Research from Water Tower Research, Water Tower Research

Water Tower Research

Research from Water Tower Research

Water Tower Research is a leading equity research firm that provides research on micro, small and mid cap companies.

Water Tower Research was founded by Wall Street veterans after witnessing a fundamental shift in the investment research industry with the result being a declining knowledge base among investors, a lack of awareness and a shrinking pool of fundamental research being conducted on companies across the small-cap and micro-cap spectrum. The same issues are now increasingly occurring in the mid-cap space. This sea change within the investment community is impacting not only the companies themselves but also current shareholders and potential investors. With significantly less active sell-side sponsorship by Wall Street, a substantial information gap has developed between companies and various constituents in the financial community. The net result is fewer channels for insight and information to flow between companies and investors.

Equity Research Firm

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

KEY HIGHLIGHTS


WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology stocks couldn’t keep up with the broader market last week, slipping 0.4% versus the prior week, while the S&amp;P 500 posted a 0.4% appreciation and the Russell 2000 rallied 1.9% for the week. Strong 2Q22 results and a strong outlook drove KWR stock up 15.3% and contributed to MTRN’s 8.6% appreciation, with LAC’s 7.7% improvement rounding out the top performers for the week. ECVT’s larger&nbsp;secondary offering priced at $8.75&nbsp;resulted in a 12.9% pullback for the stock, while VVV declined 11% despite announcing the&nbsp;sale of its Global Products business to Aramco, as investors remained concerned about margin pressures and longer-term prospects for a company still largely focused on ICE vehicle maintenance. EAF’s (9.6%) weekly performance also came courtesy of the outlook it provided on its 2Q22 earnings call, which highlighted slowing steel production and elevated costs.
Economic anxiety growing.&nbsp;Concerns over the&nbsp;impact of reduced gas supply from Russia&nbsp;and its impact on industrial production in the country were recently voiced as a reason for the cautious outlook for the balance of 2022 and into 2023, according to Covestro Germany. In yet another sign of a growing economic slowdown, domestic&nbsp;organic produce volumes declined 2.8%&nbsp;Y/Y in 2Q22, as prices went up 6.7%, indicating that consumers are becoming more price conscious as inflationary pressures heat up. This would not be good news for consumer-centric companies such as SHW, PPG, RPM, and VVV, as customer trade-downs may add mix pressures to the volume and FX headwinds.
Chip crunch prompts greater OEM involvement.&nbsp;As the chip shortage for the automotive industry&nbsp;continues to take a bite out of global production, OEMs are being looked to as reliable funding partners for future semiconductor fabs, as&nbsp;chip manufacturers look to offload some of the funding burden&nbsp;onto the ultimate customer in order to ensure the situation does not repeat once the current crunch is over,&nbsp;sometime in 2023.
LTHM gets prepayment from GM.&nbsp;In the last issue, we highlighted GM’s supply agreement with LTHM and last week we learned that the&nbsp;auto OEM is prepaying LTHM $198 million&nbsp;to ensure a six-year contractual supply—another indication of growing material availability concerns in the EV industry.

WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE


Source: YCharts; August 5 close

Ag-Tech and Bio-Ag
Farmland acres grow globally but shrink in the US.&nbsp;According to a recent article,&nbsp;global farm acreage has increased&nbsp;in 2000’s after the flattish 1980-2000 period, with most of the growth coming from LATAM, India, and former CIS regions, with oilseed crops, particularly soybeans, accounting for most of the increase. Conversely,&nbsp;domestic farm acres shrank&nbsp;over the past two decades, as succession decisions and urban and suburban development are removing 2,000 acres per day from domestic farming and grazing lands. We mentioned this trend in our previous reports and see this as a driver of adoption of newer ag technologies, including precision farming, seed treatment, and bio-based pesticide and fertilizer alternatives, which are all designed to improve yields and minimize environmental impact in order to produce more without needing more farmland. Companies such as BHIL and BIOX, as well as FMC, CTVA, and AVD, stand to benefit as use of inputs/acre grows, with BIOX and FMC being particularly well positioned given their strong LATAM presence and FMC’s over-representation in soybean and rapeseed markets.
As concerns over food scarcity grow, government regulators turn a deaf ear.&nbsp;While the Ukraine/Russia agreement that allowed exports of Ukrainian grain to resume is encouraging, concerns are rising over the 2022-23 Ukrainian crop season.&nbsp;According to the USDA, Ukrainian production of sunflower seeds is expected to decline 37% versus this year, with Ukraine being the number one producer of sunflower seeds. The report also predicts a 35% Y/Y decline in wheat production in the 2022-23 season (Ukraine is the ninth-largest wheat producer in the world) and a whopping 54% drop in the country’s corn production (Ukraine is the sixth-largest corn producer in the world). And that’s if the war’s impact on Ukraine’s farming heartland doesn’t get worse! As a major exporter of grain and ag products, Ukraine’s limited ability to export foodstuff this year and uncertainty over supply next season is raising concerns among major importing regions such as India, Africa, and Asia as to their ability to provide sufficient food for their populace.
It would seem that in this environment, governments would be doing all they could to ensure the adequate supply of ag products to the global market, or at least their own. However, that may not be the case. As we highlighted in the last issue, Netherlands regulators are putting environmental regulations in place that would raise the cost (if not make it outright impossible) for smaller Dutch farmers to continue to produce, which has led to widespread farmer demonstrations across the country. Holland may not be alone in this drive to reduce farming’s impact on the environment at any cost. Its example&nbsp;may be followed by Canada and Ireland&nbsp;and there is concern that similar environmental rules, which seem to be specifically aimed at farming, may come to the US, given the green agenda of the current administration. Tone deaf does not begin to describe these initiatives and efforts, in our opinion.
Automotive &amp; Transportation
July picks up where June left off.&nbsp;The top three economies in Europe are reporting another Y/Y decline in July new car registrations.&nbsp;Germany saw a 13% drop, while&nbsp;the UK posted a slightly less onerous 9% Y/Y&nbsp;decline in new car registrations last month.&nbsp;French registrations&nbsp;also declined, but at a slightly slower 7% pace. And while the impact of chip shortages is waning on a Y/Y basis as we mentioned previously and the Y/Y declines in registrations may also show better comps in 2H22, a recovery in demand still lies beyond the line of sight, as new obstacles replace the old concerns. Gas rationing in Europe due to Russia’s influence over gas supply to the region, higher model prices as OEMs work to preserve margins in&nbsp;a rising cost environment, and slowing the economy’s impact on consumer confidence&nbsp;are likely to continue to weigh on auto production and sales well into 2023. BMW for example, while looking for a recovery in 2H22, had to reduce its full-year 2022 outlook&nbsp;given the slower 1H22 and uncertainty and volatility of economic and geopolitical factors that make more optimistic predictions difficult at this time.
We continue to see risk for companies in our index with high exposure to the automotive and transportation sectors, including PPG, AXTA, and to a lesser extent, AVNT, FUL, and HXL.
Battery Materials &amp; EV Transformation
Technology, methods, and supply chain continue to evolve.&nbsp;Global&nbsp;automotive manufacturers and their suppliers are looking to invest half a trillion dollars&nbsp;over the next several years in order to prepare the industry to transition to an EV architecture more fully. The investments range from new EV factories, battery cell and battery plants, new and expanded mining and conversion plant infrastructure for critical materials, and the growing realization of the need to reduce the industry’s dependence on China as the primary source EV-related supply. The recent&nbsp;decision by CATL to delay&nbsp;finalizing its plans for a North American battery plant underscores those concerns. It can therefore be seen as a sign of desperate times that&nbsp;Tesla felt it necessary to sign supply agreements with two Chinese cobalt processors&nbsp;in an effort to ensure it has adequate access to that important battery metal. Can one blame it given&nbsp;the outlook for cobalt?
Looking high and low for critical materials.&nbsp;Almost every long-term projection of EV growth and corresponding growth in critical metals needed for EV batteries includes a widening disparity between expected demand and available, highly probable, and even somewhat probable supply for most of these materials—lithium first and foremost. It is not surprising then that both auto OEMs and battery companies are looking to sign supply deals with existing and even speculative suppliers. Case in point is the recent announcement of a&nbsp;supply agreement between Prime Planet Energy &amp; Solutions, the battery joint venture of Toyota and Panasonic, and Ioneer Ltd.&nbsp;(OTC: GSCCF), a development-stage company whose lithium production plant isn’t expected to commence construction until 4Q22, with an uncertain timeline to commercial production. Another source of critical materials for batteries is end-of-life EV batteries themselves. In the spirit of environmental responsibility and a circular economy,&nbsp;Ascend Elements has announced plans to invest up to $1 billion&nbsp;in a factory in Kentucky for the production of battery cathode materials for EVs. The plant will use black mass from recycled batteries to directly produce cathode materials for the EV market. Production is scheduled to start at the end of 2023, with capacity to produce enough cathode materials for 250,000 EVs annually. Similarly, British battery developer&nbsp;Nexeon secured more than $200 million in funding&nbsp;to develop its battery materials manufacturing operations for the production of silicone-based anode materials for EV batteries, showing that it’s not just the cathode-side metals, such as lithium and cobalt, that are subject to supply concerns and therefore provide opportunities for funding and growth. We also note that one of the companies in our WTR-CMI index, namely&nbsp;NGVT, took part in this round of funding&nbsp;for Nexeon.
Graphite market update.&nbsp;Speaking of anode materials, an often overlooked part of an EV battery is the graphite that goes into the battery anode. As with other critical battery materials, a severe shortage of supply versus projected demand is envisioned for the graphite market. However, until now, this pending imbalance appears to be getting little attention from investors. As the realization that the EV industry is 100% dependent on China for&nbsp;battery-grade graphite spreads, we believe this lack of attention will be addressed. One company that is looking to launch domestic production of battery-grade graphite materials is Westwater Resources (NYSE: WWR). We recently hosted a fireside chat with WWR management to discuss this apparent lack of investor understanding of the supply-demand imbalance and overreliance on China (see link below). The company will update investors on its progress Thursday, August 11 at 11:00 am EDT when management will host its 2Q22 call.
Chemicals and Materials Technology in the News
NGVT.&nbsp;In addition to making an aforementioned investment in Nexeon, the company also announced the&nbsp;acquisition of privately owned Ozark Materials, LLC and Ozark Logistics, LLC (“Ozark Materials”)&nbsp;for $325 million. The acquisition is expected to close by early 4Q22. The acquired business is on pace for annual revenues of approximately $150 million, with a ~20% EBITDA margin in FY23.
MTRN.&nbsp;The company announced that it has established a new facility in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to accelerate the growth of advanced chemical solutions for the semiconductor and EV battery markets. The new 150,000-square-foot facility expands the company’s capacity to produce Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) materials for the most sophisticated semiconductor chips and provide advanced chemicals for the development of next-generation battery technology for EVs.
Circular Economy.&nbsp;Green Dot Bioplastics, a developer and supplier of bioplastic materials for innovative, sustainable end-uses,&nbsp;announced an addition of nine new grades of bioplastics&nbsp;aimed at single-use and plastic packaging markets, as the industry looks to adjust to increasingly strict government mandates and regulations related to single-use plastics. In an effort to support similar conversions, in this case to post-consumer recycled plastics,&nbsp;AVNT announced its post-consumer recycled (PCR) Color Prediction Service&nbsp;for polyolefins and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resins as well as its new polyolefin antioxidants, Cesa Nox A4R Additives for recycled plastics, thereby lowering adoption obstacles for consumers looking to incorporate post-consumer recycled plastic into their product designs.
EAF.&nbsp;While GrafTech’s 2Q22 results and guidance for the balance of 2022 left analysts and investors unimpressed with the company’s near-term margin and volume headwinds, investors may be missing the longer-term prospects for the company as its graphite electrodes going into electric ark furnaces (EAF) are enabling a transition from high carbon-producing coal furnaces to less environmentally impactful EAF technologies, which also use steel scrap, rather than iron ore, as a raw material.&nbsp;A recent study confirming the lower carbon-generating benefits of EAF&nbsp;versus conventional smelters underscores the environmental tailwind investors may be missing in evaluating EAF’s current volume issues in an environment of declining steel production globally.
Rating and Price Target Changes
ALB –&nbsp;UBS raised its price target (PT) to $265 from $218 but maintained its Neutral rating; Oppenheimer raised its PT to $440 from $368 and reiterated its Outperform rating.
CTVA –&nbsp;Credit Suisse raised its PT to $72 from $68 and reiterated its Outperform rating; UBS raised its PT to $66 from $64 and reiterated its Buy recommendation; CFRA lowered its PT to $61 from $65 and maintained its Hold rating.
EMN –&nbsp;CFRA reiterated its Buy rating and $125 PT; Citigroup downgraded the stock to Neutral from Buy; KeyBank raised its PT to $125 from $124 and reiterated its Overweight rating; Deutsche Bank lowered its PT to $115 from $125 and reiterated its Buy rating; Stifel Nicolaus lowered its PT to $134 from $155 and reiterated its Buy rating; Barclays lowered its PT to $110 from $120 and maintained its Equal Weight rating; Wells Fargo lowered its PT to $110 from $115 and reiterated its Overweight rating; RBC raised its PT to $97 from $94 and maintained its Sector Perform rating.
FMC –&nbsp;Credit Suisse lowered its PT to $105 from $109 and reiterated its Underperform rating; CFRA lowered its PT to $120 from $126 and maintained its Hold rating; Mizuho Securities lowered its PT to $144 from $149 and reiterated its Buy rating.
FUL –&nbsp;Berenberg Bank lowered its PT to $82 from $85 and reiterated its Buy recommendation.
HXL –&nbsp;BMO raised its PT to $66 from $57 and maintained its Market Perform rating.
LTHM –&nbsp;CFRA lowered its PT to $28 from $36 and reiterated its Buy rating; Mizuho Securities lowered its PT to $30 from $34 and maintained its Neutral rating; Deutsche Bank raised its PT to $26 from $24 and maintained its Hold rating.
VVV –&nbsp;CFRA downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and maintained its $34 PT.
Recent WTR Publications and Upcoming Events
Fireside Chat with Management of Westwater Resources, Inc.
Initiation of Coverage – Westwater Resources, Inc.
Management Series Report – Marrone Bio Innovations Inc. CEO Kevin Helash
Management Series Report – Westwater Resources, Inc. Executive Chairman Terence Cryan and CAO Steven Cates
DISCLOSURES

Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.  WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.  Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the BioEconomy and Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.  Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.  In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.  The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.  The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.  All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended August 7, 2022

<h2>KEY HIGHLIGHTS</h2>
<div></div>
<ul>
<li>WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;In what was a week of recovery for the market, the S&amp;P 500 and Russell 2000 advanced 2.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology stocks outperformed the broader indexes by delivering a 6.1% bounce last week. The WTR-CMI’s performance was led by EAF’s 14.4% rebound from previous weeks’ losses and regained investor enthusiasm for lithium following Elon Musk’s remarks, which saw LTHM, PLL, LAC, and ALB deliver double-digit gains for the week. PKE and AVD were the only stocks in our index to finish the week in the red.</li>
<li>NEVs are not immune from market forces.&nbsp;An&nbsp;ACEA summary of the EU’s 2Q22 auto sales by fuel type&nbsp;showed that while the share of new energy vehicles (NEVs) of new car sales has increased Y/Y, it was more a function of declining sales volumes of conventional fueled vehicles as growth, as Y/Y sales of BEVs increased a relatively modest 11%,. Furthermore, hybrid vehicle (HEV) and plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) sales declined. This suggests that a deepening and spreading economic recession may slow the pace of NEV sales versus expectations and, by extent, affect growth forecasts for key material.</li>
<li>ASH provides positive outlook.&nbsp;Citing lower exposure to pet-chem-driven RM inflation and stable end-markets,&nbsp;ASH pre-announced&nbsp;stronger F3Q22 (Jun-Q) results and raised guidance for its Sep-Q by 3% for revenue and 4% for EBITDA, helping the stock keep up with the WTR-CMI index last week. Similar RM and end-market exposure may benefit ECL, SXT, and NGVT.</li>
<li>Keeping an eye on the future.&nbsp;Even as recession concerns grow, EV manufacturers are looking to ensure sufficient supply of critical materials for lithium batteries, casting their nets wide. Thus,&nbsp;CMP announced a signing&nbsp;of a non-binding memorandum of understanding with Ford to potentially supply the company or its battery partners with battery-grade lithium from CMP’s yet-to-be designed lithium extraction and conversion facility.</li>
<li>A new trend continues to emerge in ag.&nbsp;Indoor farming, or&nbsp;controlled environment agriculture (CEA)&nbsp;continues to evolve in order to overcome the expected land shortage and address consumer demands. We believe innovations around this sector will disproportionately benefit bio-ag companies such as BIOX and BHIL, as their products also address similar concerns.</li>
</ul>
<h3>WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE</h3>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/288/568/original/image_102276742221658965404091.png?1658965406" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="288568"></figure>
<h2>Automotive &amp; Transportation Market</h2>
<p>Chipping away at semiconductor shortages.&nbsp;Volvo, in announcing stronger 2Q22 results, also warned that&nbsp;its total car production in 2022 may be flat to down versus last year, largely due to continuing supply issues, particularly related to semiconductor availability. It therefore appears that near-term chip availability may remain an issue holding back new car production through the balance of 2022 and affecting major auto suppliers in our WTR-CMI index, such as PPG and AXTA. As we noted last week, car companies and the semiconductor industry are not taking this shortage lying down. Last week,&nbsp;VW announced a partnership with STMicroelectronics&nbsp;to co-develop semiconductors for a cross-brand single software platform. The new semiconductors are expected to be built by TSMC. Meanwhile, American semiconductor company SkyWater Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT) announced&nbsp;plans for building a chip R&amp;D and production center&nbsp;in Indiana, with groundbreaking expected sometime in 2023. Again, these steps, while essential in shortening and strengthening the automotive supply chain for the long term, are unlikely to have a material impact on chip availability in the short term and we remain cautious on the automotive sector and those companies in our industry who rely on that market for substantial portions of their sales.</p>
<h2>EVs &amp; Battery Ecosystem</h2>
<p>Maximizing climate and economic benefits.&nbsp;A European environmental group’s study concluded that&nbsp;solid state batteries for EVs will significantly reduce the carbon footprint&nbsp;of such battery production, including lower use of metals coming from such places as the DRC. The group is therefore encouraging the EU parliament and member nations to increase their focus on promoting innovations in solid state battery technology and incorporating carbon goals for EV battery production into the region’s regulations. Meanwhile, Swedish battery company&nbsp;Northvolt is looking at technology that would utilize carbon from wood, which is plentiful in Sweden, rather than natural or pet-chem based synthetic graphite for the anode material of an EV battery, in an attempt to make the EU battery market less dependent on non-EU sources of critical battery materials. Domesticating critical supply and driving economic expansion appear to be the motivations behind&nbsp;Morocco’s efforts to attract an EV battery factory to the country&nbsp;and to integrate the country’s emerging cobalt industry more fully into the automotive battery sector. As North African countries look to compete more effectively with China and India, we may see similar strategies being followed by other nations in the region, looking to spur their economies and better the lives of their citizenry.</p>
<p>Another reason for concern.&nbsp;S&amp;P predicts global copper demand could nearly double during the next decade, from 25M mt annually now to about 50M mt in 2035 and there is a growing concern that mined copper is falling well short of this projected growth in demand. What’s more, there&nbsp;may not be sufficient copper available to meet the world’s net-zero 2050 goals, even factoring in “strong price signals and incentivizing policy initiatives, aggressive capacity utilization rates and all-time high recycling rates”. We believe that, at the very least, such physical limitations (and copper is far from the most concerning supply-demand discrepancy stories) will come into play over the next decade, potentially upsetting many of the current optimistic projections. In such an environment, we would look to market segments, such as graphite anode materials, that face nearer-term supply-demand imbalances that would still exist even under significantly reduced EV growth forecasts. We believe Westwater Resources (NYSE: WWR) offers a compelling investment opportunity in this regard.</p>
<h2>Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech</h2>
<p>US crop conditions—so far so good.&nbsp;As of last week,&nbsp;corn and soybean crop conditions held steady, with 64% of corn crop listed as in good-to-excellent condition versus 65% last year, while in soybeans, good-to-excellent conditions were characterized for 61% of the crop versus 60% last year. One area of concern remains—late corn plantings resulted in only 37% of the crop silking, compared with the 48% five-year average at this time. But even assuming USDA yield and acreage projections hold, getting the harvested grain to where it needs to go via rail in the US may present its own set of problems. And while Ukraine and Russia appear to have reached an agreement on exporting Ukrainian grain through Russia-blockaded Black Sea ports, domestically,&nbsp;rail companies and unions are embroiled in labor negotiations&nbsp;that may lead to even more logistical disruptions this fall, even as grain is needing to move to processing facilities or exporting hubs.</p>
<p>Fertilizer availability (and price) remain a concern heading into 2023.&nbsp;Supply chain and logistical disruptions in the agricultural sector caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine, among other factors, are giving rise to growing concerns for the 2022-23 ag season. While fertilizer prices&nbsp;have come off their mid-season highs in North America, due to both lower off-season demand and declining energy costs, concerns remain over price and availability remain. Thus, Norwegian fertilizer company Yara, while reporting modestly stronger than expected 2Q22,&nbsp;cautioned that high natural gas prices and concerns over its availability&nbsp;given the heavy European reliance on Russian sources may result in lower production of nitrogen fertilizers in 2023, which we feel may lead to a repeat of 2021-22 price inflation in urea and ammonia, at least in the EU region. Europeans’ inability to produce sufficient fertilizer products at an acceptable cost may provide opportunities for American-based companies, such as CF Industries (NYSE: CF), to increase their market share and maintain elevated prices that should contribute to stronger margins.</p>
<p>Can grain prices support higher input cost expectations?&nbsp;With fertilizer and other crop input costs still well above 2020 levels, even after coming off mid-season peak, farmer income and farmers’ ability to withstand similar price spikes next season will depend to a large degree on commodity crop prices when this year’s harvest is monetized. As the largest importer of ag products, China’s economic health is becoming a growing concern in this regard. With the&nbsp;country’s economy slowing to 0.4% GDP growth in 2Q22&nbsp;from 4.8% growth seen in 1Q22, the Chinese government has significantly reduced its purchases of ag commodities, especially from the US, despite lower soybean production in LATAM. With Chinese imports perhaps slowing even more in conjunction with slowing economic growth, a main source of demand for ag commodities may wane over the next six to nine months, which may in turn lead to lower commodity grain prices, even as domestic farmers look to sell their supplies. Lower grain prices mean lower farmer cash income, which suggests lower ability to pay for still high input costs come 2023. US farmers may have dodged the profit contraction bullet in 2022, but it is not clear if they would be able to do it again in 2023.</p>
<p>Lower planted acreage, reduced utilization of fertilizer and ag-chem inputs per acre (as we already saw this year), and changing crop acreage decisions have the potential to negatively affect ag-chem companies such as FMC, AVD, and CTVA and we are becoming more concerned with investors’ outlook on these names souring in the months ahead. On the other hand, farmers’ strong incentive to look for alternative ways of growing and protecting their crops as well as receiving premium prices for their products may lead to faster expansion of organic farming in row crops and to accelerating adoption of bio-based fertilizers, soil conditioning products and bio-based pesticides, which we see as a positive for BIOX and BHIL.</p>
<h2>Rating and Price Target Changes</h2>
<p>ALB –&nbsp;KeyBank upgraded the stock to Sector Weight from Underweight.</p>
<p>ASH –&nbsp;Wells Fargo lowered its price target (PT) to $107 from $113 and maintained its Equal Weight rating; Deutsche Bank lowered its PT to $120 from $122 and reiterated its Buy rating; Mizuho Securities raised its PT to $139 from $138, while also reiterating its Buy rating.</p>
<p>AVNT –&nbsp;Oppenheimer lowered its PT to $58 from $69 and reiterated its Outperform rating.</p>
<p>AXTA –&nbsp;KeyBank upgraded the stock to Overweight from Sector Weight and established a PT of $30.</p>
<p>ECVT –&nbsp;KeyBank lowered its PT to $13 from $16 and reiterated its Overweight rating.</p>
<p>EMN –&nbsp;KeyBank lowered its PT to $124 from $142 and reiterated its Overweight rating.</p>
<p>FMC –&nbsp;KeyBank raised its rating on the stock to Overweight from Sector Weight and established a $122 PT.</p>
<p>PPG –&nbsp;Wells Fargo lowered its PT to $126 from $140 and maintained its Equal Weight rating; CFRA downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and lowered its PT to $135 from $165; Credit Suisse lowered its PT to $110 from $115 and reiterated its Underperform rating; UBS also lowered its PT to $160 from $161 but reiterated its Buy recommendation.</p>
<p>SHW –&nbsp;Wells Fargo lowered its PT to $270 from $285 and maintained its Equal Weight rating.</p>
<h2>Recent WTR Publications and Upcoming Events</h2>
<p>Management Series Report – Marrone Bio Innovations CEO Kevin Helash</p>
<p>Management Series Report – Westwater Resources Executive Chairman Terence Cryan and CAO Steven Cates</p>
<p>Initiation of Coverage – Westwater Resources, Inc.</p>
<h2>DISCLOSURES</h2>
<div></div>
<p>Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.<br><br>WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.<br><br>Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.<br><br>Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.<br><br>In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.<br><br>The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.<br><br>The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.<br><br>All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.</p>

