Brief Value Investing: OCBC – Difficult to Square and more

In this briefing:

1. OCBC – Difficult to Square
2. Mizuho Financial Group (8411 JP): Writing Off the Past
3. PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero): Rather Rich for a Bargain Hunter

1. OCBC – Difficult to Square

The data and text from Oversea Chinese Banking Corp. (OCBC SP) is difficult to square. It talks about improved credit quality, but its NPLs are up both YoY and QoQ.  In the bank’s Pillar 3 disclosure it notes that ‘risk-weighted assets (RWA) were largely stable in the quarter primarily due to improving asset quality.’ In its financial supplement it reports NPLs of S$3,938m compared with S$3,594m, in 4Q18 and 3Q18. This is nearly 10% higher QoQ.  The reality is that OCBC ramped up credit costs in 4Q18 to nearly 3x its full 9M18 charge and despite this, its NPL cover is now down to 57% from 78% a year ago. To us this appears like marked deterioration.  And even QoQ, where NPL cover was 65% in 3Q18. The risk now is that credit costs during the current year are more like 4Q18 or higher, rather than the paltry figures seen during full year 2018. We do not believe the market is expecting this. 

2. Mizuho Financial Group (8411 JP): Writing Off the Past

Mizuho Financial Group (8411 JP) (MHFG) has slashed its forecast for FY3/2019 consolidated net profits from ¥570 billion to just ¥80 billion, citing previously-unbudgeted write-downs on physical branch assets and retail banking software, as well as valuation losses on marking to market part of the group’s foreign bond portfolio, especially on derivative products. Total additional costs to be incurred in FY3/2019 are now expected to be around ¥680 billion.

In effect, MHFG is attempting to ‘clear the decks’ of redundant and uneconomic assets  –  a legacy from its 20^th century role as a branch-based deposit taker and lender  –   and is now positioning itself for 21^st century ‘cashless’ banking centred on electronic transaction and payment systems.  While this is a laudable effort, MHFG is late to do this; rivals Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Group (8306 JP) and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (8316 JP)  slimmed down their branch networks in FY3/2018, incurring heavy costs in doing so.

We remain skeptical that this signals the end of MHFG’s problems, and continue to recommend an Underweight position in Japanese bank stocks generally.

MHFG’s uneconomic asset problems are far from unique.  This news may just be the first of a succession of similar announcements from other banks over the next 2-3 years as they face not only an ongoing ultra-low interest rate environment but now also the stark economic realities of a declining local population, high overheads as a result of over-manned and under-utilised branches, a clear shift towards Internet banking and the increasing use of ‘cashless’ alternative payment systems by retail customers.

3. PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero): Rather Rich for a Bargain Hunter

Bank Rakyat Indonesia Perser (BBRI IJ) seems to be doing a great deal right to perhaps satisfy a punchy valuation.

Profitability is elevated with chunky NIMs and spreads, fee income and insurance are performing well, and OPEX is under control. Capital Adequacy and CIR look healthy.

However, we are concerned about rising interest costs, at a pace in excess of interest income generation.

The bank also seems to be stretching a little in terms of quality income to reach the Net Profit line with “other non-interest interest income” and gains on securities. The bottom line falls a little short of a comprehensive income assessment.

In addition, asset quality remains a thorny issue. The Balance Sheet continues to be much more toxic than the sedate NPL ratio. This relates to the micro focus.

Debt to Equity is on the rise.

Overall, trends are no better than average – as testified by a PH Score of 5.

Trading on a P/Book of 2.6x and an earnings yield of 7.3%, we believe that valuation is somewhat rich irrespective of the bank’s strengths. A franchise valuation of 52% versus a median of 8% in Asia Pacific seals the deal.