Equity Analyst, LightStream Research

Aqila Ali

Equity Analyst

Long-Short Analysis on Japan, Asia and the World

LightStream Research

LightStream conducts quantitatively rigorous and data-driven analysis with a focus on Japan and Asia.

We consistently cover the Tech, Consumer and Industrial sectors, and provide ECM and Events coverage more broadly.

We supplement traditional qualitative insights from company relationships with a robust quantitative foundation that examines as much historical data as is available.
We further refine the accuracy of our insights and calls through the use of alternative data to flesh out current trends, and through a valuation framework that emphasises non-superficial peer group selection and a proper attempt to understand the metrics and changes that have driven security valuations in the past.

Equity Bottom-Up

<p>MLCC players are likely to be affected by any decline in the end markets to which they cater. As such, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/murata-manufacturing-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:11649:1" rel="noopener">Murata Manufacturing (6981 JP)</a> has also taken a hit during the recent quarters following the slowdown in its key end-market- Communications. As <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/profiles/farha-sabri" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="accounts:1653" rel="noopener">Farha Sabri</a> mentioned in her previous notes ( <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/murata-diversification-into-new-markets-and-m-a-to-propel-long-term-growth" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:17849" rel="noopener">Murata: Diversification into New Markets and M&amp;A to Propel Long-Term Growth,  </a><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/metrocirc-production-issues-open-buying-opportunity" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:17209" rel="noopener">Metrocirc Production Issues Open Buying Opportunity</a><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/murata-diversification-into-new-markets-and-m-a-to-propel-long-term-growth" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:17849" rel="noopener"> , </a><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/murata-revises-fy03-19-guidance-following-solid-1h-performance" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:25656" rel="noopener">Murata Revises FY03/19 Guidance Following Solid 1H Performance</a>), the company is an MLCC leader, with products being developed to capture the new trends in its end market. The company trades at a premium to peers, due to its market leadership but recent unfavourable economic conditions (especially in the smartphone and automotive markets) and dependence on customers like Huawei for sales, have hurt the stock. That said, despite the current low performance in earnings (which is likely to continue during the FY), we feel that the share price has sort of reached its bottom and is unlikely to significantly decline further (similar levels during the first half of 2016). Trading at an FY1 PE of 14.5x Murata is below its historical median and in-line with its peers’ historical median, looking reasonably valued and quite attractive for its prospects in the market (focus on Auto Electronics for long term growth, attractive line-up of new products, M&amp;A activities, and strengths in technology and execution). Thus, while downside risks are minimum, the upside is quite promising for Murata, suggesting that its current investor should have faith in the stock for its long-term growth prospects and that new investors may consider now a good entry point.</p>
<p>This Insight takes a look at:</p>
<p>-The company’s 1Q FY03/20 earnings analysis</p>
<p>- Expectations for FY03/20E</p>
<p>- The long-term view for Murata and its medium-term plan</p>
<p>We go through the details below.</p>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/097/620/original/Screenshot_1.jpg?1567331928" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="97620"></figure>
<div class="content-remarks">
<p><em>Source: CapIQ</em></p>
</div>

MLCC players are likely to be affected by any decline in the end markets to which they cater. As such, Murata Manufacturing (6981 JP) has also taken a hit during the recent quarters following the slowdown in its key end-market- Communications. As Farha Sabri mentioned in her previous notes ( Murata: Diversification into New Markets and M&amp;A to Propel Long-Term Growth,  Metrocirc Production Issues Open Buying Opportunity , Murata Revises FY03/19 Guidance Following Solid 1H Performance), the company is an MLCC leader, with products being developed to capture the new trends in its end market. The company trades at a premium to peers, due to its market leadership but recent unfavourable economic conditions (especially in the smartphone and automotive markets) and dependence on customers like Huawei for sales, have hurt the stock. That said, despite the current low performance in earnings (which is likely to continue during the FY), we feel that the share price has sort of reached its bottom and is unlikely to significantly decline further (similar levels during the first half of 2016). Trading at an FY1 PE of 14.5x Murata is below its historical median and in-line with its peers’ historical median, looking reasonably valued and quite attractive for its prospects in the market (focus on Auto Electronics for long term growth, attractive line-up of new products, M&amp;A activities, and strengths in technology and execution). Thus, while downside risks are minimum, the upside is quite promising for Murata, suggesting that its current investor should have faith in the stock for its long-term growth prospects and that new investors may consider now a good entry point.
This Insight takes a look at:
-The company’s 1Q FY03/20 earnings analysis
- Expectations for FY03/20E
- The long-term view for Murata and its medium-term plan
We go through the details below.


