Event-Driven

Brief Event-Driven: Diageo Proposes Another Partial Tender for Sichuan Swellfun and more

In this briefing:

  1. Diageo Proposes Another Partial Tender for Sichuan Swellfun
  2. Yahoo Japan’s JV with OYO Could Be Big, If Tokyo Is Ready to “Co-Live”
  3. Hanergy’s Hobson’s Choice
  4. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref
  5. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

1. Diageo Proposes Another Partial Tender for Sichuan Swellfun

Screenshot%202019 02 27%20at%201.22.59%20pm

UK alcoholic drinks conglomerate Diageo Plc (DGE LN) bought a stake in Sichuan Swellfun Co Ltd A (600779 CH) in 2007, then through a 49% stake in Sichuan Chengdu Quanxing Group which owned ~40% of the Chinese baiju maker. In 2011 Diageo raised its stake in Sichuan Chengdu Quanxing Group from 49% to 53% by paying US$21mm to Chengdu Yingsheng Investment Holding Co. which lowered its stake to 47%.

In 2013, Diageo spent £233m to buy out Chengdu Yingsheng Investment Holding Co.’s 47% to go from a consolidated 21.05% to 39.71% in Swellfun (which is also named Sichuan Shui Jing Fang, after one of its brands).

Last summer, Diageo offered to buy 20.29% of the shares outstanding in a Partial Tender Offer (PTO) which was announced June 25th leading to a brief pop to RMB 60.0, and then launched a few weeks later at RMB 62.00 a share, which was a 22.6% premium to the then-current share price. The shares paid a RMB 0.62 dividend on August 1st and the PTO price was lowered to RMB 61.38 accordingly.

Last year’s Partial Tender was for 99,127,820 shares to be acquired out of a total free-float of 294,546,100 shares, which gave a minimum pro-ration of 36.65%. Surprisingly, pro-ration ended up being quite low at ~40.1%. The shares fell sharply and buy-and-tender trades done at the low were OK but in the mid 50s were not.

The shares languished as the economy softened, real estate transactions slowed, and conspicuous consumption continued to be frowned upon, and buy-and-tender-and-own-back-end trades did not do well (though owning A-shares in general did not do well either) as the shares troughed at less than half the tender offer price.

The New News

On 26 February 2019, Diageo announced it had approached the board of directors of Sichuan Swellfun with a proposal to increase its stake from 60% to 70% at RMB 45.00. This was a 19.33% premium to the last close and a 40.05% premium to the 30-day average.

The proposal was announced on the Shanghai Stock Exchange as well in Chinese.

This deal obviously has a lower minimum pro-ration, and the shares have jumped limit up this morning to RMB 41.48 leaving only 8.49% upside if you can buy at limit up today. At 25% pro-ration, breakeven is RMB 40.31, 6.9% higher than yesterday’s close. Assuming yesterday’s close is The Right Price, today’s limit up would give an implied expected pro-ration of 55%, implying only 18.2% of the remaining 40% of shares outstanding would tender. 

What To Do? 

That is the question. A-shares are on a tear, with the SSE-SZSE 300 up 23% ytd. Historically, bull markets are good to buy. Consensus forecasts have come down so there is a reason why the shares fell to where they did, but even though consensus EPS for 2019 as of six months ago is now the consensus EPS estimate for Dec 2020, on 2019 the shares at the Proposed Tender Offer Price are at less than 30x PER and less than 24x Dec 2020.

If you are buying these to get the minimum pro-ration on a target price equivalent to the offered Tender Offer Price, don’t bother. If you are looking at this as a cheap put because you may decide to downsize your position if the A-share rally sees the brakes applied, this is more interesting.

This is a trader’s trade rather than an arbitrageur’s trade and should be dealt with accordingly.

Breakeven Arb Grids for Price, PER, PBR, EV/EBITDA below.

