Asian Equities Analyst, Logistics & Transport, Tracking Traffic

Daniel Hellberg

Asian Equities Analyst, Logistics & Transport

Tracking Traffic

Focusing on Asian logistics, transportation, and travel companies

Equity Capital Markets

Kerry Express Thailand / Equity Capital Markets

<p>The purpose of this note is to analyze the different eCommerce fulfillment markets pursued by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kerry-express-thailand" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:29253:1" rel="noopener">Kerry Express Thailand (KEX TB)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/best-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:25494:1" rel="noopener">BEST Inc (BEST US).</a> KEX focuses on Thailand's domestic express market, while Best has a competing domestic service and is also developing a X-border express service to quickly move Chinese goods into multiple SE Asian markets.</p><p>To better understand these two markets, we looked at market data from KEX's IPO documents as well as financial data disclosed by eCommerce giant <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a>. These figures, combined with numbers from KEX itself and the Chinese express companies, give investors a sense of the size and growth potential of the Thai domestic and X-border eComm fulfillment markets.</p><p>While both markets offer attractive growth, they also present distinct challenges. In the Thai domestic express market, these challenges include a lack of scale (compared to China's expess market) and relatively low population density, especially outside of Metro Bangkok. Challenges presented by the X-border market include exorbitant pricing, competition from large multinationals, and increased complexity (ie, paperwork, customs, tariffs, etc). </p><p>We conclude that KEX is an intriguing pure play on Thailand's eCommerce development whose upcoming IPO is worth following. Regarding Best, we recently upgraded its shares to Buy on expected sector consolidation. To date its Thai and X-border revenues remain a very small part of the company's business which probably won't "move the needle" in the near-term. </p>

The purpose of this note is to analyze the different eCommerce fulfillment markets pursued by Kerry Express Thailand (KEX TB) and BEST Inc (BEST US). KEX focuses on Thailand's domestic express market, while Best has a competing domestic service and is also developing a X-border express service to quickly move Chinese goods into multiple SE Asian markets.To better understand these two markets, we looked at market data from KEX's IPO documents as well as financial data disclosed by eCommerce giant Alibaba Group (BABA US). These figures, combined with numbers from KEX itself and the Chinese express companies, give investors a sense of the size and growth potential of the Thai domestic and X-border eComm fulfillment markets.While both markets offer attractive growth, they also present distinct challenges. In the Thai domestic express market, these challenges include a lack of scale (compared to China's expess market) and relatively low population density, especially outside of Metro Bangkok. Challenges presented by the X-border market include exorbitant pricing, competition from large multinationals, and increased complexity (ie, paperwork, customs, tariffs, etc). We conclude that KEX is an intriguing pure play on Thailand's eCommerce development whose upcoming IPO is worth following. Regarding Best, we recently upgraded its shares to Buy on expected sector consolidation. To date its Thai and X-border revenues remain a very small part of the company's business which probably won't "move the needle" in the near-term. 

Kerry Express & Best Inc: Two Approaches to ECommerce Logistics Growth in SE Asia