Source: CapIQ


'Quantamental' Japan Specialist, LightStream Research

Campbell Gunn

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist

ja research

ja research is an independent research platform focused exclusively on Japanese equities. Leveraging data and graphic analysis provided by Japan Analytics, we provide insights on small and medium-sized companies that have been ignored by the sell-side as well as challenging conventional wisdom on larger companies. We also offer analyst and corporate access, the latter with translation if required. 

Quantitative Analysis

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/077/686/original/2019-02-02_09-34-42.png?1549067763" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="77686"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><div style="text-align: left;" class="content-caption">
<strong>Note:</strong> The Results &amp; Revision Score is the average of our Results Score and Forecasts/Revision Score and is updated daily for each company and then cap-weighted-aggregated into Peer Groups, Sectors and the Market Composite. Both scores have a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period. The Results Score is calculated quarterly, using the most recent eight quarters of company data for revenues, operating income and operating margin and measures the rate, degree and consistency of change for each metric. The Forecast/Revision Score is based on Annual and Interim period company forecasts and compares changes from previous forecasts as well as against the trailing twelve-month or previous first-half results, with annual forecasts being double-weighted.</div><p><strong>DRIP, DRIP, DRIP</strong> - We 'lead' this fortnight's update with our All-Market Composite Results &amp; Revision Score. Calculated daily, the score is a 'real-time' measure of the state of, and the outlook for, listed Japanese corporations. As the scoring methodology includes earnings momentum 'factors', the data series can be a useful leading indicator of forward earnings. The correlation with the market over the last four years is 0.578, with the indicator leading more often than lagging.   Since peaking on 16th November 2017, the Results &amp; Revisions Score has fallen by 62% and has now returned to the level of May 2017. In the last ten years, the score has only been lower than at present one-third of the time - mostly during the fiscal year ended March 2017 when the total market value averaged ¥550t, close to the December 2018 low. <strong>If we are to repeat the relatively-mild cyclical downturn of 2016, the Results &amp; Revision Score will turn negative in May of this year, and the 25th December 2018 low will be retested.</strong></p><div class="content-caption">
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/077/701/original/2019-02-02_14-11-25.png?1549084295" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="77701"></figure><p>Source: Japan Analytics</p>
</div><p><strong>PAST THE PEAK</strong> - Our earnings indicator peaked 14 months ago, two months ahead of the market's high point on 26th January 2018. It now appears that aggregate reported earnings, as well as aggregate company forecasts for the current year, are now turning decisively lower after nine quarters of uninterrupted growth. Forecast Net Income for the current year is now 7% below the high point in trailing-twelve-month (TTM) Net Income from this cycle, which was reached two months ago. Operating Income is, as usual, 'lagging' and forecasts are still marginally ahead of TTM. The TTM all-market price-earnings ratio reached 11.5 times on Christmas Day, which will prove to be the cycle low point.<strong> We expect the return to median levels, to be achieved more through lower 'E' as opposed to a higher 'P'. </strong> <strong>Mr Market is currently implying that Japanese corporate profits are due to fall by 23% on average from the cycle peak, or by 30% if we are to revisit the December low-point. </strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/077/746/original/2019-02-03_07-23-31.png?1549146223" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="77746"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>THE FIRST CUT</strong> - 23% of listed companies reported their most recent quarterly earnings results in the last two weeks. For these companies, TTM revenues grew by 5.1% year-on-year, but only by 0.5% quarter-on-quarter, the lowest qoq growth rate in over a year. TTM Operating Income is now 0.8% lower than the TTM total of one year ago and declined by 4.4% qoq. Operating margins fell by 49bps year-on-year.  Current forecasts for this group of companies imply 3.1% yoy top line growth, but only 0.3% compared to the quarter just declared. For Operating Income, the rates are -2.0% and 0.6%, reflecting the normal TTM-to-forecast 'lag'. <strong>Corporate Japan's profits are now rolling over and will be in a 'recession' by the fiscal year-end.  </strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/077/722/original/2019-02-02_18-25-46.png?1549099572" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="77722"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>INTERREGNUM</strong> - Our bear market rally has paused to look at and digest the earnings-announcement news flow and will likely be trendless for the next few weeks as 'good' reactions offset 'bad'.<strong> In due course, we expect the preponderance of negative momentum to tip the scales.</strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/077/724/original/2019-02-02_18-41-12.png?1549100508" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="77724"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>TORAKU @110</strong> - The <em>Toraku</em> advance-decline indicator has continued to recover and is within ten points of the overbought zone, which has only been breached once since the market peak of January 2018.<strong> This signal is 'amber' and could be 'red' by the end of next week. </strong></p><div class="content-highlight">
<p><strong>OUTLOOK &amp; RECOMMENDATIONS</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>We continue to recommend an underweight position in Japan in global portfolios.</strong></li>
<li><strong>The equity market decline at the end of last year was well in advance of the underlying trends in the economy and corporate profits; the recent 10% rally has corrected that imbalance. Nevertheless, the global cycle has turned down sharply, and many economies will be in a recession by the end of this quarter. We expect Japanese corporate earnings to follow suit. <em> </em></strong></li>
<li><strong>Although some of the coming decline in aggregate earnings has been well-discounted, our Results &amp; Revision Score has yet to turn negative. Accordingly, we expect the market to retest the December 2018 low, probably in May when the FY2020 forecasts are announced and our score starts 'seeing red'.</strong></li>
<li><strong>In the near term and despite the rally in the more cyclical sectors, we continue to favour undervalued domestically-orientated companies in the Information Technology, Internet, Media, and Telecommunications sectors. We would avoid or short Banks and Non-Bank Finance.</strong></li>
</ul>
</div><p>In the <strong>DETAIL</strong> section below, we will review Sector performance over the last two weeks, and, in addition to our regular roundup of results, revisions and stock performance including brief comments on <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/3700" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3700:1">Anritsu (6754 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/12001" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:12001:1">Alps Alpine (6770 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/24540" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:24540:1">SanBio (4592 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/454" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:454:1">Lixil (5938 JP)</a> (yes, again), <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/752" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:752:1">Fanuc (6954 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/219" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:219:1">Mizuho Financial Group (8411 JP)</a> , and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/8197" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8197:1">Cyberagent (4751 JP)</a>.</p>

