In this briefing:
- Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
- Itochu Confirms Intent to Deepen Hold over Descente
- Nissan/Renault: French State Intervention Continues
- The GER Weekly EVENTS Wrap: Softbank, Xiaomi, Capitaland and Navitas
- TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Inter-City Pricing -9.1%
1. Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
Last week on 17 January, printing and HR services company and funeral parlor operator Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) announced that Bain Capital Private Equity would conduct an MBO on its shares via Tender Offer, with a minimum threshold for success of acquiring 66.67% of the shares outstanding. The Tender Offer commenced on 18 January and goes through 1 Mach 2019. The Tender Offer Price is ¥610/share, which is a 43.8% premium to the close of the day before the announcement and a 59.7% premium to the one-month VWAP up through the day before the announcement.
The company’s board of directors announced it supported the deal.
Terms & Schedule
Terms & Schedule of Hitachi Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering | |
| Tender Offer Price | JPY 610 |
| Tender Offer Start Date | 18 January 2019 |
| Tender Offer Close Date | 1 March 2019 |
| Tender Agent | SMBC Securities |
| Maximum Shares To Buy | 24,913,439 shares |
| MINIMUM Shares To Buy | 16,609,000 shares |
| Currently Owned Shares | 100 shares |
| Irrevocable Undertakings | Sawada Holdings’ 3,088,500 shares or 12.40% (includes the holdings at both Sawada Holdings and HS Securities). |
This deal is probably reasonably straightforward.
- It is a big premium to last trade, and a multi-year high.
- There is one large holder publicly willing to sell and I expect the cross-holders would be willing to sell too.
- Management is involved and supportive.
Except it is being done (and recommended) at a 44% discount to Tangible Book Value Per Share after the directors managed to work Bain up from a 49% discount to TBVPS.
2. Itochu Confirms Intent to Deepen Hold over Descente
Itochu (8001 JP) continues a battle of words and equity as it attempts to gain more control over sports firm Descente (8114 JP).
Meanwhile, Descente has brought in Wacoal (3591 JP) as a white knight and made a splash in the business media about its recent success.
Itochu insists that Descente needs Itochu’s management skills, particularly to build a stronger business in China and other overseas markets, and says the only way to make Descente listen is to buy more stock – more than its current nearly 30%.
3. Nissan/Renault: French State Intervention Continues
This past week saw some interesting news out of the ongoing saga of governance and control that is the Renault SA (RNO FP)Nissan Motor (7201 JP) Alliance.
- A week ago, former Nissan Chief Performance Officer and onetime potential successor to Ghosn and/or Saikawa-san – Jose Munoz – who was put on leave to help Nissan deal with its internal investigation – resigned effective immediately. Some suggest this is the start of a bloodbath of Ghosn loyalists.
- Former Nissan CEO and still-CEO at Renault Carlos Ghosn was in court to appeal the decision to not allow him bail. I expect that will end up at the Supreme Court in not too long, but for the moment he might stay in detention for another 7-8 weeks.
- Nissan sources said (according to a Reuters report) earlier in the week they would be looking to file suit for damages against Ghosn.
- Nissan and Mitsubishi officially announced Friday that as a result of a joint investigation by Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors (7211 JP) into the Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance entity (Nissan Mitsubishi BV), it was discovered that “Ghosn entered into a personal employment contract with NMBV and that under that contract he received a total of 7,822,206.12 euros (including tax) in compensation and other payments of NMBV funds. Despite the clear requirement that any decisions regarding director compensation and employment contracts specifying compensation must be approved by NMBV’s board of directors, Ghosn entered into the contract without any discussion with the other board members, Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa and Mitsubishi Motors CEO Osamu Masuko, to improperly receive the payments.” Saikawa and Masuko were not informed and did not also get paid by the company. The NMBV entity will attempt to recoup the funds from Ghosn. Nissan and Mitsubishi are thinking of dissolving their Dutch alliance entity.
- The Nissan panel reviewing Nissan’s governance structure, made up of three independent directors and four external members, met for the first time Sunday. The proposals are due end-March, upon which the board will propose a new management system/structure for approval at the shareholder meeting at end-June 2019. The co-chair said in a comment after today’s meeting that Ghosn perhaps had questionable ethics.
- French business newspaper Les Echos carried an “exclusive” interview with Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa which was reasonably enlightening, or should have been from a French point of view. In the interview, Saikawa is adamant that he fully supports the Renault-Nissan Alliance saying that it was not just important but “crucial” and he “would do nothing to render it harm”, and that the French state’s stake in Renault “posed no problem at all” because the “French state does not impose in any way on Nissan.” Saikawa-san also noted that he had no intention of ridding Nissan of French/foreign employees.
- Renault Director Martin Vial visited Japan with French officials including Emmanuel Moulin – chief of staff to Bruno Le Maire, who is French Minister of the Economy – to meet with Hiroto Saikawa and Japanese officials Wednesday and Thursday. This trip was first reported by Le Figaro in the early hours of Wednesday morning (15 Jan) Asia time, and the point of the trip was reportedly to discuss the changes in governance at the top of Renault which might be coming – i.e. a new chairman as the French state and Renault’s independent directors appear to have decided that another two months of detention for Carlos Ghosn is enough to warrant a change even if they still presume his innocence in the charges brought in Japan. They were also to inquire after Ghosn’s case, though that seemed to have been secondary.