KEY HIGHLIGHTS


WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;In what was a week of recovery for the market, the S&amp;P 500 and Russell 2000 advanced 2.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology stocks outperformed the broader indexes by delivering a 6.1% bounce last week. The WTR-CMI’s performance was led by EAF’s 14.4% rebound from previous weeks’ losses and regained investor enthusiasm for lithium following Elon Musk’s remarks, which saw LTHM, PLL, LAC, and ALB deliver double-digit gains for the week. PKE and AVD were the only stocks in our index to finish the week in the red.
NEVs are not immune from market forces.&nbsp;An&nbsp;ACEA summary of the EU’s 2Q22 auto sales by fuel type&nbsp;showed that while the share of new energy vehicles (NEVs) of new car sales has increased Y/Y, it was more a function of declining sales volumes of conventional fueled vehicles as growth, as Y/Y sales of BEVs increased a relatively modest 11%,. Furthermore, hybrid vehicle (HEV) and plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) sales declined. This suggests that a deepening and spreading economic recession may slow the pace of NEV sales versus expectations and, by extent, affect growth forecasts for key material.
ASH provides positive outlook.&nbsp;Citing lower exposure to pet-chem-driven RM inflation and stable end-markets,&nbsp;ASH pre-announced&nbsp;stronger F3Q22 (Jun-Q) results and raised guidance for its Sep-Q by 3% for revenue and 4% for EBITDA, helping the stock keep up with the WTR-CMI index last week. Similar RM and end-market exposure may benefit ECL, SXT, and NGVT.
Keeping an eye on the future.&nbsp;Even as recession concerns grow, EV manufacturers are looking to ensure sufficient supply of critical materials for lithium batteries, casting their nets wide. Thus,&nbsp;CMP announced a signing&nbsp;of a non-binding memorandum of understanding with Ford to potentially supply the company or its battery partners with battery-grade lithium from CMP’s yet-to-be designed lithium extraction and conversion facility.
A new trend continues to emerge in ag.&nbsp;Indoor farming, or&nbsp;controlled environment agriculture (CEA)&nbsp;continues to evolve in order to overcome the expected land shortage and address consumer demands. We believe innovations around this sector will disproportionately benefit bio-ag companies such as BIOX and BHIL, as their products also address similar concerns.

WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE

Automotive &amp; Transportation Market
Chipping away at semiconductor shortages.&nbsp;Volvo, in announcing stronger 2Q22 results, also warned that&nbsp;its total car production in 2022 may be flat to down versus last year, largely due to continuing supply issues, particularly related to semiconductor availability. It therefore appears that near-term chip availability may remain an issue holding back new car production through the balance of 2022 and affecting major auto suppliers in our WTR-CMI index, such as PPG and AXTA. As we noted last week, car companies and the semiconductor industry are not taking this shortage lying down. Last week,&nbsp;VW announced a partnership with STMicroelectronics&nbsp;to co-develop semiconductors for a cross-brand single software platform. The new semiconductors are expected to be built by TSMC. Meanwhile, American semiconductor company SkyWater Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT) announced&nbsp;plans for building a chip R&amp;D and production center&nbsp;in Indiana, with groundbreaking expected sometime in 2023. Again, these steps, while essential in shortening and strengthening the automotive supply chain for the long term, are unlikely to have a material impact on chip availability in the short term and we remain cautious on the automotive sector and those companies in our industry who rely on that market for substantial portions of their sales.
EVs &amp; Battery Ecosystem
Maximizing climate and economic benefits.&nbsp;A European environmental group’s study concluded that&nbsp;solid state batteries for EVs will significantly reduce the carbon footprint&nbsp;of such battery production, including lower use of metals coming from such places as the DRC. The group is therefore encouraging the EU parliament and member nations to increase their focus on promoting innovations in solid state battery technology and incorporating carbon goals for EV battery production into the region’s regulations. Meanwhile, Swedish battery company&nbsp;Northvolt is looking at technology that would utilize carbon from wood, which is plentiful in Sweden, rather than natural or pet-chem based synthetic graphite for the anode material of an EV battery, in an attempt to make the EU battery market less dependent on non-EU sources of critical battery materials. Domesticating critical supply and driving economic expansion appear to be the motivations behind&nbsp;Morocco’s efforts to attract an EV battery factory to the country&nbsp;and to integrate the country’s emerging cobalt industry more fully into the automotive battery sector. As North African countries look to compete more effectively with China and India, we may see similar strategies being followed by other nations in the region, looking to spur their economies and better the lives of their citizenry.
Another reason for concern.&nbsp;S&amp;P predicts global copper demand could nearly double during the next decade, from 25M mt annually now to about 50M mt in 2035 and there is a growing concern that mined copper is falling well short of this projected growth in demand. What’s more, there&nbsp;may not be sufficient copper available to meet the world’s net-zero 2050 goals, even factoring in “strong price signals and incentivizing policy initiatives, aggressive capacity utilization rates and all-time high recycling rates”. We believe that, at the very least, such physical limitations (and copper is far from the most concerning supply-demand discrepancy stories) will come into play over the next decade, potentially upsetting many of the current optimistic projections. In such an environment, we would look to market segments, such as graphite anode materials, that face nearer-term supply-demand imbalances that would still exist even under significantly reduced EV growth forecasts. We believe Westwater Resources (NYSE: WWR) offers a compelling investment opportunity in this regard.
Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech
US crop conditions—so far so good.&nbsp;As of last week,&nbsp;corn and soybean crop conditions held steady, with 64% of corn crop listed as in good-to-excellent condition versus 65% last year, while in soybeans, good-to-excellent conditions were characterized for 61% of the crop versus 60% last year. One area of concern remains—late corn plantings resulted in only 37% of the crop silking, compared with the 48% five-year average at this time. But even assuming USDA yield and acreage projections hold, getting the harvested grain to where it needs to go via rail in the US may present its own set of problems. And while Ukraine and Russia appear to have reached an agreement on exporting Ukrainian grain through Russia-blockaded Black Sea ports, domestically,&nbsp;rail companies and unions are embroiled in labor negotiations&nbsp;that may lead to even more logistical disruptions this fall, even as grain is needing to move to processing facilities or exporting hubs.
Fertilizer availability (and price) remain a concern heading into 2023.&nbsp;Supply chain and logistical disruptions in the agricultural sector caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine, among other factors, are giving rise to growing concerns for the 2022-23 ag season. While fertilizer prices&nbsp;have come off their mid-season highs in North America, due to both lower off-season demand and declining energy costs, concerns remain over price and availability remain. Thus, Norwegian fertilizer company Yara, while reporting modestly stronger than expected 2Q22,&nbsp;cautioned that high natural gas prices and concerns over its availability&nbsp;given the heavy European reliance on Russian sources may result in lower production of nitrogen fertilizers in 2023, which we feel may lead to a repeat of 2021-22 price inflation in urea and ammonia, at least in the EU region. Europeans’ inability to produce sufficient fertilizer products at an acceptable cost may provide opportunities for American-based companies, such as CF Industries (NYSE: CF), to increase their market share and maintain elevated prices that should contribute to stronger margins.
Can grain prices support higher input cost expectations?&nbsp;With fertilizer and other crop input costs still well above 2020 levels, even after coming off mid-season peak, farmer income and farmers’ ability to withstand similar price spikes next season will depend to a large degree on commodity crop prices when this year’s harvest is monetized. As the largest importer of ag products, China’s economic health is becoming a growing concern in this regard. With the&nbsp;country’s economy slowing to 0.4% GDP growth in 2Q22&nbsp;from 4.8% growth seen in 1Q22, the Chinese government has significantly reduced its purchases of ag commodities, especially from the US, despite lower soybean production in LATAM. With Chinese imports perhaps slowing even more in conjunction with slowing economic growth, a main source of demand for ag commodities may wane over the next six to nine months, which may in turn lead to lower commodity grain prices, even as domestic farmers look to sell their supplies. Lower grain prices mean lower farmer cash income, which suggests lower ability to pay for still high input costs come 2023. US farmers may have dodged the profit contraction bullet in 2022, but it is not clear if they would be able to do it again in 2023.
Lower planted acreage, reduced utilization of fertilizer and ag-chem inputs per acre (as we already saw this year), and changing crop acreage decisions have the potential to negatively affect ag-chem companies such as FMC, AVD, and CTVA and we are becoming more concerned with investors’ outlook on these names souring in the months ahead. On the other hand, farmers’ strong incentive to look for alternative ways of growing and protecting their crops as well as receiving premium prices for their products may lead to faster expansion of organic farming in row crops and to accelerating adoption of bio-based fertilizers, soil conditioning products and bio-based pesticides, which we see as a positive for BIOX and BHIL.
Rating and Price Target Changes
ALB –&nbsp;KeyBank upgraded the stock to Sector Weight from Underweight.
ASH –&nbsp;Wells Fargo lowered its price target (PT) to $107 from $113 and maintained its Equal Weight rating; Deutsche Bank lowered its PT to $120 from $122 and reiterated its Buy rating; Mizuho Securities raised its PT to $139 from $138, while also reiterating its Buy rating.
AVNT –&nbsp;Oppenheimer lowered its PT to $58 from $69 and reiterated its Outperform rating.
AXTA –&nbsp;KeyBank upgraded the stock to Overweight from Sector Weight and established a PT of $30.
ECVT –&nbsp;KeyBank lowered its PT to $13 from $16 and reiterated its Overweight rating.
EMN –&nbsp;KeyBank lowered its PT to $124 from $142 and reiterated its Overweight rating.
FMC –&nbsp;KeyBank raised its rating on the stock to Overweight from Sector Weight and established a $122 PT.
PPG –&nbsp;Wells Fargo lowered its PT to $126 from $140 and maintained its Equal Weight rating; CFRA downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and lowered its PT to $135 from $165; Credit Suisse lowered its PT to $110 from $115 and reiterated its Underperform rating; UBS also lowered its PT to $160 from $161 but reiterated its Buy recommendation.
SHW –&nbsp;Wells Fargo lowered its PT to $270 from $285 and maintained its Equal Weight rating.
Recent WTR Publications and Upcoming Events
Management Series Report – Marrone Bio Innovations CEO Kevin Helash
Management Series Report – Westwater Resources Executive Chairman Terence Cryan and CAO Steven Cates
Initiation of Coverage – Westwater Resources, Inc.
DISCLOSURES

Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.  WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.  Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.  Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.  In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.  The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.  The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.  All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended July 24, 2022

<h3>KEY HIGHLIGHTS</h3>
<div></div>
<ul>
<li>WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;The sell-off continued last week, with the S&amp;P 500 losing 5.8% and the broader Russell 2000 Index giving up 7.5%. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology companies underperformed the broader market by declining 9.9%, with all the stocks in the index posting W/W losses. ECVT (down 2.1%) and PKE (down 2.3%) outperformed relative to other names, as the raw material cost pressure they are experiencing is more moderate compared with companies heavily reliant on pet-chem-based inputs. PPG also outperformed by declining 5.1%, likely bolstered by its recent investor day. KOP, CMP, and LTHM were the worst performers, as concerns over construction markets grew and investors became more concerned over the impact on inflation on economic growth, including consumers’ ability to purchase more expensive EVs, especially as several manufacturers had to raise prices to offset higher metal and graphite costs.</li>
<li>Farmer concerns grow.&nbsp;The&nbsp;Rural Mainstreet Index (RMI) from Creighton University&nbsp;reading for June dropped to 49.8 from May’s 57.7, with 50 being a growth-neutral reading, implying US farmers’ growing concerns over the economy, the impact of rising intertest rates, and ongoing supply chain bottlenecks. Nearly 93% of rural banks surveyed now put the likelihood of a recession at more than 50%.</li>
<li>Efforts to domesticate lithium supply continue.&nbsp;Cypress Development Corp. (OTC: CYDVF), an advanced lithium development company focused on commercializing lithium projects in Nevada, provided an update on the ongoing&nbsp;feasibility study&nbsp;for the company’s Clayton Valley lithium project in Nevada, as well as&nbsp;progress on its pilot plant operations, which have delivered samples to two laboratories in Canada for further testing.</li>
<li>Coatings markets growing above GDP rates.&nbsp;According to a recent report, the&nbsp;waterborne coatings market&nbsp;is expected to grow at a 3.5% CAGR over the next five years, while&nbsp;the low volatile organic compounds (VOC) segment&nbsp;of the coatings industry is expected to post an even faster 6.2% CAGR through 2026, driven by tighter emission regulations and consumers’ growing awareness of VOC’s health and environmental impact. Over the mid-term, this should be a positive for SHW, PPG, AXTA, and RPM.</li>
</ul>
<h3>WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE</h3>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/282/497/original/image_22915513821656025927561.png?1656025930" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="282497"></figure>
<p>Source: YCharts; June 19 close</p>
<h2>Automotive &amp; Transportation Market</h2>
<p>Automotive doldrums continue.&nbsp;ASEA’s May report on new car registrations in the EU&nbsp;showed an 11.2% drop in May, the 11th&nbsp;straight month of Y/Y declines, bringing the YTD decline to 13.7%. We expect June numbers to continue to comp negatively versus the year-ago period, with 2H22 comps easing, which may allow the European market to finally break what would be a year-long string of declines. However, we caution that while comps will get easier in July and beyond, higher auto prices, higher interest rates, and souring consumer sentiment, exacerbated by the continuing war in Ukraine, may constrain whatever recovery may take place. Meanwhile, on a more positive note,&nbsp;auto production lost to semiconductor chip shortages&nbsp;appears to be slowing down, with less than 28,000 added to the tally of losses last week, mostly in APAC region outside of China. Nonetheless, 2.26 million vehicles have already been removed from production expectations for 2022.</p>
<h2>EVs &amp; Battery Ecosystem</h2>
<p>As EV growth continues, solutions are sought to combat high battery metal prices.&nbsp;While China’s overall new vehicle sales continue to decline, the&nbsp;NEV segment is still posting strong Y/Y growth, with May sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) rising 111.5% and YTD sales increasing 117.4%. However, both investors’ and consumers’ concerns are shifting from availability of materials for EV batteries to the costs of said materials, at least in the near to mid-term. Consequently, it is not surprising to see ongoing efforts to find and develop alternate battery chemistries, or whole new technologies to address both concerns. One company leading these efforts is Michigan-based privately held battery start-up Our Next Energy (ONE), which&nbsp;will supply an early prototype of its Gemini “Dual-Chemistry” battery to BMW&nbsp;(whose investment arm was part of the latest funding round of ONE) for testing under real world conditions. The testing is expected to start by the end of 2022 and will focus on proving ONE’s claim of doubling the typical lithium battery range, while also prolonging battery life, all while using cheaper and more plentiful iron and manganese to reduce the need for higher-cost cobalt and nickel in battery cathodes. Meanwhile, Alsym Energy, a Massachusetts-based start-up, is working on battery chemistry and a design that would further reduce, if not&nbsp;eliminate lithium and cobalt from EV battery cathodes, making them both safer and about 50% cheaper versus current designs. And in Europe, work continues on developing solid-state batteries for the EV market, with a consortium of Spanish companies launching the&nbsp;Basquevolt initiative, with the Basque government researching, developing, and producing solid-state batteries, with pilot plant operations targeted to begin in 2025 and ramp up to a 10 GWh annual production rate by 2027.</p>
<h2>Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech</h2>
<p>With planting progress on track, weather concerns rise.&nbsp;Better conditions allowed US farmers to essentially catch up to five-year averages when it comes to&nbsp;corn and soybean plantings. However, while current crop conditions are rated mostly good to excellent, recent scorching weather across the farm belt regions may raise the possibility of less than optimal yields and we will watch these developments over the next several weeks. One thing to keep in mind is the lessons from Brazil, where drought conditions led to angst over yield expectations. However,&nbsp;the country’s second corn crop, also known as safrinha, is now expected to be up 45% Y/Y, driven by higher planted acreage and higher yield expectations versus the drought affected 2021-22 second crop season. This may help alleviate the production shortfall experienced during the first crop period earlier in the year. The news could not come at a better time, as the world is getting increasingly pessimistic regarding&nbsp;the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the global food market, not just in 2022-23, but also longer term.</p>
<p>Doing their part to ensure adequate supply.&nbsp;Against this backdrop of food security concerns, crop input companies are stepping up efforts to ensure their products are made available and at an affordable price to help offset expected declines in Russian, Belorussian, and Ukrainian supply. Nutrien (NYSE: NTR) followed up its recent announcement of production capacity expansion with even more aggressive plans to&nbsp;ramp up production of phosphate and nitrogen fertilizers, both through brownfield expansions and new capacity addition projects expected to come online through 2025 and 2027, respectively.</p>
<h2>In Other News</h2>
<p>Expanding markets served to cushion expected declines.&nbsp;One company in our WTR-CMI index—Valvoline (NYSE: VVV)—has been fielding questions and fighting investor perception of a sun-setting business for several years now, as EVs continue to grow their share of annual car sales and investors grow concerned over the company’s ability to continue to deliver superior growth in what many are seeing as a sun-setting market (lube oil for ICE passenger vehicles). However, the company is not taking these expectations lying down. Earlier, VVV announced its intentions to monetize its bulk and industrial lubes business and concentrate on growing its company-owned and franchised Valvoline Instant Oil Change (VIOC) network. More recently, the company announced that it has opened its first&nbsp;company-owned heavy-duty fleet service center&nbsp;to provide the same high-touch customer service as it currently does through its VIOC network to service to Class 5-8 vehicles that can weigh more than 30,000 pounds. We believe this move will significantly expand VVV’s addressable market in the near to mid-term, while providing a longer tail over the long term, which may ease investor concerns over the stock’s valuation levels.</p>
<p>M&amp;A deal flow continues.&nbsp;The chemicals and materials technology industry has been characterized by considerable M&amp;A activity over the last two to three decades and despite, or perhaps because of the slowing economic outlook and inflationary pressures, portfolio optimization efforts are continuing. Recently,&nbsp;PPG announced&nbsp;that it has completed the divestiture of Eberle Design, Inc. (EDI) to Vance Street Capital. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Meanwhile, global chemical and plastic distributor Brenntag (OTC: BNTGY) recently&nbsp;announced that it has entered a partnership&nbsp;with Saudi Al-Azzaz Chemicals Co. via a 75/25 joint venture. Looking to expand its geographic footprint and keep up with the M&amp;A-driven growth of SHW and PPG, AkzoNobel (OTC: AKZOY) recently&nbsp;announced that it reached an agreement&nbsp;with Kansai Paint to acquire the latter’s paints &amp; coatings business in Africa, which generates approximately $300 million in annual sales, with completion expected in 2023, subject to regulatory approvals.</p>
<h2>Rating and Price Target Changes</h2>
<p>EMN –&nbsp;Jefferies downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and reduced its price target (PT) to $87 from $150.</p>
<p>FMC –&nbsp;CFRA upgraded the stock to Hold from Sell, maintaining its $126 PT.</p>
<p>SHW –&nbsp;UBS lowered its PT to $265 from $279 and maintained its Neutral rating.</p>
<p>VVV –&nbsp;Jefferies lowered its PT to $40 from $44 and reiterated its Buy rating.</p>
<h2>Recent WTR Publications and Upcoming Events</h2>
<p>Management Series Report – Marrone Bio Innovations CEO Kevin Helash</p>
<p>Management Series Report – Westwater Resources Executive Chairman Terence Cryan and CAO Steven Cates</p>
<h2>DISCLOSURES</h2>
<div></div>
<p>Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.<br><br>WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.<br><br>Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.<br><br>Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.<br><br>In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.<br><br>The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.<br><br>The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.<br><br>All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.</p>

KEY HIGHLIGHTS


WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;The sell-off continued last week, with the S&amp;P 500 losing 5.8% and the broader Russell 2000 Index giving up 7.5%. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology companies underperformed the broader market by declining 9.9%, with all the stocks in the index posting W/W losses. ECVT (down 2.1%) and PKE (down 2.3%) outperformed relative to other names, as the raw material cost pressure they are experiencing is more moderate compared with companies heavily reliant on pet-chem-based inputs. PPG also outperformed by declining 5.1%, likely bolstered by its recent investor day. KOP, CMP, and LTHM were the worst performers, as concerns over construction markets grew and investors became more concerned over the impact on inflation on economic growth, including consumers’ ability to purchase more expensive EVs, especially as several manufacturers had to raise prices to offset higher metal and graphite costs.
Farmer concerns grow.&nbsp;The&nbsp;Rural Mainstreet Index (RMI) from Creighton University&nbsp;reading for June dropped to 49.8 from May’s 57.7, with 50 being a growth-neutral reading, implying US farmers’ growing concerns over the economy, the impact of rising intertest rates, and ongoing supply chain bottlenecks. Nearly 93% of rural banks surveyed now put the likelihood of a recession at more than 50%.
Efforts to domesticate lithium supply continue.&nbsp;Cypress Development Corp. (OTC: CYDVF), an advanced lithium development company focused on commercializing lithium projects in Nevada, provided an update on the ongoing&nbsp;feasibility study&nbsp;for the company’s Clayton Valley lithium project in Nevada, as well as&nbsp;progress on its pilot plant operations, which have delivered samples to two laboratories in Canada for further testing.
Coatings markets growing above GDP rates.&nbsp;According to a recent report, the&nbsp;waterborne coatings market&nbsp;is expected to grow at a 3.5% CAGR over the next five years, while&nbsp;the low volatile organic compounds (VOC) segment&nbsp;of the coatings industry is expected to post an even faster 6.2% CAGR through 2026, driven by tighter emission regulations and consumers’ growing awareness of VOC’s health and environmental impact. Over the mid-term, this should be a positive for SHW, PPG, AXTA, and RPM.

WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE

Source: YCharts; June 19 close
Automotive &amp; Transportation Market
Automotive doldrums continue.&nbsp;ASEA’s May report on new car registrations in the EU&nbsp;showed an 11.2% drop in May, the 11th&nbsp;straight month of Y/Y declines, bringing the YTD decline to 13.7%. We expect June numbers to continue to comp negatively versus the year-ago period, with 2H22 comps easing, which may allow the European market to finally break what would be a year-long string of declines. However, we caution that while comps will get easier in July and beyond, higher auto prices, higher interest rates, and souring consumer sentiment, exacerbated by the continuing war in Ukraine, may constrain whatever recovery may take place. Meanwhile, on a more positive note,&nbsp;auto production lost to semiconductor chip shortages&nbsp;appears to be slowing down, with less than 28,000 added to the tally of losses last week, mostly in APAC region outside of China. Nonetheless, 2.26 million vehicles have already been removed from production expectations for 2022.
EVs &amp; Battery Ecosystem
As EV growth continues, solutions are sought to combat high battery metal prices.&nbsp;While China’s overall new vehicle sales continue to decline, the&nbsp;NEV segment is still posting strong Y/Y growth, with May sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) rising 111.5% and YTD sales increasing 117.4%. However, both investors’ and consumers’ concerns are shifting from availability of materials for EV batteries to the costs of said materials, at least in the near to mid-term. Consequently, it is not surprising to see ongoing efforts to find and develop alternate battery chemistries, or whole new technologies to address both concerns. One company leading these efforts is Michigan-based privately held battery start-up Our Next Energy (ONE), which&nbsp;will supply an early prototype of its Gemini “Dual-Chemistry” battery to BMW&nbsp;(whose investment arm was part of the latest funding round of ONE) for testing under real world conditions. The testing is expected to start by the end of 2022 and will focus on proving ONE’s claim of doubling the typical lithium battery range, while also prolonging battery life, all while using cheaper and more plentiful iron and manganese to reduce the need for higher-cost cobalt and nickel in battery cathodes. Meanwhile, Alsym Energy, a Massachusetts-based start-up, is working on battery chemistry and a design that would further reduce, if not&nbsp;eliminate lithium and cobalt from EV battery cathodes, making them both safer and about 50% cheaper versus current designs. And in Europe, work continues on developing solid-state batteries for the EV market, with a consortium of Spanish companies launching the&nbsp;Basquevolt initiative, with the Basque government researching, developing, and producing solid-state batteries, with pilot plant operations targeted to begin in 2025 and ramp up to a 10 GWh annual production rate by 2027.
Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech
With planting progress on track, weather concerns rise.&nbsp;Better conditions allowed US farmers to essentially catch up to five-year averages when it comes to&nbsp;corn and soybean plantings. However, while current crop conditions are rated mostly good to excellent, recent scorching weather across the farm belt regions may raise the possibility of less than optimal yields and we will watch these developments over the next several weeks. One thing to keep in mind is the lessons from Brazil, where drought conditions led to angst over yield expectations. However,&nbsp;the country’s second corn crop, also known as safrinha, is now expected to be up 45% Y/Y, driven by higher planted acreage and higher yield expectations versus the drought affected 2021-22 second crop season. This may help alleviate the production shortfall experienced during the first crop period earlier in the year. The news could not come at a better time, as the world is getting increasingly pessimistic regarding&nbsp;the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the global food market, not just in 2022-23, but also longer term.
Doing their part to ensure adequate supply.&nbsp;Against this backdrop of food security concerns, crop input companies are stepping up efforts to ensure their products are made available and at an affordable price to help offset expected declines in Russian, Belorussian, and Ukrainian supply. Nutrien (NYSE: NTR) followed up its recent announcement of production capacity expansion with even more aggressive plans to&nbsp;ramp up production of phosphate and nitrogen fertilizers, both through brownfield expansions and new capacity addition projects expected to come online through 2025 and 2027, respectively.
In Other News
Expanding markets served to cushion expected declines.&nbsp;One company in our WTR-CMI index—Valvoline (NYSE: VVV)—has been fielding questions and fighting investor perception of a sun-setting business for several years now, as EVs continue to grow their share of annual car sales and investors grow concerned over the company’s ability to continue to deliver superior growth in what many are seeing as a sun-setting market (lube oil for ICE passenger vehicles). However, the company is not taking these expectations lying down. Earlier, VVV announced its intentions to monetize its bulk and industrial lubes business and concentrate on growing its company-owned and franchised Valvoline Instant Oil Change (VIOC) network. More recently, the company announced that it has opened its first&nbsp;company-owned heavy-duty fleet service center&nbsp;to provide the same high-touch customer service as it currently does through its VIOC network to service to Class 5-8 vehicles that can weigh more than 30,000 pounds. We believe this move will significantly expand VVV’s addressable market in the near to mid-term, while providing a longer tail over the long term, which may ease investor concerns over the stock’s valuation levels.
M&amp;A deal flow continues.&nbsp;The chemicals and materials technology industry has been characterized by considerable M&amp;A activity over the last two to three decades and despite, or perhaps because of the slowing economic outlook and inflationary pressures, portfolio optimization efforts are continuing. Recently,&nbsp;PPG announced&nbsp;that it has completed the divestiture of Eberle Design, Inc. (EDI) to Vance Street Capital. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Meanwhile, global chemical and plastic distributor Brenntag (OTC: BNTGY) recently&nbsp;announced that it has entered a partnership&nbsp;with Saudi Al-Azzaz Chemicals Co. via a 75/25 joint venture. Looking to expand its geographic footprint and keep up with the M&amp;A-driven growth of SHW and PPG, AkzoNobel (OTC: AKZOY) recently&nbsp;announced that it reached an agreement&nbsp;with Kansai Paint to acquire the latter’s paints &amp; coatings business in Africa, which generates approximately $300 million in annual sales, with completion expected in 2023, subject to regulatory approvals.
Rating and Price Target Changes
EMN –&nbsp;Jefferies downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and reduced its price target (PT) to $87 from $150.
FMC –&nbsp;CFRA upgraded the stock to Hold from Sell, maintaining its $126 PT.
SHW –&nbsp;UBS lowered its PT to $265 from $279 and maintained its Neutral rating.
VVV –&nbsp;Jefferies lowered its PT to $40 from $44 and reiterated its Buy rating.
Recent WTR Publications and Upcoming Events
Management Series Report – Marrone Bio Innovations CEO Kevin Helash
Management Series Report – Westwater Resources Executive Chairman Terence Cryan and CAO Steven Cates
DISCLOSURES

Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.  WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.  Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.  Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.  In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.  The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.  The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.  All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended June 19, 2022

