Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Independent Insight Provider

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

Postal Savings Bank of China C / Equity Bottom-Up

*Excess Provisioning Eats Away At 4Q20 Results: Established in 2007, Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) [PSB] is mainland China’s youngest large commercial bank. PSB reported 4Q20 results of CNY 11.4 bn – decreasing CNY 7.8 bn (40.8%) linked quarter. PSB’s struggles were twofold: loss provisions were too high; and an operating expenses accelerated; and * Credit Quality Risk Peaking: HOH, stated NPLs nominally increased CNY 605 mn or 1.2% to CNY 50.4 bn and amount to 88 bp to total loans – flat linked quarter. The growth in level of net new NPLs was CNY 9.3 bn or decelerating to 18.4% on an annualized basis. PSB’s loss provision increased CNY 2.9 bn (41.1%) linked quarter, almost seeming pointless given the reserve cover of 4.01x (4.03x at 3Q20) and the annualized NCO rate of 61 bp.

*Excess Provisioning Eats Away At 4Q20 Results: Established in 2007, Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) [PSB] is mainland China’s youngest large commercial bank. PSB reported 4Q20 results of CNY 11.4 bn – decreasing CNY 7.8 bn (40.8%) linked quarter. PSB’s struggles were twofold: loss provisions were too high; and an operating expenses accelerated; and * Credit Quality Risk Peaking: HOH, stated NPLs nominally increased CNY 605 mn or 1.2% to CNY 50.4 bn and amount to 88 bp to total loans – flat linked quarter. The growth in level of net new NPLs was CNY 9.3 bn or decelerating to 18.4% on an annualized basis. PSB’s loss provision increased CNY 2.9 bn (41.1%) linked quarter, almost seeming pointless given the reserve cover of 4.01x (4.03x at 3Q20) and the annualized NCO rate of 61 bp.

Postal Savings Bank of China – Excess Provisioning

*Don’t Be Misled By Better Numbers: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) [ICBC] reported 4Q20 results of CNY 87.2 bn, increasing CNY 7.3 bn or 9.2% linked quarter. The linked quarter improvement, in our view, can solely be attributed to an unjustified and massive linked quarter reduction in loss provisions of CNY 31.3 bn (57.7%).  In addition, 4Q20 results can be highlighted by ICBC’s negative operating jaws; and *Credit Risk Rising: As ICBC is the benchmark name to which all mainland Chinese banks are measured, an increase of such magnitude is more than alarming – and intimates mainland Chinese bank credit risk is moving in oppositive directions to their counterparts in India. When one considers the current break in credit quality reserves would appear to be incredibly light – in the neighborhood of CNY 410 bn which amounts to over a year of pre-tax results at ICBC.

*Don’t Be Misled By Better Numbers: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) [ICBC] reported 4Q20 results of CNY 87.2 bn, increasing CNY 7.3 bn or 9.2% linked quarter. The linked quarter improvement, in our view, can solely be attributed to an unjustified and massive linked quarter reduction in loss provisions of CNY 31.3 bn (57.7%).  In addition, 4Q20 results can be highlighted by ICBC’s negative operating jaws; and *Credit Risk Rising: As ICBC is the benchmark name to which all mainland Chinese banks are measured, an increase of such magnitude is more than alarming – and intimates mainland Chinese bank credit risk is moving in oppositive directions to their counterparts in India. When one considers the current break in credit quality reserves would appear to be incredibly light – in the neighborhood of CNY 410 bn which amounts to over a year of pre-tax results at ICBC.   

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China – Troubling Result

Financials Credit Analyst

Hank Calenti, CFA

CreditContinuum

Credit

Executive Summary: The <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/credit-suisse-group-ag" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22253:1" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse Group (CSGN VX)</a> requires between CHF4 to 8bn in additional Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) to remain competitive and bring its capital buffer in-line with peers. We noted several week ago that the firm’s capital buffer was too thin to absorb large losses while its Contingent Capital (CoCo) securities continued to trade rich relative to peers. The thin, and likely declining, buffer may now affect its ability to compete. In our view, the issue is quickly moving from damage control towards a capital raise.We derive our capital estimates by starting with the amount required to bring the CET1 buffer up to peer levels. To this we add various exceptional charges which are increasing every other week. Details within.We were ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now below $95. Our recommendation was based on a fundamental assessment of CS’ business model, risk tolerance and capitalization. Please see: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49775/Credit%20Suisse%20%E2%80%93%20Perfection%20Priced%20into%20Long-Dated%20AT1.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/7w5Cm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse – Perfection Priced into Long-Dated AT1</a> for more details. These negative factors were magnified by the Greensill episode. Please see: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49775/Credit%20Suisse:%20Greensill%20Sows%20Reputation%20Risks,%20Underweight%20CS%20Bonds.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/tq31o" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse: Greensill Sows Reputation Risks, Underweight CS Bonds</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49775/Credit%20Suisse:%20Greensill's%20Capital%20Implications%20Outweigh%20Asset%20Management%20Corrective%20Action.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/WWiXU" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse: Greensill's Capital Implications Outweigh Asset Management Corrective Action</a>. The Archegos affair adds fuel to this fire.It is too early to consider this a buying opportunity. While we believe in our recapitalization call, we do not anticipate an immediate move towards improving the firms’ competitive position. The flames are rising and more fuel could be added before the capital blanket is applied. As such, we believe CS’ bonds may continue to lag that of its peers.However, the Swiss regulator may be unwilling to wait for the smoke to dampen and the arrival of a new Board Chairman should create the opportunity to clear the air at Credit Suisse. Obviously in addition to raising equity, CS would need to take serious action concerning its risk management and tolerance. Risk tolerance needs to be reduced until risk management is improved as these are the embers which stated this fire. This should be beneficial to AT1 investors over the long-run.