Source: Japan Analytics
Note: The Results &amp; Revision Score is the average of our Results Score and Forecasts/Revision Score and is updated daily for each company and then cap-weighted-aggregated into Peer Groups, Sectors and the Market Composite. Both scores have a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period. The Results Score is calculated quarterly, using the most recent eight quarters of company data for revenues, operating income and operating margin and measures the rate, degree and consistency of change for each metric. The Forecast/Revision Score is based on Annual and Interim period company forecasts and compares changes from previous forecasts as well as against the trailing twelve-month or previous first-half results, with annual forecasts being double-weighted.DRIP, DRIP, DRIP - We 'lead' this fortnight's update with our All-Market Composite Results &amp; Revision Score. Calculated daily, the score is a 'real-time' measure of the state of, and the outlook for, listed Japanese corporations. As the scoring methodology includes earnings momentum 'factors', the data series can be a useful leading indicator of forward earnings. The correlation with the market over the last four years is 0.578, with the indicator leading more often than lagging.   Since peaking on 16th November 2017, the Results &amp; Revisions Score has fallen by 62% and has now returned to the level of May 2017. In the last ten years, the score has only been lower than at present one-third of the time - mostly during the fiscal year ended March 2017 when the total market value averaged ¥550t, close to the December 2018 low. If we are to repeat the relatively-mild cyclical downturn of 2016, the Results &amp; Revision Score will turn negative in May of this year, and the 25th December 2018 low will be retested.
Source: Japan Analytics
PAST THE PEAK - Our earnings indicator peaked 14 months ago, two months ahead of the market's high point on 26th January 2018. It now appears that aggregate reported earnings, as well as aggregate company forecasts for the current year, are now turning decisively lower after nine quarters of uninterrupted growth. Forecast Net Income for the current year is now 7% below the high point in trailing-twelve-month (TTM) Net Income from this cycle, which was reached two months ago. Operating Income is, as usual, 'lagging' and forecasts are still marginally ahead of TTM. The TTM all-market price-earnings ratio reached 11.5 times on Christmas Day, which will prove to be the cycle low point. We expect the return to median levels, to be achieved more through lower 'E' as opposed to a higher 'P'.  Mr Market is currently implying that Japanese corporate profits are due to fall by 23% on average from the cycle peak, or by 30% if we are to revisit the December low-point. Source: Japan AnalyticsTHE FIRST CUT - 23% of listed companies reported their most recent quarterly earnings results in the last two weeks. For these companies, TTM revenues grew by 5.1% year-on-year, but only by 0.5% quarter-on-quarter, the lowest qoq growth rate in over a year. TTM Operating Income is now 0.8% lower than the TTM total of one year ago and declined by 4.4% qoq. Operating margins fell by 49bps year-on-year.  Current forecasts for this group of companies imply 3.1% yoy top line growth, but only 0.3% compared to the quarter just declared. For Operating Income, the rates are -2.0% and 0.6%, reflecting the normal TTM-to-forecast 'lag'. Corporate Japan's profits are now rolling over and will be in a 'recession' by the fiscal year-end.  Source: Japan AnalyticsINTERREGNUM - Our bear market rally has paused to look at and digest the earnings-announcement news flow and will likely be trendless for the next few weeks as 'good' reactions offset 'bad'. In due course, we expect the preponderance of negative momentum to tip the scales.Source: Japan AnalyticsTORAKU @110 - The Toraku advance-decline indicator has continued to recover and is within ten points of the overbought zone, which has only been breached once since the market peak of January 2018. This signal is 'amber' and could be 'red' by the end of next week. 
OUTLOOK &amp; RECOMMENDATIONS

