Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) / Event-Driven

When <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nippon-telegraph-telephone-corporation" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:623:1" rel="noopener">NTT (Nippon Telegraph &amp; Telephone) (9432 JP)</a> announced its takeover of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ntt-docomo-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1089:1" rel="noopener">NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP)</a>, the immediate market reaction was to sell. This was seen as a sign that NTT was going to "take responsibility" for giving money back to customers. I wasn't sure why. Spending ¥4trln to buyback ¥200bn of minority interest net income was the equivalent of an enormous buyback. And given that doing so did not reward the government, which still holds more than one-third of NTT, in any way, NTT had to continue to reward the government through returns to shareholders - i.e. dividends and buybacks. Some of that was going to be supported through higher EPS, allowing continued growth in dividends. However, the government counts on getting an additional few hundred billion yen through sales proceeds every few years to fund its special projects, so the buybacks needed to continue, and as discussed many times on Smartkarma in the past, that only happens if NTT buys back stock from the public first, creating room under the NTT Law to allow NTT to buy back shares from the government while still keeping the government over one-third (or over the complicated and not-exactly-one-third calculation minimum under the law). When shares fell, NTT in November made clear that it was a) going to change things around at the NTT Docomo subsidiary - the CEO was out even before the Tender Offer ended - and b) was going to continue providing returns to shareholders. It announced a buyback on 8 November which was going to have big impact.I discussed in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/ntt-go-big-or-go-home" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:44964" rel="noopener">NTT - Go Big Or Go Home</a> then later in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/ntt-still-going-big-not-going-home" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:46264" rel="noopener">NTT - Still Going Big, Not Going Home</a>.Yesterday, NTT announced the results of its repurchase for December. It was not subtle. NTT was 18% of volume in December. There may be more impact to come.

When NTT (Nippon Telegraph &amp; Telephone) (9432 JP) announced its takeover of NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), the immediate market reaction was to sell. This was seen as a sign that NTT was going to "take responsibility" for giving money back to customers. I wasn't sure why. Spending ¥4trln to buyback ¥200bn of minority interest net income was the equivalent of an enormous buyback. And given that doing so did not reward the government, which still holds more than one-third of NTT, in any way, NTT had to continue to reward the government through returns to shareholders - i.e. dividends and buybacks. Some of that was going to be supported through higher EPS, allowing continued growth in dividends. However, the government counts on getting an additional few hundred billion yen through sales proceeds every few years to fund its special projects, so the buybacks needed to continue, and as discussed many times on Smartkarma in the past, that only happens if NTT buys back stock from the public first, creating room under the NTT Law to allow NTT to buy back shares from the government while still keeping the government over one-third (or over the complicated and not-exactly-one-third calculation minimum under the law). When shares fell, NTT in November made clear that it was a) going to change things around at the NTT Docomo subsidiary - the CEO was out even before the Tender Offer ended - and b) was going to continue providing returns to shareholders. It announced a buyback on 8 November which was going to have big impact.I discussed in NTT - Go Big Or Go Home then later in NTT - Still Going Big, Not Going Home.Yesterday, NTT announced the results of its repurchase for December. It was not subtle. NTT was 18% of volume in December. There may be more impact to come.

NTT's Big Beautiful Buyback Is Not The Only Reason to Own

In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/ntt-go-big-or-go-home" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:44964" rel="noopener">NTT - Go Big Or Go Home</a> five weeks ago, I suggested that investors really needed to look at the internal arithmetic of the <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nippon-telegraph-telephone-corporation" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:623:1" rel="noopener">NTT (Nippon Telegraph &amp; Telephone) (9432 JP)</a> buyout of subsidiary <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ntt-docomo-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1089:1" rel="noopener">NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP)</a>, which was subsequently completed, and will see the squeezeout take place early. The occasion for that insight was the announcement of a large buyback program by NTT. There had been a fear that the buy-in of Docomo was a "sign" that NTT was being pressured to fund lower Docomo pricing at the expense of NTT shareholder returns. NTT, however, made VERY clear that the company would look to continue its shareholder return policy AND pay down the ¥4+ trillion debt to be incurred buying out the Docomo minorities. The first buyback report came at the beginning of December and the data is interesting. Since I wrote that NTT shares are up 13.4% while <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kddi-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:639:1" rel="noopener">KDDI Corp (9433 JP)</a> is down slightly and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/softbank-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27445:1" rel="noopener">Softbank Corp (9434 JP)</a> is up about 8% (though 6% of that has happened in the last few days as news of a "slow-burn" minority buy-in pushes <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/softbank-group-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:315:1" rel="noopener">Softbank Group (9984 JP)</a> shares.It is worth re-iterating the dynamics here and thinking about the timing of buyback pressure, the timing of comp buyback pressure, and when investors will see newsflow on fundamentals.

