China

Daily China: 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications and more

In this briefing:

  1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications
  2. Autonomous Driving. Waymo Leading The Charge With Ten Million Miles Driven And Counting
  3. Harbin Electric: The Price Is Not Right
  4. 2019 Asia Selected Gaming Stock Outlook: Headwinds, Tailwinds and Our Top Picks for Entry Levels Now
  5. Are US Stocks Still Expensive?

1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications

Image%201

● We notice that Anjuke’s Oct.-Nov. traffic declined. We attribute this decline to the tightening of registration requirement in various cities, which will reduce the number of housing leads on WUBA platform;

● We, however, believe new home business will deliver strong revenue for WUBA this year, contributing Rmb2bn in revenues by our estimate;

● We rate the stock Buy and cut TP from US$84 to US$79.

2. Autonomous Driving. Waymo Leading The Charge With Ten Million Miles Driven And Counting

Screen%20shot%202018 12 27%20at%202.40.18%20pm

Waymo CEO John Krafcik made some bold decisions after taking the helm at Alphabet‘s self-driving project in September 2015. Chief among them was the fact that the company abandon its plans for Level 3 automated driving and focus exclusively on levels 4 & 5. Furthermore, he decreed that Waymo would no longer manufacture its own vehicles but would instead integrate their technology into those of other automakers. Three years later, those decisions would appear to be finally paying off.

On October 10 2018, Waymo reached a significant milestone having completed 10 million self-driving miles across 25 cities in the US. While their first million self-driving miles took 18 months to complete, Waymo now clocks up over a million self-driving miles per month.  The company also recently announced the launch of its robo taxi service in Phoenix, Arizona and looks set to quickly follow suit in California. Plans to extend its self-driving technology beyond robotaxis, most notably for trucks and last-mile transportation solutions are also in the works. Furthermore, the company has begun laying down a framework of innovative B2B revenue models which should help accelerate the speed with which they can eventually monetize their technology.

It hasn’t been smooth sailing all the way for Waymo however. Earlier this year, the company was derided for the driving style of its autonomous vehicles and faced the criticism that its driverless cars continue to have safety drivers. There was also an embarrassing incident where one of those very safety drivers caused the self-driving car he was monitoring to hit a motorcyclist when he attempted to take control of the vehicle. According to Waymo’s own analysis of the vehicle log files, the accident would not have happened had he not intervened. 

With ten million self-driving miles under their belt and a thoughtful, strategic approach to monetizing their technology beginning to emerge, Waymo remains firmly ahead of their peers in leading the autonomous driving charge.  

3. Harbin Electric: The Price Is Not Right

Chart2

As speculated in Harbin Electric Expected To Be Privatised, Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK) has now announced a privatisation Offer from parent and 60.41%-shareholder Harbin Electric Corporation (“HEC”) by way of a merger by absorption. 

The Offer price of $4.56/share, an 82.4% premium to last close, has been declared final. The price corresponds to the subscription of 329mn domestic shares (~47.16% of the existing issued domestic shares and ~24.02% of the existing total issued shares) @$4.56/share by HEC in January this year

Of greater significance, the Offer price is a 37% discount to HE’s net cash of $7.27/share as at 30 June 2018. Should the privatisation be successful, this Offer will cost HEC ~HK$3.08bn, following which it can pocket the remaining net cash of $9.3bn PLUS the power generation equipment manufacturer business thrown in for free.

On pricing, “fair” to me would be something like the distribution of net cash to zero then taking over the company on a PER with respect to peers. That is not happening. It will be difficult to see how independent directors can justify recommending an Offer to shareholders at any price which gave cash less cavalier than cash.

Dissension rights are available, however, what constitutes a “fair price” under those rights, and the timing of the settlement under such rights, are not evident. 

As all PRC approvals have been obtained, this transaction may complete earlier than prior mergers by absorption, which have taken 6-8 months from the initial announcement.

4. 2019 Asia Selected Gaming Stock Outlook: Headwinds, Tailwinds and Our Top Picks for Entry Levels Now

D76bc97afe36a6d6afbb2d45b25c4d19

Our review of ten Asian gaming companies forward prospects for 2019 yielded our top five picks. Two of those comprise this insight. Three more will follow in Part Two. There is, in our opinion, some disconnect between continuing macro headwinds in both the VIP and mass sectors and a more bullish tone based on a recent upside trend in Macau, strong results in the Philippines and Cambodia. Given the battering of the market in general, the already 8 month old bearish tone to the sector and the current pricing of the two stocks noted here, we see significant upside opportunity as we near the beginning of 2019.

5. Are US Stocks Still Expensive?

Picture1

There are striking parallels between 1929 and 2018.  

The 1929 crash put a halt to a nine-year bull run on the market.

Up until October 1929, same as this year, market consensus was that asset prices could only go up from their current level.

As we mentioned in When the Tide Goes Out, Dominoes Fall, a decade of building up excesses meant a painful burst, back 79 years ago: between October of 1929 and September of 1932, eighty-nine percent of the value of stocks was erased and the market didn’t recover to its former peak until 25 years later.

Are we in a similar situation right now?