Brief Event-Driven: Baidu: Time to Swoop In, with NAV Discount Widening Substantially and more

In this briefing:

1. Baidu: Time to Swoop In, with NAV Discount Widening Substantially
2. Pinduoduo (PDD US): Follow-On Offering Is a Smart Move for the Company, Rather than for Investors
3. LG Corp Holdco/Synthetic Sub Trade: Current Status & Trade Approach
4. TRADE IDEA – Toyota Industries (6201 JP): Close the Stub Trade
5. Largest Panalpina Shareholder to Other Shareholders: Get Stuffed

1. Baidu: Time to Swoop In, with NAV Discount Widening Substantially

• Our stub valuation analysis reveals that Baidu Inc (ADR) (BIDU US) attractively trades at near 2 SD below its 3-yr average of NAV discount.
• Fundamentally, BIDU’s core business (Baidu Core) has grown healthily, with strong cash flows generation.
• China consumption slowdown is likely to mean modest sales growth deceleration (not a “sales falling off the cliff” scenario) for BIDU in 2019E.
• Implied in the current ADR price, the market is unjustifiably valuing Baidu Core (11.2x 2019E PE) as an “Old economy” company with little to no growth prospect, in our opinion.
• Our PT for next 3-6 mo, assuming 10% holdco discount to NAV, works out to be US$224/ADR, representing a 27% upside potential.   

2. Pinduoduo (PDD US): Follow-On Offering Is a Smart Move for the Company, Rather than for Investors

With the shares hitting all-time highs, Pinduoduo (PDD US) announced a follow-on public offering to raise net proceeds (potentially of $1.1 billion) from the sale of 37 million ADS along with the placing of 14.8 million ADS from existing shareholders (post-lockup expiry).

3. LG Corp Holdco/Synthetic Sub Trade: Current Status & Trade Approach

• LG Corp’s 4 listed major subs take up 90% of its holdings. This makes these 4 subs a suitable candidate for a synthetic sub. I synthesize them based on their respective value % in the holdings with their sum as 100%: LG Chem (40.74%), LG H&H (31.36%), LG Elec (16.95%) and LG Uplus (10.96%).
• On a time horizon of 120 days, the Holdco/Synthetic Sub price ratio is currently at the widest gap in favor of Holdco. On a 20D MA, Holdco is now above +1σ. The prices began to diverge since early last month mainly due to LG Uplus’ nearly 20% price loss.
• We are now seeing some recovery signals on Korea’s local telcos. It is unlikely that LG Uplus will continue this radical price divergence. I expect to see a mean reversion on the LG Holdo/Synthetic Sub price ratio at this point. I’d aim at -0.5σ for a 3.7~4% yield. For the sake of hedge, I’d trade the entire synthetic sub at the ratio of 40:30:18:12 rather than LG Uplus alone.

4. TRADE IDEA – Toyota Industries (6201 JP): Close the Stub Trade

In my original insight on December 11, 2018 TRADE IDEA – Toyota Industries (6201 JP) Stub: Riding the Automation Wave , I proposed setting up a stub trade to isolate the market leading materials handling and automotive components business of Toyota Industries (6201 JP) that was trading at an unwarranted 35% discount to NAV . During the 56 calendar days that followed, Toyota Industries (6201 JP) has gained an underwhelming 4% and the trade has made 1.96% on the gross notional. This hasn’t exactly been a trade to tell the grand-kids about, more or less a flat result but in this insight I will outline why I think the trade is over.

In this insight I will discuss:

• Performance of ALL my recommended stub trades
• a post-mortem trade analysis on the Toyota Industries stub
• alternative data support for my actions

5. Largest Panalpina Shareholder to Other Shareholders: Get Stuffed

A bit over a week ago Klaus-Michael Kühne – chairman of the eponymous freight forwarding major Kuehne + Nagel International A (KNIN VX) showed up in the Handelszeitung newspaper saying that he/Kuehne+Nagel had no interest in Panalpina as it was “hopelessly overvalued” and the company did not want to either overpay, or undertake a “megafusion” (large M&A) because of the difficulty in integrating companies. 

This was more than a little confusing.

Less than a week after Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) had changed its mind about the validity of its corporate governance structure (asserted when three of the major shareholders had questioned it) and on 19 November issued a press release saying Peter Ulber would not stand for re-election at next May’s AGM, Swiss newspaper Finanz und Wirtschaft carried an interview with K&N CEO Detlef Trefzger, who said they were interested in pursuing tie-up talks. One investment bank – which has for years issued a list of likely takeover stocks in the sector – noted in response that K&N was on the lookout for transformational M&A.

Furthermore, K&N seemed like a decent fit. K&N is larger, but it needs scale in its weakest segment, which is Asian air cargo forwarding. Interestingly enough, that happens to be Panalpina’s strong point – that’s where it gets almost all of its OP. With K&N efficiency in Europe, and Panalpina branding and efficiency in Asia, it is a pretty great fit.

But Klaus-Michael Kühne indirectly controls 53% of K&N so one should take his opinion about the company quite seriously. So that left the DSV bid, which was in limbo. And the shares continued to trade above the €170/share proposed offer.

The New News

This morning, Panalpina offered a press release saying…

Panalpina confirms that the Ernst Göhner Foundation, Panalpina’s largest shareholder representing approximately 46% of the total share capital, informed the Board of Directors that it does not support the current non-binding proposal from DSV and that it supports Panalpina’s Board of Directors in pursuing an independent growth strategy that includes M&A.

According to its fiduciary duties the Board of Directors of Panalpina continues to carefully review the situation with its professional advisers. Further announcements will be made as appropriate.

The stock is down 7+% this morning, but is trading only 3% below DSV’s indicative offer, and 20.5% above where the stock was trading in mid-January before DSV’s indicative non-binding proposal. 

This doesn’t mean that there will be no deal, but it does mean there will be a lull unless someone else comes up with a more aggressive. 

At some point and some price, the fiduciary duty of the directors would almost certainly have to be “we should sell here.” It is obvious from this statement that for the Ernst Göhner Foundation, that price is higher, and perhaps materially higher.  If management wants to remain entrenched, and the Ernst Göhner Foundation is happy to entrench them, it may not matter what the directors would recommend because the Foundation would not need to sell the stake they have owned for almost 50 years.

The other info public today suggests this is perhaps an issue with non-economic inputs. And those are the toughest to fight against.