Brief China: Tencent (700 HK): The Worst Part Online Game Recovered in Q4 Before Restarting License Approval and more

In this briefing:

1. Tencent (700 HK): The Worst Part Online Game Recovered in Q4 Before Restarting License Approval
2. Navitas Gets An Agreed Deal with BGH
3. Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Trading Update – First Day Volume Was Higher than Futu, Close to QTT
4. Tencent Music: A Case of Failing to Live up to Hyped Expectations
5. Tencent Music (TME): Problems Come from Corporate Clients and In-House Contents, 35% Downside

1. Tencent (700 HK): The Worst Part Online Game Recovered in Q4 Before Restarting License Approval

• The worst business, online game, recovered in 4Q2018, because small competitors died.
• The growth rate of game broadcast also bounced up in 4Q2018, as an important competitor Panda TV went bankrupt.
• In fact, games are only a small part of Tencent and other businesses have been growing strongly.
• The re-organization in October 2018 controlled expenses well.
• The 5-year P/E band suggests that Tencent’s stock price has upside of 26%.

2. Navitas Gets An Agreed Deal with BGH

After 6 months of haggling and due diligence, debt negotiation, and structuring, global education company Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) has now signed a Board-recommended Scheme Implementation Deed with a consortium led by Australian Private Equity firm BGH Capital consortium which includes Navitas Founder Rod Jones (also the largest holder at 13%) and AustralianSuper.

The agreed Scheme Price of A$5.825 is a 6% uplift from the original A$5.50 offered in the preliminary, indicative, non-binding offer announced on 10 October 2018 and a 34% premium to the undisturbed price of 9 October 2018 of A$4.35/share.

This history is that the consortium came in at A$5.50 (plus another cash+RollCo scrip offer), a month or so later the company effectively rejected it by not allowing the consortium to do due diligence after management lifted earnings guidance. This upset a number of shareholders. In November the share price ranged from A$4.95-5.25 or so and Chairman Tracey Horton got only 51% support at the AGM that month. The shares fell briefly below A$4.70 in early January this year before BGH came back in mid-January with a “revised indicative offer” of A$5.825 whereupon the shares bounced from about A$4.90 to about A$5.50 then climbed to A$5.60+ on 10mm shares volume in 3 days. 

The shares hovered around A$5.58-5.62 for 6-7 weeks until the beginning of March, briefly traded into the A$5.70s, and then traded back down the last few days this week to the A$5.59-5.63 area.

On Thursday 21 March the shares were halted for the day, StreetTalk had an article about the deal being imminent, and late in the afternoon, the BGH SID was announced. 

Now we start the official process. The Scheme document is expected to be dispatched in May 2019 with a deal completed by end-June or early July. I expect this deal gets up.

3. Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Trading Update – First Day Volume Was Higher than Futu, Close to QTT

Up Fintech (TIGR US)‘s IPO was priced at US$8/share, above its range of US$5-7/ADS raising at total of US$111m, including the proceeds from the private placement with Interactive Brokers Group, Inc (IBKR US). 

In my earlier insights, I looked at the company’s background,  past financial performance, scored the deal on our IPO framework and compared it to Futu Holdings Ltd (FHL US): 

• Futu Holdings IPO Quick Note – Comparison with Tiger Brokers – Same Market, Different Economics
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Pre-IPO Quick Note – Much Too Reliant on IBKR
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either

In this insight, I will re-visit some of the deal dynamics, comment on share price drivers and provide a table with implied valuations.

4. Tencent Music: A Case of Failing to Live up to Hyped Expectations

• One word to describe Tencent Music Entertainment’s (TME US) first conference call post IPO is uninspiring.
• Management does not provide concrete 2019/1Q19 guidance, but hints margin pressures persist largely due to investments in music contents.
• We expect that consensus still has to revise down TME’s 2019-20E net profits forecast by 17-26%.
• On our earnings forecast, TME unattractively trades at 46.3x/37x 2019-20E PE, a whopping 48-52% premium to peers average.

5. Tencent Music (TME): Problems Come from Corporate Clients and In-House Contents, 35% Downside

• Stripping music subscription revenues, we find TME’s revenues from corporate clients are not stable.
• We believe in-house products will negatively impact margin in 2019.
• We believe the main business line, social entertainment, will grow strongly. However, we also believe the market is over optimistic about the margin.
• We believe the stock price has downside of 35%.