In this briefing:
- Nongshim Holdings Stub Trade: Time for Holdco To Catch Up
- M1 Offer Coming – Market Odds Suggest a Bump But…
- Healthscope (HSO AU): A Material Bump to Brookfield’s Offer Is Doubtful
- Reality Check 2019: What Premium Does Thanachart Deserve from TMB’s Takeover?
- Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon
1. Nongshim Holdings Stub Trade: Time for Holdco To Catch Up
- Nongshim Co Ltd (004370 KS) is responsible for 70% of Nong Shim Holdings Co (072710 KS) NAV. Holdco is currently at a 54% discount to NAV. This is a 2 year low.
- Thanks to improved Korea-China relation, Opco (004320 KS) shares have nicely rebounded lately. Nongshim Holdco hasn’t caught up. This created the highest price ratio gap in 2 years. On a 20D MA, they are close to the mean. But on a 2 year mean, Holdco is currently and still severely undervalued.
- Liquidity has played a major role in the recent price gap widening. At a rebounding cycle like this, liquidity must have been a huge factor. But it shouldn’t be too long until Holdco catches up. Opco has kinda drifted sideways for a while now. This should be time for Holdco to begin a catchup.
2. M1 Offer Coming – Market Odds Suggest a Bump But…
Singapore telecom firm M1 announced on the 28th of December 2018 that Konnectivity Pte. Ltd. (a company jointly owned by Keppel Corp Ltd (KEP SP) and Singapore Press Holdings (SPH SP)) had made a Voluntary Conditional General Offer following the satisfaction of the pre-condition (IMDA approval) mentioned in the pre-conditional offer made in September.
The offer is to buy a minimum of 16.69% of the total share capital of M1 at a price of S$2.06 in order to increase the collective holding of the acquirer and its related parties from the current level of 33.32% to 50+% of fully-diluted shares (current shares out + 26.826mm Options + ~2.1mm Award shares).
The Offerors will buy all shares tendered if they get to a minimum of 50+%.
The other terms and conditions of this deal will be set out in the offer document which is expected to be despatched in mid-January 2019 (14-21 days from 28 December).
The offer price of S$2.06 translated to a premium of 26.4% to the undisturbed price before the trading halt for the pre-conditional offer. At the time of writing, the stock is trading at S$2.10 which is higher than the proposed Offer Price, indicating the market is expecting a bump or an overbid.
We’ll see.
3. Healthscope (HSO AU): A Material Bump to Brookfield’s Offer Is Doubtful
Healthscope Ltd (HSO AU), Australia’s second-largest private hospital operator, is caught again in a bidding war between Brookfield Asset Management (BAM US) and BGH-AustralianSuper. On 21 December 2018, Healthscope extended exclusive due diligence with Brookfield. Brookfield noted that it has “no reason to believe it would not be willing and able to proceed” with its proposal.
The popular narrative is that should a binding proposal materialise; shareholders can expect a bidding war among the existing bidders, and potential new bidders as Healthscope is “in play”. While there is there is a possibility for some ‘‘sweetening’’ to the bid price, we think that that the formal “winning” bid is unlikely to be materially above the current Brookfield bid.
4. Reality Check 2019: What Premium Does Thanachart Deserve from TMB’s Takeover?
As the merger between TMB and Thanachart gets a nudge from the Ministry of Finance and could be finalized this month, we try to answer a few questions in this review:
- Takeover premium. Based on our estimates, the potential improvements in ROE from the merger and potential divestment of MBK, we think it justifies an Bt11.1/sh premium for Thanachart. The new best case price target for Thanachart stands at Bt64.25/sh, implying a 29% premium over current share price.
- Negotiations will play a key role in the actual takeover price. We provide a table of how much money is left on the table for TMB if they acquire TCAP at lower than what we expect.
- Benefits. Thanachart has a higher ROE than TMB and appears smaller but better managed. The merger would allow TMB to re-enter the securities business (more cross-selling), enlarge its asset management franchise, and scale up deposit base for both banks…more so on the Thanachart side.
- Size. Even after the merger, the combined bank would still have a much smaller headcount than BAY, smallest of the five largest Thai banks. However, it would have more branches than BAY and just 11% less branches than KBANK.
5. Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon
- Hyosung Corporation (004800 KS) had fallen 16% just in two days. Holdco is now at a 50% discount to NAV. This is a 10%p drop from 10 days ago (Dec 19). Holdco price must have been overly corrected. The ongoing police investigation on Cho Hyun-joon’s alleged crime won’t lead to a delisting. 10%p drop in discount to NAV must be a price divergence, not a sensible price correction.
- Trade volume remained steady. Local hedge funds led the selling on Dec 27. Even they changed their position the following day. No short selling spike has been seen either. Hyosung is one of the highest yielding div holdco stocks. Hyosung Capital liquidation and Anyang Plant revaluation would be another short-term plus.
- I’d exploit this price divergence. It would soon revert to the Dec 19 discount level. It should at least stay at the peer average.