Pan-Asia Index Rebalances/ Events/ Delta One, Periscope Analytics

Brian Freitas

Pan-Asia Index Rebalances/ Events/ Delta One

Quantitative Analysis

<div><p>The Asia Short Interest weekly looks at moves in market wide short interest and highlights movements in stock specific short interest across Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan using the last available data published by the relevant authorities.</p></div><div><p>The SFC has not yet published the short sell position report for Hong Kong for the week ended 25 September. We will cover that in our next update or in a discussion to this Insight.</p></div><div><p>Japan saw increase in short positions on <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/fast-retailing-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:751:1" rel="noopener">Fast Retailing (9983 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/seven-i-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1041:1" rel="noopener">Seven &amp; I Holdings (3382 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bridgestone-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8914:1" rel="noopener">Bridgestone Corp (5108 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hitachi-transport-system-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:2395:1" rel="noopener">Hitachi Transport System (9086 JP)</a> while there was short covering on <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/softbank-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27445:1" rel="noopener">Softbank Corp (9434 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/komatsu-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8416:1" rel="noopener">Komatsu Ltd (6301 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yamato-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:2:1" rel="noopener">Yamato Holdings (9064 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/lasalle-logiport-reit" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22658:1" rel="noopener">Lasalle Logiport REIT (3466 JP)</a>. Sectorally, short increased in Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Information Technology, and were covered in Communication Services.</p></div><div><p>Stocks in Korea that saw the most short covering were <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/netmarble-corporation" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22839:1" rel="noopener">Netmarble Corporation (251270 KS)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/celltrion-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:991:1" rel="noopener">Celltrion Inc (068270 KS)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/samsung-electronics-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:191:1" rel="noopener">Samsung Electronics (005930 KS)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/shinpoong-pharmaceutical-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7296:1" rel="noopener">Shinpoong Pharmaceutical (019170 KS)</a>. </p></div><div><p>Stocks in Taiwan that saw the highest increase in shorts were <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/united-microelectronics-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6450:1" rel="noopener">United Microelectronics Corp (2303 TT)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/largan-precision-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:9126:1" rel="noopener">Largan Precision (3008 TT)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/realtek-semiconductor-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7326:1" rel="noopener">Realtek Semiconductor (2379 TT)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/taiwan-cement" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:19736:1" rel="noopener">Taiwan Cement (1101 TT)</a> while shorts were covered on Swancor Holdings (3708 TT), <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ruentex-development-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8382:1" rel="noopener">Ruentex Development (9945 TT)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/novatek-microelectronics-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:10904:1" rel="noopener">Novatek Microelectronics Corp (3034 TT)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nanya-technology-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3269:1" rel="noopener">Nanya Technology (2408 TT)</a>. </p></div>

The Asia Short Interest weekly looks at moves in market wide short interest and highlights movements in stock specific short interest across Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan using the last available data published by the relevant authorities.The SFC has not yet published the short sell position report for Hong Kong for the week ended 25 September. We will cover that in our next update or in a discussion to this Insight.Japan saw increase in short positions on Fast Retailing (9983 JP), Seven &amp; I Holdings (3382 JP), Bridgestone Corp (5108 JP) and Hitachi Transport System (9086 JP) while there was short covering on Softbank Corp (9434 JP), Komatsu Ltd (6301 JP), Yamato Holdings (9064 JP) and Lasalle Logiport REIT (3466 JP). Sectorally, short increased in Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Information Technology, and were covered in Communication Services.Stocks in Korea that saw the most short covering were Netmarble Corporation (251270 KS), Celltrion Inc (068270 KS), Samsung Electronics (005930 KS) and Shinpoong Pharmaceutical (019170 KS). Stocks in Taiwan that saw the highest increase in shorts were United Microelectronics Corp (2303 TT), Largan Precision (3008 TT), Realtek Semiconductor (2379 TT) and Taiwan Cement (1101 TT) while shorts were covered on Swancor Holdings (3708 TT), Ruentex Development (9945 TT), Novatek Microelectronics Corp (3034 TT) and Nanya Technology (2408 TT). 

Asia Short Interest Weekly: Fast Retailing, Softbank, Seven&I, Netmarble, Shinpoong, UMC, Largan

