Brief Value Investing: Auto Earnings: Positive Toyota/Mazda, Negative Subaru/Suzuki and more

In this briefing:

1. Auto Earnings: Positive Toyota/Mazda, Negative Subaru/Suzuki
2. Tesla (TSLA): SWOT Analysis Leads To…Rivian

1. Auto Earnings: Positive Toyota/Mazda, Negative Subaru/Suzuki

On a relative basis we have been positive on Toyota Motor (7203 JP)  and negative on Subaru Corp (7270 JP)  since early 2017 as we consider Toyota’s underlying earnings strength to be superior to the majority of its peers and consider hybrids to be moving towards the mass adoption stage while we also feel that Subaru, after a purple patch when it led the automotive industry in terms of margins, is now falling back to Earth and the sell side remains behind the curve on the depth of issues and underspend that needs to be addressed at the company. The ratio between the two returned about 40% in 2018 but is down about 12% so far this year.

In the case of Mazda Motor (7261 JP) and Suzuki Motor (7269 JP), in Mar 2018 we took the contrarian view of preferring Mazda over Suzuki despite earnings momentum being significantly stronger for Suzuki than for Mazda. This proved to be “early” as the ratio declined 16% during the year and at one point fell as much as 30%, but we continue to feel that our thesis has merit and would note that the ratio is now up 2% relative to its value at our initial recommendation. Our thesis is simply that Mazda’s earnings are under pressure due to forward investments in technology (extremely high efficiency gasoline and diesel engines) and distribution and after sales which have traditionally been a Mazda weakness and are in our opinion the main difference between Mazda and a much stronger company like Honda. In the case of Suzuki, while the long-term growth outlook due to the India exposure remains bright, we felt that momentum was likely to decelerate and that Suzuki could face headwinds in the short-term as consumer upgraded from mini-vehicles in which it is dominant, to compact and mid-size cars where Suzuki is strong in India, but not the force of nature that it is in the mini-vehicle segment. While it has taken time, recent results suggest this thesis is starting to play out.

2. Tesla (TSLA): SWOT Analysis Leads To…Rivian

What happens when innovation becomes commoditized?  We believe this is a core concern to every Tesla watcher, bulls and bears so we began our Lunar New Year week (or Pro Am 2019 week in Pebble Beach) with a quick and dirty SWOT analysis of Tesla to see where the next potential existential threat can come from…and we ended up looking at Rivian.  

Rivian is a private company that has not issued public debt so financial information on the company is unavailable in the U.S. public domain, so we poured through strategic investor Sumitomo Corp’s Yuho reports to see if we can find any tidbits in Japan but found nothing there either.  Hence, while we cannot make much financial observations about the company at this point, we do see a number of strategic signs from Rivian’s actions that may indicating that it is most likely improving upon the Tesla experience to avoid the hiccups and the bumps on the road to premium EV segment dominance.

From an APAC stock market perspective, we see LG Chem and Sumitomo Corp as two entities that could potentially see financial impact from Rivian in the next several years. Teslerati has made an educated guess on LG Chem as Rivian’s cell supplier which we believe to be reasonable, although Rivian and LG Chem have neither confirmed nor denied the relationship (https://insideevs.com/new-details-rivian-battery-pack-design/, https://www.teslarati.com/rivian-battery-lab-irvine-california-megapack-production/).  Current investment in Rivian by Sumitomo Corp is most likely an insignificant amount from the latter’s perspective but could perhaps grow into something bigger at some point in the future.  

The Rivian R1S