In this briefing:
- Japan Display: Squeezing Up 36% As Chinese Investment Could Solve Balance Sheet Troubles
- Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time for 1P to Catch Up
- Wonik Merger Swap: Div-Adjusted Yield Is Now at 4.17% – Cancellation Risk Is Slim
- Share Classifications: Mid-December 2018 Snapshot
- Hengan Intl. (1044 HK): Our Analysis Suggests that Bonitas’ Allegations Have Some Substance
1. Japan Display: Squeezing Up 36% As Chinese Investment Could Solve Balance Sheet Troubles
As we mentioned in a comment in Japan Display: Cost Structure Improvement Is Good but Shipment Delay and IPhone XR Cloud Outlook the NHK reported last night that JDI was in talks with a Chinese consortium to secure something in the region of ¥50bn in funding (more than its market cap yesterday) for a more than 33% stake in the company. The Nikkei shed light on the identities of some of the consortium this morning mentioning investment fund Silk Road, Minth Group Ltd (425 HK) and Shenzhen O Film Tech Co A (002456 CH). Bloomberg has also mentioned that the consortium could invest a further ¥500bn to establish a new facility in China for the production of OLED panels.
We spoke to the company this morning to get colour on these announcements.
2. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time for 1P to Catch Up
- 1P (005385 KS) was supposed to make a catchup move yesterday relative to 2P (005387 KS). But it didn’t. Price ratio is currently well below -1 σ. Div yield difference is at 0.53%p. This is close to yearly high. At this level, 1P has no other way but to catch up with 2P.
- In my previous insight, I suggested holding onto 1P/2P long/short position. This trade hasn’t performed well. We are at a 5.07% loss at yesterday’s closing. I’d still hold onto this position for the same reasonings as before.
- Tricky one is the recently announced hydrogen cell investment. This may be seen as something boosting Common and likely 2P. Hydrogen cell investment should rather be considered as a signal that the HMG-government relation has vastly improved. This suggests that the restructuring may get accelerated. Anything positively affecting the restructuring should be positive on 1P.
3. Wonik Merger Swap: Div-Adjusted Yield Is Now at 4.17% – Cancellation Risk Is Slim
- Wonik IPS (240810 KS) / Wonik Tera Semicon (123100 KS) merger got shareholder approval yesterday. Spread now stands at 4.28%. Spread peaked at 5.12% on Dec 12. Dividend-adjusted spread is 4.17%.
- Tera Semicon is a bit of a concern. Its stock purchase price is 1.38% higher than current price. Worst case would be half of the minority shareholders claiming rights. Even if so, this would be less than ₩60bil. The company is liquid enough to absorb it.
- Local institutional arb traders have been seen doing this trade, at least partly. I’d make this trade when spread widens to 5~6%. I expect it to get to this level very soon.
4. Share Classifications: Mid-December 2018 Snapshot
This weekly share class summary is a companion insight to Travis Lundy‘s H/A Spread & Southbound Monitor – most recently discussed in H/A Spread & Southbound Monitor – Going Into Year End.
This share class monitor provides a snapshot of the premium/discounts for various share classifications around the region, and comprises four sets of data:
1. 82 ADRs
2. 105 Korean Prefs
3. 22 Regional Dual Classes
4. 7 Foreign/Local Thai shares
The average premium/discount for each set over a one-year period is graphed below.
![](https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/073/085/original/Screenshot%202018-12-13%20at%209.10.30%20PM.png?1544706669)
For a granular breakdown of each set, PDFs are attached at the bottom of this insight.
5. Hengan Intl. (1044 HK): Our Analysis Suggests that Bonitas’ Allegations Have Some Substance
Hengan Intl Group (1044 HK), China’s leading sanitary towel and nappy producer, has been targeted by a short seller, Bonitas Research. Hengan has denied Bonitas’ allegations to which Bonitas has responded that Hengan’s response was weak and evasive. The shares have continued to slide suggesting that investors are less than convinced with Hengan’s rebuttal.
The aim of our note is to analyse alternative financial metrics to judge if Bonitas’ allegations are groundless or have some substance. Overall, our analysis suggests that Bonitas’ claims have some substance and investors should not be so quick to dismiss them.