Daily BriefsESG

Daily Brief ESG: Slow Policy Shareholdings Reduction Is Similar Backdrop to Unclear Nomination Process for Directors and more

In today’s briefing:

  • Slow Policy Shareholdings Reduction Is Similar Backdrop to Unclear Nomination Process for Directors
  • Recordati – ESG Report – Lucror Analytics


Slow Policy Shareholdings Reduction Is Similar Backdrop to Unclear Nomination Process for Directors

By Aki Matsumoto

  • Policy shareholdings don’t create tension in management and ensure the interests of minority shareholders. Secondly, holding shares that don’t create value can burden capital profitability and undermine shareholder interests.
  • The increase in foreign ownership only changed the mindset of some company managers, but “TSE’s request” was enough to awake managers who had become accustomed to being protected by cross-shareholdings.
  • If reducing policy shareholdings is viewed as HR issues related to the director election agenda, it makes sense why improvements haven’t progressed similarly to the unclear nomination process for directors.

Recordati – ESG Report – Lucror Analytics

By Leonard Law, CFA

Lucror Analytics’ ESG Scores are based on a 3-tiered scale and are adjusted for Controversies (if applicable).
We assess Recordati’s ESG as “Adequate”, in line with its Environmental, Social and Governance scores. Controversies are “Material”, while Disclosure is “Strong”.


💡 Before it’s here, it’s on Smartkarma

Sign Up for Free

The Smartkarma Preview Pass is your entry to the Independent Investment Research Network

  • ✓ Unlimited Research Summaries
  • ✓ Personalised Alerts
  • ✓ Custom Watchlists
  • ✓ Company Data and News
  • ✓ Events & Webinars