We continue to recommend an underweight position in Japan in global portfolios.
The equity market decline at the end of last year was well in advance of the underlying trends in the economy and corporate profits; the recent 10% rally has corrected that imbalance. Nevertheless, the global cycle has turned down sharply, and many economies will be in a recession by the end of this quarter. We expect Japanese corporate earnings to follow suit.  
Although some of the coming decline in aggregate earnings has been well-discounted, our Results &amp; Revision Score has yet to turn negative. Accordingly, we expect the market to retest the December 2018 low, probably in May when the FY2020 forecasts are announced and our score starts 'seeing red'.
In the near term and despite the rally in the more cyclical sectors, we continue to favour undervalued domestically-orientated companies in the Information Technology, Internet, Media, and Telecommunications sectors. We would avoid or short Banks and Non-Bank Finance.

In the DETAIL section below, we will review Sector performance over the last two weeks, and, in addition to our regular roundup of results, revisions and stock performance including brief comments on Anritsu (6754 JP), Alps Alpine (6770 JP), SanBio (4592 JP), Lixil (5938 JP) (yes, again), Fanuc (6954 JP), Mizuho Financial Group (8411 JP) , and Cyberagent (4751 JP).

Japan Fortnightly Update: Drip, Drip, Drip...

Farha Sabri

<ul class="">
<li>TDK revised its FY03/19E guidance following the 3QFY03/19 earnings release, which underperformed both consensus and LSR expectations. </li>
<li>The company has been affected by the US-China trade war and the deceleration of the Chinese economy in the third quarter. </li>
<li>Revenue guidance for FY03/19E has been decreased to JPY1,370bn from JPY1,420bn (-3.5%) projected in October 2018. OP guidance for the year has been reduced to JPY110bn compared to the previous expectation of JPY120bn (-8.3%).</li>
<li>On our estimates, TDK is currently trading at a FY1 PE of 12x, lower than its historical median of 16.4x.</li>
</ul>


TDK revised its FY03/19E guidance following the 3QFY03/19 earnings release, which underperformed both consensus and LSR expectations. 
The company has been affected by the US-China trade war and the deceleration of the Chinese economy in the third quarter. 
Revenue guidance for FY03/19E has been decreased to JPY1,370bn from JPY1,420bn (-3.5%) projected in October 2018. OP guidance for the year has been reduced to JPY110bn compared to the previous expectation of JPY120bn (-8.3%).
On our estimates, TDK is currently trading at a FY1 PE of 12x, lower than its historical median of 16.4x.