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

<p>At the end of March 2016, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hitachi-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7797:1" rel="noopener">Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)</a>,  <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hitachi-transport-system-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:2395:1" rel="noopener">Hitachi Transport System (9086 JP)</a>, and as-yet unlisted <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sg-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26070:1" rel="noopener">SG Holdings (9143 JP)</a><a href="https://www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/month/2016/03/f_160330a.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> that Hitachi Transport and SG subsidiary, and well-known door-to-door delivery unit Sagawa Express would form a capital and business tie-up and would look to merge <em>"within three years"</em> (i.e. merger by 1 April 2019). </p><p>The deal was that Hitachi Transport was going to spend ¥66.3bn to buy a 20% stake in the unlisted <em>delivery</em> subsidiary of then still-unlisted SG Holdings, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hitachi-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7797:1" rel="noopener">Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)</a> was going to sell a 29% stake (out of the 59% they owned) in Hitachi Transport for ¥87.5 billion. They were both going to expand strongly outside of Asia.  HTS was known at the time for its 3PL and "Smart Logistics" capabilities to make customer supply chains more efficient, etc, whereas Sagawa was known as a top last-mile delivery business. The combined entity was set to overtake <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yamato-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:2:1" rel="noopener">Yamato Holdings (9064 JP)</a> in terms of revenue and get closer to industry top dog <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nippon-express-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18582:1" rel="noopener">Nippon Express (9062 JP)</a>. It was supposed to help SG improve margins by doing more in B2B. </p><p>SG IPOed in late 2017. Three years came and went. Nothing happened. There were collaborative projects started such as a "Japan-China integrated service" and "mutual utilisation of logistics facilities" such as e-commerce delivery hubs, but it was slow-going.</p><p>Some signs of discord have been clear for a while. If one reads between the lines one could have wondered what the point was even in 2016, but I expect there was hope that the two sides could get along. </p><p>In late May 2019 after the earnings presentation which marked the three year anniversary/deadline of a deal, and a new <a href="https://www.hitachi-transportsystem.com/en/ir/library/presentations/pdf/midtermmanagementplan_190524enR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mid-Term Management Plan</a> "Logisteed 2021" in which the forward-looking part had basically no mention of SG or Sagawa, the Nikkei carried an interview with HTS President Nakatani who said, when asked about the integration, <em>"I am aware that we are moving toward integration. I would like to harmonize future directions." </em>[Nikkei: He showed a positive attitude...]<em> "We have decided to discuss and consider the possibility of business integration, but we have not made any decisions, including any start to discussions."</em></p><p>Three years on and there had obviously been discussions about discussions, but the two sides hadn't made any commitment to starting discussions officially. </p><h2>The NEW News</h2><p>Today mid-day, Diamond Online released a scoop saying the capital and business tie-up between the two was going to be scrapped. </p><p>The first reaction was to send Hitachi Transport shares down 10+%. </p><p>Hitachi Transport's first release to the exchange said that the article wasn't based on information they announced and that it was not going to be a dissolution of the capital tie-up, just a re-arranging of the deckchairs and a board meeting was going on and there would be an announcement within the day. HTS shares - which at that point were down 7% on the day - bounced sharply. </p><p>After the close it became clear there was a difference of opinion on what the "review of the level equity affiliation" actually meant. </p><p>The headline of the Hitachi Transport release says "Announcement of Partial Modification of the Strategic Capital and Business Alliance with SG Holdings and SAGAWA EXPRESS". It talks at some length about what has been accomplished in four and a half years of working together and then it notes the "modification of the capital tie-up."</p><ol>
<li>HTS will sell the 20% of Sagawa Express that it owns for ¥87.5bn. That trade will be executed on 29 Sep 2020. </li>
<li>HTS will buy back "a portion" of the shares that SG owns in a <a href="https://www.hitachi-transportsystem.com/jp/news/pdf/20200924_jikokabusikinoshutokukaituke.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ToSTNeT-3 transaction</a> the morning of 25 September. Reminder that SG owns 32.35mm shares of HTS or 29.00% of shares out. Tomorrow morning, HTS will buy back 27.675mm shares at the closing price on the 24 September of ¥3,570. That is up to 24.8% of shares out. </li>
</ol><p> That is a very big unwind in a very big hurry. </p><p>This creates some interesting side effects and they are well-worth thinking about. </p><p>More below the fold.</p>

At the end of March 2016, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP),  Hitachi Transport System (9086 JP), and as-yet unlisted SG Holdings (9143 JP)announced that Hitachi Transport and SG subsidiary, and well-known door-to-door delivery unit Sagawa Express would form a capital and business tie-up and would look to merge "within three years" (i.e. merger by 1 April 2019). The deal was that Hitachi Transport was going to spend ¥66.3bn to buy a 20% stake in the unlisted delivery subsidiary of then still-unlisted SG Holdings, and Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) was going to sell a 29% stake (out of the 59% they owned) in Hitachi Transport for ¥87.5 billion. They were both going to expand strongly outside of Asia.  HTS was known at the time for its 3PL and "Smart Logistics" capabilities to make customer supply chains more efficient, etc, whereas Sagawa was known as a top last-mile delivery business. The combined entity was set to overtake Yamato Holdings (9064 JP) in terms of revenue and get closer to industry top dog Nippon Express (9062 JP). It was supposed to help SG improve margins by doing more in B2B. SG IPOed in late 2017. Three years came and went. Nothing happened. There were collaborative projects started such as a "Japan-China integrated service" and "mutual utilisation of logistics facilities" such as e-commerce delivery hubs, but it was slow-going.Some signs of discord have been clear for a while. If one reads between the lines one could have wondered what the point was even in 2016, but I expect there was hope that the two sides could get along. In late May 2019 after the earnings presentation which marked the three year anniversary/deadline of a deal, and a new Mid-Term Management Plan "Logisteed 2021" in which the forward-looking part had basically no mention of SG or Sagawa, the Nikkei carried an interview with HTS President Nakatani who said, when asked about the integration, "I am aware that we are moving toward integration. I would like to harmonize future directions." [Nikkei: He showed a positive attitude...] "We have decided to discuss and consider the possibility of business integration, but we have not made any decisions, including any start to discussions."Three years on and there had obviously been discussions about discussions, but the two sides hadn't made any commitment to starting discussions officially. The NEW NewsToday mid-day, Diamond Online released a scoop saying the capital and business tie-up between the two was going to be scrapped. The first reaction was to send Hitachi Transport shares down 10+%. Hitachi Transport's first release to the exchange said that the article wasn't based on information they announced and that it was not going to be a dissolution of the capital tie-up, just a re-arranging of the deckchairs and a board meeting was going on and there would be an announcement within the day. HTS shares - which at that point were down 7% on the day - bounced sharply. After the close it became clear there was a difference of opinion on what the "review of the level equity affiliation" actually meant. The headline of the Hitachi Transport release says "Announcement of Partial Modification of the Strategic Capital and Business Alliance with SG Holdings and SAGAWA EXPRESS". It talks at some length about what has been accomplished in four and a half years of working together and then it notes the "modification of the capital tie-up."
HTS will sell the 20% of Sagawa Express that it owns for ¥87.5bn. That trade will be executed on 29 Sep 2020. 
HTS will buy back "a portion" of the shares that SG owns in a ToSTNeT-3 transaction the morning of 25 September. Reminder that SG owns 32.35mm shares of HTS or 29.00% of shares out. Tomorrow morning, HTS will buy back 27.675mm shares at the closing price on the 24 September of ¥3,570. That is up to 24.8% of shares out. 
 That is a very big unwind in a very big hurry. This creates some interesting side effects and they are well-worth thinking about. More below the fold.

