In this briefing:
- AFFIN Bank: To Affinity and Beyond
- China Meidong (1268 HK): Standout Story in Gloomy Auto Dealership Sector; Luxury Brands Outperform
- Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP): All That Glitters Is Neither Gold Nor Star Quality
- Global Banks: Why Buy High Into Popular and Fashionable Banks and Markets? Be Contrarian and Buy Low
1. AFFIN Bank: To Affinity and Beyond
Based in Malaysia, AFFIN Bank Bhd (ABANK MK) is the product of two mergers over the last decade. Today AFFIN is a small-medium-sized financial services group, with 107 branches, combining corporate and SME banking; consumer banking (remittance services, vehicle loans, mortgages, personal loans, credit cards, unit trusts, and bancassurance products); Investment/Merchant Banking via AFFIN Hwang (AHAM), including corporate finance, capital market services and investment management; plus underwriting of general and life insurance (an underpenetrated market) through AAGI and AALI. AFFIN Islamic is a wholly owned subsidiary.
The core shareholders are LTAT (the superannuation fund for the Armed Forces), the Bank of East Asia, and Boustead Holdings which limits the float.
Malaysia has a tailwind of a new administration, vowing to overturn many aspects of its predecessor – including cancelling mega infra projects and reducing the “real” National debt.
The economy is pretty buoyant and is slated to generate an average of 4.75% GDP growth over 2018-2022. Inflation has mellowed, supported by the cut in GST, but will still, once these effects diminish, be modest, at around 2%, this year. The current and trade accounts are in surplus.
Malaysia, however, has a high level (by Asian standards) of household (excluding mortgages) indebtedness, dominated by credit cards, auto/vehicle finance, and personal loans. This had led to a moderately high risk in terms of the credit-to-GDP gap. The corporate sector is not excessively leveraged.
AFFIN trades at a P/B ratio of 0.5x and a Mkt Cap./Deposits of 8%, well below the global and EM medians. Earnings Yield lies at 13.3%. The limited float will have a bearing on the valuation. A quintile 1 PH Score™ of 7.9 captures above-average metric change (though not in asset quality and efficiency) and value-quality attributes. Combining technical momentum, franchise valuation, and the PH Score™, the overall ranking stands in the top decile globally. A RSI of 43 points to potential upside.
2. China Meidong (1268 HK): Standout Story in Gloomy Auto Dealership Sector; Luxury Brands Outperform
China Meidong Auto (1268 HK) has been on a rollercoaster ride in 2018. The stock price of Meidong started 2018 around 2.7 HKD and recently has been trading around 2.9 HKD.
Nice and steady ride? Not exactly, as it has swung from 4.3 HKD in June to 2.6 HKD in August. After analyzing how NPAT estimates evolved over the past year there should be no justifications for these wild swings.
Meidong is likely to report solid FY18 results by late March vs industry peers which are expected to report a weak 2H18. While BMW dealers have been reportedly suffering in China during 2018, Meidong was fortunate to have other luxury brands pick up the slack.
FY19 should be another growth year for Meidong as 1) recently acquired BMW showrooms contribute their maiden results and 2) other luxury brands continue to perform despite overall doom and gloom in the Chinese auto market. Should the Chinese government launch car replacement stimulus measures this would be icing on the cake.
Fair Value lowered slightly from 4.7 HKD to 4.4 HKD (10x 2019E) on lower 2019 profit estimates, which leaves 52% upside excluding dividends.
3. Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP): All That Glitters Is Neither Gold Nor Star Quality
Since our bearish Insight on Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP) issued in November 2018, Tokyo Kiraboshi FG (7173 JP): Shooting Star, the stock’s subsequent performance has fully justified our pessimism, with the share price finishing CY2018 down 47.7% year-on-year (YoY). Having touched a low of ¥1,504 on Christmas Day, the shares have recovered 10.1% to ¥1,656 as of Friday’s close: slightly better than the Topix Bank Index, which closed on Friday at 154.44, up 9.0% over the same period. Trading on a forward-looking price/earnings multiple of 12.5x (using the bank’s current FY3/2019 guidance) and a price/book ratio of 0.21x, TKFG looks cheap. This is deceptive. Adjusting the group’s earnings per share (EPS) for the ¥55 billion (US$507 million) in two still-outstanding preference share issues pushes the PER to over 18x: hardly a bargain. Meanwhile, the group’s RoA and RoE ratios are woefully low, loan growth has collapsed since end-March 2018, deposits have fallen alarmingly, and main bank subsidiary Kiraboshi Bank is struggling to keep its net return on funds deployed (NRFD) in positive territory. A stock best avoided.
