Brief Japan: Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and more

In this briefing:

1. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA
2. Yahoo Japan’s JV with OYO Could Be Big, If Tokyo Is Ready to “Co-Live”
3. 🇯🇵 Japan • Winter Large Cap Results & Revision Scores – Contrarian Buys & Sells/​Peak & Ex-Growth
4. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet
5. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

1. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA

Procurri Corporation (PROC SP) released FY18 results which showed the company growing revenues to 220M SGD (+21% vs FY17), EBITDA to 19.7M SGD (+185% vs FY17), PBT to 10.1M SGD (vs 2.3M loss in 2017) and a small net profit of 5.3M SGD which was artificially low because of an astronomical 47% tax rate. The high tax rate should reverse in 2H19 which would show the reported profitability of Procurri improve substantially. 

Procurri remains deep value trading at just 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and 0.4x 2018 EV/Sales. If we adjust the FY18 net profit figure(assume 30% tax rate vs 47%) the shares trade at a P/E multiple of just 13x.

The shareholder register of Procurri has seen a dramatic change YTD with multiple announcements on SGX. The most significant development is the entry of Singapore PE fund Novo Tellus acquiring a 29.6% stake on 19/2/19. Consequently this means that the biggest corporate overhang on Procurri (read: the control by Declout Ltd (DLL SP) ) is now almost over with their stake reduced to 17% from 47% previously.

Given the well-publicized track record of Novo Tellus at SGX listed Aem Holdings (AEM SP) the question is if Novo Tellus sees another multi-bagger in the making?

While a “10-bagger” type return like AEM is unlikely at Procurri, doubling the market cap from 90M to 180M SGD would not be impossible as Procurri continues to grow in FY19 and the depressed multiple expands modestly.

2. Yahoo Japan’s JV with OYO Could Be Big, If Tokyo Is Ready to “Co-Live”

• OYO, the largest budget hotel network in India, announced a JV with Yahoo Japan (4689 JP) to expand its co-living rental service, “OYO Living”, to Japan. OYO will own 66.1% while YJ will own the remainder of the JV, named “Oyo Technology & Hospitality Japan”. 

• Rebranded as “OYO Life”, the service would be the first of its kind, in the virtually non-existent co-living market in Japan. In Japan, apartments are usually compact single-occupier units as opposed to shared spaces, which might pose a problem for OYO’s co-living model. 

• Assuming the model is a success and OYO Life could ramp up its capacity to around 150,000 beds in Tokyo, which is around 5% of the total apartment stock in central Tokyo, this would contribute around ¥3bn (2% of net income in FY03/18) to Yahoo Japan’s net income. There is potential for further gains, however, this would depend on how ready Tokyo is to move into a “Co-Living” culture in masses.

3. 🇯🇵 Japan • Winter Large Cap Results & Revision Scores – Contrarian Buys & Sells/​Peak & Ex-Growth

Source: Japan Analytics

LARGE CAP RESULTS & REVISION SCORES – The final instalment of our series of reviews of Japan’s most recent earnings and revisions announcements covers the Results & Revision Scores for Japan’s 785 larger capitalisation companies with a market capitalisation of over ¥100b.

In the DETAIL section below we look at:- 

• The 30 top and bottom-ranked companies by Results & Revision Score as well as the top and bottom thirty ranked by change in score over the last quarter and provide brief comments on companies and topics of note.
• By comparing Results Scores and Forecast/Revision Scores, we sort companies into‘Optimists’, ‘Pessimists’, ‘Increasingly Optimistic’ and ‘Increasingly Pessimistic‘ categories.
• As shown above, the relationship between the Results & Revision Score (RRS) and our Relative Price Score (RPS) for each company and divide the large-cap universe into four ‘quadrants’ – ‘Contrarian Buy’ (Low RRS & Low RPS) , ‘Contrarian Sell’ (High RRS & High RPS), ‘Peak Growth’ (High RRS & Low RPS) and ‘Ex-Growth/Turnaround’  (Low RRS & High RPS), highlighting the outliers in each quadrant.
  • In the two ‘Contrarian‘ quadrants, the market is aligned with the current earnings momentum of the companies suggesting opportunities exist only for those willing or brave enough to take a contrarian view. 
  • For ‘Peak Growth‘, the market is calling for a downturn in momentum that has yet to be reflected in quarterly earnings. Where the cycle is more prolonged than expected, there are often opportunities for short-term rebounds in what are normally relatively-inexpensive companies.
  • The ‘Ex-Growth‘ quadrant often consists of former ‘Contrarian Sell‘s where the market is reluctant to acknowledge that the cycle has turned. This quadrant can also contain ‘Turnarounds‘ – formerly ‘Contrarian Buys‘ where the market is correctly anticipating a change in fortunes.   
• Finally, we provide tables of the top and bottom five ranked companies in each of our 30 Sectors.

4. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

5. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

As discussed in previous insights, Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) is currently the subject of a TOB (Takeover Bid) by an SPV established by Bain to acquire all the shares outstanding. This has been discussed in three different insights so far.
  ❖ Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
  ❖ Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms
  ❖ Kosaido TOB: Situation Gets Weird – Activists+Independent Opposition to MBO 

The TOB started as a lowball price TOB with the explanation that the MBO was needed to rehabilitate the printing/information business which makes up three-quarters of consolidated revenue of the company and is the basis upon which the company was founded decades ago.

A read between the lines showed quite quickly that the more ostensible reason for taking the company private was to be able to own 61% of the company which provided the other 25% of consolidated revenue and made up materially all of the operating profit of Kosaido over the past few years. And that business was being bought at just over half of book while the rest of the business was being bought for effectively zero.

My first insight questioned that despite “independent directors” not doing so, and an activist in the form of Yoshiaki Murakami’s firm Reno KK did something about it, quickly buying just under 10% of the company in the two weeks after announcement. On that news, the stock shot up to 30-40% through terms, and fell back, but since it started rising above terms and peaking, it has not fallen below about 15% through terms.

The New News

YESTERDAY, the directors of Kosaido released an amendment to their Statement of Support of the Tender Offer adding a phrase to the effect that “subsequent to the initial meeting where all the statutory auditors had expressed support, at the Board Meeting on the 25th of February, Independent Statutory Auditor Nakatsuji-[san] expressed his opposition to the Tender Offer.” This follows his notice of opposition on the 19th.

TODAY, the Offeror announced an Amendment to the Tender Offer and was extending its Tender Offer by 7 business days – from 30 business days to 37 business days – which has the effect of changing the Closing Date from March 1 to March 12.

With the shares 20% through terms (¥738/share as I write) despite what appears to be no increase by the main activist in the last two weeks, the likelihood retail will tender at ¥610/share this looks like a situation where the deal may fail unless there is a bump.

But it would still be up for grabs.