Brief Industrials: Tesla – Truth and Consequences and more

In this briefing:

1. Tesla – Truth and Consequences
2. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile
3. Harmonic Drive: Measuring the Potential Downside Risk

1. Tesla – Truth and Consequences

Tesla’s problems aren’t going away, they’re escalating:

• Elon Musk is in trouble again with the SEC;
• Tesla’s brand-new general counsel is leaving after just two months on the job;

• Consumer Reports withdrew its recommendation on the flagship Model 3 due to serious quality and reliability concerns–not actually surprising given increasing risks I have tracked  with Tesla quality controls curtailed and flawed cars increasingly delivered to customers (see “Musk and Weird Q3 Developments Are Driving Investors to Telsa’s Rivals” and “Tesla – Dave’s Not Here, and Musk Won’t Leave” and “Tesla: Down to the Wire”).

• The 2018 10-K filing confirms Tesla’s operations still are not generating consistently sustainable profits or cash flow unvarnished by substantial boosts from accounting maneuvers and unusual items as seen with the “miracle” third quarter (see “Great Magic Trick Tesla; Now Do it Again“)
• Which is bad news for first quarter results already foundering with pricing cuts, rising costs, unhappy customers, and escalating demand pressure;
• Plus liquidity strain worsened by $920 million in cash due to go out on March 1st to pay off maturing convertible bonds.
• Tesla Shanghai Gigafactory construction is underway and yet still not fully funded after at least six months of negotiations with bankers, and thus may also be developing differently versus what Tesla has presented (adding to my previously noted concerns in “Tesla – Shanghai Surprise“).

The common theme here is that all these problems were preventable, avoidable, and unnecessary. 

That’s not going away any time soon–as long as Musk remains in complete control.

How long will that be? 

Good question–Read on as Bond Angle analysis continues.

2. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile

Descente Ltd (8114 JP) has been in the press quite a bit in recent days with management commentary about how the company and directors disagree with the Tender Offer launched by Itochu Corp (8001 JP) to raise their stake from 30% to 40% and how it could lead to conflict of interest and worsening management, lower morale for employees, and a loss of independence.

Management, former management, and former employees have all joined the party. Wednesday saw a significant sell-down of shares to a post-Tender Offer low, but it was not clear why.

Descente had, on the 26th, noted in a puff piece in the Nikkei that it would move up the release of its next Mid-Term (Three Year) Plan (normally due in May this year), and it would focus on growing direct sales in China through more stores, growing sales in the US through adding products to the list (currently the major product in North America is skiwear), selling LeCoq Sportif in Indonesia and Munsingwear in Vietnam. WHEN is unknown, but the explicit goal is to encourage shareholders to keep their shares rather than tender them to Itochu.

Today saw a new filing from Itochu in which it amended its original announcement, claimed Descente’s activity in the media was additional and additive to the Target Company Position Statement filed on 7 February, and for that reason, their activity had not been appropriately disclosed to shareholders. Furthermore, Itochu noted that while the jibber-jabber had been going on the last two-plus weeks, Descente had asked Itochu to negotiate post-Tender management structure plans, and Itochu had agreed. Itochu and Descente talked for 9 days from 11-20 Feb but Descente was bad-mouthing Itochu in the press at the same time. That induced Itochu to stop talks. And late today, the Nikkei has released a 27 February interview with the CEO of ANTA, Itochu’s longtime textile partner in China and a 6.86% holder of Descente shares, where he says that he supports Itochu’s tender offer, will not sell their shares in Descente, and would support Itochu efforts to restructure management. 

These three new developments change things in interesting ways, in my opinion pushing Descente’s own plans closer to Itochu’s, and introducing the possibility of significantly more hostility to come, with a much higher likelihood Itochu can win the proxy wars to come. 

In-depth analysis below the fold.

Previous insights on the situation and its runup are listed below.

3. Harmonic Drive: Measuring the Potential Downside Risk

With Harmonic Drive Systems (6324 JP) having rebounded as much as 56% from its trough this year, risk-reward looks decidedly less attractive now. While we had been somewhat constructive on the name due to order looking like they have a hit bottom, a closer analysis of the breakdown of orders has us thinking that a potential rebound could underwhelm relative to the markets revenue expectations and that the stock’s premium multiple could leave it more vulnerable than more modestly priced peers.