In NTT - Go Big Or Go Home five weeks ago, I suggested that investors really needed to look at the internal arithmetic of the NTT (Nippon Telegraph &amp; Telephone) (9432 JP) buyout of subsidiary NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), which was subsequently completed, and will see the squeezeout take place early. The occasion for that insight was the announcement of a large buyback program by NTT. There had been a fear that the buy-in of Docomo was a "sign" that NTT was being pressured to fund lower Docomo pricing at the expense of NTT shareholder returns. NTT, however, made VERY clear that the company would look to continue its shareholder return policy AND pay down the ¥4+ trillion debt to be incurred buying out the Docomo minorities. The first buyback report came at the beginning of December and the data is interesting. Since I wrote that NTT shares are up 13.4% while KDDI Corp (9433 JP) is down slightly and Softbank Corp (9434 JP) is up about 8% (though 6% of that has happened in the last few days as news of a "slow-burn" minority buy-in pushes Softbank Group (9984 JP) shares.It is worth re-iterating the dynamics here and thinking about the timing of buyback pressure, the timing of comp buyback pressure, and when investors will see newsflow on fundamentals.

Telco/Internet specialist

Kirk Boodry

Redex Research

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

A new era in the Japanese telecom sector has arrived. If the Abe era was defined by better corporate governance and improved returns to shareholders, with Prime Minister Suga the focus may be shifting to national industrial policy. Reports from the <a href="https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO66833950Q0A131C2MM8000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nikkei</a> that DoCoMo will cut prices for high end plans by c. 50% are disruptive and deliver a political win for the current government just as NTT prepares to argue in front of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) for deeper integration of its mobile and ICT businesses. Accelerated concerns from competitors in the wake of NTT’s acquisition of DoCoMo minorities makes a lot more sense now as the possibility that the MIC could decide cooperation with NTT to lower mobile prices is as effective as support for MVNOs and Rakuten. Winners include the government, NEC and (possibly) Apple whilst mobile operators get the short end of the stick. In particular, Rakuten looks fragile as its disruptive ¥2,980/month price point has been matched by Japan’s largest mobile operator less than a year after it launched service.

A new era in the Japanese telecom sector has arrived. If the Abe era was defined by better corporate governance and improved returns to shareholders, with Prime Minister Suga the focus may be shifting to national industrial policy. Reports from the Nikkei that DoCoMo will cut prices for high end plans by c. 50% are disruptive and deliver a political win for the current government just as NTT prepares to argue in front of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) for deeper integration of its mobile and ICT businesses. Accelerated concerns from competitors in the wake of NTT’s acquisition of DoCoMo minorities makes a lot more sense now as the possibility that the MIC could decide cooperation with NTT to lower mobile prices is as effective as support for MVNOs and Rakuten. Winners include the government, NEC and (possibly) Apple whilst mobile operators get the short end of the stick. In particular, Rakuten looks fragile as its disruptive ¥2,980/month price point has been matched by Japan’s largest mobile operator less than a year after it launched service. 

Japan Telecom Sector: DoCoMo Move Is More than a Price Reduction

Asset Allocation & Fund Positioning, Copley Fund Research

Steven Holden

Asset Allocation & Fund Positioning

Copley Fund Research

Copley Fund Research provide research and data on asset allocation among Global and Emerging Market equity funds.  The analysis details absolute and relative positioning across countries, sectors and industries together with highly granular data on single stock and single fund allocations.  The data is updated monthly with time series going back to January 2011.

