In this briefing:
- ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise
- Newmark Group Inc (NMRK US): Valuation/Fundamentals Mismatch, Stock Trades At Bargain Levels
- Bank of Zhengzhou: “Bend One Cubit, Make Eight Cubits Straight”
- Jiangxi Bank: “No Sooner Has One Pushed a Gourd Under Water than Another Pops Up”
- “Deep Doubts, Deep Wisdom; Small Doubts, Little Wisdom”
1. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise
ICBC (H) (1398 HK) delivered a robust PH Score of 8.5 – our quantamental value-quality gauge.
A highlight was the trend in cost-control. The bank delivered underlying “jaws” of 420bps. Besides OPEX restraint, including payroll, Efficiency gains were supported by robust underlying top-line expansion as growth in interest income on earning assets, underpinned by moderate credit growth, broadly matched expansion of interest expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. This combination is not so prevalent in China these days, especially in smaller or medium-sized lenders.
It is well-flagged that the system is grappling with Asset Quality issues and there is a debate about the interrelated property market. ICBC is not immune, similar to other SOEs, from migration of souring loans. However, by China standards, rising asset writedowns which exerted a negative pull on Pre-Tax Profit as a % of pre-impairment Operating Profit, high charge-offs, and swelling (though not exploding) substandard and loss loans look arguably manageable given ICBC‘s sheer scale. The Asset Quality issue here is also not as bad as it was in bygone years (2004 springs to mind) when capital injections, asset transfers, and government-subsidised bad loan disposals were the order of the day. This is a “Big Four” player.
Shares are not expensive. ICBC trades at a P/Book of 0.8x, a Franchise Valuation of 10%, an Earnings Yield of 16.7%, a Dividend Yield of 4.9%, and a Total Return Ratio of 1.6x.
2. Newmark Group Inc (NMRK US): Valuation/Fundamentals Mismatch, Stock Trades At Bargain Levels
Having gained ~30% in a little more than two months following its full separation from BGC Partners (BGCP US) at the end of November 2018 after a dismal share price performance since coming to the market in a partial IPO at the end of December 2017, the shares of commercial real estate services company, Newmark Group (NMRK US) have experienced another slide over the past several weeks despite its cheap valuation which belies its positive fundanmental drivers and peer group comparisons.
Notwithstanding its robust fundamentals, notice of alterations it plans to make to its Non-GAAP earnings presentations to bring them more into line with many other US-listed companies, has brought the company into the headlights of the ongoing controversy caused by this topic, and in particular with respect to the treatement of stock-based compensation in Non-GAAP earnings. While Newmark follows many other companies by excluding it from Adjusted Earnings, its heavy use of stock-based compensation, which it intends to lessen going forward, makes it an easy target for critique of its earnings presentations. Nevertheless, we assess that Newmark is at least 35% undervalued relative to its peers after incorparting stock compensation expenses in its earnings-based valuation metrics. It is also noteworthy that Newmark is currently paying shareholders a yield of ~4% against barely any dividend being paid out by peers
3. Bank of Zhengzhou: “Bend One Cubit, Make Eight Cubits Straight”
Bank Of Zhengzhou (6196 HK) reveals a picture of cascading asset toxicity and subpar earnings quality. As elsewhere in China, it is difficult to decipher whether better NPL recognition is behind this profound asset quality deterioration or poor underwriting practice and discipline combined with troubled debtors: the answer may lie somewhere in between.
While the low PH Score (a value-quality gauge) of 4.7 is supported by a lowly valuation metric (earnings quality is not reassuring), it is more a testament to -and reflection of- core eroding fundamental trends across the board. Regarding trends, Capital Adequacy and Provisioning were the variables to post a positive change. But even then, not all Capitalisation and Provisioning metrics moved in the right direction.
Franchise Valuation at 12% does not indicate that the bank is especially cheap though P/Book of 0.64x is below the regional median of 0.78x.
4. Jiangxi Bank: “No Sooner Has One Pushed a Gourd Under Water than Another Pops Up”
Jiangxi Bank Co Ltd (1916 HK) initially attracted our attention with a subpar PH Score (a quantamental value-quality gauge). The bank only scored positively on Capital Adequacy and Efficiency trends. The latter is almost certainly not a true picture.
Further analysis reveals a bank ratcheting up the credit spigot exuberantly on the back of poor asset quality fundamentals (booming substandard loans and SML expansion) with ensuing elevated asset writedowns weighing on a reducing bottom-line despite gains from securities and a lower tax provision.
Valuations do not fully reflect a somewhat challenging picture. Shares trade at Book Value vs a regional median of 0.8x, at a Franchise Valuation of 13% vs a regional median of 9%, and at an Earnings Yield of 8.4% vs a regional median of 10%. Based on FY18 data, this is a bank that should trade at a discount rather than at a premium to peers.
5. “Deep Doubts, Deep Wisdom; Small Doubts, Little Wisdom”
Postal Savings Bank Of China (1658 HK) is outgrowing its peers on the top-line given exuberant pace of credit growth (especially in consumer lending such as credit cards but also in corporate and in agriculture). Expansion in Interest Income on earning assets is well in excess of an increase in Interest Expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. This is not always the case in China today. Fee income is also growing by double-digits too. The bank has a huge deposit base and Liquidity is ample. In addition, “Jaws” stand out as being highly positive at 20pts given aforementioned top-line growth coupled with OPEX restraint.
However, capital remains tight and asset quality has deteriorated markedly. Despite the top-line growth and cost-control, an increasing amount of pre-impairment Income is being consumed by loan loss provisions and other asset writedowns. Substandard loans have exploded while loss loans have climbed forcefully. The bank shapes as if it is striving to grow itself out an asset quality bind. Given Balance Sheet risks, the bank has adjusted its provisioning accordingly.
The relatively meagre capital position (for example Equity/Assets or Basel 111 Leverage Ratio) while improving is surely the reason why Postal Savings cannot pay a higher dividend in comparison with say Agricultural Bank Of China (1288 HK) , Bank Of China (601988 CH), and China Construction Bank (601939 CH) which all command yields in excess of 5% and rate as income stocks. The Dividend Yield here though is not unattractive at 3.9%.
The PH Score of 7.7 encompasses valuation as well as generally positive metric progression. Combined with an underbought technical position and an additional valuation filter, the bank stands out with the aforementioned strategic peers in the top decile of global bank opportunity. Valuations are not stretched: shares trade at a P/Book of 0.74x, a Franchise Valuation of 4%, and an Earnings Yield of 15.5%.
Despite the aforementioned deep concerns and caveats, we believe that Postal Savings Bank is a valuable, liquid, deposit-rich franchise with a capacity to grow.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
