Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Independent Insight Provider

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

*Stake Purchase In Mainland Bank: DBS Group Holdings (DBS.SP) [DBS] for the second time in five months announced a transaction. The latest being its intention to acquire a 13% stake in the privately-held Shenzhen Rural Commercial Bank (SRCB) for CNY 5.29 bn (USD 814.3 mn), in a move that will accelerate its Greater Bay Area expansion strategy;*Very Expensive Transaction: DBS did disclose that this stake will be priced at a stated P/BV of 1.01x. By our calculation, the post-money P/BV amounts to 0.92x – which is still 41.5% (USD 338 mn) higher than the average valuation (0.65x P/BV) for a mainland Chinese bank; and*Deal Distractions Mount: On November 17, 2020, the RBI also announced a draft scheme to merge LVB with DBS Bank India Limited, the 100%-owned subsidiary of DBS Bank Holdings (DBS.SP), which will infuse INR 25 bn into its subsidiary to absorb and recapitalize LVB. While SRCB dos not appear to be riddled with problems the way LVB is, no doubt there will be issues to contend with.  DBS apparently isn’t done with its shopping spree, being in the running for parts of Citigroup's (C.US) consumer business in Asia. Frankly, DBS needs to focus on improving its own legacy issues before it starts both taking on that of other financial institutions.

*Stake Purchase In Mainland Bank: DBS Group Holdings (DBS.SP) [DBS] for the second time in five months announced a transaction. The latest being its intention to acquire a 13% stake in the privately-held Shenzhen Rural Commercial Bank (SRCB) for CNY 5.29 bn (USD 814.3 mn), in a move that will accelerate its Greater Bay Area expansion strategy;*Very Expensive Transaction: DBS did disclose that this stake will be priced at a stated P/BV of 1.01x. By our calculation, the post-money P/BV amounts to 0.92x – which is still 41.5% (USD 338 mn) higher than the average valuation (0.65x P/BV) for a mainland Chinese bank; and*Deal Distractions Mount: On November 17, 2020, the RBI also announced a draft scheme to merge LVB with DBS Bank India Limited, the 100%-owned subsidiary of DBS Bank Holdings (DBS.SP), which will infuse INR 25 bn into its subsidiary to absorb and recapitalize LVB. While SRCB dos not appear to be riddled with problems the way LVB is, no doubt there will be issues to contend with.  DBS apparently isn’t done with its shopping spree, being in the running for parts of Citigroup's (C.US) consumer business in Asia. Frankly, DBS needs to focus on improving its own legacy issues before it starts both taking on that of other financial institutions.

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Better, But Likely Unsustainable: Bank of America (BAC.US) [BAC] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 2.4 bn (45.2%) linked quarter. Results were driven by two factors: a) a negative USD 1.9 bn, in contravention to overall credit performance; and b) a USD 2.1 bn (147.3%) increase trading activities, the sustainability of which we call into question; and*BAC Still Needs To Focus On Credit Quality: Given the USD 774 mn in NCOs (33 bp annualized of total loans), we note that net new NPLs reversed course – increasing a a high 74.8% on an annualized basis. JPM and Citigroup each reported declines. Relative to NPLs, however, reserves – while still significant – declined 67.4% to 3.00x while declining 24 bp to 1.79% against total loans.

*Results Better, But Likely Unsustainable: Bank of America (BAC.US) [BAC] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 2.4 bn (45.2%) linked quarter. Results were driven by two factors: a) a negative USD 1.9 bn, in contravention to overall credit performance; and b) a USD 2.1 bn (147.3%) increase trading activities, the sustainability of which we call into question; and*BAC Still Needs To Focus On Credit Quality: Given the USD 774 mn in NCOs (33 bp annualized of total loans), we note that net new NPLs reversed course – increasing a a high 74.8% on an annualized basis. JPM and Citigroup each reported declines. Relative to NPLs, however, reserves – while still significant – declined 67.4% to 3.00x while declining 24 bp to 1.79% against total loans.