<h2>KEY HIGHLIGHTS</h2>
<div></div>
<ul>
<li>WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;In what was another down week for the market, with the Russell 2000 declining 1.1% and the S&amp;P 500 dropping a whopping 3.0%, our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology companies bucked the trend and posted a 1.0% appreciation. YTD, our index, while down 9.8%, is materially outperforming the broader market, as the Russell 2000 has declined 21%, while the S&amp;P 500 has lost 18.1% of its value since the beginning of 2022.</li>
<li>Winners and losers.&nbsp;Lithium stocks’ recovery led the performance last week, with PLL (up 10.9%), LAC (up 7.8%), and LTHM (up 7.4%) leading the way. Conversely, KWR, SHW, and PKE suffered the biggest declines, dropping 5.5%, 5.4%, and 5.0%, respectively, being the only stocks in our index to underperform the S&amp;P 500.</li>
<li>Addressing biologics’ growing needs.&nbsp;Taking a break from boardroom fights, AVD announced the development (with 3Bar Biologics) of&nbsp;non-reusable packaging&nbsp;for liquid biologic crop protection products, as bio-based crop inputs are incompatible with reusable packaging typically used in these applications due to the threat of contamination and the need for sterility when dealing with live organisms.</li>
<li>April was the worst month of the year…so far.&nbsp;The European new car market saw another negative Y/Y comp, with&nbsp;new car registrations declining almost 21%&nbsp;compared with April of 2021, the steepest Y/Y drop this year. Unfortunately, as the&nbsp;Bloomberg chart shows, May and June results may not be much better and hopes may begin to fade for a 2H22 recovery, given the general economic slowdown taking place globally and the still unresolved supply chain and logistics issues. In our sector, PPG, AXTA, and to a lesser extent, FUL, AVNT, KWR, and HXL have the greatest exposure to the automotive and transportation industry, suggesting volume growth will be hard to come by for these companies in 2022.</li>
<li>Plantings accelerate in US, but concerns remain.&nbsp;Better weather conditions allowed US farmers to get out into the field and attempt to catch up on getting seeds into the ground. Corn and soybean&nbsp;plantings increased significantly last week, but remain below five-year averages, with planting window rapidly closing over the&nbsp;next two to three weeks.</li>
</ul>
<h2>WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE</h2>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/276/563/original/image_95819690821653520816686.png?1653520819" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="276563"></figure>
<p>Source: YCharts; May 20 close</p>
<main>
<div data-view-name="PostsShowView">
<div id="js_post_650">
<div id="content-wrap">
<div id="content">
<div>
<div>
<h2>Lithium &amp; EV Ecosystem</h2>
<p>Auto manufacturers continue to look for an edge in EV race.&nbsp;Two German automakers made announcements last week of partnerships with companies employing new technologies to enable a more rapid transition to<br>battery-powered vehicles.&nbsp;Mercedes Benz announced the addition of a new battery technology&nbsp;in cooperation with Sila Nanotechnologies, which utilizes higher silicon content anodes for lithium batteries. The newer anodes allow for greater energy density by 20-40% and therefore expanded battery range, addressing one of the main consumer concerns. The two companies hope to have the battery as an option for high-end and heavier SUV vehicles by the middle of this decade. Meanwhile,&nbsp;BMW joined Mangrove Lithium&nbsp;(privately held Canadian company) as the lead investor. Mangrove Lithium has developed a process to transform virgin and recycled raw lithium into battery-grade material that does not require a separate carbonate plant to convert lithium raw material into battery-grade lithium carbonate. While still in the pilot plant stage, the junior lithium converter hopes to use the recently raised capital to accelerate the construction of its first commercial production plant. No timetable was provided.</p>
<p>Expanding EV ecosystem.&nbsp;Swedish start-up&nbsp;Northvolt has started commercial deliveries of its battery cells&nbsp;to a car manufacturer in Europe. While the identity of the car manufacturer was not revealed, Northvolt’s customers (companies that signed supply agreements with the lithium cell producer) include BMW, Volkswagen, Volvo Cars, and Polestar. Here in the US,&nbsp;ACE Green Recycling&nbsp;announced plans to build and operate North America’s largest sustainable battery recycling park in Texas. The proposed plant will be able to recycle both traditional lead-acid batteries, as well as lithium batteries, using a more environmentally sustainable process that can also produce higher battery material yields.</p>
<p>As if higher metal prices and looming material shortage weren’t enough.&nbsp;The new government in Chile, the world’s second-largest producer of lithium, has pledged to establish a&nbsp;state lithium firm&nbsp;to develop the ultra-light battery metal and hopes to establish a model for the company by the end of the year, effectively setting up a government-run competitor to SQM and ALB, who are currently developing and mining lithium for the global EV market in the country. Meanwhile, current lithium operators in the country are facing a new challenge, or rather a new chapter in an old challenge – environmental activism. The issue at hand is the pink flamingo population, which a&nbsp;recent study&nbsp;suggested was declining, partly as a result of excessive water use by lithium miners operating in the country, which is putting a strain on flamingo habitats. While the merit of the study and its conclusions can be debated, environmental groups have seized on the report to limit future mining activities in the country. Unfortunately, Chile is not unique – domestically, both PLL and LAC, who are trying to commercialize both lithium mining and battery material processing facilities in North Carolina and Nevada, respectively, are facing similar obstacles in getting regulatory and environmental permits necessary to commence development and construction of these projects, as environmental groups and those representing indigenous populations are actively lobbying and in some cases suing in an attempt to hinder the development of domestic supply of the materials critical to the ongoing transformation of the automotive and transportation industries. We believe these trends will continue, highlighting the underlying issues with automotive electrification – key materials to enable the transition are mined or, in the case of graphite for battery anodes, still rely on petrochemical feedstocks, which means their environmental impact must be considered and accounted for. We believe blocking domestic development of resources critical to the industry’s needs will do little to accelerate the rate of EV adoption by consumers, while keeping domestic markets hostage to Chinese sources, or reliant on materials produced in other parts of the world that may not be as environmentally responsible as domestic manufacture would be.</p>
<h2>Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech</h2>
<p>Food security is a real concern.&nbsp;In the latest sign of growing global food security concerns, India, the second-largest wheat grower in the world,&nbsp;has mostly prohibited exports, saying that the nation’s food security is under threat. Hot weather in wheat-producing regions of the country has already affected expected harvest yields, causing the government to lower its production outlook for the season by 5.7% to 105 million metric tons for the crop year ending in June. Meanwhile,&nbsp;grain exports from Ukraine&nbsp;are down 64% so far in May compared with last year at this time, as a result of Russia’s invasion of the country and disruptions to shipping as well as planting. Russia’s blockade of Ukrainian Black Sea ports has stranded approximately&nbsp;20 million tons of grain in the country’s warehouses, keeping the critical supplies from the global market and countries that rely on Ukrainian wheat for their food security. Ukraine accounted for 10% of global wheat exports in 2021.</p>
<p>Late plantings raise weed concerns, which may be a positive for herbicide producers.&nbsp;One consequence of late plantings and therefore late sprouting of row crops this year is the disadvantage it puts these sprouting crops versus faster growing,&nbsp;more aggressive grasses and weeds&nbsp;that compete with sowed grain for nutrients and water. As a result, greater use of herbicides (assuming farmers can get them, given the shortages and higher prices we discussed in previous publications) may be required, which may be seen as a positive for herbicide producers, such as CTVA, BASF, Bayer, AVD, and to a lesser extent, FMC (due to that company’s higher proportion of insecticide sales). It may also benefit emerging biobased ag input companies, such as BIOX and MBII, who sell products that help crops utilize the nutrients in the soil, as well as condition the soil itself to be less hospitable to pests.</p>
<h2>Recent WTR Publications</h2>
<p>Bio-ag market update and Marrone Bio Innovations-Bioceres Merger</p>
<p>Marrone Bio Innovations 1Q22 Results</p>
<p>Fireside Chat: Kevin R. Helash, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Marrone Bio Innovations</p>
<h2>Rating and Price Target Changes</h2>
<p>EAF –&nbsp;GLJ Research lowered its price target (PT) to $4.93 from $6.72 and reiterated its Sell recommendation.</p>
<p>ECL –&nbsp;Credit Suisse initiated coverage of the stock with a Neutral rating and $180 PT.</p>
<p>KWR –&nbsp;Deutsche Bank lowered its PT to $175 from $225 and reiterated its Buy rating.</p>
<p>LTHM –&nbsp;Deutsche Bank initiated coverage of the stock with a Hold rating and $29 PT.</p>
<p>PPG –&nbsp;Berenberg Bank downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and lowered its PT to $140 from $180.</p>
<p>SHW –&nbsp;Berenberg Bank lowered its PT to $285 from $310 and maintained its Hold recommendation.</p>
<h3>DISCLOSURES</h3>
<div></div>
<p>Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.<br><br>WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.<br><br>Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.<br><br>Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.<br><br>In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.<br><br>The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.<br><br>The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.<br><br>All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</main>

KEY HIGHLIGHTS


WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;In what was another down week for the market, with the Russell 2000 declining 1.1% and the S&amp;P 500 dropping a whopping 3.0%, our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology companies bucked the trend and posted a 1.0% appreciation. YTD, our index, while down 9.8%, is materially outperforming the broader market, as the Russell 2000 has declined 21%, while the S&amp;P 500 has lost 18.1% of its value since the beginning of 2022.
Winners and losers.&nbsp;Lithium stocks’ recovery led the performance last week, with PLL (up 10.9%), LAC (up 7.8%), and LTHM (up 7.4%) leading the way. Conversely, KWR, SHW, and PKE suffered the biggest declines, dropping 5.5%, 5.4%, and 5.0%, respectively, being the only stocks in our index to underperform the S&amp;P 500.
Addressing biologics’ growing needs.&nbsp;Taking a break from boardroom fights, AVD announced the development (with 3Bar Biologics) of&nbsp;non-reusable packaging&nbsp;for liquid biologic crop protection products, as bio-based crop inputs are incompatible with reusable packaging typically used in these applications due to the threat of contamination and the need for sterility when dealing with live organisms.
April was the worst month of the year…so far.&nbsp;The European new car market saw another negative Y/Y comp, with&nbsp;new car registrations declining almost 21%&nbsp;compared with April of 2021, the steepest Y/Y drop this year. Unfortunately, as the&nbsp;Bloomberg chart shows, May and June results may not be much better and hopes may begin to fade for a 2H22 recovery, given the general economic slowdown taking place globally and the still unresolved supply chain and logistics issues. In our sector, PPG, AXTA, and to a lesser extent, FUL, AVNT, KWR, and HXL have the greatest exposure to the automotive and transportation industry, suggesting volume growth will be hard to come by for these companies in 2022.
Plantings accelerate in US, but concerns remain.&nbsp;Better weather conditions allowed US farmers to get out into the field and attempt to catch up on getting seeds into the ground. Corn and soybean&nbsp;plantings increased significantly last week, but remain below five-year averages, with planting window rapidly closing over the&nbsp;next two to three weeks.

WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE

Source: YCharts; May 20 close







Lithium &amp; EV Ecosystem
Auto manufacturers continue to look for an edge in EV race.&nbsp;Two German automakers made announcements last week of partnerships with companies employing new technologies to enable a more rapid transition to battery-powered vehicles.&nbsp;Mercedes Benz announced the addition of a new battery technology&nbsp;in cooperation with Sila Nanotechnologies, which utilizes higher silicon content anodes for lithium batteries. The newer anodes allow for greater energy density by 20-40% and therefore expanded battery range, addressing one of the main consumer concerns. The two companies hope to have the battery as an option for high-end and heavier SUV vehicles by the middle of this decade. Meanwhile,&nbsp;BMW joined Mangrove Lithium&nbsp;(privately held Canadian company) as the lead investor. Mangrove Lithium has developed a process to transform virgin and recycled raw lithium into battery-grade material that does not require a separate carbonate plant to convert lithium raw material into battery-grade lithium carbonate. While still in the pilot plant stage, the junior lithium converter hopes to use the recently raised capital to accelerate the construction of its first commercial production plant. No timetable was provided.
Expanding EV ecosystem.&nbsp;Swedish start-up&nbsp;Northvolt has started commercial deliveries of its battery cells&nbsp;to a car manufacturer in Europe. While the identity of the car manufacturer was not revealed, Northvolt’s customers (companies that signed supply agreements with the lithium cell producer) include BMW, Volkswagen, Volvo Cars, and Polestar. Here in the US,&nbsp;ACE Green Recycling&nbsp;announced plans to build and operate North America’s largest sustainable battery recycling park in Texas. The proposed plant will be able to recycle both traditional lead-acid batteries, as well as lithium batteries, using a more environmentally sustainable process that can also produce higher battery material yields.
As if higher metal prices and looming material shortage weren’t enough.&nbsp;The new government in Chile, the world’s second-largest producer of lithium, has pledged to establish a&nbsp;state lithium firm&nbsp;to develop the ultra-light battery metal and hopes to establish a model for the company by the end of the year, effectively setting up a government-run competitor to SQM and ALB, who are currently developing and mining lithium for the global EV market in the country. Meanwhile, current lithium operators in the country are facing a new challenge, or rather a new chapter in an old challenge – environmental activism. The issue at hand is the pink flamingo population, which a&nbsp;recent study&nbsp;suggested was declining, partly as a result of excessive water use by lithium miners operating in the country, which is putting a strain on flamingo habitats. While the merit of the study and its conclusions can be debated, environmental groups have seized on the report to limit future mining activities in the country. Unfortunately, Chile is not unique – domestically, both PLL and LAC, who are trying to commercialize both lithium mining and battery material processing facilities in North Carolina and Nevada, respectively, are facing similar obstacles in getting regulatory and environmental permits necessary to commence development and construction of these projects, as environmental groups and those representing indigenous populations are actively lobbying and in some cases suing in an attempt to hinder the development of domestic supply of the materials critical to the ongoing transformation of the automotive and transportation industries. We believe these trends will continue, highlighting the underlying issues with automotive electrification – key materials to enable the transition are mined or, in the case of graphite for battery anodes, still rely on petrochemical feedstocks, which means their environmental impact must be considered and accounted for. We believe blocking domestic development of resources critical to the industry’s needs will do little to accelerate the rate of EV adoption by consumers, while keeping domestic markets hostage to Chinese sources, or reliant on materials produced in other parts of the world that may not be as environmentally responsible as domestic manufacture would be.
Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech
Food security is a real concern.&nbsp;In the latest sign of growing global food security concerns, India, the second-largest wheat grower in the world,&nbsp;has mostly prohibited exports, saying that the nation’s food security is under threat. Hot weather in wheat-producing regions of the country has already affected expected harvest yields, causing the government to lower its production outlook for the season by 5.7% to 105 million metric tons for the crop year ending in June. Meanwhile,&nbsp;grain exports from Ukraine&nbsp;are down 64% so far in May compared with last year at this time, as a result of Russia’s invasion of the country and disruptions to shipping as well as planting. Russia’s blockade of Ukrainian Black Sea ports has stranded approximately&nbsp;20 million tons of grain in the country’s warehouses, keeping the critical supplies from the global market and countries that rely on Ukrainian wheat for their food security. Ukraine accounted for 10% of global wheat exports in 2021.
Late plantings raise weed concerns, which may be a positive for herbicide producers.&nbsp;One consequence of late plantings and therefore late sprouting of row crops this year is the disadvantage it puts these sprouting crops versus faster growing,&nbsp;more aggressive grasses and weeds&nbsp;that compete with sowed grain for nutrients and water. As a result, greater use of herbicides (assuming farmers can get them, given the shortages and higher prices we discussed in previous publications) may be required, which may be seen as a positive for herbicide producers, such as CTVA, BASF, Bayer, AVD, and to a lesser extent, FMC (due to that company’s higher proportion of insecticide sales). It may also benefit emerging biobased ag input companies, such as BIOX and MBII, who sell products that help crops utilize the nutrients in the soil, as well as condition the soil itself to be less hospitable to pests.
Recent WTR Publications
Bio-ag market update and Marrone Bio Innovations-Bioceres Merger
Marrone Bio Innovations 1Q22 Results
Fireside Chat: Kevin R. Helash, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Marrone Bio Innovations
Rating and Price Target Changes
EAF –&nbsp;GLJ Research lowered its price target (PT) to $4.93 from $6.72 and reiterated its Sell recommendation.
ECL –&nbsp;Credit Suisse initiated coverage of the stock with a Neutral rating and $180 PT.
KWR –&nbsp;Deutsche Bank lowered its PT to $175 from $225 and reiterated its Buy rating.
LTHM –&nbsp;Deutsche Bank initiated coverage of the stock with a Hold rating and $29 PT.
PPG –&nbsp;Berenberg Bank downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy and lowered its PT to $140 from $180.
SHW –&nbsp;Berenberg Bank lowered its PT to $285 from $310 and maintained its Hold recommendation.
DISCLOSURES

Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.  WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.  Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.  Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.  In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.  The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.  The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.  All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.








Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended May 22, 2022

<h2>KEY HIGHLIGHTS</h2>
<div></div>
<ul>
<li>WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;The market continued to correct, with both the S&amp;P 500 and Russell 2000 declining 2.4% and 2.5%, respectively. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology stocks didn’t quite keep up the pace, losing 2.6% over the course of last week.</li>
<li>Winners and losers.&nbsp;Possibly driven by the prospects of boardroom actions, AVD led our index last week with a 4.1% gain. Overall, only eight of our 30 stocks saw their value increase last week. The declines were led by PLL, which lost 15.5%, along with other lithium stocks in our index, including ALB, LTHM, and LAC (down 5.6%, 5.9%, and 7.0%, respectively), which are beginning to trade like energy stocks in response to announced increases in Saudi Arabian oil production.</li>
<li>Patent fights and boardroom machinations (cont.).&nbsp;FMC continues its legal battles with unlicensed manufacturers of its leading insecticide active ingredient and announced that the Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court in Zhejiang Province, China,&nbsp;granted the company a pre-suit preliminary injunction&nbsp;restraining Zhejiang Yongtai Technology Co. Ltd. from infringing on the chlorantraniliprole (Rynaxypyr®) patent. Meanwhile, Cruiser Capital Advisors responded to the AVD board’s letter to the shareholders with one of its own, accompanied by a&nbsp;presentation filed with the SEC&nbsp;that advocates its position.</li>
<li>String of auto sales declines continued in April.&nbsp;If April new car registration declines in the US, UK, and France were bad, China’s COVID lockdown policies contributed to an even steeper&nbsp;48% drop in Y/Y registrations&nbsp;to the lowest April level in 10 years. The consequences of the invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions that followed were evident in&nbsp;Russia’s 79% Y/Y plunge&nbsp;in new car registrations last month. Even&nbsp;Germany&nbsp;wasn’t spared, with April registrations down 22% Y/Y.</li>
<li>Not quite ready for primetime?&nbsp;Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares recently spoke at an industry event and&nbsp;expressed apprehension&nbsp;over the rapid growth of EV production, often driven by political considerations, without addressing the other parts of the EV infrastructure, such as charging, mining, and energy grids, which may give rise to problems of their own, suggesting more thought should be given to the execution of the EV transition.</li>
</ul>
<h2>WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE</h2>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/275/517/original/image_84217254721653010732172.png?1653010735" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="275517"></figure>
<p>Source: YCharts; May 13 close</p>
<h2>Automotive &amp; Transportation</h2>
<p>Bad April results may not be the last.&nbsp;As major auto producing countries finish reporting their April new car sales results, early indications are that May may not show much of an improvement, even as Y/Y comps get slightly easier. Recently,&nbsp;Toyota announced temporary idling&nbsp;of several lines across its plants in Japan, citing COVID lockdowns and supply chain disruptions. The company lowered its production target for the month by approximately 7%. While some supply chain issues are getting resolved, particularly when it comes to European manufacturers, with wire harness producer&nbsp;Leoni getting back close to pre-war levels, semiconductor chip shortages continue to buffet the industry as well, with&nbsp;another 75,300 vehicles axed&nbsp;from global production estimates by AutoForecast Solutions. Consequently, we remain concerned over the performance of PPG, AXTA, FUL, AVNT, and other companies in our sector with significant exposure to the automotive and transportation industry, as weaker end customer volumes may not be fully offset by higher prices, especially now that the US dollar has rallied to multi-year highs against foreign currencies, adding FX risk to earnings and sales forecasts.</p>
<h2>Lithium &amp; EV Ecosystem</h2>
<p>China’s NEV growth hits a snag in April.&nbsp;While April NEV sales in the country were up 50% Y/Y, they&nbsp;were down more than 38% versus March&nbsp;and were the lowest monthly sales so far this year, even when compared with February, which was affected by Chinese Lunar New Year events. The unwinding of COVID lockdowns may allow the Y/Y growth pace to pick up again in May, but we may have to wait until June for the industry to return to high double-digit or<br>triple-digit Y/Y growth of NEVs, especially as vehicle prices are going up due to rapidly rising battery metal and other raw material costs.</p>
<p>Expanding European EV ecosystem.&nbsp;Privately held Green Lithium, a lithium processing company, has published plans to build the&nbsp;UK’s first lithium refinery&nbsp;in northern England. Construction is expected to begin in2023, with production targeted to start in 2024. Full production capacity of 50,000 mt of battery-grade lithium products is expected to be reached in 2026 and is intended to supply the European EV and battery market. Meanwhile, a year after buying land in Germany for the construction of a battery grade-lithium hydroxide processing plant, AMG Lithium GmbH, a subsidiary of the Dutch Advanced Metallurgical Group (AMG),&nbsp;started construction&nbsp;of its lithium hydroxide plant in Bitterfeld-Wolfen<br>(Saxony-Anhalt), with production expected in the fall of 2023 and initial annual production capacity of 20,000 mt, enough to supply 800,000 electric cars. The plant will be capable of expanding production to 100,000 mt over time, as demand warrants.</p>
<p>Rising costs drive consternation and innovation.&nbsp;We previously highlighted Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares’ concerns over the hurdles the EV industry must clear in the near to mid-term; a somewhat more optimistic view was provided by a&nbsp;recent report analyzing the EV market&nbsp;published by Transportation &amp; Environment, which suggests we have sufficient critical metals infrastructure to meet the expected demand from the EV market at least through the next two to four years, by which time a slew of new mining, refining, converting, and battery production capacity is expected to be brought online. A more&nbsp;granular look at the various metals&nbsp;that go into EV batteries was provided by Davis Index, which highlighted recent geopolitical issues, including the war in Ukraine, and offered a less optimistic view, more in line with that of Mr. Tavares. Regardless of forecasts and assumptions around EV growth and possible projected raw material shortfalls, one thing is certain now: metal prices have skyrocketed over the last two years, which is driving technology decisions today, and may have implications for the long term. Thus,&nbsp;BMW is working to switch to a newer and cheaper battery cell technology&nbsp;that may allow it to cut its battery costs by 30%, while improving energy density of battery packs by at least low double-digit percent versus batteries currently used by Tesla. With higher lithium prices&nbsp;reducing the premium&nbsp;of nickel-cobalt-manganese, or NCM, batteries versus lithium-iron-phosphate, or LFP batteries, auto manufacturers may begin to reconsider sacrificing the performance of NCM packs in favor of lower priced LFP technology for entry level and bargain priced EVs. Meanwhile, research continues on&nbsp;commercializing sodium-ion batteries&nbsp;as an alternative to current lithium-ion technologies, given the obvious price and availability advantages of sodium versus lithium.</p>
<h2>Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech</h2>
<p>Weather takes center stage as US plantings fall behind schedule.&nbsp;The latest USDA report shows that&nbsp;plantings are off to their worst start in nine years, with only 22% the crop planted, which is 28% below the five-year average for this time of year. The news isn’t much better in soybeans, with plantings at 12% being half that of the five-year average. Not surprising,&nbsp;the USDA recently lowered its yield projections for corn, although the soybean outlook still remains robust, with higher planted acres still expected. Historically, it’s been difficult, if not impossible, to catch up with plantings after such a slow start, but even&nbsp;late plantings have a chance to produce higher-than-expected yields. However, record yields still used by the USDA in its projections for corn may not be achievable, suggesting another cut in USDA expectations may be coming. Globally, despite ongoing war,&nbsp;Ukrainian farmers are doing what they can&nbsp;to get their crop into the ground to help avert food shortages at home and have an opportunity to export to countries dependent on Ukraine for crops. Meanwhile, the country awaits the opportunity to export the wheat from its last harvest, which is currently being blocked by Russian blockades of Ukrainian ports.</p>
<h2>Recent WTR Publications</h2>
<p>Bio-ag market update and Marrone Bio Innovations-Bioceres Merger</p>
<p>Marrone Bio Innovations 1Q22 Results</p>
<p>Fireside Chat with Marrone Bio Innovations CEO – Kevin Helash</p>
<h2>Rating and Price Target Changes</h2>
<p>ALB –&nbsp;KeyBank raised its price target (PT) to $125 from $198 and reiterated its Underweight recommendation; JP Morgan raised its PT to $235 from $200 and maintained its Neutral rating; Morgan Stanley raised its PT to $135 from $80 and reiterated its Underweight rating; RBC raised its PT to $300 from $276 and reiterated its Outperform rating; Wells Fargo upgraded the stock to Overweight from Equal Weight and raised its PT to $285 from $215.</p>
<p>CTVA –&nbsp;Deutsche Bank raised its PT to $64 from $56 and reiterated its Buy recommendation.</p>
<p>EAF –&nbsp;RBC lowered its PT to $10 from $12 but reiterated its Buy recommendation.</p>
<p>NGVT –&nbsp;Wells Fargo raised its PT to $74 from $70 and maintained its Equal Weight recommendation.</p>
<p>VVV –&nbsp;CFRA lowered its PT to $34 from $40 and reiterated its Buy rating; Citigroup also lowered its PT to $35 from $40 and reiterated its Buy recommendation; JP Morgan upgraded the stock to Overweight from Neutral and established a $36 PT.</p>
<h2>DISCLOSURES</h2>
<div></div>
<p>Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.<br><br>WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.<br><br>Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.<br><br>Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.<br><br>In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.<br><br>The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.<br><br>The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.<br><br>All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.</p>

KEY HIGHLIGHTS


WTR-CMI last week.&nbsp;The market continued to correct, with both the S&amp;P 500 and Russell 2000 declining 2.4% and 2.5%, respectively. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology stocks didn’t quite keep up the pace, losing 2.6% over the course of last week.
Winners and losers.&nbsp;Possibly driven by the prospects of boardroom actions, AVD led our index last week with a 4.1% gain. Overall, only eight of our 30 stocks saw their value increase last week. The declines were led by PLL, which lost 15.5%, along with other lithium stocks in our index, including ALB, LTHM, and LAC (down 5.6%, 5.9%, and 7.0%, respectively), which are beginning to trade like energy stocks in response to announced increases in Saudi Arabian oil production.
Patent fights and boardroom machinations (cont.).&nbsp;FMC continues its legal battles with unlicensed manufacturers of its leading insecticide active ingredient and announced that the Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court in Zhejiang Province, China,&nbsp;granted the company a pre-suit preliminary injunction&nbsp;restraining Zhejiang Yongtai Technology Co. Ltd. from infringing on the chlorantraniliprole (Rynaxypyr®) patent. Meanwhile, Cruiser Capital Advisors responded to the AVD board’s letter to the shareholders with one of its own, accompanied by a&nbsp;presentation filed with the SEC&nbsp;that advocates its position.
String of auto sales declines continued in April.&nbsp;If April new car registration declines in the US, UK, and France were bad, China’s COVID lockdown policies contributed to an even steeper&nbsp;48% drop in Y/Y registrations&nbsp;to the lowest April level in 10 years. The consequences of the invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions that followed were evident in&nbsp;Russia’s 79% Y/Y plunge&nbsp;in new car registrations last month. Even&nbsp;Germany&nbsp;wasn’t spared, with April registrations down 22% Y/Y.
Not quite ready for primetime?&nbsp;Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares recently spoke at an industry event and&nbsp;expressed apprehension&nbsp;over the rapid growth of EV production, often driven by political considerations, without addressing the other parts of the EV infrastructure, such as charging, mining, and energy grids, which may give rise to problems of their own, suggesting more thought should be given to the execution of the EV transition.

