Asian Fixed Income/Frontier Market Research

Bondcritic

Bondcritic, established in 2009, is designed to be an independent credit research voice that helps investors gain insights and unbiased analyses on Asian fixed income market. Our mission is to discover deep-value Asian high-yield and distressed bonds with a bottom-up approach, together with the help of our proprietary ESG (Environmental, Social Development, and Governance) model. At the same time, we focus on bringing investment cases of unrated and unloved issuers to the general public.

China Huarong Asset Management  - Ratings Agencies Fail Us Again

China Huarong Asset Management (2799 HK): This Is Manageable

China Huarong: Contagion Creates Opportunity

Battle Lines Drawn As BABA Builds Out First/Last-Mile Capacity; But Who Will Fund 75+ Bn CNY CapEx?

Independent Asian Credit Research, Bondcritic

Warut Promboon

Independent Asian Credit Research

Credit

We highlighted <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-huarong-asset-management-26375cc4-728e-4f75-b058-64298b10f256" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:28089:1" rel="noopener">China Huarong Asset Management (HUAZ CH)</a> (Huarong) in our debut  “The Chinese Credit Chronicle (CCC)” last month on Huarong’s annual report delay. The subsequent events have stabilized Huarong’s HRINTH complex somewhat before the market fears Huarong’s debt could be restructured.
The rating downgrades by Fitch and Moody’s are less of an issue, in our view, as they are simply actions to catch up with what the market fears. Huarong’s story is less flamboyant than the HNA Group Limited (HNA) and yet it highlights the very same problem with HNA in terms of a lack of transparency and implicit support by the Chinese government. Both were eventually rescued by state-owned Chinese banks and both could be restructured down the road.
At the end of the day, we believe Huarong has been viewed as a quasi-sovereign credit and even rating agencies have been being caught by surprise as the market doubts support from the Chinese government will be certain. For Huarong, we still believe government support can be expected, but we believe the dust has not settled yet on the liabilities (and losses) that Huarong may have in store for bondholders. As a result, we cannot recommend buying Huarong’s HRINTH complex.
In a greater context, the risk we see here is that the rating agencies may revamp their methodologies to assess Chinese government-related entities (GREs). The adjustment could result in a wholesale downgrade of those GREs which are spread negative, not just for the Chinese GREs, but also other Chinese credits with implicit support from the central and local Chinese governments. We note that Chinese issuers have come a long way in terms of corporate governance improvement but transparency remains one of the key reasons why developed market USD bonds trade much tighter than Chinese USD bonds with the same rating, and this Huarong saga is a reminder that the spread will not narrow anytime in the near future.

We highlighted China Huarong Asset Management (HUAZ CH) (Huarong) in our debut  “The Chinese Credit Chronicle (CCC)” last month on Huarong’s annual report delay. The subsequent events have stabilized Huarong’s HRINTH complex somewhat before the market fears Huarong’s debt could be restructured.
The rating downgrades by Fitch and Moody’s are less of an issue, in our view, as they are simply actions to catch up with what the market fears. Huarong’s story is less flamboyant than the HNA Group Limited (HNA) and yet it highlights the very same problem with HNA in terms of a lack of transparency and implicit support by the Chinese government. Both were eventually rescued by state-owned Chinese banks and both could be restructured down the road.
At the end of the day, we believe Huarong has been viewed as a quasi-sovereign credit and even rating agencies have been being caught by surprise as the market doubts support from the Chinese government will be certain. For Huarong, we still believe government support can be expected, but we believe the dust has not settled yet on the liabilities (and losses) that Huarong may have in store for bondholders. As a result, we cannot recommend buying Huarong’s HRINTH complex.
In a greater context, the risk we see here is that the rating agencies may revamp their methodologies to assess Chinese government-related entities (GREs). The adjustment could result in a wholesale downgrade of those GREs which are spread negative, not just for the Chinese GREs, but also other Chinese credits with implicit support from the central and local Chinese governments. We note that Chinese issuers have come a long way in terms of corporate governance improvement but transparency remains one of the key reasons why developed market USD bonds trade much tighter than Chinese USD bonds with the same rating, and this Huarong saga is a reminder that the spread will not narrow anytime in the near future.

China Orient Asset Management Co (1167Z CH)

China Huarong Asset Management

China Huarong: No Confidence Motion