Daily BriefsJapan

Japan: Softbank Group, W Scope Corp, Sunac China Holdings, Tokyo Stock Exchange Tokyo Price Index Topix and more

In today’s briefing:

  • Softbank – Why We Think Arm Is Worth Less Than $10bn
  • W Scope (6619): Wrong Victim of Nickel Price Surge
  • Weekly Wrap – 18 Mar 2022
  • Japan’s Governance: What Are the Effective Factors for Stock Returns?

Softbank – Why We Think Arm Is Worth Less Than $10bn

By Mio Kato

  • Softbank is apparently trying to garner a $50bn valuation for Arm at its IPO and secure $8bn in margin loans on the back of that.
  • We think that is a stretch though it is certainly not impossible that it would succeed. 
  • However, in terms of real value we suspect Arm could be worth less than $10bn and articulate why below.

W Scope (6619): Wrong Victim of Nickel Price Surge

By Henry Soediarko

  • Nickel price was the catalyst for the share price underperformance in the last 2 weeks, especially after the Russian invasion of Ukraine which drove it up to a 100% increase.
  • Its main product is a lithium-ion secondary battery separator that is critical for rechargeable battery safety. Thus the sell-off due to the higher commodity price especially nickel is unwarranted.
  • W Scope Corp (6619 JP) share price has underperformed the NCM and LFP battery makers presents a compelling buying opportunity. 

Weekly Wrap – 18 Mar 2022

By Charles Macgregor

Lucror Analytics Weekly Wraps provide an overview of all Morning Views comments and reports published by our analyst team in the past week, and also showcase a list of the most-read reports.

In this Insight:

  1. CIFI Holdings
  2. China Jinmao Holdings
  3. Kaisa Group Holdings
  4. Guangzhou R&F Properties
  5. Sunac China Holdings

and more…


Japan’s Governance: What Are the Effective Factors for Stock Returns?

By Aki Matsumoto

  • During the period from December 2020 to February 2022, the increase in foreign ownership and the increase in Tobin’s q contributed to the increase in market capitalization.
  • Since it’s difficult to expect board practices to directly affect market capitalization over one-year, I maintain the hypothesis that improving board practices raise it by leading to improving key actions.
  • Regarding key actions, rather than implementation of individual shareholder return policies alone, systematic implementation of such policies in the context of growth and capital allocation management policies is more effective.

Before it’s here, it’s on Smartkarma