Global Research - Analysis of 165 prominent Global equity funds, combined AUM $335bn
GEM Research - Analysis of 127 prominent global EM equity funds, combined AUM $250bn

Asset Allocation - Global and GEM Equity

Equity Bottom-Up

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sony-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:563:1" rel="noopener">Sony Corp (6758 JP)</a> has seen an upward shift in ownership among active Global fund managers.  The percentage of funds invested in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sony-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:563:1" rel="noopener">Sony Corp (6758 JP)</a>  is at record levels, with weights and overweights continuing to rise. Sony is also moving from being an Aggressive Growth play to a stock more appealing to a wider group of Growth, Value and GARP investors.  Our data also shows that this switch has further to run, with many investors with previous knowledge and exposure to <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sony-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:563:1" rel="noopener">Sony Corp (6758 JP)</a> remaining on the sidelines, or at lower levels of exposure, for now. For this reason, we would expect ownership among Global investors to be well supported, which, given the relationship between fund ownership and price, should be supportive of returns going forwards.

Sony Corp (6758 JP) has seen an upward shift in ownership among active Global fund managers.  The percentage of funds invested in Sony Corp (6758 JP)  is at record levels, with weights and overweights continuing to rise. Sony is also moving from being an Aggressive Growth play to a stock more appealing to a wider group of Growth, Value and GARP investors.  Our data also shows that this switch has further to run, with many investors with previous knowledge and exposure to Sony Corp (6758 JP) remaining on the sidelines, or at lower levels of exposure, for now. For this reason, we would expect ownership among Global investors to be well supported, which, given the relationship between fund ownership and price, should be supportive of returns going forwards.

Sony Corp:  Momentum Strong as Global Funds Continue to Add.

Quantitative Analysis

Long-time Japan strategist Jonathan Allum, most recently of SMBC Nikko, put a guest post titled <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/a97cf336-518d-45dd-8092-ec0363c18725" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Takeaways from 30 years of Covering the Japanese Market</a> in the Financial Times on 26 November (Thanksgiving) which is well worth a read.He points out that foreign investors in 2020 are likely going to be net dis-investors in Japan for the fourth year in five, fifth year in six, and increasing the net selldown which has occurred since the monster year in 2013. <section class="figure"><section class="figure"><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/174/956/original/Screenshot%202020-11-29%20at%203.07.23%20PM.png?1606633655" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="174956"></figure></section>This data is compiled from the weekly data which shows each investor category. On a net basis across all investor categories, it will be flat because while it shows buybacks on market, crediting the "Business Corporations" category, it does not show the data of investors selling into Tender Offers or the data of investors buying from IPOs.</section>Of course, the data is not that clean because investing doesn't always happen according to calendar year decisions. 
<section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/174/969/original/Screenshot%202020-11-29%20at%203.40.57%20PM.png?1606635676" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="174969"></figure></section>It just so happens that the last two really big selloffs in dollar terms (both exceeding ¥6trln on a rolling 52wk basis) did not happen to see start and end points coincide with those of the Gregorian calendar.
There has been an interesting confluence of "lack of participation in the market" this year. After lifting ETF buys in March 2020, the BOJ has slowed down its ETF buying considerably in the past six months (the current 6-month total is near the lower end of the range seen in the past four years), buybacks are down this year as companies slowed their activity in the face of covid-19-induced uncertainty, and foreigners are net sellers. 
Of course Japanese insurers are on the verge of extending what will be a 12-year streak of net sells to a 13th year, and it looks like Japanese banks will be extending their net selling to a 14th year in a row. Trust Banks will be net buyers for the sixth year in seven this year, but for at least the fourth year in a row it will be less than the net buying of ETFs by the BOJ so ex-BOJ trust banks will have been net sellers for several years. 
Business corporations are up ¥1.335trln year-to-date through the 20th of November, and will almost certainly extend their streak to ten years on the buy side. The interesting net flow this year is the "Proprietary" flow at brokers. This is now positive for ten years in a row, and there are particular reasons for this, as discussed below.
Because of the noise around recent articles about the BOJ and foreign activity, I decided to once again dust off the long-term analytics on Japan investor class flows, and present them here. Because flows net off to close to zero (i.e. there are a certain number of shares, and if some investor class is a net seller, other investor classes must be net buyer(s)), deriving a model for behavior is useful.  Long ago, in roles in fixed income and equity derivatives strategy, I built models of net foreign buying, and they uniformly showed that foreign investors chase/push/drive performance. My final model is a multi-input model which provides a simple combination of two factors they chase.
This insight discusses those behavior models, investor class flow dynamics, cycles, and trends and pressures near-term.
The combination of the investor class flows, and the model which drives net foreign activity, is interesting. I think it helps because the top-down aspect matters for understanding allocation flow.
Read on for the nitty gritty (as usual, we start with Conclusions First).</section>