Hitachi Transport & SG Holdings:  Consciously Uncoupling

Japan Specialist

Mark Chadwick

Equity Bottom-Up

<div><p><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">Until now, the package delivery company has been a sleeping giant. After years of chasing market share, but struggling with profit growth, the company has woken up to a significant earnings opportunity. Despite dominating the “last mile” delivery in a market where ecommerce growth has continued to soar, Yamato’s profits have trailed due to a lack of innovation and high labor costs. Hopefully, that is all in the past, as the company seems to have shifted its focus from the top line to the bottom. T</span><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">he sell-side doesn’t seem to have paid much attention and t</span><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">hese changes have yet to be reflected in the share price.  </span><span data-ccp-props='{"201341983":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":259}'> </span><span> </span></p></div><div><p><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">What are the key issues facing Yamato right now? It boils down to two simple questions. Most importantly, can the company lift margins to competitor norms? If they can, is the current stock price attractive?</span><span data-ccp-props='{"201341983":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":259}'> </span></p></div>

Until now, the package delivery company has been a sleeping giant. After years of chasing market share, but struggling with profit growth, the company has woken up to a significant earnings opportunity. Despite dominating the “last mile” delivery in a market where ecommerce growth has continued to soar, Yamato’s profits have trailed due to a lack of innovation and high labor costs. Hopefully, that is all in the past, as the company seems to have shifted its focus from the top line to the bottom. The sell-side doesn’t seem to have paid much attention and these changes have yet to be reflected in the share price.    What are the key issues facing Yamato right now? It boils down to two simple questions. Most importantly, can the company lift margins to competitor norms? If they can, is the current stock price attractive? 

Yamato(9064) – The Sleeping Giant Awakens as Consensus Continues to Slumber

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist, LightStream Research

Campbell Gunn

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist

Long-Short Analysis on Japan, Asia and the World

LightStream Research

LightStream conducts quantitatively rigorous and data-driven analysis with a focus on Japan and Asia.

We consistently cover the Tech, Consumer and Industrial sectors, and provide ECM and Events coverage more broadly.

We supplement traditional qualitative insights from company relationships with a robust quantitative foundation that examines as much historical data as is available.
We further refine the accuracy of our insights and calls through the use of alternative data to flesh out current trends, and through a valuation framework that emphasises non-superficial peer group selection and a proper attempt to understand the metrics and changes that have driven security valuations in the past.