TDK Revises FY03/19 Guidance on the Back of US-China Trade Tensions

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

<p>A comment from a Smartkarma client prompted me to dig through this. It was an interesting comment suggesting the high weight Nikkei 225 names, or high weight-low float names were getting squeezed by BOJ buying or by a short squeeze on the short basket which had been proposed by a number of sellside brokers after the BOJ dropped its Nikkei 225 buying. The likelihood and nature of the change in Nikkei 225 buying by the BOJ was most recently discussed in the insights below:</p>
<table class="table table-striped">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<h2>Insights This Past Summer on BOJ ETF Buying and Nikkei 225</h2>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td><strong>Before/After BOJ</strong></td>
<td><strong>Title of Insight</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>19-Jul-2018</td>
<td>Before</td>
<td><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-passive-boj-heading-for-trouble-with-nikkei-225" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:21980">JAPAN PASSIVE:  BOJ Heading For Trouble with Nikkei 225</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>23-Jul-2018</td>
<td>Before</td>
<td><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-passive-the-nikkei-225-baskets-if-boj-changes" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:22367">JAPAN PASSIVE:  The Nikkei 225 Baskets if BOJ Changes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>27-Jul-2018</td>
<td>Before</td>
<td><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-passive-boj-to-buy-less-nikkei-225-highly-likely" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:22484">JAPAN PASSIVE - BOJ To Buy Less Nikkei 225? Highly Likely</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>31-Jul-2018</td>
<td>After</td>
<td><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-passive-dovish-meeting-boj-to-buy-less-nikkei-225" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:22617">JAPAN PASSIVE - Dovish Meeting; BOJ to Buy Less Nikkei 225</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>However, the BOJ and Nikkei 225 story has been a deceased equine I have been belabouring for 2+ years.</p>
<p>Of course, the trigger for many people's suggestions of a trade was the decision by the BOJ on 31 July to lower its annual rate of purchases of ETFs in the grouping of the TOPIX, Nikkei 225, and JPX Nikkei 400 basket which was seeing total buys of ¥3.0trln a year (in addition to the ¥2.7trln on TOPIX alone) to ¥1.5trln, raising and lifting the portion of "only TOPIX" to ¥4.2trln. That meant the total to be bought in Nikkei would drop from about ¥1.3-1.4trln to about half that, and JPX Nikkei 400 saw its portion of BOJ ETF buys drop to very low single digit percentages, with TOPIX taking about 85% of total buys from there on.</p>
<p>As described in numerous insights on Smartkarma dating back a few years, it is to be noted that the "float" on several Japanese stocks in the Nikkei 225 is not really "float" and <em>Real World Float</em> is much smaller. In some cases single digit percentages of the shares outstanding.</p>
<p>Many of us have watched the 70+% performance since end-August for <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/320" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:320:1">Familymart Uny Holdings (8028 JP)</a> - one of my favored names to get heavily sold should the Nikkei 225 actually change its weighting methodology as I proposed earlier this year. It has been the avatar for high weight low-float names in the Nikkei 225.</p>
<p>So I tested the idea. The results were <em>somewhat</em> <em>surprising</em>.</p>

A comment from a Smartkarma client prompted me to dig through this. It was an interesting comment suggesting the high weight Nikkei 225 names, or high weight-low float names were getting squeezed by BOJ buying or by a short squeeze on the short basket which had been proposed by a number of sellside brokers after the BOJ dropped its Nikkei 225 buying. The likelihood and nature of the change in Nikkei 225 buying by the BOJ was most recently discussed in the insights below:




