In this briefing:
- Tencent Music (TME): Both Live Video and Music Fairly Valued, No Action
- AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: What You Need to Know Before the Trading Debut
- Softbank Corp IPO – Trading Strategies
- Takeda: Move Over Newton! Now It’s Spooky Action At a Distance
- Hitachi (6501 JP): A Bold but Risky Acquisition of ABB’s Power Grids
1. Tencent Music (TME): Both Live Video and Music Fairly Valued, No Action
- We believe that TME is fairly valued based on peer companies’ price / sales ratios.
- The Chinese internet peer companies as comparison bases in valuation have declined significantly more than indices, we believe it is not a concern that indices declined further.
- We believe that the main business of music will grow strongly in 2019 and 2020 due to the rapid growth of both the paying user base and ARPU (Average Revenues per User per month).
2. AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: What You Need to Know Before the Trading Debut
AsiaInfo Tech priced its IPO at HKD 10.50/share and will start trading today. Prior to the trading debut, in this short note, we summarize the latest information with updates on our valuation.
Our Previous Insight on AsiaInfo Tech:
- AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Cost Control Is the Key (Part 1)
- AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Lessons from Privatization and Three Bearish Trends (Part 2)
- AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Latest Numbers Showcase the Company’s Questionable Expansion Plan
- AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Valuation Rich Vs Delisting and Peers
3. Softbank Corp IPO – Trading Strategies
Bloomberg reported Softbank Corp (9434 JP)‘s international bookbuild was 2 – 3x covered while retail offering was at almost 2x. There were other reports of bookrunners struggling to sell shares to retail investors.
In this insight, we will look at how peers and market have performed since bookbuild and provide a sensitivity table with implied valuations for different price points and thoughts on the price range for near-term trading.
We have already covered most aspects of Softbank Corp (9434 JP) ‘s IPO in our previous insights:
- Valuation from a retail investor POV – Softbank IPO Review – Attractive from a Retail Perspective, Could Provide Short-Term Upside
- Valuation from an institutional investor POV – Softbank Corp IPO Review – Yield Ensured Demand May Not Guarantee Performance
- Updates from prospectus – Softbank Corp IPO Review – Segment Breakdown, Capex, and Risks
- Operating metric comparison – Softbank Telecom Pre-IPO – Higher Yield to Compensate for Poorer Metrics
- Impact of Rakuten entry and FCF and dividend sustainability analysis – Softbank Telecom Pre-IPO – All About the Yield
- Company background and overview – Softbank Telecom Pre-IPO Review – Vision Is Needed to Arrive at US$90bn Valuation
4. Takeda: Move Over Newton! Now It’s Spooky Action At a Distance
Over the weekend I published Softbank Corp, Takeda, and Newton’s Three Laws of Motion. Newton’s Three Laws helpfully guide one to understanding the nature of interaction of forces and bodies and the motion which results. Later, Euler’s laws of motion applied a framework for rigid and continuum bodies, and since then “action at a distance” has been replaced be Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.
After I wrote the bit about one part of the index impact, FTSE unhelpfully changed their mind on timing based on an unhelpful change by the LSE. On Monday, the TSE exercised its discretion – clearly stated in the TOPIX Index Guidebook on p4 (2nd sentence of the opening paragraph) as something it may do – to go its own course in how it will adapt index changes to the first couple of increases in share count due to mergers with foreign corporations.
If an event not specified in this document occurs, or if TSE determines that it is difficult to use the methods described in this document, TSE may use an alternative method of index calculation as it deems appropriate.
So with the changes at FTSE and now TOPIX and JPX Nikkei 400, we no longer have quite the same clarity of forces on the bodies, and therefore less clarity on the resulting motion. The LSE’s announced market change appears to have led the MSCI to change its deletion date for Shire as well, now also (along with FTSE) deleting Shire at the close of the 21st (announcement early this AM Asia time).
Investors have prepared based on the idea that there was a reasonably tight relationship – helped because it was a lot of force applied in a short period (selling and buying all done in a short period in January) between the particles. Now that relationship is being stretched. A lot.
The problem resembles that which Einstein famously pooh-poohed as “Spooky Action At a Distance”. Schrödinger called this entanglement – and it turns out to be one of the weirder branches of quantum mechanics – a field broken wide open by Bell’s Theorem a decade after Einstein shuffled off this mortal coil* – and about which John Wheeler famously said, “If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it.”
I cheerfully say quantum mechanics completely baffles me.
I less cheerfully say this whole episode with Takeda and index providers has baffled me too.
But it is important to note that the timing and implications are vastly different than expected just two trading days ago. And the difference is worth thinking about. When the FTSE/MSCI net sell of risk was just 3 days apart, there was a clear connection across that three day distance. Now, the 6-10 week spread of time between the FTSE/MSCI events, the weird two weeks of SETSqx illiquid purgatory just as everyone is full up of risk, then the walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Flowback before we get the first really good net index inclusion to cover the Shire risk people have been dumping for months means that the certainty of understanding the movement of the particle on the other side is substantially lower.
If it all works out well, it might just be Spooky Action At a Distance.
5. Hitachi (6501 JP): A Bold but Risky Acquisition of ABB’s Power Grids
Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) announced the acquisition of an 80.1% stake in ABB Ltd (ABBN VX)’s power grids business for $6.4 billion. ABB will retain the remaining stake in the divested unit, which is valued at an EV of $11 billion. ABB’s power grids is a global #1 player and makes transformers, long distance electricity-transmission systems and energy storage units.
Setting aside the huge cultural and integration challenges, we believe that Hitachi’s acquisition of ABB’s power grids is a bold but a risky move.
