Brief Singapore: Embassy Office Parks REIT – Comparison with AIT and a Look at the Required Yield and more

In this briefing:

1. Embassy Office Parks REIT – Comparison with AIT and a Look at the Required Yield
2. Singapore Real Deals (Issue 4): Purpose Built Workers Accommodation, an Alternative Asset Class
3. Monthly Geopolitical Comment: Waiting for Trump and Xi to Clinch a Deal
4. Global EM Special: Andean Condors Vs Asian Elephants – Where Is the Growth in EM?

1. Embassy Office Parks REIT – Comparison with AIT and a Look at the Required Yield

Embassy Office Parks REIT (EOP IN) plans to raise around US$1bn in its India IPO. EOP will primarily hold office assets in Bengaluru, Pune and Noida with a total portfolio size of US$4.2bn. 

In my previous insight, Embassy Office Parks REIT – Good Assets but Projections Might Be a Tad Too Bullish I covered the company background and its projected growth. In this insight, I’ll compare it to its closest listed peer, Ascendas India Trust (AIT SP) and add in the performance of other yield driven listings in India.

2. Singapore Real Deals (Issue 4): Purpose Built Workers Accommodation, an Alternative Asset Class

Singapore Real Deals is a fortnightly property digest that takes you through the peculiarities of Singapore’s real estate market. In this issue, we examine Singapore’s Purpose Built Workers Accommodation (PBWA) industry landscape in light of the nation’s foreign work force policy.

The number of Work Permit holders in the construction, marine, processing and manufacturing industries has declined in the last three years and we see the government being content to keep the foreign workers quota unchanged for these sectors in Budget 2019. In spite of the continued decline in the foreign workers population amidst a soft patch in those industries, Centurion Corp (CENT SP), a major PBWA operator in Singapore, has identified a huge gap between demand and supply, where demand outstrips supply by 120,000 to 150,000 beds. This shortfall of supply represents a whopping 54% to 67% of existing bed capacity for PBWA. There is no new supply expected in 2019 and we observed that government policies continue to encourage the shift of foreign workers from public housing, on-site dormitories and other non-purpose built accommodation to PBWA.

However, capacity growth for PBWA is limited by land scarcity, high construction cost as well as stricter regulatory standards which increase the operators’ running costs.

Based on Centurion’s results for the financial year ended 2018 (FY2018), its portfolio of four workers accommodation in Singapore is enjoying a healthy average occupancy rate of 96%. Pre-tax profit margin improved from 60% in FY2017 to 62% in FY2018. In light of the heavy regulation in Singapore’s PBWA, the company is expecting stronger growth to come instead from its PBWA business in our neighbouring country, Malaysia. There are about 1.7 million registered legal foreign workers in Malaysia. Half of this number is from manufacturing. The Malaysian government is said to be drafting new laws requiring employers to provide adequate housing for foreign workers. Centurion’s PBWA capacity in Malaysia is forecast to grow 28% in 2019 and a further 20% in 2020 to reach 36,400 beds, while its capacity in Singapore is forecast to remain constant at 26,100 over the next two years. That said, the strong profit margin of its PBWA business in Singapore could still be sustainable due to the demand and supply imbalance and high entry barriers.

Centurion, the only listed operator (dual listing in Singapore and Hong Kong Centurion Corp (6090 HK) ), is believed to be one of the largest operators in Singapore’s S$720-million¹ dollar PBWA industry based on its 10.8% share of industry revenue and 11.7% share of total bed capacity. Investing in Centurion is a cheaper option to profit from running a PBWA compared to being an operator. Besides its core business in PBWA, Centurion operates a growing portfolio of student accommodation in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Singapore and South Korea. 

3. Monthly Geopolitical Comment: Waiting for Trump and Xi to Clinch a Deal

4. Global EM Special: Andean Condors Vs Asian Elephants – Where Is the Growth in EM?

Global growth is expected to slow over the coming quarters, possibly years – and emerging market economies are certainly not immune from this. Nevertheless, within this diverse universe, the pace of deceleration will be uneven. Whilst some “open” EM economies are generally synchronized with growth dynamics in the rest of the world, others will be shielded by a combination of idiosyncratic forces – including renewed accommodative (monetary and fiscal) policies, cyclical recovery or upswing in domestic growth drivers and – for some – positive political developments and reform progress. Still, other EMs are less fortunate and a growth deceleration is likely to deepen in the near-term – held back by less policy flexibility, political uncertainty and various domestic or external shocks.

With 4Q18 GDP growth reports underway, we sifted through – and synthesized – various growth indicators to introduce a “Growth-Profile Framework” (GPF) to systematically evaluate – and rank – growth profiles in a data-driven, automated and standardized manner. The “GPF” not only takes into account GDP for the most recently-reported four quarters but also forward-looking forecasts and the latest economist revisions, which often take into account the latest data surprises and other material developments.

The observation universe is the “Emerging Markets-25” (EM-25) of large, investable EM countries most often found in benchmark indices such as MSCI EM and JPMorgan (GBI-EM and EMBI) indices. This opportunity set offers a breadth of diversity spanning across Asia, EMEA and LatAm and different stages of development. 

Highlights: 

• Introducing the “EM-25” Growth Profile Framework: This data-driven, automated and standardized model generates a ranking of the “EM-25” economies based on a composite of factors reflecting: 1/ The most recent GDP growth data (in relation to three look-back periods), 2/ Forward-looking consensus growth forecasts (in relation to the most recent four quarters of GDP) and 3/ Upgrades and downgrades to those forecasts.
• Andean condors soar while Asian elephants amble along: LatAm – specifically the Andean economies (plus Brazil) – currently stand out as having the most attractive growth profiles among the EM-25. They are helped by a combination of – largely idiosyncratic – factors ranging from newfound reform optimism (Brazil), improving domestic confidence (Colombia), pent-up domestic demand (Peru) and stabilizing appetite for key commodities (Chile). This contrasts with export-oriented Asian manufacturers that dominate the bottom rankings. Elsewhere, the legacy of past macroeconomic policy choices – both painfully orthodox (Argentina) and otherwise (Turkey, Venezuela, Pakistan) – are taking their unique toll on certain other economies.
• Does growth matter for investment strategy? Yes…: Simplistically speaking, economies with exemplary growth profiles are viable candidates for long or overweight positions in equity markets and external debt. Strong growth is often associated with stronger corporate earnings potential as well as lower debt-to-GDP levels, respectively. Growth implications for FX and local debt are more ambiguous, but to the extent that a robust growth outlook guides central banks to tighten policy or lifts the government’s fiscal revenues over time, then this may also be positive for currencies and rates, respectively.

• …But it’s complicated: However, strong growth can detract asset performance if it is the result of unsustainable policies (e.g. overly loose fiscal or monetary actions) or if it leads to overheating conditions (e.g. runaway inflation or a wider current account deficit). An attractive growth profile, as with all data sets, needs to be judged against its context. Although high and improving growth is an end-goal for many policymakers, the road to strong – and sustainable – growth is far more important for its longevity (and for risk assets over the medium-term). For instance: Are growth prospects improving due to rising productivity (as it might from structural reform)? Or rather from overly-stimulative policies that risk fanning inflation or widening the current account deficit? To what extent do officials have the policy flexibility to stoke growth, smoothen downside growth risks or stave off a recession? We touch upon these questions in the individual country sections below.

• While the narrative is almost always more important than the number itself, this GPF framework nevertheless offers a valuable screening tool that systematically evaluates growth profiles – on a stand-alone and relative basis – across the “EM-25” universe.