Long-time Japan strategist Jonathan Allum, most recently of SMBC Nikko, put a guest post titled Takeaways from 30 years of Covering the Japanese Market in the Financial Times on 26 November (Thanksgiving) which is well worth a read.He points out that foreign investors in 2020 are likely going to be net dis-investors in Japan for the fourth year in five, fifth year in six, and increasing the net selldown which has occurred since the monster year in 2013. This data is compiled from the weekly data which shows each investor category. On a net basis across all investor categories, it will be flat because while it shows buybacks on market, crediting the "Business Corporations" category, it does not show the data of investors selling into Tender Offers or the data of investors buying from IPOs.Of course, the data is not that clean because investing doesn't always happen according to calendar year decisions. 
It just so happens that the last two really big selloffs in dollar terms (both exceeding ¥6trln on a rolling 52wk basis) did not happen to see start and end points coincide with those of the Gregorian calendar.
There has been an interesting confluence of "lack of participation in the market" this year. After lifting ETF buys in March 2020, the BOJ has slowed down its ETF buying considerably in the past six months (the current 6-month total is near the lower end of the range seen in the past four years), buybacks are down this year as companies slowed their activity in the face of covid-19-induced uncertainty, and foreigners are net sellers. 
Of course Japanese insurers are on the verge of extending what will be a 12-year streak of net sells to a 13th year, and it looks like Japanese banks will be extending their net selling to a 14th year in a row. Trust Banks will be net buyers for the sixth year in seven this year, but for at least the fourth year in a row it will be less than the net buying of ETFs by the BOJ so ex-BOJ trust banks will have been net sellers for several years. 
Business corporations are up ¥1.335trln year-to-date through the 20th of November, and will almost certainly extend their streak to ten years on the buy side. The interesting net flow this year is the "Proprietary" flow at brokers. This is now positive for ten years in a row, and there are particular reasons for this, as discussed below.
Because of the noise around recent articles about the BOJ and foreign activity, I decided to once again dust off the long-term analytics on Japan investor class flows, and present them here. Because flows net off to close to zero (i.e. there are a certain number of shares, and if some investor class is a net seller, other investor classes must be net buyer(s)), deriving a model for behavior is useful.  Long ago, in roles in fixed income and equity derivatives strategy, I built models of net foreign buying, and they uniformly showed that foreign investors chase/push/drive performance. My final model is a multi-input model which provides a simple combination of two factors they chase.
This insight discusses those behavior models, investor class flow dynamics, cycles, and trends and pressures near-term.
The combination of the investor class flows, and the model which drives net foreign activity, is interesting. I think it helps because the top-down aspect matters for understanding allocation flow.
Read on for the nitty gritty (as usual, we start with Conclusions First).

JAPAN FLOW:  Foreign Investor Flows Still Matter (Redux, Reduxed) - Playing Catchup

Japan

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation provides a variety of telecommunication services, including telephone, telegraph, leased circuits, data communication, terminal equipment sales, and related services. The Company provides both local and long distance telephone services within Japan.

NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP)

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP)

NTT's Big Beautiful Buyback Is Not The Only Reason to Own

NTT's Buyback is big and beautiful, but it is not the only reason to own. There are two other good reasons. But the buyback will still have impact...

Travis Lundy

NTT - Still Going Big, Not Going Home

NTT is under-appreciated - March 2022 forecasts still do not include accretion of the NTT Docomo minority into EPS. The company has responded to...

Travis Lundy

Japan Telecom Sector: DoCoMo Move Is More than a Price Reduction

If the Abe era for telcos was defined by better corporate governance and improved returns to shareholders, with Prime Minister Suga the focus may...

Kirk Boodry

Sony Corp: Momentum Strong as Global Funds Continue to Add.

Sony Corp (6758 JP) has seen an upward shift in ownership among active Global fund managers, but is far from over owned...

Steven Holden

JAPAN FLOW: Foreign Investor Flows Still Matter (Redux, Reduxed) - Playing Catchup

The Japanese market has unusual flow cyclicality. Foreigners take price. They have been net sellers. They buy when USD-denom TOPIX outperforms....

Travis Lundy

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)