Daily Japan: Global Banks: Why Buy High Into Popular and Fashionable Banks and Markets? Be Contrarian and Buy Low and more

In this briefing:

1. Global Banks: Why Buy High Into Popular and Fashionable Banks and Markets? Be Contrarian and Buy Low
2. Mitsubishi Selling off Stake in Aeon, Ministop in Limbo
3. Business Happenings in the Americas that May Be “Below the Radar” – Week Ending January 17, 2019
4. Japan: Relative Price Scores – Overbought and Oversold Companies – Calling ‘Tops’ & ‘Bottoms’
5. Courts Asia To Be Taken Over By Nojima

1. Global Banks: Why Buy High Into Popular and Fashionable Banks and Markets? Be Contrarian and Buy Low

Trawling through  >1500 global banks, based on the last quarter of reported Balance Sheets, we apply the discipline of the PH Score™ , a value-quality fundamental momentum screen, plus a low RSI screen, and a low Franchise Valuation (FV) screen to deliver our latest rankings for global banks.

While not all of top decile 1 scores are a buy – some are value traps while others maybe somewhat small and obscure and traded sparsely- the bottom decile names should awaken caution. We would be hard pressed to recommend some of the more popular and fashionable names from the bottom decile. Names such as ICICI Bank Ltd (ICICIBC IN) , Credicorp of Peru, Bank Central Asia (BBCA IJ) and Itau Unibanco Holding Sa (ITUB US) are EM favourites. Their share prices have performed well for an extended period and thus carry valuation risk. They represent pricey quality in some cases. They are not priced for disappointment but rather for hope. Are the constituents of the bottom decile not fertile grounds for short sellers?

Why pay top dollar for a bank franchise given risks related to domestic (let alone global) politics and the economy? Some investors and analysts have expressed “inspiration” for developments in Brazil and Argentina. But Brazilian bonds are now trading as if the country is Investment Grade again. (This is relevant for banks especially). Guedes and co. may deliver on pension/social security reform. If so, prices will become even more inflated. But what happens if they don’t deliver on reform? Why pay top dollar for hope given the ramp up in prices already? Argentina is an even more fragile “hope narrative”. More of a “Hope take 2”. Similar to Brazil, bank Franchise Valuations are elevated. While the current account adjustment and easing inflation are to be expected, the political and social scene will be a challenge. LATAM seems to be “hot” again with investment bankers talking of resilience. But resilience is different from valuation. Banks from Chile, Peru, and Colombia feature in the bottom decile too. If an investor wants to be in these markets and desires bank exposure, surely it makes sense to look for the best value on offer. Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (AVAL CB) may represent one such opportunity.

Our bottom decile rankings feature a great deal of banks from Indonesia. In a promising market such as Indonesia, given bank valuations, one needs to tread extremely carefully to not end up paying over the odds, to not pay for extrapolation. In addition, India is a susceptible jurisdiction for any bank operating there – no bank is “superhuman” and especially not at the prices on offer for the popular private sector “winners”. Saudi Arabia is another market that suddenly became popular last year. We are mindful of valuations and FX.

Does it not make more sense to look at opportunity in the top decile? While some of the names here will be too small or illiquid (mea culpa), there are genuine portfolio candidates. South Korea stands out in the rankings. Woori Bank (WF US) is top of the rankings after a share price plunge related to a stock overhang but this will pass. Hana Financial (086790 KS) , Industrial Bank of Korea (IBK LX) and DGB Financial Group (139130 KS) are portfolio candidates. Elsewhere, Russia and Vietnam rightly feature while Sri Lanka and Pakistan contribute some names despite very real political and macro risks. We would caution on some of the relatively small Chinese names but recommend the big 4 versus EM peers – they are not expensive. In fact some of the big 4 feature in decile 2 of our rankings. There are many Japanese banks here too. And many, like some Chinese lenders, are cheap for a reason. While the technical picture for Japanese banks is bearish, at some stage selective weeding out of opportunity within Japan’s banking sector may be rewarding. The megabanks are certainly not dear. Europe is another matter. Despite valuations, we are cautious on French lenders and on German consolidation narratives – did a merger of 2 weak banks ever deliver shareholder value? The inclusion of two Romanian banks in the top decile is somewhat of a headscratcher. These are perfectly investable opportunities but share prices have been poor of late.