- As a sidebar to this trip, Bruno Le Maire came out Wednesday saying that the State had asked the Renault board to hold a board meeting to replace Ghosn, and said that the French state would leave it to Renault’s directors to choose, but also came out and said that Cie Generale Des Etablissement MIchelin (ML FP) CEO Jean-Dominique Senard would be a great choice (though other suggestions are that he might take the role of Chairman as others note that Renault Interim CEO Thierry Bolloré’s role could be made permanent). His comments about Mr. Senard included those suggesting that Mr. Senard adheres to certain ideas of the “social responsibilities” of the company – ideas which Mr. Le Maire shares.
Mr Le Maire also said this week…
“Nous souhaitons la pérennité de l’alliance. La question des participations au sein de l’alliance n’est pas sur la table.”
Another quote from an article which came out Saturday night at midnight Paris time was similar.
“Un rééquilibrage actionnarial, une modification des participations croisées entre Renault et Nissan n’est pas sur la table”, déclare Bruno Le Maire. “Nous sommes attachés au bon fonctionnement de cette alliance qui fait sa force.”
Both quotes say “we” (the French state) seek for the Alliance to continue functioning in a stable manner and changes of the crossholding relationship or ownership rates between the companies were not on the table.
The second appears to be a quote from the Journal du Dimanche (article linked above) which was probably conducted a day or two earlier – and it makes a reference to it having been conducted just after his return from Tokyo (it was not revealed earlier this week that he had made the trip with Mssrs. Vial and Moulin so this is something of a question mark).
All of this was out by Friday. It was all very measured and reassuring.
Then Sunday saw a bombshell dropped… again…
In the Nikkei and Bloomberg, it was revealed that the French visitors to Tokyo had informed Japanese officials of their intention to have Renault appoint the next chairman of Nissan (as apparently the Alliance agreement allows) and of the French State’s intention to seek to integrate Nissan and Renault under the umbrella of a single holding company.
This is interesting for three reasons…
- A holding company where the two companies stay listed does nothing that the Alliance does not do now except put a single board in place on top of both companies. That would be a Dutch Foundation structure. A holding company where one of the two companies loses its listing (because it is taken over) would require one of those companies lose a set of shareholders.
- A Dutch Foundation (which is effectively the same thing if the two companies stay listed) was an idea which a year ago in the previous kerfuffle last spring about merging was “not an option acceptable to the government” (Les Echos, 7-Mar-18)
- This is, once again, the French state seeking to intervene in the governance of Nissan. That’s a no-no according to the Alliance Agreement as modified in December 2015.
This is widely reported in English, Japanese, and French on Sunday.
There is a conciliatory article in Bloomberg with a headline suggesting a French official (Le Maire) downplayed the French comments about a holding company, but that refers to the JDD article, which is probably days old and repeated the same comment he made publicly earlier this week, reported by Les Echos and Le Figaro about a lack of change in cross-holding, but a careful read of the timeline suggests his comments were made in France before someone leaked this to the Nikkei.
Saikawa-san was reported to have said this morning (Monday 21 Jan 2019) that he had not heard about this, but that now was not the time to consider revising capital ties.
One should note, once again, that this is not the CEO or independent Chairman of Renault saying this. It is not the board or Nissan saying this. It is the French state.
What does this all mean? What are the possibilities and ramifications? Read on…
4. The GER Weekly EVENTS Wrap: Softbank, Xiaomi, Capitaland and Navitas
Have nascent bull cases developed for maligned Softbank Group (9984 JP) and Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK)? In this version of the GER weekly events wrap, we asses an interesting debt tender for Softbank Group (9984 JP) which could portend action for the equity. Secondly, we review our long-standing negative stance on Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK) after a very poor recent run. Finally, we are hesitant on the Capitaland Ltd (CAPL SP) acquisition and think a bump is possible for Navitas Ltd (NVT AU)
The rest of our event-driven research can be found below.
Best of luck for the new week – Rickin, Venkat and Arun
5. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Inter-City Pricing -9.1%
Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes.
This month’s issue covers the following topics:
- December express parcel pricing fell by over 9% Y/Y. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 9.1% Y/Y, the worst decline since Q216 (excluding January/February figures distorted by the Lunar New Year holiday).
- Express parcel revenue growth remained well below 20% last month. Weak pricing dragged sector revenue growth down to 17% in December, the 4th consecutive month of sub-20% growth.
- Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) was strong in 2018. Relative to weak inter-city pricing (down 3.1% Y/Y in 2018), pricing for intra-city express shipments was firm, rising by 0.1% last year. In fact, average pricing for intra-city express shipments has risen in four of the last five years.
- Underlying domestic transport demand remained firm in December. Although demand for inter-city express shipments appears to be moderating (from high levels), underlying transportation activity in December remained firm. The three modes of freight transport we track (rail, highway, air) in aggregate rose 6.6% Y/Y in December, even as the growth of air freight slowed.
We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing for inter-city shipments appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut, leading to margin compression.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
