Daily BriefsIndustrials

Daily Brief Industrials: Toshiba Corp, OHB SE, Asiana Airlines, S.F. Holding and more

In today’s briefing:

  • Toshiba (6502) Tender Offer – Kioxia Optionality
  • KKR/OHB: Agreed Take-Private Offer
  • What Is KDB’s Plan B for Asiana Airlines?
  • A Look at How SF Holding Differs from A) Its Express Peers and B) The Pre-Covid Version of Itself


Toshiba (6502) Tender Offer – Kioxia Optionality

By Travis Lundy

  • Yesterday, JIP finally announced its Tender Offer for Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) as discussed in JIP Tender Offer for Toshiba (6502) Finally Here 
  • I got a few questions this morning on the earnings call comments from Chairman Watanabe regarding what might happen if a Kioxia Transaction were announced mid-JIP Tender.
  • My assumption before, during, and after, is that the Board wants this deal done. And doesn’t really want to take any responsibility for pushing any more.

KKR/OHB: Agreed Take-Private Offer

By Jesus Rodriguez Aguilar

  • KKR’s launching a cash offer for space tech firm OHB SE (OHB GR) at €44/share, 37% premium, 8.1x EV/Fwd NTM EBITDA, 16.1x Fwd P/E for an implied equity value of c.€769 million.
  • The Fuchs family will retain its majority shareholding. OHB’s strong balance sheet might be leveraged to further consolidate the industry. The offer price seems slightly cheap but not outrageous.
  • I believe a price hike is unlikely. Gross spread is 3.75%. Considering a break of €32.2, the market is pricing an 86% probability of success. I’d be long the shares.

What Is KDB’s Plan B for Asiana Airlines?

By Douglas Kim

  • There have been increasing local news flows about KDB’s potential “Plan B” for Asiana Airlines in case the merger between Asiana Airlines and Korean Air Lines is finally cancelled.
  • The final decisions by the European and US regulators on whether to pass/block this merger are likely to take place in 4Q 2023. 
  • The higher probability scenarios are for one or both of these regulators to block this deal. As such, KDB will need to come up with Plan B.

A Look at How SF Holding Differs from A) Its Express Peers and B) The Pre-Covid Version of Itself

By Daniel Hellberg

  • SF Holding differs from its Chinese peers in several important ways, including business scale, its lack of a formal relationship with Alibaba, and its many non-express lines of business
  • SF also differs from the pre-Covid version of itself: it’s far larger than it was in 2019, but core margins have declined, and internatonal exposure has risen dramatically
  • In this insight we also take a look at current EV/Revenue valuations vs peers and list important milestones to watch for ahead of the company’s planned HK IPO

💡 Before it’s here, it’s on Smartkarma

Sign Up for Free

The Smartkarma Preview Pass is your entry to the Independent Investment Research Network

  • ✓ Unlimited Research Summaries
  • ✓ Personalised Alerts
  • ✓ Custom Watchlists
  • ✓ Company Data and News
  • ✓ Events & Webinars