Financials & FinTech research, Galliano’s Financials Research

Victor Galliano

Victor Galliano is an experienced equity banks analyst, having covered Latin America banks and non-bank financials for over 12 years, as well as more recently covering the Italian banks. He has worked in sell side equity research for 30 years in a career spanning Barclays, HSBC, BBVA LatInvest, Barings and NatWest.
Galliano's Financials Research provides fundamental research in Emerging Markets financials, including FinTech, as well as financials in select Developed Markets.
The investment style applied is generally value oriented, although Growth At Reasonable Price (GARP) strategies can also be used where appropriate. Our investment research approach aim is often contrarian, looking to capitalise on overly sceptical or optimistic consensus views. In terms of valuation techniques, the focus is on PBV ratio to ROE, PE multiples and dividend yield, as well as the application of PEG ratios and, where appropriate, Sum of the Parts (SOTP) valuations.

Financials & FinTech research

Southern Europe Bank Screens; Picks for 2021

Unicredit (UCG IM) – Orcel’s Balancing Act

Natixis (KN FP) - BPCE: European Bank Consolidation Rolls On

Italian Banks M&A - The Complex Italian Job

Financials & FinTech, EM & Developed Markets

Galliano’s Financials Research

Galliano's Financials Research provides fundamental research in Emerging Markets financials, including FinTech, as well as financials in select Developed Markets.

The investment style applied is generally value oriented, although Growth At Reasonable Price (GARP) strategies can also be used where appropriate. 

Our investment research approach aim is often contrarian, looking to capitalise on overly sceptical or optimistic consensus views. In terms of valuation techniques, the focus is on PBV ratio to ROE, PE multiples and dividend yield, as well as the application of PEG ratios and, where appropriate, Sum of the Parts (SOTP) valuations.

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<ul>
<li>The elephant in the Italian bank M&amp;A room is government controlled <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/banca-monte-dei-paschi-di-siena" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:21162:1" rel="noopener">Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (BMPS IM)</a>, which needs to find a merger partner in 2021; will that be <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/unicredit-spa" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:21234:1" rel="noopener">UniCredit SpA (UCG IM)</a>, post-Mustier, and who could be its new CEO?</li>
<li>We believe that, in the event of a Unicredit acquisition of BMPS, it would require meaningful “government sponsorship”; in effect, for BMPS, pre-deal, to dispose of the bulk of its NPLs – which is underway – and for a capital infusion that renders the deal to be capital neutral for Unicredit</li>
<li>The other big M&amp;A unknowns relate to the listed mid-cap banks especially <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/banco-bpm-spa" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:28121:1" rel="noopener">Banco BPM SpA (BAMI IM)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bper-banca-s-p-a" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:21165:1" rel="noopener">BPER Banca S.p.A (BPE IM)</a>; these banks need to cut costs and branch networks, which can be more readily incorporated into a merger restructuring plan</li>
<li>We believe that the risk of a BMPS acquisition is largely priced into Unicredit shares, and we expect its wide PBV discount to premium valued <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/intesa-sanpaolo-spa" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:21200:1" rel="noopener">Intesa Sanpaolo (ISP IM)</a> to narrow;  our recommendation is to go long Unicredit, short Intesa</li>
<li>We think <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/credit-agricole-sa" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:21373:1" rel="noopener">Credit Agricole Sa (ACA FP)</a> is unlikely to sweeten the <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/credito-valtellinese-spa" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:21175:1" rel="noopener">Credito Valtellinese Sc (CVAL IM)</a> cash offer of €10.50 per share, and with CreVal shares trading at a 7% offer premium, there could be downside risk</li>
<li>We remain negative on Banco BPM shares, as, in the wake of the CredAg offer for CreVal, we believe that BPM’s options are limited, and that it may be the potential “back-stop” merger candidate with BMPS, in the event of no deal with Unicredit; the alternative could be a BPM-BPER merger, and we turn constructive on BPER, after its protracted underperformance</li>
<li>Risks to our view include Unicredit acquiring BMPS on worse than expected terms, with Intesa on the other hand delivering better than expected synergies and savings from the UBI integration; other risks also include a bidder emerging for BPM, as well as no merger or bid for BPER</li>
</ul>


The elephant in the Italian bank M&amp;A room is government controlled Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (BMPS IM), which needs to find a merger partner in 2021; will that be UniCredit SpA (UCG IM), post-Mustier, and who could be its new CEO?
We believe that, in the event of a Unicredit acquisition of BMPS, it would require meaningful “government sponsorship”; in effect, for BMPS, pre-deal, to dispose of the bulk of its NPLs – which is underway – and for a capital infusion that renders the deal to be capital neutral for Unicredit
The other big M&amp;A unknowns relate to the listed mid-cap banks especially Banco BPM SpA (BAMI IM) and BPER Banca S.p.A (BPE IM); these banks need to cut costs and branch networks, which can be more readily incorporated into a merger restructuring plan
We believe that the risk of a BMPS acquisition is largely priced into Unicredit shares, and we expect its wide PBV discount to premium valued Intesa Sanpaolo (ISP IM) to narrow;  our recommendation is to go long Unicredit, short Intesa
We think Credit Agricole Sa (ACA FP) is unlikely to sweeten the Credito Valtellinese Sc (CVAL IM) cash offer of €10.50 per share, and with CreVal shares trading at a 7% offer premium, there could be downside risk
We remain negative on Banco BPM shares, as, in the wake of the CredAg offer for CreVal, we believe that BPM’s options are limited, and that it may be the potential “back-stop” merger candidate with BMPS, in the event of no deal with Unicredit; the alternative could be a BPM-BPER merger, and we turn constructive on BPER, after its protracted underperformance
Risks to our view include Unicredit acquiring BMPS on worse than expected terms, with Intesa on the other hand delivering better than expected synergies and savings from the UBI integration; other risks also include a bidder emerging for BPM, as well as no merger or bid for BPER


Italian Banks M&A Scenarios: The Italian Job in 2021