Executive Summary: The Credit Suisse Group (CSGN VX) requires between CHF4 to 8bn in additional Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) to remain competitive and bring its capital buffer in-line with peers. We noted several week ago that the firm’s capital buffer was too thin to absorb large losses while its Contingent Capital (CoCo) securities continued to trade rich relative to peers. The thin, and likely declining, buffer may now affect its ability to compete. In our view, the issue is quickly moving from damage control towards a capital raise.We derive our capital estimates by starting with the amount required to bring the CET1 buffer up to peer levels. To this we add various exceptional charges which are increasing every other week. Details within.We were ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now below $95. Our recommendation was based on a fundamental assessment of CS’ business model, risk tolerance and capitalization. Please see: Credit Suisse – Perfection Priced into Long-Dated AT1 for more details. These negative factors were magnified by the Greensill episode. Please see: Credit Suisse: Greensill Sows Reputation Risks, Underweight CS Bonds and Credit Suisse: Greensill's Capital Implications Outweigh Asset Management Corrective Action. The Archegos affair adds fuel to this fire.It is too early to consider this a buying opportunity. While we believe in our recapitalization call, we do not anticipate an immediate move towards improving the firms’ competitive position. The flames are rising and more fuel could be added before the capital blanket is applied. As such, we believe CS’ bonds may continue to lag that of its peers.However, the Swiss regulator may be unwilling to wait for the smoke to dampen and the arrival of a new Board Chairman should create the opportunity to clear the air at Credit Suisse. Obviously in addition to raising equity, CS would need to take serious action concerning its risk management and tolerance. Risk tolerance needs to be reduced until risk management is improved as these are the embers which stated this fire. This should be beneficial to AT1 investors over the long-run. 

Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/jpmorgan-chase-co" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:277:1" rel="noopener">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co's (JPM US)</a> fortress foundation needs repair. Rather than a rock-solid balance sheet, JPM’s capital foundation needs to be strengthened to handle the leverage load. It has the lowest Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) amongst the largest US banks and its Tier 1 securities suffer, in part, due to this. It is time to lighten the leverage exposure and add a layer of capital. This creates an investment opportunity.As the pandemic-induced economic crisis unfolded last year, we noted that JPM Tier 1 securities were over-bought relative to the leverage exposure risk at the institution. Please see: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49670/Bank%20Credit%20Weekly:%20US%20Capital%20Buffer%20Risk%20&amp;%20Q1%20Earnings%20Reports-%20JPMorgan%20Looks%20Slightly%20Overbought.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/uQHaQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bank Credit Weekly: US Capital Buffer Risk &amp; Q1 Earnings Reports- JPMorgan Looks Slightly Overbought.</a>The Fed exemption of Treasury securities and deposits with the central bank from the SLR bought JPM time. Fast forward one year later to the expiration of these exemptions and, despite ample opportunity, JPMorgan did not issue Tier 1 securities until only two weeks ago when it brought a $25 par security. In additional to raising needed capital, the firm recently threatened to stop taking deposits. It may price itself out of the deposit market, temporarily, but this is not a long-term strategy. The SLR is the binding capital constrain on the firm’s asset growth. JPM needs to obtain or retain more Tier 1 capital. We quantify this within.We believe that JPM could easily bring a 10-year Tier 1 bond to the market and find between US$2 to US$3bn in demand, thereby taking the total Tier 1 financing needs, or balance sheet optimization equivalent, down materially for the remainder of the year. Based on its recently issued Preferred, we believe JPM could achieve a price of Treasuries plus circa 300bps in a 10-year Tier 1 note.Aside from its SLR level, JPMorgan’s credit metrics are on-par with, if not superior to, most other large systemically important financial institutions. And yet, as we present within, JPM’s Tier 1 bonds trade at a discount to materially weaker banks located outside the US. Furthermore, we find that JPMorgan’s 2025 callable Tier 1 bond is at least 40bps oversold as, in our view, its call option is overvalued by the same amount.JPM faces an inflection point with respect to its capital adequacy. Concurrently, the Fed may re-adjust the SLR requirements before year-end; however, we believe it would be foolish of JPM not to take the opportunity to increase its SLR in an improving economic environment. It should re-enforce the foundation of its fortress balance sheet. We believe investors should pre-position for this eventuality. We recommend overweighting JPMorgan’s Tier 1 securities.

JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co's (JPM US) fortress foundation needs repair. Rather than a rock-solid balance sheet, JPM’s capital foundation needs to be strengthened to handle the leverage load. It has the lowest Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) amongst the largest US banks and its Tier 1 securities suffer, in part, due to this. It is time to lighten the leverage exposure and add a layer of capital. This creates an investment opportunity.As the pandemic-induced economic crisis unfolded last year, we noted that JPM Tier 1 securities were over-bought relative to the leverage exposure risk at the institution. Please see: Bank Credit Weekly: US Capital Buffer Risk &amp; Q1 Earnings Reports- JPMorgan Looks Slightly Overbought.The Fed exemption of Treasury securities and deposits with the central bank from the SLR bought JPM time. Fast forward one year later to the expiration of these exemptions and, despite ample opportunity, JPMorgan did not issue Tier 1 securities until only two weeks ago when it brought a $25 par security. In additional to raising needed capital, the firm recently threatened to stop taking deposits. It may price itself out of the deposit market, temporarily, but this is not a long-term strategy. The SLR is the binding capital constrain on the firm’s asset growth. JPM needs to obtain or retain more Tier 1 capital. We quantify this within.We believe that JPM could easily bring a 10-year Tier 1 bond to the market and find between US$2 to US$3bn in demand, thereby taking the total Tier 1 financing needs, or balance sheet optimization equivalent, down materially for the remainder of the year. Based on its recently issued Preferred, we believe JPM could achieve a price of Treasuries plus circa 300bps in a 10-year Tier 1 note.Aside from its SLR level, JPMorgan’s credit metrics are on-par with, if not superior to, most other large systemically important financial institutions. And yet, as we present within, JPM’s Tier 1 bonds trade at a discount to materially weaker banks located outside the US. Furthermore, we find that JPMorgan’s 2025 callable Tier 1 bond is at least 40bps oversold as, in our view, its call option is overvalued by the same amount.JPM faces an inflection point with respect to its capital adequacy. Concurrently, the Fed may re-adjust the SLR requirements before year-end; however, we believe it would be foolish of JPM not to take the opportunity to increase its SLR in an improving economic environment. It should re-enforce the foundation of its fortress balance sheet. We believe investors should pre-position for this eventuality. We recommend overweighting JPMorgan’s Tier 1 securities.

US Banks and the SLR Situation: Overweight JPM Tier 1 Securities

*BEA Life Deal: In an effort to reinforce its Greater China franchise, AIA Group (1299.HK) [AIA] has entered into an agreement to purchase Bank of East Asia’s (23.HK) [BEA] wholly-owned life insurance unit, BEA Life, and entered into an exclusive 15-year bancassurance relationship with BEA for HKD 5.07 bn (USD 653 mn) covering Hong Kong and mainland China; and *Lost Focus: Acquiring a fledgling Hong Kong insurance franchise at a premium when you’re the dominant player and unemployment remains excessive, suggests that AIA is more concerned with growth metrics rather than addressing the risks that AIA is facing in mainland China, Hong Kong, and in its investment portfolio.

*BEA Life Deal: In an effort to reinforce its Greater China franchise, AIA Group (1299.HK) [AIA] has entered into an agreement to purchase Bank of East Asia’s (23.HK) [BEA] wholly-owned life insurance unit, BEA Life, and entered into an exclusive 15-year bancassurance relationship with BEA for HKD 5.07 bn (USD 653 mn) covering Hong Kong and mainland China; and *Lost Focus: Acquiring a fledgling Hong Kong insurance franchise at a premium when you’re the dominant player and unemployment remains excessive, suggests that AIA is more concerned with growth metrics rather than addressing the risks that AIA is facing in mainland China, Hong Kong, and in its investment portfolio. 

AIA Group – Confirming No Organic Growth On Horizon

United Kingdom

HSBC Holdings plc is the holding company for the HSBC Group. The Company provides a variety of international banking and financial services, including retail and corporate banking, trade, trusteeship, securities, custody, capital markets, treasury, private and investment banking, and insurance.  The Group operates worldwide.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

HSBC Holdings (5 HK)

Postal Savings Bank of China – Excess Provisioning

POSTAL SAVINGS BANK: PSB reported a 40.8% decline in QOQ results, as loss provisioning was too high relative to risk is peaking; and an operating...

Thomas J. Monaco

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China – Troubling Result

ICBC: ICBC reported a 9.2% QOQ increase in 4Q20 results, which is solely attributed to an unjustified and massive linked quarter reduction in loss...

Thomas J. Monaco

Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise

CS needs as much as CHF8bn in common equity to bring its capital buffer in-line with peers. The Archegos affair adds fuel to risk management and...

Hank Calenti, CFA

US Banks and the SLR Situation: Overweight JPM Tier 1 Securities

JPM’s fortress foundation needs repair. It has the lowest SLR buffer, and its Tier 1 suffers from this. Leverage slimming and a deeper capital...

Hank Calenti, CFA

AIA Group – Confirming No Organic Growth On Horizon

AIA GROUP: AIA entered into an agreement to acquire BEA Life, and entered into a bancassurance relationship with BEA. Acquiring a fledgling Hong...

Thomas J. Monaco

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)