4. Global Banks: Why Buy High Into Popular and Fashionable Banks and Markets? Be Contrarian and Buy Low
Trawling through >1500 global banks, based on the last quarter of reported Balance Sheets, we apply the discipline of the PH Score™ , a value-quality fundamental momentum screen, plus a low RSI screen, and a low Franchise Valuation (FV) screen to deliver our latest rankings for global banks.
While not all of top decile 1 scores are a buy – some are value traps while others maybe somewhat small and obscure and traded sparsely- the bottom decile names should awaken caution. We would be hard pressed to recommend some of the more popular and fashionable names from the bottom decile. Names such as ICICI Bank Ltd (ICICIBC IN) , Credicorp of Peru, Bank Central Asia (BBCA IJ) and Itau Unibanco Holding Sa (ITUB US) are EM favourites. Their share prices have performed well for an extended period and thus carry valuation risk. They represent pricey quality in some cases. They are not priced for disappointment but rather for hope. Are the constituents of the bottom decile not fertile grounds for short sellers?
Why pay top dollar for a bank franchise given risks related to domestic (let alone global) politics and the economy? Some investors and analysts have expressed “inspiration” for developments in Brazil and Argentina. But Brazilian bonds are now trading as if the country is Investment Grade again. (This is relevant for banks especially). Guedes and co. may deliver on pension/social security reform. If so, prices will become even more inflated. But what happens if they don’t deliver on reform? Why pay top dollar for hope given the ramp up in prices already? Argentina is an even more fragile “hope narrative”. More of a “Hope take 2”. Similar to Brazil, bank Franchise Valuations are elevated. While the current account adjustment and easing inflation are to be expected, the political and social scene will be a challenge. LATAM seems to be “hot” again with investment bankers talking of resilience. But resilience is different from valuation. Banks from Chile, Peru, and Colombia feature in the bottom decile too. If an investor wants to be in these markets and desires bank exposure, surely it makes sense to look for the best value on offer. Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (AVAL CB) may represent one such opportunity.
Our bottom decile rankings feature a great deal of banks from Indonesia. In a promising market such as Indonesia, given bank valuations, one needs to tread extremely carefully to not end up paying over the odds, to not pay for extrapolation. In addition, India is a susceptible jurisdiction for any bank operating there – no bank is “superhuman” and especially not at the prices on offer for the popular private sector “winners”. Saudi Arabia is another market that suddenly became popular last year. We are mindful of valuations and FX.
Does it not make more sense to look at opportunity in the top decile? While some of the names here will be too small or illiquid (mea culpa), there are genuine portfolio candidates. South Korea stands out in the rankings. Woori Bank (WF US) is top of the rankings after a share price plunge related to a stock overhang but this will pass. Hana Financial (086790 KS) , Industrial Bank of Korea (IBK LX) and DGB Financial Group (139130 KS) are portfolio candidates. Elsewhere, Russia and Vietnam rightly feature while Sri Lanka and Pakistan contribute some names despite very real political and macro risks. We would caution on some of the relatively small Chinese names but recommend the big 4 versus EM peers – they are not expensive. In fact some of the big 4 feature in decile 2 of our rankings. There are many Japanese banks here too. And many, like some Chinese lenders, are cheap for a reason. While the technical picture for Japanese banks is bearish, at some stage selective weeding out of opportunity within Japan’s banking sector may be rewarding. The megabanks are certainly not dear. Europe is another matter. Despite valuations, we are cautious on French lenders and on German consolidation narratives – did a merger of 2 weak banks ever deliver shareholder value? The inclusion of two Romanian banks in the top decile is somewhat of a headscratcher. These are perfectly investable opportunities but share prices have been poor of late.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
