Event-Driven

Daily Event-Driven: API Tilts at Sigma Healthcare: Expect More and more

In this briefing:

  1. API Tilts at Sigma Healthcare: Expect More
  2. Japan Display: Squeezing Up 36% As Chinese Investment Could Solve Balance Sheet Troubles
  3. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time for 1P to Catch Up
  4. Wonik Merger Swap: Div-Adjusted Yield Is Now at 4.17% – Cancellation Risk Is Slim
  5. Share Classifications: Mid-December 2018 Snapshot

1. API Tilts at Sigma Healthcare: Expect More

Screenshot%202018 12 14%20at%208.35.57%20pm

Friday morning, wholesale and retail pharmacy health/beauty and lifestyle products operator Australian Pharmaceutical Industries (API AU) announced that it had become a substantial shareholder in wholesale and retail pharmacy health/beauty and lifestyle products operator Sigma Healthcare Ltd (SIG AU) by purchasing 137.26mm shares. Roughly 52.5mm of those shares were purchased between A$0.53 and A$0.63/share between 5 September (the day before the half-year report came out) and 10 October and the other ~84.8mm shares were purchased Thursday 13 December at A$0.64, bringing the total position to 12.95%. 

It turns out that on 11 October, API made an indicative non-binding proposal to Sigma through a Scheme of Arrangement whereby Sigma shareholders would receive 0.31 shares of API and A$0.23 in cash for each share of Sigma held. 

That offer is now made public.

Worth A$0.686 per Sigma share as of announcement, the Indicative Proposal comes at a 69% premium to the close of trading on 13 December and a 46.8% premium to the one-month average. It is, however, a 10% premium to where API was buying shares on market in September and October. API shares were up a further 8+% on Friday, lifting terms further.

Sigma traded up 43% Friday to A$0.58 against terms which are now ~A$0.723, so there is still 24.7% upside to terms and there might be further upside on further synergy bullishness.

The Scheme Proposal is based on publicly available information, is subject to a number of conditions precedent, ACCC approval, due diligence, and confirmation of what they see as cost synergies.

This deal is somewhat opportunistic after recent troubles at Sigma, and I expect the ongoing strategic review at Sigma (assisted by Accenture) will come out saying that on a standalone basis after fixing itself up it is worth more than where it has been trading. The question is whether a merger would accelerate both the internal efforts at Sigma and improve competitiveness through cost synergies.

Allan Gray was the seller of the 8% stake yesterday it appears. The CIO is quoted in the API announcement as saying they support consolidation in the pharmaceutical wholesaling sector and are “positively disposed to efforts to expedite this consolidation.” They support it to such an extent that they decided to cut in half their participation in the economics of such efforts at expediting this consolidation. 

First time indicative opportunistic offers in Australia can be an arbitrageurs’ graveyard. 

2. Japan Display: Squeezing Up 36% As Chinese Investment Could Solve Balance Sheet Troubles

As we mentioned in a comment in  Japan Display: Cost Structure Improvement Is Good but Shipment Delay and IPhone XR Cloud Outlook the NHK reported last night that JDI was in talks with a Chinese consortium to secure something in the region of ¥50bn in funding (more than its market cap yesterday) for a more than 33% stake in the company. The Nikkei shed light on the identities of some of the consortium this morning mentioning investment fund Silk Road, Minth Group Ltd (425 HK) and  Shenzhen O Film Tech Co A (002456 CH). Bloomberg has also mentioned that the consortium could invest a further ¥500bn to establish a new facility in China for the production of OLED panels.

We spoke to the company this morning to get colour on these announcements.

3. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time for 1P to Catch Up

13

  • 1P (005385 KS) was supposed to make a catchup move yesterday relative to 2P (005387 KS). But it didn’t. Price ratio is currently well below -1 σ. Div yield difference is at 0.53%p. This is close to yearly high. At this level, 1P has no other way but to catch up with 2P.
  • In my previous insight, I suggested holding onto 1P/2P long/short position. This trade hasn’t performed well. We are at a 5.07% loss at yesterday’s closing. I’d still hold onto this position for the same reasonings as before.
  • Tricky one is the recently announced hydrogen cell investment. This may be seen as something boosting Common and likely 2P. Hydrogen cell investment should rather be considered as a signal that the HMG-government relation has vastly improved. This suggests that the restructuring may get accelerated. Anything positively affecting the restructuring should be positive on 1P.

4. Wonik Merger Swap: Div-Adjusted Yield Is Now at 4.17% – Cancellation Risk Is Slim

4

  • Wonik IPS (240810 KS) / Wonik Tera Semicon (123100 KS) merger got shareholder approval yesterday. Spread now stands at 4.28%. Spread peaked at 5.12% on Dec 12. Dividend-adjusted spread is 4.17%.
  • Tera Semicon is a bit of a concern. Its stock purchase price is 1.38% higher than current price. Worst case would be half of the minority shareholders claiming rights. Even if so, this would be less than ₩60bil. The company is liquid enough to absorb it.
  • Local institutional arb traders have been seen doing this trade, at least partly. I’d make this trade when spread widens to 5~6%. I expect it to get to this level very soon. 

5. Share Classifications: Mid-December 2018 Snapshot

Screenshot%202018 12 13%20at%209.10.30%20pm

This weekly share class summary is a companion insight to Travis Lundy‘s H/A Spread & Southbound Monitor – most recently discussed in H/A Spread & Southbound Monitor – Going Into Year End.   

This share class monitor provides a snapshot of the premium/discounts for various share classifications around the region, and comprises four sets of data:

1.  82 ADRs
2.  105 Korean Prefs
3.  22 Regional Dual Classes
4.  7 Foreign/Local Thai shares 

The average premium/discount for each set over a one-year period is graphed below.

Source: CapIQ

For a granular breakdown of each set, PDFs are attached at the bottom of this insight.