Brief TMT & Internet: Futu Holdings IPO – Given the Team, Execution, and Backers, Might Be Worth a Look at the Low-End and more

In this briefing:

1. Futu Holdings IPO – Given the Team, Execution, and Backers, Might Be Worth a Look at the Low-End
2. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA
3. HKT Benefits from Price Increases and Offers Strong Dividend Support.
4. Hanergy’s Hobson’s Choice
5. AEM Holdings: FY18 Results Solid; Decent FY19 Outlook; Upside Could Come from Huawei and Novoflex

1. Futu Holdings IPO – Given the Team, Execution, and Backers, Might Be Worth a Look at the Low-End

Futu Holdings Ltd (FHL US) plans to raise upto US$130m in its US listing. The deal has been downsized from its earlier indicative size of US$300m and the valuation too has been downsized by almost the same extent to around US$1.2-1.5bn.

In my earlier insights, Futu Holdings Pre-IPO – Great Metrics but in a Commoditised Industry and Futu Holdings Pre-IPO – FY18 Updates And Quick Thoughts on Valuation, I looked at the company’s background and past financial performance.

 In this insight, I’ll run the deal through our IPO framework and comment on valuations. At the low-end the deal might be worth looking into, although free-float might end up being very small owing to US$30m being taken up Tencent which would leave just about US$100m as free-float.

2. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA

Procurri Corporation (PROC SP) released FY18 results which showed the company growing revenues to 220M SGD (+21% vs FY17), EBITDA to 19.7M SGD (+185% vs FY17), PBT to 10.1M SGD (vs 2.3M loss in 2017) and a small net profit of 5.3M SGD which was artificially low because of an astronomical 47% tax rate. The high tax rate should reverse in 2H19 which would show the reported profitability of Procurri improve substantially. 

Procurri remains deep value trading at just 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and 0.4x 2018 EV/Sales. If we adjust the FY18 net profit figure(assume 30% tax rate vs 47%) the shares trade at a P/E multiple of just 13x.

The shareholder register of Procurri has seen a dramatic change YTD with multiple announcements on SGX. The most significant development is the entry of Singapore PE fund Novo Tellus acquiring a 29.6% stake on 19/2/19. Consequently this means that the biggest corporate overhang on Procurri (read: the control by Declout Ltd (DLL SP) ) is now almost over with their stake reduced to 17% from 47% previously.

Given the well-publicized track record of Novo Tellus at SGX listed Aem Holdings (AEM SP) the question is if Novo Tellus sees another multi-bagger in the making?

While a “10-bagger” type return like AEM is unlikely at Procurri, doubling the market cap from 90M to 180M SGD would not be impossible as Procurri continues to grow in FY19 and the depressed multiple expands modestly.

3. HKT Benefits from Price Increases and Offers Strong Dividend Support.

HKT (6823 HK) reported 2H18 EBITDA slightly below our estimates but free cash flow was in line and allowed a 5% increase in the dividend (to a 5.7% yield). We look for the dividend to grow gradually going forward as management’s focus is once again on returns. We saw that with the move by HKT to raise prices in September 2018 which is already helping mobile top-line trends.

Despite HKBN (1310 HK) and China Mobile HK not following, the pre-paid segment does not appear to be suffering. Management has not ruled out further tariff increases, and they clearly want to see more rational competition in the run up to 5G (and to allow for dividend growth).

Growing cash flow has allowed management to maintain an attractive dividend policy which we see as supportive for the group overall. The improved monetization in mobile and continued efficiencies is likely to support future cash flow growth. Given the encouraging mobile outlook we have lifted our target slightly HKD13.8 from HKD13.6), and maintain a BUY on the stock. For a discussion on parent PCCW (8 HK) and the stub trade, please see David Blennerhassett ‘s recent note: StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating.

4. Hanergy’s Hobson’s Choice

On the 23 October last year, the Board of Hanergy Mobile Energy Holdings Group Limited (HMEH), Hanergy Thin Film Power (566 HK)‘s majority shareholder, announced an intention to privatise the company at “no less than HK$5/share” via cash or scrip. Over a full week later, Hanergy acknowledged the proposal.

Following this privatisation, Hanergy would be listed on China’s A-share market. The indicative offer valued Hanergy at ~US$27bn.  Hanergy has been suspended since 20 May 2015 and last traded at $3.91/share.

Hanergy has now announced the intention of HMEH to privatise the company by way of a Scheme. The ultimate intention of HMEH still remains the listing of Hanergy’s business in China.

The rub is that the consideration under the Scheme will be in the form of one special purpose vehicle share (SPV) per Hanergy share.  To this: 

it is not certain whether the A-Share Listing can be achieved. If the A-Share Listing cannot be completed, the Independent Shareholders will be holding onto unlisted SPV Shares for which there is no exchange platform for transfers. Even if the A-Share Listing is completed, there is no certainty as to
(a) when and how the SPV will be able to dispose of the A-Share Listco Shares;
(b) at what price the A-Share Listco Shares can be sold; and
(c) when the cash exit can be available to the Independent Shareholders, via the proposed A-Share Listing.

Upon consultation with the Executive and given the above uncertainties, the Offeror is required not to attribute any monetary value to
(i) the Proposal and
(ii) any potential cash exit for the Independent Shareholders.

The announcement does not stipulate the jurisdiction of the SPV, only that it may be established in a jurisdiction apart from Hong Kong. That itself is a risk.

Long-suffering shareholders, who comprise 32.49% of shares out, have the dubious honour of holding SPV  shares which may remain in A-share pre-listing purgatory; or should the Scheme fail/lapse, hold unlisted shares if Hanergy fails to resume trading by end-July 2019, as per recently introduced HKEx guidelines. Such an outcome affords HMEH the flexibility to squeeze out minorities at a bargain price.

(A Hobson’s choice is a free choice in which only one thing is offered. In this instance, each outcome is undesirable.)

5. AEM Holdings: FY18 Results Solid; Decent FY19 Outlook; Upside Could Come from Huawei and Novoflex

Aem Holdings (AEM SP) reported solid FY18 results and gave a decent outlook for FY19. Customer concentration remains high (85%+ of revenues linked to one of biggest IT companies globally) but new growth opportunities with Huawei and Novoflex could potentially add meaningfully to earnings and customer diversification as of FY20.

The balance sheet remains strong (58M SGD net cash) and should be further utilized for M&A to complement the current product offering.

Given the large change in the shareholder register over the past twelve months (after Novo Tellus distributed the shares to its LPs) free float is now 83% with Aberdeen and UBS among the largest shareholders. The high free float and low market cap make AEM a prime takeover candidate the coming 2-3 years.

Fair Value of 2.1 SGD remains unchanged (based on just 2x revenue or 10x FY2020 EV/EBITDA).