Industrials

Brief Industrials: SBS (2384) A Great Third Party Logistics Company Seeing Good Organic Growth as Well as Via M&A. and more

In this briefing:

  1. SBS (2384) A Great Third Party Logistics Company Seeing Good Organic Growth as Well as Via M&A.
  2. Xenith Is Running Out Of Excuses
  3. DHICO Rights Offer: Arb Yields for Early Arb Traders & Trade Approach for Late Arb Traders
  4. Small Cap Diary: Rajthanee Hospital, CAZ
  5. New J Hutton – Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 22/03/19)

1. SBS (2384) A Great Third Party Logistics Company Seeing Good Organic Growth as Well as Via M&A.

2384

It is seeing decent organic growth, led by a focus on third party logistics (3PL). This will carry on. The recently acquired Ricoh Logistics should eventually see margins improve as it is integrated into SBS. This year’s operating profit forecast of Y9bn (+10%) is conservative. An increase of Y1bn this year will come from Ricoh Logistics alone, and then we have organic growth. In our view operating profit will be at least Y10bn. There is the unrealised profit on land, which add some Y85bn to a company whose market cap is Y71bn. Despite the outperformance over the last 12 months, this remains a decent long-term domestic buy, and one in which foreigners still own only 12%. The shares trade on 13x 12/19 assuming an operating profit of Y10bn. 

2. Xenith Is Running Out Of Excuses

Price3

When IPH Ltd (IPH AU) gate-crashed Xenith Ip (XIP AU)/Qantm Intellectual Property (QIP AU)‘s marriage of equals, submitting a scheme proposal comprising cash (A$1.28) and IPH shares (0.1056 IPH shares) or A$1.97/share, versus QANTM’s all-cash offer (1.22 QANTM), the key risk to IPH’s Offer was ACCC opposing its Offer. As announced today, ACCC will not oppose.

This decision was largely expected and previously discussed here. Although IPH, QANTM, and Xenith are the only three ASX-listed intellectual property companies, privately owned companies collectively hold a larger market share – and growing – compared to the three listcos. The ACCC agrees and signed off on an IPH/XIP tie-up as it did on the 21 March, by not opposing the merger of XIP and QANTM.

XIP acknowledged the ACCC decision resolves a major uncertainty, but stops short of supporting IPH’s offer as there still exists a number of concerns as detailed in its 19 March announcement. IPH responded to those concerns on the 20 March. These include:

  1. Shareholders of Xenith will hold an immaterial % of the merged IPH entity compared to QANTM.
    • IPH’s scrip portion accounted for (then) 35% of its Offer (now ~37%), shares which have superior liquidity versus QANTM given IPH’s position in the ASX200. 
    • The cash portion also provides added certainty on value into the Offer compared to QANTM’s all scrip offer.
  2. The control premium as at 11 March is insufficient.
    • Probably the most contentious concern. QANTM’s all-scrip offer on the 27 November backed out an indicative offer price of $1.598/share or a 28.4% premium to last close.
    • IPH’s $1.97/share indicative offer (a 60% premium to XIP’s undisturbed price, and a 31% premium to the independent expert’s mid-point fair value (page 55)) compared to QANTM’s indicative offer of $2.03 immediately before IPH’s announcement.
    • Circumstances have changed materially since, with IPH’s cash/scrip offer now worth $2.02 as I type, versus $1.67 for QANTM.
      Source: CapIQ
  3. The increased execution risk concerning ACCC. Now a non-issue.
  4. It is questionable whether employees, controlling 40% of Xenith, would support the offer.
    • Employees are free to decide on what they consider to be the most compelling Offer. IPH has offered to hold discussions with XIP employees. 
  5. CGT rollover will likely be lower via the large cash element under IPH’s offer vs. QANTM’s all scrip offer.
    • Maybe. Possibly. An all-scrip offer typically affords greater rollover relief. Nevertheless, Xenith is trading below its 2015 IPO price of $2.72/share.

With IPH’s 19.9% blocking stake, the QANTM/Xenith scheme is a non-starter. Xenith still should engage with IPH. The scheme meeting to decide on the QANTM Offer is scheduled for the 3 April.

3. DHICO Rights Offer: Arb Yields for Early Arb Traders & Trade Approach for Late Arb Traders

7

  • As well expected, DHICO was heavily shorted yesterday, ex-rights day. We had a heavy buying movement by short-term arb traders at both local and foreign on DHICO right before ex-rights. As shown in the second table, yesterday’s shorting was mostly done by short-term traders again both local and foreign alike.
  • These early arb traders had presumably bought DHICO shares at ₩8,076 on Mar 25~26. They then disposed shares at ₩6,974 yesterday. They then shorted the same amount of shares additionally at ₩6,983. As a result, at ceiling price ₩5,550 their yield is virtually fixed at 4.10%. If the offering price goes down to the bottom of ₩5,000 which is a very high possibility at this point, their yield will go up as high as 10.91%.
  • For those who haven’t made early moves, there are now two options to play this event. You can either trade now and hope that subscription right price won’t hit breaking price level or wait until Apr 19~25 subscription rights period for a perfectly risk-free entry point. At the current price ₩6,800, breaking price for subscription rights is still at a comfortable level. That is, I’d make trades right now by shorting DHICO shares.

→ DHICO price just got down nearly 3%. At this reduced price, below are updated numbers for late arb traders’ arb yield. To me, it still seems we won’t be in a losing position if we make trades now. But we’d better hurry up.

4. Small Cap Diary: Rajthanee Hospital, CAZ

We visited two small-cap companies from totally different industries today. These are the key highlights.

  • Rajthanee Hospital, a small hospital chain based in Ayuthya, achieved 15.7% revenue growth CAGR since 2016 on the back of its proximity to industrial estates.
  • CAZ has seen its backlog double to Bt2.5bn largely due to its good relations with major clients (PTT) and partners (Samsung and other Korean chaebol), which dole out projects in the oil & gas sector to it.
  • Internally, CAZ follows a sophisticated cost control method sporting bar codes and GPS to track materials and dedicated cost-control staff.

5. New J Hutton – Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 22/03/19)

Figure%205

Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma

Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.