2. Yahoo Japan’s JV with OYO Could Be Big, If Tokyo Is Ready to “Co-Live”

  • OYO, the largest budget hotel network in India, announced a JV with Yahoo Japan (4689 JP) to expand its co-living rental service, “OYO Living”, to Japan. OYO will own 66.1% while YJ will own the remainder of the JV, named “Oyo Technology & Hospitality Japan”. 
  • Rebranded as “OYO Life”, the service would be the first of its kind, in the virtually non-existent co-living market in Japan. In Japan, apartments are usually compact single-occupier units as opposed to shared spaces, which might pose a problem for OYO’s co-living model. 
  • Assuming the model is a success and OYO Life could ramp up its capacity to around 150,000 beds in Tokyo, which is around 5% of the total apartment stock in central Tokyo, this would contribute around ¥3bn (2% of net income in FY03/18) to Yahoo Japan’s net income. There is potential for further gains, however, this would depend on how ready Tokyo is to move into a “Co-Living” culture in masses.

3. Hanergy’s Hobson’s Choice

Spv

On the 23 October last year, the Board of Hanergy Mobile Energy Holdings Group Limited (HMEH), Hanergy Thin Film Power (566 HK)‘s majority shareholder, announced an intention to privatise the company at “no less than HK$5/share” via cash or scrip. Over a full week later, Hanergy acknowledged the proposal.

Following this privatisation, Hanergy would be listed on China’s A-share market. The indicative offer valued Hanergy at ~US$27bn.  Hanergy has been suspended since 20 May 2015 and last traded at $3.91/share.

Hanergy has now announced the intention of HMEH to privatise the company by way of a Scheme. The ultimate intention of HMEH still remains the listing of Hanergy’s business in China.

The rub is that the consideration under the Scheme will be in the form of one special purpose vehicle share (SPV) per Hanergy share.  To this: 

it is not certain whether the A-Share Listing can be achieved. If the A-Share Listing cannot be completed, the Independent Shareholders will be holding onto unlisted SPV Shares for which there is no exchange platform for transfers. Even if the A-Share Listing is completed, there is no certainty as to
(a) when and how the SPV will be able to dispose of the A-Share Listco Shares;
(b) at what price the A-Share Listco Shares can be sold; and
(c) when the cash exit can be available to the Independent Shareholders, via the proposed A-Share Listing.

Upon consultation with the Executive and given the above uncertainties, the Offeror is required not to attribute any monetary value to
(i) the Proposal and
(ii) any potential cash exit for the Independent Shareholders.

The announcement does not stipulate the jurisdiction of the SPV, only that it may be established in a jurisdiction apart from Hong Kong. That itself is a risk.

Long-suffering shareholders, who comprise 32.49% of shares out, have the dubious honour of holding SPV  shares which may remain in A-share pre-listing purgatory; or should the Scheme fail/lapse, hold unlisted shares if Hanergy fails to resume trading by end-July 2019, as per recently introduced HKEx guidelines. Such an outcome affords HMEH the flexibility to squeeze out minorities at a bargain price.

(A Hobson’s choice is a free choice in which only one thing is offered. In this instance, each outcome is undesirable.)

4. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

1

  • Common is widening pref discount today as it is generating the highest gain mainly on the Elliott pushing. As of now (1PM in Korea time), Common and 1P/2PB gain difference is nearly 1.5%p. This is putting price ratio at nearly 120D high. On a 20D MA, both Common/1P and Common/2PB are above 200% of σ. We see this level for the first time since mid Dec last year.
  • It is unlikely that Elliott’s ₩4.5tril dividend demand will get shareholder approval in the upcoming Mar 22 AGM. But it is enough to create a market mood that Hyundai Motor will hand out more generous shareholder friendly measures. Generally, common gets favored market sentiment as we move into AGM cycle. This time should be different. Each time Elliott factor came in, HM Pref tended to outperform Common.
  • This should be time again for HM Pref to shine more. Both 1P and 2PB are sufficiently undervalued relative to Common. Div yield difference to Common is also at the highest for both pref types. I’d go short Common and long 1P or 2PB now. 1P seems a little more safe bet. But 2PB is more liquid. Either way wouldn’t go terribly wrong.

5. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

Screenshot%202019 02 26%20at%209.08.46%20pm

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma

Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.