Bank of America – Not Exactly A Shining Result

*Results Should Only Get Better: JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.US) [JPM] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 13.9 bn, increasing USD 2.2 bn (18.4%) linked quarter. Results were essentially driven by two factors: a) revenue growth at the Corporate &amp; Investment Bank (CIB) of USD 3.3 bn (28.7%) due primarily to principal transactions which increased USD 3.0 bn (103%); and b) a reserve reversal of USD 4.2 bn – increasing USD 2.3 bn (120%) over 4Q20’s provision reversal. The strength of the bottom-line, should allow larger capital returns in 2Q21 predicated on the Federal Reserve Board’s (FRB) dividend payout ratio test; and*Credit Improvement: JPM’s net new NPLs linked quarter amounted to just USD 638 mn or a 22.2% increase on an annualized basis – which is incredibly good. Given the current risk profile of JPM’s loan portfolio that the company remains over-provided for and that we will continue to see loss provision reversals until loan growth returns in some meaningful way.

*Results Should Only Get Better: JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.US) [JPM] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 13.9 bn, increasing USD 2.2 bn (18.4%) linked quarter. Results were essentially driven by two factors: a) revenue growth at the Corporate &amp; Investment Bank (CIB) of USD 3.3 bn (28.7%) due primarily to principal transactions which increased USD 3.0 bn (103%); and b) a reserve reversal of USD 4.2 bn – increasing USD 2.3 bn (120%) over 4Q20’s provision reversal. The strength of the bottom-line, should allow larger capital returns in 2Q21 predicated on the Federal Reserve Board’s (FRB) dividend payout ratio test; and*Credit Improvement: JPM’s net new NPLs linked quarter amounted to just USD 638 mn or a 22.2% increase on an annualized basis – which is incredibly good. Given the current risk profile of JPM’s loan portfolio that the company remains over-provided for and that we will continue to see loss provision reversals until loan growth returns in some meaningful way.

Research and consultancy, Tabbush Report

Daniel Tabbush

Research and consultancy

Tabbush Report

We provide research and consultancy on Asian banks. Our focus is on what we call “Asian bank research, without the noise.” We are interested in the most critical swing-factors for banks, the NPL and credit cycle, and where we believe there is a gap between perception and reality. We often focus on the less studied components of bank financial statements.  Our research is highly thematic, sometimes examining unlisted banks and companies as a window on mainstream banks. 

Being independent allows us to look at smaller banks, often overlooked by others. Analysis of BIS bank guidelines in the context of Asia, is also a focal point, while we also analyze global banks operating in the region. We use what we believe is the most comprehensive, reliable financials database, SNL Financial. S&P Capital IQ augments our database, with corporate data and CEIC, with economics. 

Asian bank research, without the noise.

HSBC can continue to underperform DBS for a multitude of reasons, including both structural and cyclical factors. Higher oil prices will benefit DBS more so than HSBC, where the UK giant has de-risked and where total exposures are small.

HSBC can continue to underperform DBS for a multitude of reasons, including both structural and cyclical factors. Higher oil prices will benefit DBS more so than HSBC, where the UK giant has de-risked and where total exposures are small. 

United Kingdom

HSBC Holdings plc is the holding company for the HSBC Group. The Company provides a variety of international banking and financial services, including retail and corporate banking, trade, trusteeship, securities, custody, capital markets, treasury, private and investment banking, and insurance.  The Group operates worldwide.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

HSBC Holdings (HSBA LN)

DBS Group Holdings – Pricey China Deal

DBS GROUP HOLDINGS: DBS is acquiring a 13% stake in the privately-held SRCB for USD 814.3 mn. P/BV amounts to 0.92x – which is still 41.5% higher...

Thomas J. Monaco

Citigroup – Shifting Winds

CITIGROUP: Citi reported a QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line result increase of 89.0% due to provision reversals and principal transactions. Net new NPLs...

Thomas J. Monaco

Bank of America – Not Exactly A Shining Result

BANK OF AMERICA: BAC's QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line increased 45.2% driven by reserve releases and trading (not sustainable). Net new NPLs reversed course...

Thomas J. Monaco

J.P Morgan Chase & Co. – Well On Track

JP MORGAN CHASE: JPM 1Q21 bottom-line results increased 18.4% linked quarter due to principal transactions and provision reversals. This should...

Thomas J. Monaco

HSBC and DBS – Divergent Performance

HSBC can continue to underperform DBS for many reasons, structural and cyclical. Higher oil prices can benefit DBS, more, weak UK hurts HSBC,...

Daniel Tabbush

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)