WTR-CMI WEEKLY PERFORMANCE

Source: YCharts; May 13 close
Automotive &amp; Transportation
Bad April results may not be the last.&nbsp;As major auto producing countries finish reporting their April new car sales results, early indications are that May may not show much of an improvement, even as Y/Y comps get slightly easier. Recently,&nbsp;Toyota announced temporary idling&nbsp;of several lines across its plants in Japan, citing COVID lockdowns and supply chain disruptions. The company lowered its production target for the month by approximately 7%. While some supply chain issues are getting resolved, particularly when it comes to European manufacturers, with wire harness producer&nbsp;Leoni getting back close to pre-war levels, semiconductor chip shortages continue to buffet the industry as well, with&nbsp;another 75,300 vehicles axed&nbsp;from global production estimates by AutoForecast Solutions. Consequently, we remain concerned over the performance of PPG, AXTA, FUL, AVNT, and other companies in our sector with significant exposure to the automotive and transportation industry, as weaker end customer volumes may not be fully offset by higher prices, especially now that the US dollar has rallied to multi-year highs against foreign currencies, adding FX risk to earnings and sales forecasts.
Lithium &amp; EV Ecosystem
China’s NEV growth hits a snag in April.&nbsp;While April NEV sales in the country were up 50% Y/Y, they&nbsp;were down more than 38% versus March&nbsp;and were the lowest monthly sales so far this year, even when compared with February, which was affected by Chinese Lunar New Year events. The unwinding of COVID lockdowns may allow the Y/Y growth pace to pick up again in May, but we may have to wait until June for the industry to return to high double-digit or triple-digit Y/Y growth of NEVs, especially as vehicle prices are going up due to rapidly rising battery metal and other raw material costs.
Expanding European EV ecosystem.&nbsp;Privately held Green Lithium, a lithium processing company, has published plans to build the&nbsp;UK’s first lithium refinery&nbsp;in northern England. Construction is expected to begin in2023, with production targeted to start in 2024. Full production capacity of 50,000 mt of battery-grade lithium products is expected to be reached in 2026 and is intended to supply the European EV and battery market. Meanwhile, a year after buying land in Germany for the construction of a battery grade-lithium hydroxide processing plant, AMG Lithium GmbH, a subsidiary of the Dutch Advanced Metallurgical Group (AMG),&nbsp;started construction&nbsp;of its lithium hydroxide plant in Bitterfeld-Wolfen (Saxony-Anhalt), with production expected in the fall of 2023 and initial annual production capacity of 20,000 mt, enough to supply 800,000 electric cars. The plant will be capable of expanding production to 100,000 mt over time, as demand warrants.
Rising costs drive consternation and innovation.&nbsp;We previously highlighted Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares’ concerns over the hurdles the EV industry must clear in the near to mid-term; a somewhat more optimistic view was provided by a&nbsp;recent report analyzing the EV market&nbsp;published by Transportation &amp; Environment, which suggests we have sufficient critical metals infrastructure to meet the expected demand from the EV market at least through the next two to four years, by which time a slew of new mining, refining, converting, and battery production capacity is expected to be brought online. A more&nbsp;granular look at the various metals&nbsp;that go into EV batteries was provided by Davis Index, which highlighted recent geopolitical issues, including the war in Ukraine, and offered a less optimistic view, more in line with that of Mr. Tavares. Regardless of forecasts and assumptions around EV growth and possible projected raw material shortfalls, one thing is certain now: metal prices have skyrocketed over the last two years, which is driving technology decisions today, and may have implications for the long term. Thus,&nbsp;BMW is working to switch to a newer and cheaper battery cell technology&nbsp;that may allow it to cut its battery costs by 30%, while improving energy density of battery packs by at least low double-digit percent versus batteries currently used by Tesla. With higher lithium prices&nbsp;reducing the premium&nbsp;of nickel-cobalt-manganese, or NCM, batteries versus lithium-iron-phosphate, or LFP batteries, auto manufacturers may begin to reconsider sacrificing the performance of NCM packs in favor of lower priced LFP technology for entry level and bargain priced EVs. Meanwhile, research continues on&nbsp;commercializing sodium-ion batteries&nbsp;as an alternative to current lithium-ion technologies, given the obvious price and availability advantages of sodium versus lithium.
Ag-Chem and Ag-Tech
Weather takes center stage as US plantings fall behind schedule.&nbsp;The latest USDA report shows that&nbsp;plantings are off to their worst start in nine years, with only 22% the crop planted, which is 28% below the five-year average for this time of year. The news isn’t much better in soybeans, with plantings at 12% being half that of the five-year average. Not surprising,&nbsp;the USDA recently lowered its yield projections for corn, although the soybean outlook still remains robust, with higher planted acres still expected. Historically, it’s been difficult, if not impossible, to catch up with plantings after such a slow start, but even&nbsp;late plantings have a chance to produce higher-than-expected yields. However, record yields still used by the USDA in its projections for corn may not be achievable, suggesting another cut in USDA expectations may be coming. Globally, despite ongoing war,&nbsp;Ukrainian farmers are doing what they can&nbsp;to get their crop into the ground to help avert food shortages at home and have an opportunity to export to countries dependent on Ukraine for crops. Meanwhile, the country awaits the opportunity to export the wheat from its last harvest, which is currently being blocked by Russian blockades of Ukrainian ports.
Recent WTR Publications
Bio-ag market update and Marrone Bio Innovations-Bioceres Merger
Marrone Bio Innovations 1Q22 Results
Fireside Chat with Marrone Bio Innovations CEO – Kevin Helash
Rating and Price Target Changes
ALB –&nbsp;KeyBank raised its price target (PT) to $125 from $198 and reiterated its Underweight recommendation; JP Morgan raised its PT to $235 from $200 and maintained its Neutral rating; Morgan Stanley raised its PT to $135 from $80 and reiterated its Underweight rating; RBC raised its PT to $300 from $276 and reiterated its Outperform rating; Wells Fargo upgraded the stock to Overweight from Equal Weight and raised its PT to $285 from $215.
CTVA –&nbsp;Deutsche Bank raised its PT to $64 from $56 and reiterated its Buy recommendation.
EAF –&nbsp;RBC lowered its PT to $10 from $12 but reiterated its Buy recommendation.
NGVT –&nbsp;Wells Fargo raised its PT to $74 from $70 and maintained its Equal Weight recommendation.
VVV –&nbsp;CFRA lowered its PT to $34 from $40 and reiterated its Buy rating; Citigroup also lowered its PT to $35 from $40 and reiterated its Buy recommendation; JP Morgan upgraded the stock to Overweight from Neutral and established a $36 PT.
DISCLOSURES

Water Tower Research (“WTR”) is a professional publisher of investment research reports on public companies and, to a lesser extent, private firms (“the Companies”). WTR provides investor-focused content and digital distribution strategies designed to help companies communicate with investors.  WTR is not a registered investment adviser or a broker/dealer nor does WTR provide investment banking services. WTR operates as an exempt investment adviser under the so called “publishers’ exemption” from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. WTR does not provide investment ratings / recommendations or price targets on the companies it reports on. Readers are advised that the research reports are published and provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities or the rendering of investment advice. The information provided in this report should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as personalized advice. All users and readers of WTR’s reports are cautioned to consult their own independent financial, tax and legal advisors prior to purchasing or selling securities.  Dmitry Silversteyn, who is the writer of this report, covers the Chemicals &amp; Materials Technology and BioEconomy sectors for WTR. Mr. Silversteyn and members of his household have no personal or business-related relationship to the subject company other than providing digital content and any ancillary services WTR may offer.  Unless otherwise indicated, WTR intends to provide continuing coverage of the covered companies. WTR will notify its readers through website postings or other appropriate means if WTR determines to terminate coverage of any of the companies covered.  In certain instances, including this report, WTR will write research covering non-clients. Readers should assume that WTR may seek to turn these non-paying companies into paying clients. Likewise, WTR may seek to transform these non-clients into paying clients of it or of its affiliate, which provides services such as presenting at sponsored investor conferences, distributing press releases, advising on investor relations and broader corporate communications and public relations strategies as well as performing certain other related services (“Ancillary Services”). The companies that WTR covers in our research are not required to purchase or use Ancillary Services of WTR or an affiliate might offer to clients.  The manner of WTR’s potential research compensation and Ancillary Services to covered companies raise actual and perceived conflicts of interest. WTR is committed to manage those conflicts to protect its reputation and the objectivity of employees/analysts by adhering to strictly written compliance guidelines.  The views and analyses included in our research reports are based on current public information that we consider to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness. Neither we nor our analysts, directors, officers, employees, representatives, independent contractors or agents shall be liable for any omissions, errors or inaccuracies, regardless of cause, foreseeability or the lack of timeliness of, or any delay or interruptions in the transmission of our reports to content users. This lack of liability extends to direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, losses, lost income, lost profit or opportunity costs.  All investment information contained herein should be independently verified by the reader or user of this report. For additional information, all readers of this report are encouraged to visit WTR’s website www.watertowerresearch.com.

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended May 15, 2022

United States

Ecovyst Inc. provides specialty catalysts and services in the United States, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company operates through two segments, Ecoservices and Catalyst Technologies. The Ecoservices segment offers sulfuric acid recycling services for production of alkylate for refineries; and virgin sulfuric acid for mining, water treatment, and industrial applications. The Catalyst Technologies segment provides customized catalyst products and process solutions to producers and licensors of polyethylene and methyl methacrylate. Its catalyst supports the production of plastics used in packaging films, bottles, containers, and other molded applications. This segment also provides zeolite-based emission control catalysts, which enable the removal of nitrogen oxides from diesel engine emissions, as well as sulfur dioxide from fuels during the refining process. The company was formerly known as PQ Group Holdings Inc. and changed its name to Ecovyst Inc. in August 2021. Ecovyst Inc. was founded in 1831 and is headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Ecovyst (ECVT US)

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended August 7, 2022

KEY HIGHLIGHTS WTR-CMI last week. Our WTR-CMI index of 30 chemicals and materials technology stocks couldn’t keep up with the broader market last...

Water Tower Research

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended July 24, 2022

KEY HIGHLIGHTS WTR-CMI last week. In what was a week of recovery for the market, the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 advanced 2.5% and 3.6%,...

Water Tower Research

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended June 19, 2022

KEY HIGHLIGHTS WTR-CMI last week. The sell-off continued last week, with the S&P 500 losing 5.8% and the broader Russell 2000 Index giving up...

Water Tower Research

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended May 22, 2022

KEY HIGHLIGHTS WTR-CMI last week. In what was another down week for the market, with the Russell 2000 declining 1.1% and the S&P 500 dropping...

Water Tower Research

Mat-Chem Notes for the Week Ended May 15, 2022

KEY HIGHLIGHTS WTR-CMI last week. The market continued to correct, with both the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 declining 2.4% and 2.5%,...

Water Tower Research

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)