2. Mitsubishi Selling off Stake in Aeon, Ministop in Limbo

Mitsubishi has finally given up its hope of convincing Aeon to merge Ministop (9946 JP) with Lawson and is selling its stake in the largest retail group.

There will be no change to the extensive supply relationship between the two companies and Mitsubishi’s food wholesale arm, Mitsubishi Shokuhin (7451 JP).

While Aeon seems to have spurned Mitsubishi for now, it is hard to see how Aeon will progress in the convenience store sector without Mitsubishi’s help. In the short-term Ministop looks like a poor investment but Aeon may have to sell to Mitsubishi eventually and will want a good price for it.

3. Business Happenings in the Americas that May Be “Below the Radar” – Week Ending January 17, 2019

Highlights of significant recent happenings include:

4. Japan: Relative Price Scores – Overbought and Oversold Companies – Calling ‘Tops’ & ‘Bottoms’

Source: Japan Analytics

RELATIVE PRICE SCORE – The Relative Price Score (RPS) measures stock price performance relative to TOPIX and is calculated by comparing the current deviation with the mean absolute deviation of monthly and daily relative share prices. As all companies are, as a result, on a comparable scale, ‘overbought’ and ‘oversold’ outliers and changes in scoring can reveal short-term and longer-term trading opportunities. This insight updates our list of overbought and oversold companies, reviews the best and worst performing companies by RPS over the last two months and adds some specific comments on stocks on each category.

RPS STATISTICS – The Company ‘outlier’ thresholds are set to “+4” for overbought and “-2” for oversold.  Currently, of the 3,686 listed companies for which monthly data is available, 91 companies are ‘Overbought’, and 120 are ‘Oversold’ – 2.5% and 3.2%, respectively of the total. For companies with a market capitalisation of over ¥100b, there are 35 ‘Overbought’ and 24 ‘Oversold’ companies. 

RPS ‘TOPS’ – In the last two years, 445 companies have achieved an RPS of ‘4’ or more. 80% have seen their RPS fall to below ‘4’ within the following two months. For companies with a market capitalisation higher than ¥100b, the numbers are 95 companies and 63% – demonstrating the superior persistence of large capitalisation companies in this regard. Some examples of RPS mean reversion in the last two months have been Descente (8114 JP),  Ariake Japan (2815 JP), Fancl (4921 JP), Bandai Namco (7832 JP), Don Quijote (7532 JP), and Gmo Payment Gateway (3769 JP).

RPS ‘BOTTOMS’ – 296 companies have seen their RPS fall to ‘-2’ or below in the last two years. 58% have seen their RPS recover to above ‘-2’ within three to six months. For larger capitalisation companies, the numbers are 72 companies and 67%. Some recent examples of positive RPS mean reversion in the last two months have been LINE Corp (3938 JP) – a ‘contrarians only’ selection in our last Insight, and Tokyo Electric Power (9501 JP).

5. Courts Asia To Be Taken Over By Nojima

Courts Asia Ltd (COURTS SP), a leading electrical, consumer electronics and furniture retailer in predominantly Singapore and Malaysia, has announced a voluntary conditional offer from Nojima Corp (7419 JP) at $0.205/share, a 34.9% premium to the last closing price.

The key condition to the Offer is the valid acceptances of 50% of shares out. Singapore Retail Group, with 73.8%, has given an irrevocable to tender. Once tendered, this offer will become unconditional.

CAL’s share price has endured a steady decline since touching $1.14 back in May 2015. It traded above the Offer price as recently as late-July 2018.

However, the controlling shareholder, which has maintained its stake since CAL’s listing in 2012, is cashing in. Nojima has stated it will exercise its right to compulsorily acquisition if acceptances reach 90%; and it does not intend to support any action or take steps to maintain the listing status of the company in the event its suspended due to free float requirements. I would look to cash out also. Consideration under the Offer may be remitted as early as the fourth week of Feb.