In this briefing:
- TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
- Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
- Friday Deadline Looms As MYOB Snubs KKR’s Reduced Offer
- Korean Government and Hyundai Motor Group’s Grand Ambitions to Expand Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles
- NTT Buybacks Will Roll On
1. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes.
This month’s issue covers the following topics:
- November express parcel pricing remained weak. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 7.8% Y/Y to just 11.06 RMB per piece. November’s average price represents a new all-time low for the industry, and November’s Y/Y decline was the steepest monthly decline in over two years (excluding Lunar New Year months, which tend to be distorted by the timing of the holiday).
- Express parcel revenue growth dipped below 15% last month. Weak per-parcel pricing pulled express sector Y/Y revenue growth down to just 14.6% in November, the worst on record (again excluding distorted Lunar New Year comparisons). Chinese e-commerce demand has slowed and we suspect ‘O2O’ initiatives, under which online purchases are fulfilled via local stores, are also undermining express demand growth.
- Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) remains firm relative to inter-city. Relative to weak inter-city express pricing (where ZTO Express (ZTO US) and the other listed express companies compete), pricing for local, intra-city express deliveries remained firm. In the first 11 months of 2018, express pricing rose 1.7% Y/Y versus a -2.9% decline in inter-city shipments (international pricing fell sharply, -14.5% Y/Y). Relatively firm pricing on local shipments may make it hard for local food delivery companies like Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) and Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s ele.me to beat down unit operating costs.
- Underlying domestic transport demand held up well again in November. Although demand for speedy, relatively expensive express service (and air freight) appears to be moderating, demand for rail and highway freight transport has held up well. The relative strength of rail and water transport (slow, cheap, industry-facing) versus express and air freight (fast, expensive, consumer-oriented) suggests a couple of things: a) upstream industrial activity is stronger than downstream retail activity and b) the people in charge of paying freight are shifting to cheaper modes of transport when possible.
We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut. Overall domestic transportation demand, however, remains solid and shows no signs of slowing.
2. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
- Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize.
- Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY.
- The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19.
- A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).
3. Friday Deadline Looms As MYOB Snubs KKR’s Reduced Offer
A last-minute lump of coal in the stocking from accounting software and services provider MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU)?
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts has reduced its indicative offer to $3.40 from $3.77 after sifting through MYOB’s books, with MYOB announcing:
Following completion of due diligence and finalisation of debt funding commitments, KKR has revised the offer price to $3.40 per share. … The board has informed KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal. (my emphasis)
KKR’s revised non-binding proposal is scheduled to expire at 5pm Friday, providing a day and change for MYOB to sound out shareholders as to the next move. Either the lower tilt is grudgingly accepted, or MYOB rejects and KKR walks away (for now), or goes hostile.
Either way, with MYOB’s VWAP above the revised proposal on all but 6 days since the initial announcement on the 8 October and $3.47/share on average, there won’t be a lot of Ho Ho Ho’ing.
Shares are down 11% as I type, implying 13% upside and 11% downside (using the ASX performance-adjusted price) or ~18% downside when pegged to peers. That’s not an attractive risk/reward heading into year-end.
4. Korean Government and Hyundai Motor Group’s Grand Ambitions to Expand Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles
- On December 18th, the Korean government announced numerous measures to reduce fine dust levels, including a significant increase in the number of hydrogen powered vehicles, including expanding hydrogen vehicles to 65,000 units by 2022 (cumulative).
- The Korean government wants to encourage the growth of hydrogen powered economy and position the country as one of the global leaders in this segment. The Korean government plans to spend about 3.5 trillion won to support the Korean auto industry. The Korean government’s new plan is to expand the hydrogen vehicles to 65,000 units by 2022, which is a big increase from the previous plan of expanding the hydrogen vehicles to 15,000 units by 2022.
- The Hyundai Motor Group also recently announced a grand plan to expand its fuel cell vehicles with the announcement of its ‘FCEV Vision 2030.’ The Hyundai Motor Group plans to increase its annual production capacity for fuel cell systems to 0.7 million units by 2030, with plans to invest about $7 billion in the next 10 years to develop hydrogen fuel cell systems.
5. NTT Buybacks Will Roll On
There is an extensive history of writing on the NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP) family (and indeed Japan telecom sector) buybacks – their modalities and methods, impacts, legal and accounting requirements, competition, push-me-pull-you effect, etc.
One of the longstanding features of buybacks for NTT is that NTT is subject to the NTT Law which requires (for the moment) that the government hold at least one-third of the shares outstanding in NTT.
Today, the Nikkei carried an article noting that the Japanese government’sFY2019 budget currently being formed proposes a sale of JPY 160bn of shares to help fund any revenue impact from the upcoming consumption tax rate hike from 8% to 10% next October. The article helpfully notes that they plan on selling when NTT is buying back shares.
This news is not unexpected to Smartkarma readers of the ongoing series. And there are implications and read-throughs.