Insights This Past Summer on BOJ ETF Buying and Nikkei 225



Date
Before/After BOJ
Title of Insight


19-Jul-2018
Before
JAPAN PASSIVE:  BOJ Heading For Trouble with Nikkei 225


23-Jul-2018
Before
JAPAN PASSIVE:  The Nikkei 225 Baskets if BOJ Changes


27-Jul-2018
Before
JAPAN PASSIVE - BOJ To Buy Less Nikkei 225? Highly Likely


31-Jul-2018
After
JAPAN PASSIVE - Dovish Meeting; BOJ to Buy Less Nikkei 225



However, the BOJ and Nikkei 225 story has been a deceased equine I have been belabouring for 2+ years.
Of course, the trigger for many people's suggestions of a trade was the decision by the BOJ on 31 July to lower its annual rate of purchases of ETFs in the grouping of the TOPIX, Nikkei 225, and JPX Nikkei 400 basket which was seeing total buys of ¥3.0trln a year (in addition to the ¥2.7trln on TOPIX alone) to ¥1.5trln, raising and lifting the portion of "only TOPIX" to ¥4.2trln. That meant the total to be bought in Nikkei would drop from about ¥1.3-1.4trln to about half that, and JPX Nikkei 400 saw its portion of BOJ ETF buys drop to very low single digit percentages, with TOPIX taking about 85% of total buys from there on.
As described in numerous insights on Smartkarma dating back a few years, it is to be noted that the "float" on several Japanese stocks in the Nikkei 225 is not really "float" and Real World Float is much smaller. In some cases single digit percentages of the shares outstanding.
Many of us have watched the 70+% performance since end-August for Familymart Uny Holdings (8028 JP) - one of my favored names to get heavily sold should the Nikkei 225 actually change its weighting methodology as I proposed earlier this year. It has been the avatar for high weight low-float names in the Nikkei 225.
So I tested the idea. The results were somewhat surprising.

Is It a Nikkei BOJ Squeeze on Nikkei 225 Low Float Names? Or Just FamilyMart Being FamilyMart?

Doing bespoke work since 2002....., Custom Products Group

Patrick Hansen

Doing bespoke work since 2002.....

Custom Products Group

Custom Products was started 14 years ago at Lehman Brothers by current co-founder Patrick Hansen, CFA. After 3 years at Lehman, Patrick moved the team to Macquarie Securities where Simon Rigney (co-founder) joined. 3 years ago we took Custom Products independent. 

Our core strength can be summed up three words. 1- Customization - we have very little off the shelf products and most work is done on a one on one bespoke basis. 2- Speed - We pride ourselves in our ability to get requests back to the client very quickly. 3- Confidentiality - We do not redistribute. There is no grace period where we wait a week and then mass blast. Any request stops with that client.

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<p>At the beginning of the fiscal year, Japanese companies issue full-year guidance. Most of them will then revise those number when they announce 2Q results in the fall. Their hope is that they get close enough to the up and coming actual results so that they do not have to change anything again before the year closes. </p><p>We have screened for companies that have significantly changed their full-year guidance. </p>

At the beginning of the fiscal year, Japanese companies issue full-year guidance. Most of them will then revise those number when they announce 2Q results in the fall. Their hope is that they get close enough to the up and coming actual results so that they do not have to change anything again before the year closes. We have screened for companies that have significantly changed their full-year guidance. 

2Q Earnings Is the Time for Full-Year Guidance Revisions. See Who Changed Their Numbers the Most....

Japan

TDK CORPORATION manufactures electronics components such as magnetic tapes and ferrite cores.  The Company also sells power supplies, inductors, transformers, ceramic capacitors, magnets, LAN (Local Area Network) components, sensors, and semiconductors.  TDK markets its products worldwide.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

TDK Corp (6762 JP)

Murata: MLCCs for the Long Term

MLCC players are likely to be affected by any decline in the end markets to which they cater. As such, Murata Manufacturing (6981 JP) has also...

Aqila Ali

Japan Fortnightly Update: Drip, Drip, Drip...

DRIP, DRIP, DRIP - We 'lead' this fortnight's update with our All-Market Composite Results & Revision Score. Calculated daily, the score is a...

Campbell Gunn

TDK Revises FY03/19 Guidance on the Back of US-China Trade Tensions

TDK revised its FY03/19E guidance following the 3QFY03/19 earnings release, which underperformed both consensus and LSR expectations. The company...

Farha Sabri

Is It a Nikkei BOJ Squeeze on Nikkei 225 Low Float Names? Or Just FamilyMart Being FamilyMart?

A comment from a Smartkarma client prompted me to dig through this. It was an interesting comment suggesting the high weight Nikkei 225 names,...

Travis Lundy

2Q Earnings Is the Time for Full-Year Guidance Revisions. See Who Changed Their Numbers the Most....

At the beginning of the fiscal year, Japanese companies issue full-year guidance. Most of them will then revise those number when they announce 2Q...

Custom Products Group

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)