In this briefing:
- TRACKING TRAFFIC/Containers & Air Cargo: Container Rates Up
- LIC Housing Finance Ltd. – Builder Loans and LAP to Drive Growth in Loan Book
- COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
- TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
- Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
1. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Containers & Air Cargo: Container Rates Up
Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo is the hub for all of our research on container shipping and air cargo, featuring analysis of monthly industry data, notes from our conversations with industry participants, and links to recent company and thematic pieces.
Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo aims to highlight changes to existing trends, relationships, and views affecting the leading Asian companies in these two sectors. This month’s note includes data from about twenty different sources.
In this issue readers will find:
- An analysis of November container shipping rates, which our index suggests increased by over 20% Y/Y. We concede that our index skews toward volatile spot rates rather than contract rates, but we suspect higher average container rates in Q418, combined with moderating fuel prices, will result in surprisingly strong earnings for the quarter.
- A look at November air cargo activity and air cargo pricing, which diverged. The volume of air cargo handled by the five airlines we track declined slightly (-0.1% Y/Y) but some of those carriers reported sharply higher yields (circa +10% Y/Y), due to limited capacity expansion in the region.
- Some good news: fuel prices have continued to moderate. Bunker climbed by just 5.1% Y/Y as of mid-December, and jet fuel prices have fallen about 11% Y/Y. Given firm container rates and air cargo pricing, the drop in fuel prices bodes well for Q418 margins, though it’s unclear whether such gains are sustainable.
Although slowing demand growth is unlikely to generate impressive top-line improvements, firmer pricing combined with lower fuel costs should support an ongoing improvement in profitability for container carriers and air cargo operations in the near-term. We believe many investors remain too pessimistic regarding near-term earnings for container carriers and airlines.
2. LIC Housing Finance Ltd. – Builder Loans and LAP to Drive Growth in Loan Book
Lic Housing Finance (LICHF IN), founded by Life Insurance Corporation of India, is the 2nd largest Housing Finance Company (HFC) in India with a total outstanding loan book portfolio of Rs 1,759 bn as of 2QFY19. 94% of the company’s loans were to retail customers as home loans & Loan Against Properties (LAP) and the balance 6% were to project developers as of 2QFY19.
We like the business of LICHF for following reasons:
- LICHF focuses on the salaried segment. 86% of the customers as of 2QFY19 were from the salaried class. This provides the company with stability in earnings and better asset quality. We expect the NIMs & Spreads to be stable at 2.4% & 1.2% respectively for the period of FY18-21E.
- We expect LICHF’s total loan book to grow at a CAGR of 16% over the period of FY18-21E. This growth will be supported by LAP and Developer loans. We expect the retail home loan portfolio to grow at a CAGR of 11% over the same period.
- As the company focuses on LAP & developer segment to grow the total loan book, we expect this to affect the asset quality adversely. We expect the Gross Non-Performing Assets (GNPA) & Net Non-Performing Assets (NNPA) to increase to 1.3% (from 1.2% as of Sept-18) & 0.5% (from 0.4% as of Sept-18) respectively.
We initiate coverage on LICHF with a fair value estimate of Rs 570/- over the next 12 months. This implies a potential upside of 19% from the closing market price of Rs 481 as on 20th December 2018. This is arrived by applying P/ABV (Price to Adjusted Book Value) multiple of 1.7X to our Adjusted Book Value Estimate of Rs 337 per share for the period ending Sept-20E.
Particulars | FY18 | FY19E | FY20E | FY21E |
P/ABV (X) | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
ROE (%) | 17.3 | 15.5 | 14.5 | 15.1 |
ROA (%) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
3. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
- Improving asset turnover, good risk adjusted price momentum, and relatively strong analyst recommendations relative to its sector
- Larger distribution channel through acquisition of DNA Retail Link to add 95 more stores to current 518 stores
- New mobile product launches in 4Q18 and COM7’s focus on high margin products, such as Android smartphones, should support high earnings growth which was up 56% YoY in 3Q18
- Attractive at a 19CE* PEG of 0.9 versus ASEAN sector at a PEG of 2.7
- Risks: Lower-than-expected demand for new IT products, slower-than-expected store expansions
* Consensus Estimates
4. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes.
This month’s issue covers the following topics:
- November express parcel pricing remained weak. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 7.8% Y/Y to just 11.06 RMB per piece. November’s average price represents a new all-time low for the industry, and November’s Y/Y decline was the steepest monthly decline in over two years (excluding Lunar New Year months, which tend to be distorted by the timing of the holiday).
- Express parcel revenue growth dipped below 15% last month. Weak per-parcel pricing pulled express sector Y/Y revenue growth down to just 14.6% in November, the worst on record (again excluding distorted Lunar New Year comparisons). Chinese e-commerce demand has slowed and we suspect ‘O2O’ initiatives, under which online purchases are fulfilled via local stores, are also undermining express demand growth.
- Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) remains firm relative to inter-city. Relative to weak inter-city express pricing (where ZTO Express (ZTO US) and the other listed express companies compete), pricing for local, intra-city express deliveries remained firm. In the first 11 months of 2018, express pricing rose 1.7% Y/Y versus a -2.9% decline in inter-city shipments (international pricing fell sharply, -14.5% Y/Y). Relatively firm pricing on local shipments may make it hard for local food delivery companies like Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) and Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s ele.me to beat down unit operating costs.
- Underlying domestic transport demand held up well again in November. Although demand for speedy, relatively expensive express service (and air freight) appears to be moderating, demand for rail and highway freight transport has held up well. The relative strength of rail and water transport (slow, cheap, industry-facing) versus express and air freight (fast, expensive, consumer-oriented) suggests a couple of things: a) upstream industrial activity is stronger than downstream retail activity and b) the people in charge of paying freight are shifting to cheaper modes of transport when possible.
We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut. Overall domestic transportation demand, however, remains solid and shows no signs of slowing.
5. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
- Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize.
- Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY.
- The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19.
- A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).