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/834/original/2020-08-02_06-39-22.png?1596317982" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149834"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>CORRECTION</strong> - The last day of July saw the TOPIX index fall by 2.8% to reach a new two-month low, 8.2% below the closing high of June 8th. A combination of a strong yen, peak COVID-19 cases, the continuing unedifying stream of results &amp; revisions, and month-end portfolio 'adjustments' proved toxic. Our Results Score lost a further 57 basis points, while bullish initial full-year forecasts from <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/takeda-pharmaceutical-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:11747:1" rel="noopener">Takeda Pharmaceutical (4502 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/denso-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18703:1" rel="noopener">Denso (6902 JP)</a> helped the Forecast/Revision Score recover by 51 basis points. Nevertheless, the market's correlation with earnings and revisions momentum remains distorted by central bank liquidity. As noted in<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-market-update-tired" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41562" rel="noopener"> Tired</a>, we expect both our Scores to bottom nearer the 2009 lows, in which case the Bank of Japan's cumulative purchases could reach over 10% of market value.</p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/839/original/2020-08-02_07-35-10.png?1596321328" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149839"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>DOWNFALL</strong> - After one-third of quarterly earnings announcements, at the current pace forward aggregate operating and net income could reach ¥35 trillion and ¥20 trillion, respectively by the end of the month, taking the market multiple to 30x, absent any further correction in share prices. </p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/840/original/2020-08-02_07-52-16.png?1596322358" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149840"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>SECTOR SCORES</strong> - As in past cycles, the <strong>Information Technology</strong>,<strong> Internet</strong>, and<strong> Healthcare</strong> Sectors have proved to be the most resilient. On the downside, the breadth of the lowest-scoring Sectors is abnormal, with <strong>Consumer Services</strong> and <strong>Transport &amp; Logistics</strong> joining <strong>Metals</strong>, <strong>Autos</strong>, <strong>Eletcial Equipment</strong> and<strong> Machinery</strong>. The trailing-twelve-month (TTM) results in the table below confirm the chart above but suggests some caution over <strong>Internet</strong> Sector margins.   </p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/842/original/2020-08-02_07-59-45.png?1596322803" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149842"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><hr><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>•BEST &amp; WORST 31st JULY •</strong></p><p style="text-align: left;"><strong>BEST &amp; WORST</strong> - Combining the day's results, revisions and forecasts, we select the 'best' and the 'worst' announcements according to our scoring. On the podium were <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/takeda-pharmaceutical-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:11747:1" rel="noopener">Takeda Pharmaceutical (4502 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/infocom-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8412:1" rel="noopener">Infocom (4348 JP)</a>. In the pits were <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/casio-computer-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18338:1" rel="noopener">Casio Computer (6952 JP)</a> and three railway lines - <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/odakyu-electric-railway-co" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:5405:1" rel="noopener">Odakyu (9007 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/west-japan-railway-co" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:12077:1" rel="noopener">West Japan (9021 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/central-japan-railway-co" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13520:1" rel="noopener">Central Japan (9022 JP)</a> for which we will show the Peer Group's record-low long-term Scores.</p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/913/original/2020-08-02_08-30-42.png?1596324654" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149913"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/914/original/2020-08-02_08-31-29.png?1596324699" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149914"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/915/original/2020-08-02_08-33-28.png?1596324818" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149915"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/149/916/original/2020-08-02_08-40-22.png?1596325251" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="149916"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><div>
<hr>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>DAILY STATS</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>PERCENTAGES</strong> - <strong>66%</strong> of quarterly results,  <strong>71%</strong> of annual forecasts/revisions and <strong>75%</strong> of interim forecasts have negative Scores and <strong>26%</strong> of companies reporting lost money for the quarter.</p>
</div><hr><div><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>429 Quarterly Results</strong></p></div><div><ul>
<li>
<strong>Results Score:</strong> 28% Positive / 6% Neutral / 66% Negative</li>
<li>
<strong>Average Results Score Change:</strong> -3.1 points</li>
<li>
<strong>Average % Change in Revenue:</strong> -9.3% Quarter YoY / -2.0% Rolling TTM YoY </li>
<li>
<strong>Average Operating Profit Margin Change:</strong> -1.0 ppt</li>
<li>
<strong>Percentage Making Quarterly Losses:</strong> 26%</li>
</ul></div><hr><div><p style="text-align: center;"><br><strong>153 Annual • 115 Interim Forecasts/Revisions</strong></p></div><div><ul>
<li>
<strong>Annual Forecast/Revision Score:</strong> 26% Positive / 3% Neutral / 71% Negative</li>
<li>
<strong>Interim Forecast/Revision Score Change</strong>: 24% Positive / 1% Neutral / 75% Negative</li>
<li>
<strong>Average Forecast/Revision Score Change:</strong> -8.4 points</li>
</ul></div>

