In this briefing:
- Kosmos Energy: The Standout Internationally-Focused E&P Company
- Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus
- Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power
- Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability
- Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering
1. Kosmos Energy: The Standout Internationally-Focused E&P Company
We think that Kosmos Energy (KOS US) offers everything that is required from an internationally focused E&P company. It has a highly rated management team, strong balance sheet and free cash flow generation from its existing producing assets, low risk / high value near field exploration potential, selective high risk / reward frontier exploration in which it has a proven track record, it has done recent value accretive acquisitions with room for more, it has demonstrated the ability to farm-down its assets on multiple occasions and is currently in the process of a major asset sell down, which could surprise the market to the upside. Despite this the stock trades on a significant discount to risked NAV, making it a potential acquisition target and has plenty of catalysts coming up this year to close the valuation gap.
2. Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus
The boards of Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ) and Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) have agreed to increase the Offer price to £0.575 from £0.55, representing a 73.2% premium to the undisturbed price.
All other details of the scheme remain unchanged. The court meeting is to take place on the 25 March, while the long stop is the 20 June – unless both companies agree to an extension.
On Petrus
Petrus has yet to respond to the Offer increase; however, it would be surprising if its stance against the takeover has altered.
In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco – excluding the Tanzanian and Mexican investments – with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.
Shortly before the increase, Petrus was quoted (paywalled) it would vote its 3.95% against the takeover, while adding “Our satisfaction with the value our board deems as satisfactory has decreased further“, with reference to the release of Ophir’s full-year results on the 12 March.
On Sand Grove/Coro
Subsequent to the bump, Coro Energy PLC (CORO LN), which had previously submitted a non-binding cash/scrip reverse takeover offer on the 8 March, declared it has no intention to bid.
Sand Grove has also announced it has given an irrevocable undertaking to vote its 18.73% in favour of the scheme. Coro held discussions with Sand Grove before abandoning its bid.
Trading Tight – Upside Less Assured
Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears less tenuous following the 4.5% bump and Sand Grove’s irrevocable undertaking. While I consider the offer for Ophir sub-optimal – and shares have closed above terms on 30% of the trading days since Medco’s initial offer – Petrus alone cannot disrupt the vote. Of note, the next three largest shareholders behind Sand Grove have reduced their holdings since end-December 2018.
The gross/annualised spread is tight at 0.7%/2.6%, assuming early-July payment. The risk/reward in punting at or just below terms is now less attractive following this Offer Price increase and the irrevocable undertaking.
3. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power
Tightening supply fundamentals are starting to take centre-stage in the oil market, and briefly sent crude to a four-month high last week. But just as Brent crossed $68 during intraday trading and market watchers began to wonder if it was going to breach $70, the benchmark slipped down a few notches.
Crude’s jagged ascent has become a feature since the start of this year, making every upward surge feel tentative. The selling pressure that seized the crude market in the fourth quarter of last year is not yet done. Every rally seems to have plenty of skeptics waiting to sell into it.
Aside from OPEC’s output curbs, which surpassed 100% compliance in February, production from at least two producers not bound by quotas is under threat. Crude output in Venezuela, crippled by a major power outage for more than a week now, has plummeted, while the US says it wants to force Iranian crude exports to below 1 million b/d when the current batch of sanctions waivers expire at the start of May.
A US-China trade deal looks certain, even though the signing may be pushed back to April…or maybe June. However, economic worries elsewhere continue to weigh on oil market sentiment and demand growth expectations.
OPEC appears determined to stay the course with its production cuts in conjunction with its non-OPEC allies. But it sees non-OPEC supply growth this year dwarfing demand growth by nearly 1.1 million b/d, and is feeling the burden of rebalancing the market once again on its shoulders.
This week, we also discuss:
- What jumped out at us in the IEA’s annual report
- US EIA lowering its production forecasts
- WTI Houston’s emergence as US crude benchmark
We note the controversial decision by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund to unwind its holdings in the upstream oil and gas sector, a topic we will be tackling in the next edition of Weekly Oil Views.
4. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability
Underlying profitability continues to deteriorate at Vodafone Idea (IDEA IN) (IDEA). Chris Hoare has updated his liquidity analysis, and estimates that IDEA needs prices to rise by over 50% to hit cash flow break-even in the medium term. That needs market behavior to change from Jio in particular. Bulls will point to IDEA’s current capital raising and the large capital raising planned at Bharti Airtel (BHARTI IN) as signalling a possible end to hostilities. However, the math at IDEA is such that even a $3.5bn injection gives only temporary relief. What they really need are price increases. Without them (and even with the capital increase), Chris thinks IDEA runs out of cash in about 2 years. We retain our Reduce recommendation and cut our price target to INR16.
5. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering
Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.
Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.
Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development. Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.
At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
