Event-Driven

Brief Event-Driven: Minebea-Mitsumi Underpriced Tender for U SHIN (6985 JP) Launched and more

In this briefing:

  1. Minebea-Mitsumi Underpriced Tender for U SHIN (6985 JP) Launched
  2. Korea M&A Spotlight: LGUplus to Acquire CJ Hellovision: What’s Next for Tbroad and D’Live?
  3. Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium
  4. BGF Holdco/Sub Trade: Sub Overbuying Wouldn’t Last Another Day
  5. Oslo Børs, Euronext and Nasdaq – Shootout at the NOK Corral

1. Minebea-Mitsumi Underpriced Tender for U SHIN (6985 JP) Launched

Screenshot%202019 02 14%20at%206.15.31%20pm

Three months ago, Minebea Mitsumi (6479 JP) announced that it would launch a Tender Offer for U Shin Ltd (6985 JP) and it would take just under three months until the approvals were received and it could officially start the Tender Offer process. It took a couple of weeks longer, as proposed by U Shin’s update on 30 January, which indicated anti-trust approvals had been received.

The background to the Tender Offer was discussed in Minebea Mitsumi Launches Offer for U-SHIN in early November.

My first conclusion in November was that this was the “riskiest” straight-out non-hostile TOB I had seen in a while. 

This is a wide-open deal. The buyer owns 1 round lot. The largest holder is an activist. The deal is being proposed at not such a super-high multiple (8x forecast FY earnings for the year ending 31 December 2018) and 4.9x EV/EBITDA. It is 3.7-4.0x when taking into account the 67 different equity positions they held at the end of last year, some of which they have recently liquidated. 

from (8 Nov 2018) Minebea Mitsumi Launches Offer for U-SHIN

In the interim, the activist dropped their position in half (necessitating a filing of a Large Shareholder Report for going below 5% – and they may have completely liquidated by now), and an investment bank has gone above 5% since then.

data source: investing.com

The financial advisory “valuations” at the time were more than questionable. A discussion of the valuation levels can be found in the previous insight (I don’t need to repeat them here, just go there).

Today, the company raised its OP and Ordinary Income forecasts for the year ended 31 December 2018, but lowered its Net Income forecast by 98.8% due to writeoffs at many overseas facilities. Then the promptly reported earnings (also only in Japanese) a few seconds later (only available in Japanese). 

Op is now forecast to drop 2% in 2019 vs 2018, but the 2019 forecast is 11+% higher than the 2018 forecast was just yesterday. The forecast for Net Income is ¥99.35/share, putting the deal at <10x forecast PER. And even less if one considers that the cross-shareholdings could be reduced. 

The New News

Today Minebea Mitsumi announced the launch of its Tender Offer, to commence tomorrow, at the same price as originally planned (¥985/share), and to run for 38 days. 

This deal is still perplexing to me. It’s easy enough from an industrial standpoint. I mean, why not buy relatively cheap assets then see if you can cross-sell or assume some attrition. But for investors… I wonder why they put up with this.

2. Korea M&A Spotlight: LGUplus to Acquire CJ Hellovision: What’s Next for Tbroad and D’Live?

  • It was finally announced today that LG Uplus Corp (032640 KS) will acquire a 50 percent + one share in Cj Hellovision (037560 KS) for 800 billion won.
  • LG Uplus’ acquisition of CJ Hellovision is likely to further accelerate the consolidation of the Korean cable TV/media sector. KT Corp (030200 KS) is now likely to aggressively try to acquire D’Live cable company. SK Telecom (017670 KS) has shown some interests in acquiring Tbroad cable company. 
  • Potential M&A Valuation Price for Tbroad- If we assume our base case EV/EBITDA valuation multiple to be 5.5x for Tbroad and assume annualized EBITDA of 181.8 billion won in 2018, this would suggest an implied EV of 1.0 trillion won. After adjusting for net cash, the implied market cap would be 1.2 trillion won for Tbroad. Thus, if Taekwang Industrial decides to sell just over 50% stake in Tbroad, this could potentially be worth about 600 billion won. Taekwang Industrial currently has a market cap of 1.7 trillion won so its stake (53.9% stake in Tbroad) could be nearly 35% the value of its entire market cap.
  • The long battle to acquire CJ Hellovision has been completed (with the final stamp of approval from FTC). This move should help to consolidate the cable TV industry with SK Telecom and KT potentially battling out for either Tbroad or D’Live. In the midst of these uncertainties, there could be some further positive momentum for Taekwang Industrial (003240 KS), the majority owner of Tbroad.

3. Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium

Share%20price

Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) has announced its major shareholder, Guangxin Aluminium (a wholly-owned Guangdong SASAC vehicle), has acquired 5,000 shares, lifting its stake to 30.001%, triggering a mandatory general offer. The offer price is $5.60, a premium of just 2.94% to last close.

Guangxin, together with certain management of Xingfa, attempted to take Xingfa private at $3.70/share back in 1H17. That scheme failed comprehensively, which was a good outcome for minorities as FY17 net income increased 28%. 1H18 profit was also a 25% improvement over the corresponding period.

The offer price is in line to where Xingfa traded last October and 23% below the recent peak back in mid-June 2018. It is also 37% below where China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) acquired its 26.3% stake in April last year.

At a guess, this low-ball offer provides an exit for large(r) investor with regards to Xingfa’s low liquidity. But no irrevocables have been given and the Offer remains conditional on Guangxin holding 50% of the voting votes.

As expected, Xingfa is currently trading 1.4% through terms. For those interested in small-cap, illiquid stocks, I would buy around these levels to play the back-end, or the (remote) possibility of a bump. The offer has not been declared final.

4. BGF Holdco/Sub Trade: Sub Overbuying Wouldn’t Last Another Day

1

  • BGF Sub had a 5.39% gain on better-than-expected 4Q18 results. Holdco stayed flat. As a result, we had a 2+σ jump from 95% of σ to -133% of σ. This is the widest jump in 120D. Holdco discount is currently at 47% to NAV.
  • On a 120D horizon, price ratio is still well below 120D mean. Despite recent gains, Holdco price relative to Sub is nearly 20+%p down since 120D ago. 4Q results seem to be encouraging. But local sentiments are still heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. 4Q results aren’t strong enough to turn the tide drastically.
  • Sub has been one of the most heavily shorted stocks in Korea lately. Yesterday’s huge gain might have been a short covering. This shouldn’t be a structural price pushing up for Sub. Sub staying below -1σ wouldn’t last another day. I expect a quick mean reversion at this point.

5. Oslo Børs, Euronext and Nasdaq – Shootout at the NOK Corral

Oslo%20ns%20top%20shareholders%20as%20of%2031jan19 3

Oslo Bors VPS Holding ASA (OSLO NS) based in Oslo, Norway, is an owner and operator of marketplaces for the trading of financial instruments as well as settlement, securities registration and information services. It includes Oslo Børs, the central marketplace for the listing and trading of equities, equity certificates, ETPs, fixed income instruments and derivative products in the Norwegian market, and VPS, the only central securities depository in Norway.

OSLO NS is the target of competing tender offers from Euronext NV (ENX FP) and Nasdaq Inc (NDAQ US). Euronext owns 5.3% and has irrevocables for 45.2% of OSLO NS shares, for 50.5% total. It launched an Offer to acquire all shares at NOK 145, and just raised that to NOK 158 on February 11, 2019. Nasdaq has irrevocables for 35.2% of OSLO NS shares and has launched an Offer to acquire all OSLO NS shares at NOK 152 per share. Nasdaq’s Offer received the unanimous recommendation of Oslo Børs VPS’s Board when it was announced. As things stand there are two deep-pocketed bidders, each with a large slug of shares in their corner at loggerheads.

Has this contest for a Norwegian company reached a Mexican standoff[i] between an American powerhouse and a Franco/Dutch European champion? Or will the dust clear after pistols at dawn, providing a clear view of a winner? Read on for the Good, The Bad and the Ugly.

________________________________________________________________

[i] According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a Mexican standoff is “A deadlock, stalemate, impasse; a roughly equal (and frequently unsatisfactory) outcome to a conflict in which there is no clear winner or loser; (also formerly) a massacre in cold blood.”

Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma

Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.