Source • Japan AnalyticsCORRECTION - The last day of July saw the TOPIX index fall by 2.8% to reach a new two-month low, 8.2% below the closing high of June 8th. A combination of a strong yen, peak COVID-19 cases, the continuing unedifying stream of results &amp; revisions, and month-end portfolio 'adjustments' proved toxic. Our Results Score lost a further 57 basis points, while bullish initial full-year forecasts from Takeda Pharmaceutical (4502 JP) and Denso (6902 JP) helped the Forecast/Revision Score recover by 51 basis points. Nevertheless, the market's correlation with earnings and revisions momentum remains distorted by central bank liquidity. As noted in Tired, we expect both our Scores to bottom nearer the 2009 lows, in which case the Bank of Japan's cumulative purchases could reach over 10% of market value.Source • Japan AnalyticsDOWNFALL - After one-third of quarterly earnings announcements, at the current pace forward aggregate operating and net income could reach ¥35 trillion and ¥20 trillion, respectively by the end of the month, taking the market multiple to 30x, absent any further correction in share prices. Source • Japan AnalyticsSECTOR SCORES - As in past cycles, the Information Technology, Internet, and Healthcare Sectors have proved to be the most resilient. On the downside, the breadth of the lowest-scoring Sectors is abnormal, with Consumer Services and Transport &amp; Logistics joining Metals, Autos, Eletcial Equipment and Machinery. The trailing-twelve-month (TTM) results in the table below confirm the chart above but suggests some caution over Internet Sector margins.   Source • Japan Analytics•BEST &amp; WORST 31st JULY •BEST &amp; WORST - Combining the day's results, revisions and forecasts, we select the 'best' and the 'worst' announcements according to our scoring. On the podium were Takeda Pharmaceutical (4502 JP) and Infocom (4348 JP). In the pits were Casio Computer (6952 JP) and three railway lines - Odakyu (9007 JP), West Japan (9021 JP) and Central Japan (9022 JP) for which we will show the Peer Group's record-low long-term Scores.Source • Japan Analytics

DAILY STATS
PERCENTAGES - 66% of quarterly results,  71% of annual forecasts/revisions and 75% of interim forecasts have negative Scores and 26% of companies reporting lost money for the quarter.
429 Quarterly Results

Results Score: 28% Positive / 6% Neutral / 66% Negative

Average Results Score Change: -3.1 points

Average % Change in Revenue: -9.3% Quarter YoY / -2.0% Rolling TTM YoY 

Average Operating Profit Margin Change: -1.0 ppt

Percentage Making Quarterly Losses: 26%
 153 Annual • 115 Interim Forecasts/Revisions

Annual Forecast/Revision Score: 26% Positive / 3% Neutral / 71% Negative

Interim Forecast/Revision Score Change: 24% Positive / 1% Neutral / 75% Negative

Average Forecast/Revision Score Change: -8.4 points


🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions 31st July - Takeda, Yamato/SG, Seria, FP, Keyence, Dai-Ichi Sankyo

Japan

Yamato Holdings Co., Ltd. mainly provides door-to-door parcel delivery services. The Company has developed a nationwide delivery system specializing in time-specified delivery. Yamato Holdings offers moving services and other comprehensive transportation services including logistics services for both domestic and overseas customers as well as financial and autoworks services.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Yamato Holdings (9064 JP)

Kerry Express & Best Inc: Two Approaches to ECommerce Logistics Growth in SE Asia

Define market opportunity: domestic Thailand (KEX

Tracking Traffic

Asia Short Interest Weekly: Fast Retailing, Softbank, Seven&I, Netmarble, Shinpoong, UMC, Largan

The Asia Short Interest weekly looks at moves in market wide short interest and highlights movements in stock specific short interest across Hong...

Brian Freitas

Hitachi Transport & SG Holdings: Consciously Uncoupling

In May of 2016

Travis Lundy

Yamato(9064) – The Sleeping Giant Awakens as Consensus Continues to Slumber

Until now, the package delivery company has been a sleeping giant. After years of chasing market share, but struggling with profit growth, the...

Mark Chadwick

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions 31st July - Takeda, Yamato/SG, Seria, FP, Keyence, Dai-Ichi Sankyo

CORRECTION - The last day of July saw the TOPIX index fall by 2.8% to reach a new two-month low, 8.2% below the closing high of June 8th. A...

Campbell Gunn

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)