make a right-hand turn at an uncontrolled intersection. At the time of the accident, it was unknown whether Autopilot was engaged or not. If it transpires that it was engaged, it will represent a serious blow to Tesla's credibility not least in part due to the company's claims that its self-driving technology is continuously learning and improving based on the experiences and data collected on a daily basis from its ever-growing fleet of vehicles on the road.Until now, on the one-month anniversary on this latest fatality, Tesla's silence on the matter remains deafening.  

Tesla. Autopilot Safety Claims Roundly Debunked As Deafening Silence Follows Latest Fatality